prove that there infinitely many primes of the form $8k-1$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Using the fact that $$left ( frac2p right )=(-1)^fracp^2-18$$
for each prime $p>2$,prove that there infinitely many primes of the form $8k-1$.



I thought that we could I assume that there is a finite number of primes of the form $8k-1$: $p_1,p_2 dots ,p_k$



Could we maybe set $N=8p_1p_2 cdots p_k-1 >1$



Then $N$ has a prime divisor $p$.$p$ can be of the form $8n+1,8n+3,8n+5 text or 8n+7$..



How could I continue?? Also...how can I use this: $left ( frac2p right )=(-1)^fracp^2-18$ ?







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Using the fact that $$left ( frac2p right )=(-1)^fracp^2-18$$
    for each prime $p>2$,prove that there infinitely many primes of the form $8k-1$.



    I thought that we could I assume that there is a finite number of primes of the form $8k-1$: $p_1,p_2 dots ,p_k$



    Could we maybe set $N=8p_1p_2 cdots p_k-1 >1$



    Then $N$ has a prime divisor $p$.$p$ can be of the form $8n+1,8n+3,8n+5 text or 8n+7$..



    How could I continue?? Also...how can I use this: $left ( frac2p right )=(-1)^fracp^2-18$ ?







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Using the fact that $$left ( frac2p right )=(-1)^fracp^2-18$$
      for each prime $p>2$,prove that there infinitely many primes of the form $8k-1$.



      I thought that we could I assume that there is a finite number of primes of the form $8k-1$: $p_1,p_2 dots ,p_k$



      Could we maybe set $N=8p_1p_2 cdots p_k-1 >1$



      Then $N$ has a prime divisor $p$.$p$ can be of the form $8n+1,8n+3,8n+5 text or 8n+7$..



      How could I continue?? Also...how can I use this: $left ( frac2p right )=(-1)^fracp^2-18$ ?







      share|cite|improve this question












      Using the fact that $$left ( frac2p right )=(-1)^fracp^2-18$$
      for each prime $p>2$,prove that there infinitely many primes of the form $8k-1$.



      I thought that we could I assume that there is a finite number of primes of the form $8k-1$: $p_1,p_2 dots ,p_k$



      Could we maybe set $N=8p_1p_2 cdots p_k-1 >1$



      Then $N$ has a prime divisor $p$.$p$ can be of the form $8n+1,8n+3,8n+5 text or 8n+7$..



      How could I continue?? Also...how can I use this: $left ( frac2p right )=(-1)^fracp^2-18$ ?









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jun 22 '14 at 22:30









      evinda

      4,04031643




      4,04031643




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $p_1,p_2, ldots, p_k$ be the list of ALL primes of the form $8s+7$. Let
          $$N=(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2-2.$$
          Note that $N equiv 7 pmod8$ and is odd. If $p$ is a prime that divides $N$, then
          $$(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2 equiv 2 pmodp.$$ Thus
          $$left(frac2pright)=1.$$
          Thus $p equiv pm 1 pmod8$.



          So all primes that divide $N$ must be of the from $8s+1$ or $8s+7$. But not all of them can be of the form $8s+1$ (ask why???)



          So there must be one of the form $q=8s+7$. Now see if you can proceed from here.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Anurag A: Why $N equiv 7 pmod 8$? We know that $p_1, dots , p_k equiv 7 pmod 8$,but why also the difference $(p_1 cdots p_k)^2-2 equiv 7 pmod 8$ ?? $$$$ If $N$ has a prime divisor $p$ of the form $8s-1$,$p$ must be of of $p_1, dots, p_k$,so $p mid p_1 cdot p_2 cdots p_k Rightarrow p mid (p_1 cdots p_k)^2 text and as p mid N Rightarrow p mid 2 text that is a contradiction.$
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:06











          • I understood it now...thank you very much!!!!
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:27










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f844041%2fprove-that-there-infinitely-many-primes-of-the-form-8k-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $p_1,p_2, ldots, p_k$ be the list of ALL primes of the form $8s+7$. Let
          $$N=(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2-2.$$
          Note that $N equiv 7 pmod8$ and is odd. If $p$ is a prime that divides $N$, then
          $$(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2 equiv 2 pmodp.$$ Thus
          $$left(frac2pright)=1.$$
          Thus $p equiv pm 1 pmod8$.



          So all primes that divide $N$ must be of the from $8s+1$ or $8s+7$. But not all of them can be of the form $8s+1$ (ask why???)



          So there must be one of the form $q=8s+7$. Now see if you can proceed from here.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Anurag A: Why $N equiv 7 pmod 8$? We know that $p_1, dots , p_k equiv 7 pmod 8$,but why also the difference $(p_1 cdots p_k)^2-2 equiv 7 pmod 8$ ?? $$$$ If $N$ has a prime divisor $p$ of the form $8s-1$,$p$ must be of of $p_1, dots, p_k$,so $p mid p_1 cdot p_2 cdots p_k Rightarrow p mid (p_1 cdots p_k)^2 text and as p mid N Rightarrow p mid 2 text that is a contradiction.$
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:06











          • I understood it now...thank you very much!!!!
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:27














          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $p_1,p_2, ldots, p_k$ be the list of ALL primes of the form $8s+7$. Let
          $$N=(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2-2.$$
          Note that $N equiv 7 pmod8$ and is odd. If $p$ is a prime that divides $N$, then
          $$(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2 equiv 2 pmodp.$$ Thus
          $$left(frac2pright)=1.$$
          Thus $p equiv pm 1 pmod8$.



          So all primes that divide $N$ must be of the from $8s+1$ or $8s+7$. But not all of them can be of the form $8s+1$ (ask why???)



          So there must be one of the form $q=8s+7$. Now see if you can proceed from here.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Anurag A: Why $N equiv 7 pmod 8$? We know that $p_1, dots , p_k equiv 7 pmod 8$,but why also the difference $(p_1 cdots p_k)^2-2 equiv 7 pmod 8$ ?? $$$$ If $N$ has a prime divisor $p$ of the form $8s-1$,$p$ must be of of $p_1, dots, p_k$,so $p mid p_1 cdot p_2 cdots p_k Rightarrow p mid (p_1 cdots p_k)^2 text and as p mid N Rightarrow p mid 2 text that is a contradiction.$
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:06











          • I understood it now...thank you very much!!!!
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:27












          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted






          Let $p_1,p_2, ldots, p_k$ be the list of ALL primes of the form $8s+7$. Let
          $$N=(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2-2.$$
          Note that $N equiv 7 pmod8$ and is odd. If $p$ is a prime that divides $N$, then
          $$(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2 equiv 2 pmodp.$$ Thus
          $$left(frac2pright)=1.$$
          Thus $p equiv pm 1 pmod8$.



          So all primes that divide $N$ must be of the from $8s+1$ or $8s+7$. But not all of them can be of the form $8s+1$ (ask why???)



          So there must be one of the form $q=8s+7$. Now see if you can proceed from here.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let $p_1,p_2, ldots, p_k$ be the list of ALL primes of the form $8s+7$. Let
          $$N=(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2-2.$$
          Note that $N equiv 7 pmod8$ and is odd. If $p$ is a prime that divides $N$, then
          $$(p_1p_2 dotsb p_k)^2 equiv 2 pmodp.$$ Thus
          $$left(frac2pright)=1.$$
          Thus $p equiv pm 1 pmod8$.



          So all primes that divide $N$ must be of the from $8s+1$ or $8s+7$. But not all of them can be of the form $8s+1$ (ask why???)



          So there must be one of the form $q=8s+7$. Now see if you can proceed from here.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jun 22 '14 at 22:40









          Anurag A

          22.4k12243




          22.4k12243











          • Anurag A: Why $N equiv 7 pmod 8$? We know that $p_1, dots , p_k equiv 7 pmod 8$,but why also the difference $(p_1 cdots p_k)^2-2 equiv 7 pmod 8$ ?? $$$$ If $N$ has a prime divisor $p$ of the form $8s-1$,$p$ must be of of $p_1, dots, p_k$,so $p mid p_1 cdot p_2 cdots p_k Rightarrow p mid (p_1 cdots p_k)^2 text and as p mid N Rightarrow p mid 2 text that is a contradiction.$
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:06











          • I understood it now...thank you very much!!!!
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:27
















          • Anurag A: Why $N equiv 7 pmod 8$? We know that $p_1, dots , p_k equiv 7 pmod 8$,but why also the difference $(p_1 cdots p_k)^2-2 equiv 7 pmod 8$ ?? $$$$ If $N$ has a prime divisor $p$ of the form $8s-1$,$p$ must be of of $p_1, dots, p_k$,so $p mid p_1 cdot p_2 cdots p_k Rightarrow p mid (p_1 cdots p_k)^2 text and as p mid N Rightarrow p mid 2 text that is a contradiction.$
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:06











          • I understood it now...thank you very much!!!!
            – evinda
            Jun 22 '14 at 23:27















          Anurag A: Why $N equiv 7 pmod 8$? We know that $p_1, dots , p_k equiv 7 pmod 8$,but why also the difference $(p_1 cdots p_k)^2-2 equiv 7 pmod 8$ ?? $$$$ If $N$ has a prime divisor $p$ of the form $8s-1$,$p$ must be of of $p_1, dots, p_k$,so $p mid p_1 cdot p_2 cdots p_k Rightarrow p mid (p_1 cdots p_k)^2 text and as p mid N Rightarrow p mid 2 text that is a contradiction.$
          – evinda
          Jun 22 '14 at 23:06





          Anurag A: Why $N equiv 7 pmod 8$? We know that $p_1, dots , p_k equiv 7 pmod 8$,but why also the difference $(p_1 cdots p_k)^2-2 equiv 7 pmod 8$ ?? $$$$ If $N$ has a prime divisor $p$ of the form $8s-1$,$p$ must be of of $p_1, dots, p_k$,so $p mid p_1 cdot p_2 cdots p_k Rightarrow p mid (p_1 cdots p_k)^2 text and as p mid N Rightarrow p mid 2 text that is a contradiction.$
          – evinda
          Jun 22 '14 at 23:06













          I understood it now...thank you very much!!!!
          – evinda
          Jun 22 '14 at 23:27




          I understood it now...thank you very much!!!!
          – evinda
          Jun 22 '14 at 23:27












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f844041%2fprove-that-there-infinitely-many-primes-of-the-form-8k-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Carbon dioxide

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?