Computing Hochschild cohomology of an algebra in GAP
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I would like to calculate Hochschild cohomology of a path algebra of a quiver (modulo some relations) using GAP.
Creating the quiver and its path algebra modulo relations is explained in detail in the QPA manual.
After having defined an algebra $A$ I used
M := AlgebraAsModuleOverEnvelopingAlgebra(A);
to regard $A$ as a module over its enveloping algebra $A otimes A^mathrmop$.
There are a few steps left to calculate Hochschild cohomology
- find a projective resolution $P^bullet$ of $M$
- take $operatornameHom (-, A)$ of the complex $P^bullet$ (or rather its truncation?)
- calculate the homology of the resulting complex
For step 1, there are both ProjectiveResolution
and ProjectiveResolutionOfPathAlgebraModule
. Which would be preferable here?
Step 2 I don't know how to do in GAP.
(Step 3 should be HomologyOfComplex(C,i);
where C
is the output from step 2.)
homology-cohomology gap quiver
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I would like to calculate Hochschild cohomology of a path algebra of a quiver (modulo some relations) using GAP.
Creating the quiver and its path algebra modulo relations is explained in detail in the QPA manual.
After having defined an algebra $A$ I used
M := AlgebraAsModuleOverEnvelopingAlgebra(A);
to regard $A$ as a module over its enveloping algebra $A otimes A^mathrmop$.
There are a few steps left to calculate Hochschild cohomology
- find a projective resolution $P^bullet$ of $M$
- take $operatornameHom (-, A)$ of the complex $P^bullet$ (or rather its truncation?)
- calculate the homology of the resulting complex
For step 1, there are both ProjectiveResolution
and ProjectiveResolutionOfPathAlgebraModule
. Which would be preferable here?
Step 2 I don't know how to do in GAP.
(Step 3 should be HomologyOfComplex(C,i);
where C
is the output from step 2.)
homology-cohomology gap quiver
For a package-specific question, it might be better to ask QPA authors directly.
â Alexander Konovalov
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I would like to calculate Hochschild cohomology of a path algebra of a quiver (modulo some relations) using GAP.
Creating the quiver and its path algebra modulo relations is explained in detail in the QPA manual.
After having defined an algebra $A$ I used
M := AlgebraAsModuleOverEnvelopingAlgebra(A);
to regard $A$ as a module over its enveloping algebra $A otimes A^mathrmop$.
There are a few steps left to calculate Hochschild cohomology
- find a projective resolution $P^bullet$ of $M$
- take $operatornameHom (-, A)$ of the complex $P^bullet$ (or rather its truncation?)
- calculate the homology of the resulting complex
For step 1, there are both ProjectiveResolution
and ProjectiveResolutionOfPathAlgebraModule
. Which would be preferable here?
Step 2 I don't know how to do in GAP.
(Step 3 should be HomologyOfComplex(C,i);
where C
is the output from step 2.)
homology-cohomology gap quiver
I would like to calculate Hochschild cohomology of a path algebra of a quiver (modulo some relations) using GAP.
Creating the quiver and its path algebra modulo relations is explained in detail in the QPA manual.
After having defined an algebra $A$ I used
M := AlgebraAsModuleOverEnvelopingAlgebra(A);
to regard $A$ as a module over its enveloping algebra $A otimes A^mathrmop$.
There are a few steps left to calculate Hochschild cohomology
- find a projective resolution $P^bullet$ of $M$
- take $operatornameHom (-, A)$ of the complex $P^bullet$ (or rather its truncation?)
- calculate the homology of the resulting complex
For step 1, there are both ProjectiveResolution
and ProjectiveResolutionOfPathAlgebraModule
. Which would be preferable here?
Step 2 I don't know how to do in GAP.
(Step 3 should be HomologyOfComplex(C,i);
where C
is the output from step 2.)
homology-cohomology gap quiver
edited 2 days ago
asked Aug 14 at 10:16
Earthlià Â
743926
743926
For a package-specific question, it might be better to ask QPA authors directly.
â Alexander Konovalov
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
For a package-specific question, it might be better to ask QPA authors directly.
â Alexander Konovalov
2 days ago
For a package-specific question, it might be better to ask QPA authors directly.
â Alexander Konovalov
2 days ago
For a package-specific question, it might be better to ask QPA authors directly.
â Alexander Konovalov
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2882305%2fcomputing-hochschild-cohomology-of-an-algebra-in-gap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
For a package-specific question, it might be better to ask QPA authors directly.
â Alexander Konovalov
2 days ago