Interesting questions (with answers) about concepts in topology for an amateur audience
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I have been asked to hold an introductory math quiz for the Freshmen batch in my college. It entails interesting questions about different areas of mathematics presented in such a way so that it seems it has nothing to do with that area of mathematics. An example of such a problem is the Futurama Theorem.
These questions should not be in a language which involves terms from topology (like topological spaces, homeomorphism, etc) considering the amateur audience for whom this is being presented. Personally I haven't been able to find any such questions except a few which involves showing equivalence of different knots.
general-topology algebraic-topology education big-list
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I have been asked to hold an introductory math quiz for the Freshmen batch in my college. It entails interesting questions about different areas of mathematics presented in such a way so that it seems it has nothing to do with that area of mathematics. An example of such a problem is the Futurama Theorem.
These questions should not be in a language which involves terms from topology (like topological spaces, homeomorphism, etc) considering the amateur audience for whom this is being presented. Personally I haven't been able to find any such questions except a few which involves showing equivalence of different knots.
general-topology algebraic-topology education big-list
I would also like to make this question Community Wiki but haven't been able to
â Albas
Aug 14 at 9:38
1
What does it mean, to hold a quiz?
â Barry Cipra
Aug 14 at 14:44
What is the question?
â Peter Mortensen
Aug 14 at 15:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I have been asked to hold an introductory math quiz for the Freshmen batch in my college. It entails interesting questions about different areas of mathematics presented in such a way so that it seems it has nothing to do with that area of mathematics. An example of such a problem is the Futurama Theorem.
These questions should not be in a language which involves terms from topology (like topological spaces, homeomorphism, etc) considering the amateur audience for whom this is being presented. Personally I haven't been able to find any such questions except a few which involves showing equivalence of different knots.
general-topology algebraic-topology education big-list
I have been asked to hold an introductory math quiz for the Freshmen batch in my college. It entails interesting questions about different areas of mathematics presented in such a way so that it seems it has nothing to do with that area of mathematics. An example of such a problem is the Futurama Theorem.
These questions should not be in a language which involves terms from topology (like topological spaces, homeomorphism, etc) considering the amateur audience for whom this is being presented. Personally I haven't been able to find any such questions except a few which involves showing equivalence of different knots.
general-topology algebraic-topology education big-list
edited Aug 17 at 3:08
Xander Henderson
13.2k83150
13.2k83150
asked Aug 14 at 9:37
Albas
558416
558416
I would also like to make this question Community Wiki but haven't been able to
â Albas
Aug 14 at 9:38
1
What does it mean, to hold a quiz?
â Barry Cipra
Aug 14 at 14:44
What is the question?
â Peter Mortensen
Aug 14 at 15:51
add a comment |Â
I would also like to make this question Community Wiki but haven't been able to
â Albas
Aug 14 at 9:38
1
What does it mean, to hold a quiz?
â Barry Cipra
Aug 14 at 14:44
What is the question?
â Peter Mortensen
Aug 14 at 15:51
I would also like to make this question Community Wiki but haven't been able to
â Albas
Aug 14 at 9:38
I would also like to make this question Community Wiki but haven't been able to
â Albas
Aug 14 at 9:38
1
1
What does it mean, to hold a quiz?
â Barry Cipra
Aug 14 at 14:44
What does it mean, to hold a quiz?
â Barry Cipra
Aug 14 at 14:44
What is the question?
â Peter Mortensen
Aug 14 at 15:51
What is the question?
â Peter Mortensen
Aug 14 at 15:51
add a comment |Â
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
I always liked the: hang a picture on two nails, such that if you remove one the picture falls down .
While the solution to this can be found with a bit luck and without the knowledge of fundamental groups the more complicated ones (hanging it on $n$ nails) is probably impossible without any mathematical advanced ideas.
never seen this, love the linked thread, classic!
â Mehness
Aug 14 at 9:57
1
+1 : This seems like the only answer that actually adresses the question, in that it's not a problem that's phrased in terms of topology but has an answer that can be (indeed $mathbbR^2setminus x,y sim S^1lor S^1 $ which has fundamental group $mathbbF_2$, if $xneq y$)
â Max
Aug 14 at 13:25
1
@Max For a moment I was really astounded by the assertion the the fundamental group of $S^1vee S^1$ is a field of two elements...
â Servaes
Aug 14 at 16:39
@Servaes : ah, notational overloading is really a b****
â Max
Aug 14 at 21:56
@Servaes $F_2$ stands for the free group on two letters.
â Peter Saveliev
Aug 15 at 2:43
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Here is a list of suggestions:
Take a disk of paper. Crumpled it and place the crumple paper over the place of the initial disk. One point of the crumpled paper will be at the vertical of its initial position in the disk. This is the fixed point theorem.
Create a Möbius strip. An example of a surface with only one side.
Describe the construction of the Peano curve. A curve filling a square.
How to paint an infinite surface with a finite amount of painting. The painter paradox.
The Schwarz lantern. Or how to approximate a surface of finite area with triangles whose areas are infinite.
You may find other examples on topology in my mathcounterexamples.net web site.
5
How is 4. related to topology?
â Ludvig Lindström
Aug 14 at 13:04
5
There is a much better variant of 1): Bring a map, which includes the location and put it on the floor. Now there is a point on the map, which lies exactly on the point at the floor.
â allo
Aug 14 at 14:15
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
A nice (and classic) problem would be the Bridges of Königsberg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Bridges_of_K%C3%B6nigsberg).
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Here's just a line of thought. I think it would be fruitful to communicate some of the more geometric ideas of algebraic topology or just generally cool results from more general topology. Here are some examples of questions I would think would be insightful:
Given a square sheet of paper, how can you make a torus out of it? (In algebraic topology this leads to the idea of quotient spaces)
How can you recover a plane from a sphere? (In topology a sphere of dimension $n$ minus a point is homeomophic to to $mathbbR^n$)
Given a torus, can we deform any loop on it to a point? (In algebraic topology this is the result that the fundamental group of a torus is non trivial)
All of these examples convey the sort of geometric problems one asks in algebraic topology, without needing to develop the necessary terminology to explain it rigorously. I think that's good in this case because you want to convey an idea of what math can be like without going into all the hairy details of how it works.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As you meantioned, knots and braids are a good source of these kinds of problems. Here are a few that you may not have encountered.
For instance, you could demonstrate that the braid groups on the sphere have torsion elements and then relate this to the Dirac belt trick/plate trick - normally this is explained by using the fact that $SU(2)$ is simply connected, but it can equally well be explained by the fact that the 2-string braid group on the sphere $B_2(S^2)$ is isomorphic to $mathbbZ/2mathbbZ$.
Some simple invariants can be demonstrated with very little prior knowledge as well, such as the colourability of knots - so you could show how to distinguish one knot from another by showing that one is tricolourable and one is not.
In my experience, people are always rather intrigued by the existence of Brunnian links (and braids) and there's certainly plenty of material here to work with.
The existence of Seifert surfaces via the Seifert algorithm is very pictorial and is pretty fun to play with on paper.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Give out paper, scissors and glue.
Get them to make a Möbius strip. Explain how it is a 2D object, but needs the 3rd dimension to fully realise the shape.
For homework, get them to make a Klein bottle. :)
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The three utilities problem is a disguised version of asking whether $K_3,3$ is a planar graph. It's not, but $K_3,3$ is regularly embeddable in the torus -- if given one "handle" attached to the plane, you can attach the last house/utility pair. The general question is "how many handles do you need" for various numbers of utilities and houses. This is Turán's brick factory problem and is open (upper and lower bounds are known).
Brouwer's fixed point theorem tells me that if I start with a flat piece of paper, crumple it up, and drop it back where it started, at least one crumpled point projects (perpendicularly to the original sheet) back to its initial position. (The linked version of this example attributed to Brouwer is better stated.) Similarly, the Borsuk-Ulam theorem leads to the non-technical result that at every instant, there is a pair of antipodal points of Earth with identical temperatures and barometric pressures (or any other pair of continuous scalar properties you like).
The hairy ball theorem states (very informally) you can't comb a hairy ball without a cowlick. But you can comb a hairy torus without one. So there is a boring automated way to paint a torus, but not so much for a sphere.
There's always More Knot Theory...
You can demonstrate tying a knot in string without letting go of the ends during the tying (description and illustration). This gives an overhand knot, which is a chiral knot. You can tie its reflection by reversing the helicity of the starting state of the arms. Interestingly, not all knots are chiral; there are amphichiral knots.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Try an exhibition on knots: http://groupoids.org.uk/popmath/cpm/exhib/knotexhib.html
The aim was to use knots to present some basic methods in the development of mathematics. Knots were used because of their familiarity and visual aspect.
See also http://groupoids.org.uk/outofline/out-home.html
add a comment |Â
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
I always liked the: hang a picture on two nails, such that if you remove one the picture falls down .
While the solution to this can be found with a bit luck and without the knowledge of fundamental groups the more complicated ones (hanging it on $n$ nails) is probably impossible without any mathematical advanced ideas.
never seen this, love the linked thread, classic!
â Mehness
Aug 14 at 9:57
1
+1 : This seems like the only answer that actually adresses the question, in that it's not a problem that's phrased in terms of topology but has an answer that can be (indeed $mathbbR^2setminus x,y sim S^1lor S^1 $ which has fundamental group $mathbbF_2$, if $xneq y$)
â Max
Aug 14 at 13:25
1
@Max For a moment I was really astounded by the assertion the the fundamental group of $S^1vee S^1$ is a field of two elements...
â Servaes
Aug 14 at 16:39
@Servaes : ah, notational overloading is really a b****
â Max
Aug 14 at 21:56
@Servaes $F_2$ stands for the free group on two letters.
â Peter Saveliev
Aug 15 at 2:43
add a comment |Â
up vote
10
down vote
I always liked the: hang a picture on two nails, such that if you remove one the picture falls down .
While the solution to this can be found with a bit luck and without the knowledge of fundamental groups the more complicated ones (hanging it on $n$ nails) is probably impossible without any mathematical advanced ideas.
never seen this, love the linked thread, classic!
â Mehness
Aug 14 at 9:57
1
+1 : This seems like the only answer that actually adresses the question, in that it's not a problem that's phrased in terms of topology but has an answer that can be (indeed $mathbbR^2setminus x,y sim S^1lor S^1 $ which has fundamental group $mathbbF_2$, if $xneq y$)
â Max
Aug 14 at 13:25
1
@Max For a moment I was really astounded by the assertion the the fundamental group of $S^1vee S^1$ is a field of two elements...
â Servaes
Aug 14 at 16:39
@Servaes : ah, notational overloading is really a b****
â Max
Aug 14 at 21:56
@Servaes $F_2$ stands for the free group on two letters.
â Peter Saveliev
Aug 15 at 2:43
add a comment |Â
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
I always liked the: hang a picture on two nails, such that if you remove one the picture falls down .
While the solution to this can be found with a bit luck and without the knowledge of fundamental groups the more complicated ones (hanging it on $n$ nails) is probably impossible without any mathematical advanced ideas.
I always liked the: hang a picture on two nails, such that if you remove one the picture falls down .
While the solution to this can be found with a bit luck and without the knowledge of fundamental groups the more complicated ones (hanging it on $n$ nails) is probably impossible without any mathematical advanced ideas.
answered Aug 14 at 9:46
Jürg Merlin Spaak
94614
94614
never seen this, love the linked thread, classic!
â Mehness
Aug 14 at 9:57
1
+1 : This seems like the only answer that actually adresses the question, in that it's not a problem that's phrased in terms of topology but has an answer that can be (indeed $mathbbR^2setminus x,y sim S^1lor S^1 $ which has fundamental group $mathbbF_2$, if $xneq y$)
â Max
Aug 14 at 13:25
1
@Max For a moment I was really astounded by the assertion the the fundamental group of $S^1vee S^1$ is a field of two elements...
â Servaes
Aug 14 at 16:39
@Servaes : ah, notational overloading is really a b****
â Max
Aug 14 at 21:56
@Servaes $F_2$ stands for the free group on two letters.
â Peter Saveliev
Aug 15 at 2:43
add a comment |Â
never seen this, love the linked thread, classic!
â Mehness
Aug 14 at 9:57
1
+1 : This seems like the only answer that actually adresses the question, in that it's not a problem that's phrased in terms of topology but has an answer that can be (indeed $mathbbR^2setminus x,y sim S^1lor S^1 $ which has fundamental group $mathbbF_2$, if $xneq y$)
â Max
Aug 14 at 13:25
1
@Max For a moment I was really astounded by the assertion the the fundamental group of $S^1vee S^1$ is a field of two elements...
â Servaes
Aug 14 at 16:39
@Servaes : ah, notational overloading is really a b****
â Max
Aug 14 at 21:56
@Servaes $F_2$ stands for the free group on two letters.
â Peter Saveliev
Aug 15 at 2:43
never seen this, love the linked thread, classic!
â Mehness
Aug 14 at 9:57
never seen this, love the linked thread, classic!
â Mehness
Aug 14 at 9:57
1
1
+1 : This seems like the only answer that actually adresses the question, in that it's not a problem that's phrased in terms of topology but has an answer that can be (indeed $mathbbR^2setminus x,y sim S^1lor S^1 $ which has fundamental group $mathbbF_2$, if $xneq y$)
â Max
Aug 14 at 13:25
+1 : This seems like the only answer that actually adresses the question, in that it's not a problem that's phrased in terms of topology but has an answer that can be (indeed $mathbbR^2setminus x,y sim S^1lor S^1 $ which has fundamental group $mathbbF_2$, if $xneq y$)
â Max
Aug 14 at 13:25
1
1
@Max For a moment I was really astounded by the assertion the the fundamental group of $S^1vee S^1$ is a field of two elements...
â Servaes
Aug 14 at 16:39
@Max For a moment I was really astounded by the assertion the the fundamental group of $S^1vee S^1$ is a field of two elements...
â Servaes
Aug 14 at 16:39
@Servaes : ah, notational overloading is really a b****
â Max
Aug 14 at 21:56
@Servaes : ah, notational overloading is really a b****
â Max
Aug 14 at 21:56
@Servaes $F_2$ stands for the free group on two letters.
â Peter Saveliev
Aug 15 at 2:43
@Servaes $F_2$ stands for the free group on two letters.
â Peter Saveliev
Aug 15 at 2:43
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Here is a list of suggestions:
Take a disk of paper. Crumpled it and place the crumple paper over the place of the initial disk. One point of the crumpled paper will be at the vertical of its initial position in the disk. This is the fixed point theorem.
Create a Möbius strip. An example of a surface with only one side.
Describe the construction of the Peano curve. A curve filling a square.
How to paint an infinite surface with a finite amount of painting. The painter paradox.
The Schwarz lantern. Or how to approximate a surface of finite area with triangles whose areas are infinite.
You may find other examples on topology in my mathcounterexamples.net web site.
5
How is 4. related to topology?
â Ludvig Lindström
Aug 14 at 13:04
5
There is a much better variant of 1): Bring a map, which includes the location and put it on the floor. Now there is a point on the map, which lies exactly on the point at the floor.
â allo
Aug 14 at 14:15
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Here is a list of suggestions:
Take a disk of paper. Crumpled it and place the crumple paper over the place of the initial disk. One point of the crumpled paper will be at the vertical of its initial position in the disk. This is the fixed point theorem.
Create a Möbius strip. An example of a surface with only one side.
Describe the construction of the Peano curve. A curve filling a square.
How to paint an infinite surface with a finite amount of painting. The painter paradox.
The Schwarz lantern. Or how to approximate a surface of finite area with triangles whose areas are infinite.
You may find other examples on topology in my mathcounterexamples.net web site.
5
How is 4. related to topology?
â Ludvig Lindström
Aug 14 at 13:04
5
There is a much better variant of 1): Bring a map, which includes the location and put it on the floor. Now there is a point on the map, which lies exactly on the point at the floor.
â allo
Aug 14 at 14:15
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Here is a list of suggestions:
Take a disk of paper. Crumpled it and place the crumple paper over the place of the initial disk. One point of the crumpled paper will be at the vertical of its initial position in the disk. This is the fixed point theorem.
Create a Möbius strip. An example of a surface with only one side.
Describe the construction of the Peano curve. A curve filling a square.
How to paint an infinite surface with a finite amount of painting. The painter paradox.
The Schwarz lantern. Or how to approximate a surface of finite area with triangles whose areas are infinite.
You may find other examples on topology in my mathcounterexamples.net web site.
Here is a list of suggestions:
Take a disk of paper. Crumpled it and place the crumple paper over the place of the initial disk. One point of the crumpled paper will be at the vertical of its initial position in the disk. This is the fixed point theorem.
Create a Möbius strip. An example of a surface with only one side.
Describe the construction of the Peano curve. A curve filling a square.
How to paint an infinite surface with a finite amount of painting. The painter paradox.
The Schwarz lantern. Or how to approximate a surface of finite area with triangles whose areas are infinite.
You may find other examples on topology in my mathcounterexamples.net web site.
answered Aug 14 at 10:03
mathcounterexamples.net
25k21754
25k21754
5
How is 4. related to topology?
â Ludvig Lindström
Aug 14 at 13:04
5
There is a much better variant of 1): Bring a map, which includes the location and put it on the floor. Now there is a point on the map, which lies exactly on the point at the floor.
â allo
Aug 14 at 14:15
add a comment |Â
5
How is 4. related to topology?
â Ludvig Lindström
Aug 14 at 13:04
5
There is a much better variant of 1): Bring a map, which includes the location and put it on the floor. Now there is a point on the map, which lies exactly on the point at the floor.
â allo
Aug 14 at 14:15
5
5
How is 4. related to topology?
â Ludvig Lindström
Aug 14 at 13:04
How is 4. related to topology?
â Ludvig Lindström
Aug 14 at 13:04
5
5
There is a much better variant of 1): Bring a map, which includes the location and put it on the floor. Now there is a point on the map, which lies exactly on the point at the floor.
â allo
Aug 14 at 14:15
There is a much better variant of 1): Bring a map, which includes the location and put it on the floor. Now there is a point on the map, which lies exactly on the point at the floor.
â allo
Aug 14 at 14:15
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
A nice (and classic) problem would be the Bridges of Königsberg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Bridges_of_K%C3%B6nigsberg).
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
A nice (and classic) problem would be the Bridges of Königsberg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Bridges_of_K%C3%B6nigsberg).
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
A nice (and classic) problem would be the Bridges of Königsberg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Bridges_of_K%C3%B6nigsberg).
A nice (and classic) problem would be the Bridges of Königsberg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Bridges_of_K%C3%B6nigsberg).
answered Aug 14 at 12:53
Toffomat
1,261216
1,261216
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Here's just a line of thought. I think it would be fruitful to communicate some of the more geometric ideas of algebraic topology or just generally cool results from more general topology. Here are some examples of questions I would think would be insightful:
Given a square sheet of paper, how can you make a torus out of it? (In algebraic topology this leads to the idea of quotient spaces)
How can you recover a plane from a sphere? (In topology a sphere of dimension $n$ minus a point is homeomophic to to $mathbbR^n$)
Given a torus, can we deform any loop on it to a point? (In algebraic topology this is the result that the fundamental group of a torus is non trivial)
All of these examples convey the sort of geometric problems one asks in algebraic topology, without needing to develop the necessary terminology to explain it rigorously. I think that's good in this case because you want to convey an idea of what math can be like without going into all the hairy details of how it works.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Here's just a line of thought. I think it would be fruitful to communicate some of the more geometric ideas of algebraic topology or just generally cool results from more general topology. Here are some examples of questions I would think would be insightful:
Given a square sheet of paper, how can you make a torus out of it? (In algebraic topology this leads to the idea of quotient spaces)
How can you recover a plane from a sphere? (In topology a sphere of dimension $n$ minus a point is homeomophic to to $mathbbR^n$)
Given a torus, can we deform any loop on it to a point? (In algebraic topology this is the result that the fundamental group of a torus is non trivial)
All of these examples convey the sort of geometric problems one asks in algebraic topology, without needing to develop the necessary terminology to explain it rigorously. I think that's good in this case because you want to convey an idea of what math can be like without going into all the hairy details of how it works.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Here's just a line of thought. I think it would be fruitful to communicate some of the more geometric ideas of algebraic topology or just generally cool results from more general topology. Here are some examples of questions I would think would be insightful:
Given a square sheet of paper, how can you make a torus out of it? (In algebraic topology this leads to the idea of quotient spaces)
How can you recover a plane from a sphere? (In topology a sphere of dimension $n$ minus a point is homeomophic to to $mathbbR^n$)
Given a torus, can we deform any loop on it to a point? (In algebraic topology this is the result that the fundamental group of a torus is non trivial)
All of these examples convey the sort of geometric problems one asks in algebraic topology, without needing to develop the necessary terminology to explain it rigorously. I think that's good in this case because you want to convey an idea of what math can be like without going into all the hairy details of how it works.
Here's just a line of thought. I think it would be fruitful to communicate some of the more geometric ideas of algebraic topology or just generally cool results from more general topology. Here are some examples of questions I would think would be insightful:
Given a square sheet of paper, how can you make a torus out of it? (In algebraic topology this leads to the idea of quotient spaces)
How can you recover a plane from a sphere? (In topology a sphere of dimension $n$ minus a point is homeomophic to to $mathbbR^n$)
Given a torus, can we deform any loop on it to a point? (In algebraic topology this is the result that the fundamental group of a torus is non trivial)
All of these examples convey the sort of geometric problems one asks in algebraic topology, without needing to develop the necessary terminology to explain it rigorously. I think that's good in this case because you want to convey an idea of what math can be like without going into all the hairy details of how it works.
edited Aug 14 at 11:39
answered Aug 14 at 9:56
Perturbative
3,54311039
3,54311039
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As you meantioned, knots and braids are a good source of these kinds of problems. Here are a few that you may not have encountered.
For instance, you could demonstrate that the braid groups on the sphere have torsion elements and then relate this to the Dirac belt trick/plate trick - normally this is explained by using the fact that $SU(2)$ is simply connected, but it can equally well be explained by the fact that the 2-string braid group on the sphere $B_2(S^2)$ is isomorphic to $mathbbZ/2mathbbZ$.
Some simple invariants can be demonstrated with very little prior knowledge as well, such as the colourability of knots - so you could show how to distinguish one knot from another by showing that one is tricolourable and one is not.
In my experience, people are always rather intrigued by the existence of Brunnian links (and braids) and there's certainly plenty of material here to work with.
The existence of Seifert surfaces via the Seifert algorithm is very pictorial and is pretty fun to play with on paper.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As you meantioned, knots and braids are a good source of these kinds of problems. Here are a few that you may not have encountered.
For instance, you could demonstrate that the braid groups on the sphere have torsion elements and then relate this to the Dirac belt trick/plate trick - normally this is explained by using the fact that $SU(2)$ is simply connected, but it can equally well be explained by the fact that the 2-string braid group on the sphere $B_2(S^2)$ is isomorphic to $mathbbZ/2mathbbZ$.
Some simple invariants can be demonstrated with very little prior knowledge as well, such as the colourability of knots - so you could show how to distinguish one knot from another by showing that one is tricolourable and one is not.
In my experience, people are always rather intrigued by the existence of Brunnian links (and braids) and there's certainly plenty of material here to work with.
The existence of Seifert surfaces via the Seifert algorithm is very pictorial and is pretty fun to play with on paper.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As you meantioned, knots and braids are a good source of these kinds of problems. Here are a few that you may not have encountered.
For instance, you could demonstrate that the braid groups on the sphere have torsion elements and then relate this to the Dirac belt trick/plate trick - normally this is explained by using the fact that $SU(2)$ is simply connected, but it can equally well be explained by the fact that the 2-string braid group on the sphere $B_2(S^2)$ is isomorphic to $mathbbZ/2mathbbZ$.
Some simple invariants can be demonstrated with very little prior knowledge as well, such as the colourability of knots - so you could show how to distinguish one knot from another by showing that one is tricolourable and one is not.
In my experience, people are always rather intrigued by the existence of Brunnian links (and braids) and there's certainly plenty of material here to work with.
The existence of Seifert surfaces via the Seifert algorithm is very pictorial and is pretty fun to play with on paper.
As you meantioned, knots and braids are a good source of these kinds of problems. Here are a few that you may not have encountered.
For instance, you could demonstrate that the braid groups on the sphere have torsion elements and then relate this to the Dirac belt trick/plate trick - normally this is explained by using the fact that $SU(2)$ is simply connected, but it can equally well be explained by the fact that the 2-string braid group on the sphere $B_2(S^2)$ is isomorphic to $mathbbZ/2mathbbZ$.
Some simple invariants can be demonstrated with very little prior knowledge as well, such as the colourability of knots - so you could show how to distinguish one knot from another by showing that one is tricolourable and one is not.
In my experience, people are always rather intrigued by the existence of Brunnian links (and braids) and there's certainly plenty of material here to work with.
The existence of Seifert surfaces via the Seifert algorithm is very pictorial and is pretty fun to play with on paper.
answered Aug 14 at 13:42
Dan Rust
22.2k114784
22.2k114784
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Give out paper, scissors and glue.
Get them to make a Möbius strip. Explain how it is a 2D object, but needs the 3rd dimension to fully realise the shape.
For homework, get them to make a Klein bottle. :)
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Give out paper, scissors and glue.
Get them to make a Möbius strip. Explain how it is a 2D object, but needs the 3rd dimension to fully realise the shape.
For homework, get them to make a Klein bottle. :)
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Give out paper, scissors and glue.
Get them to make a Möbius strip. Explain how it is a 2D object, but needs the 3rd dimension to fully realise the shape.
For homework, get them to make a Klein bottle. :)
Give out paper, scissors and glue.
Get them to make a Möbius strip. Explain how it is a 2D object, but needs the 3rd dimension to fully realise the shape.
For homework, get them to make a Klein bottle. :)
answered Aug 14 at 14:36
Rewind
101
101
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The three utilities problem is a disguised version of asking whether $K_3,3$ is a planar graph. It's not, but $K_3,3$ is regularly embeddable in the torus -- if given one "handle" attached to the plane, you can attach the last house/utility pair. The general question is "how many handles do you need" for various numbers of utilities and houses. This is Turán's brick factory problem and is open (upper and lower bounds are known).
Brouwer's fixed point theorem tells me that if I start with a flat piece of paper, crumple it up, and drop it back where it started, at least one crumpled point projects (perpendicularly to the original sheet) back to its initial position. (The linked version of this example attributed to Brouwer is better stated.) Similarly, the Borsuk-Ulam theorem leads to the non-technical result that at every instant, there is a pair of antipodal points of Earth with identical temperatures and barometric pressures (or any other pair of continuous scalar properties you like).
The hairy ball theorem states (very informally) you can't comb a hairy ball without a cowlick. But you can comb a hairy torus without one. So there is a boring automated way to paint a torus, but not so much for a sphere.
There's always More Knot Theory...
You can demonstrate tying a knot in string without letting go of the ends during the tying (description and illustration). This gives an overhand knot, which is a chiral knot. You can tie its reflection by reversing the helicity of the starting state of the arms. Interestingly, not all knots are chiral; there are amphichiral knots.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The three utilities problem is a disguised version of asking whether $K_3,3$ is a planar graph. It's not, but $K_3,3$ is regularly embeddable in the torus -- if given one "handle" attached to the plane, you can attach the last house/utility pair. The general question is "how many handles do you need" for various numbers of utilities and houses. This is Turán's brick factory problem and is open (upper and lower bounds are known).
Brouwer's fixed point theorem tells me that if I start with a flat piece of paper, crumple it up, and drop it back where it started, at least one crumpled point projects (perpendicularly to the original sheet) back to its initial position. (The linked version of this example attributed to Brouwer is better stated.) Similarly, the Borsuk-Ulam theorem leads to the non-technical result that at every instant, there is a pair of antipodal points of Earth with identical temperatures and barometric pressures (or any other pair of continuous scalar properties you like).
The hairy ball theorem states (very informally) you can't comb a hairy ball without a cowlick. But you can comb a hairy torus without one. So there is a boring automated way to paint a torus, but not so much for a sphere.
There's always More Knot Theory...
You can demonstrate tying a knot in string without letting go of the ends during the tying (description and illustration). This gives an overhand knot, which is a chiral knot. You can tie its reflection by reversing the helicity of the starting state of the arms. Interestingly, not all knots are chiral; there are amphichiral knots.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The three utilities problem is a disguised version of asking whether $K_3,3$ is a planar graph. It's not, but $K_3,3$ is regularly embeddable in the torus -- if given one "handle" attached to the plane, you can attach the last house/utility pair. The general question is "how many handles do you need" for various numbers of utilities and houses. This is Turán's brick factory problem and is open (upper and lower bounds are known).
Brouwer's fixed point theorem tells me that if I start with a flat piece of paper, crumple it up, and drop it back where it started, at least one crumpled point projects (perpendicularly to the original sheet) back to its initial position. (The linked version of this example attributed to Brouwer is better stated.) Similarly, the Borsuk-Ulam theorem leads to the non-technical result that at every instant, there is a pair of antipodal points of Earth with identical temperatures and barometric pressures (or any other pair of continuous scalar properties you like).
The hairy ball theorem states (very informally) you can't comb a hairy ball without a cowlick. But you can comb a hairy torus without one. So there is a boring automated way to paint a torus, but not so much for a sphere.
There's always More Knot Theory...
You can demonstrate tying a knot in string without letting go of the ends during the tying (description and illustration). This gives an overhand knot, which is a chiral knot. You can tie its reflection by reversing the helicity of the starting state of the arms. Interestingly, not all knots are chiral; there are amphichiral knots.
The three utilities problem is a disguised version of asking whether $K_3,3$ is a planar graph. It's not, but $K_3,3$ is regularly embeddable in the torus -- if given one "handle" attached to the plane, you can attach the last house/utility pair. The general question is "how many handles do you need" for various numbers of utilities and houses. This is Turán's brick factory problem and is open (upper and lower bounds are known).
Brouwer's fixed point theorem tells me that if I start with a flat piece of paper, crumple it up, and drop it back where it started, at least one crumpled point projects (perpendicularly to the original sheet) back to its initial position. (The linked version of this example attributed to Brouwer is better stated.) Similarly, the Borsuk-Ulam theorem leads to the non-technical result that at every instant, there is a pair of antipodal points of Earth with identical temperatures and barometric pressures (or any other pair of continuous scalar properties you like).
The hairy ball theorem states (very informally) you can't comb a hairy ball without a cowlick. But you can comb a hairy torus without one. So there is a boring automated way to paint a torus, but not so much for a sphere.
There's always More Knot Theory...
You can demonstrate tying a knot in string without letting go of the ends during the tying (description and illustration). This gives an overhand knot, which is a chiral knot. You can tie its reflection by reversing the helicity of the starting state of the arms. Interestingly, not all knots are chiral; there are amphichiral knots.
answered Aug 14 at 17:24
Eric Towers
30.5k22264
30.5k22264
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Try an exhibition on knots: http://groupoids.org.uk/popmath/cpm/exhib/knotexhib.html
The aim was to use knots to present some basic methods in the development of mathematics. Knots were used because of their familiarity and visual aspect.
See also http://groupoids.org.uk/outofline/out-home.html
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Try an exhibition on knots: http://groupoids.org.uk/popmath/cpm/exhib/knotexhib.html
The aim was to use knots to present some basic methods in the development of mathematics. Knots were used because of their familiarity and visual aspect.
See also http://groupoids.org.uk/outofline/out-home.html
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Try an exhibition on knots: http://groupoids.org.uk/popmath/cpm/exhib/knotexhib.html
The aim was to use knots to present some basic methods in the development of mathematics. Knots were used because of their familiarity and visual aspect.
See also http://groupoids.org.uk/outofline/out-home.html
Try an exhibition on knots: http://groupoids.org.uk/popmath/cpm/exhib/knotexhib.html
The aim was to use knots to present some basic methods in the development of mathematics. Knots were used because of their familiarity and visual aspect.
See also http://groupoids.org.uk/outofline/out-home.html
answered Aug 15 at 20:00
Ronnie Brown
11.6k12938
11.6k12938
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2882276%2finteresting-questions-with-answers-about-concepts-in-topology-for-an-amateur-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I would also like to make this question Community Wiki but haven't been able to
â Albas
Aug 14 at 9:38
1
What does it mean, to hold a quiz?
â Barry Cipra
Aug 14 at 14:44
What is the question?
â Peter Mortensen
Aug 14 at 15:51