Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












In triangle $ABC$, let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the angle-bisectors of angles $A$ and $B$. Let $P$ be a point on $DE$. Let the feet of the perpendiculars onto $CB$, $AB$ and $CA$ be $X$, $Y$, $Z$ respectively. Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$.



enter image description here



So far spotted that $ZCXP$, $ZCBY$, $ZAYP$ are cyclic and have tried using Pythagoras on all the right-angles triangles.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
    – Jack D'Aurizio♦
    Aug 14 at 8:41















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












In triangle $ABC$, let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the angle-bisectors of angles $A$ and $B$. Let $P$ be a point on $DE$. Let the feet of the perpendiculars onto $CB$, $AB$ and $CA$ be $X$, $Y$, $Z$ respectively. Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$.



enter image description here



So far spotted that $ZCXP$, $ZCBY$, $ZAYP$ are cyclic and have tried using Pythagoras on all the right-angles triangles.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
    – Jack D'Aurizio♦
    Aug 14 at 8:41













up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





In triangle $ABC$, let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the angle-bisectors of angles $A$ and $B$. Let $P$ be a point on $DE$. Let the feet of the perpendiculars onto $CB$, $AB$ and $CA$ be $X$, $Y$, $Z$ respectively. Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$.



enter image description here



So far spotted that $ZCXP$, $ZCBY$, $ZAYP$ are cyclic and have tried using Pythagoras on all the right-angles triangles.







share|cite|improve this question












In triangle $ABC$, let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the angle-bisectors of angles $A$ and $B$. Let $P$ be a point on $DE$. Let the feet of the perpendiculars onto $CB$, $AB$ and $CA$ be $X$, $Y$, $Z$ respectively. Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$.



enter image description here



So far spotted that $ZCXP$, $ZCBY$, $ZAYP$ are cyclic and have tried using Pythagoras on all the right-angles triangles.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 14 at 8:32









Plato

1,121517




1,121517







  • 1




    This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
    – Jack D'Aurizio♦
    Aug 14 at 8:41













  • 1




    This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
    – Jack D'Aurizio♦
    Aug 14 at 8:41








1




1




This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 14 at 8:41





This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 14 at 8:41











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.



Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.



Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.



enter image description here



Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.



Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.



Through the above construction, we have:-



(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;



(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and



(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.



From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.



From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.



Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.



Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’



Required result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • wow - kudos to you
    – Plato
    Aug 21 at 11:24










  • @Plato Hope that helps.
    – Mick
    Aug 21 at 15:26










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2882211%2fprove-that-pxpy-pz%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.



Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.



Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.



enter image description here



Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.



Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.



Through the above construction, we have:-



(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;



(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and



(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.



From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.



From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.



Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.



Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’



Required result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • wow - kudos to you
    – Plato
    Aug 21 at 11:24










  • @Plato Hope that helps.
    – Mick
    Aug 21 at 15:26














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.



Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.



Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.



enter image description here



Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.



Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.



Through the above construction, we have:-



(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;



(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and



(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.



From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.



From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.



Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.



Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’



Required result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • wow - kudos to you
    – Plato
    Aug 21 at 11:24










  • @Plato Hope that helps.
    – Mick
    Aug 21 at 15:26












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.



Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.



Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.



enter image description here



Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.



Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.



Through the above construction, we have:-



(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;



(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and



(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.



From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.



From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.



Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.



Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’



Required result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer












This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.



Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.



Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.



enter image description here



Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.



Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.



Through the above construction, we have:-



(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;



(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and



(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.



From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.



From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.



Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.



Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’



Required result follows.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 20 at 22:53









Mick

11.5k21540




11.5k21540











  • wow - kudos to you
    – Plato
    Aug 21 at 11:24










  • @Plato Hope that helps.
    – Mick
    Aug 21 at 15:26
















  • wow - kudos to you
    – Plato
    Aug 21 at 11:24










  • @Plato Hope that helps.
    – Mick
    Aug 21 at 15:26















wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24




wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24












@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26




@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2882211%2fprove-that-pxpy-pz%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Carbon dioxide

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?