Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$

Multi tool use
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
In triangle $ABC$, let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the angle-bisectors of angles $A$ and $B$. Let $P$ be a point on $DE$. Let the feet of the perpendiculars onto $CB$, $AB$ and $CA$ be $X$, $Y$, $Z$ respectively. Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$.
So far spotted that $ZCXP$, $ZCBY$, $ZAYP$ are cyclic and have tried using Pythagoras on all the right-angles triangles.
euclidean-geometry
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
In triangle $ABC$, let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the angle-bisectors of angles $A$ and $B$. Let $P$ be a point on $DE$. Let the feet of the perpendiculars onto $CB$, $AB$ and $CA$ be $X$, $Y$, $Z$ respectively. Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$.
So far spotted that $ZCXP$, $ZCBY$, $ZAYP$ are cyclic and have tried using Pythagoras on all the right-angles triangles.
euclidean-geometry
1
This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 14 at 8:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
In triangle $ABC$, let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the angle-bisectors of angles $A$ and $B$. Let $P$ be a point on $DE$. Let the feet of the perpendiculars onto $CB$, $AB$ and $CA$ be $X$, $Y$, $Z$ respectively. Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$.
So far spotted that $ZCXP$, $ZCBY$, $ZAYP$ are cyclic and have tried using Pythagoras on all the right-angles triangles.
euclidean-geometry
In triangle $ABC$, let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the angle-bisectors of angles $A$ and $B$. Let $P$ be a point on $DE$. Let the feet of the perpendiculars onto $CB$, $AB$ and $CA$ be $X$, $Y$, $Z$ respectively. Prove that $PX+PY=PZ$.
So far spotted that $ZCXP$, $ZCBY$, $ZAYP$ are cyclic and have tried using Pythagoras on all the right-angles triangles.
euclidean-geometry
asked Aug 14 at 8:32
Plato
1,121517
1,121517
1
This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 14 at 8:41
add a comment |Â
1
This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 14 at 8:41
1
1
This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 14 at 8:41
This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 14 at 8:41
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.
Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.
Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.
Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.
Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.
Through the above construction, we have:-
(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;
(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and
(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.
From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.
From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.
Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.
Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’
Required result follows.
wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24
@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.
Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.
Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.
Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.
Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.
Through the above construction, we have:-
(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;
(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and
(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.
From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.
From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.
Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.
Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’
Required result follows.
wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24
@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.
Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.
Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.
Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.
Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.
Through the above construction, we have:-
(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;
(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and
(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.
From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.
From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.
Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.
Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’
Required result follows.
wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24
@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.
Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.
Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.
Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.
Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.
Through the above construction, we have:-
(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;
(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and
(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.
From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.
From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.
Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.
Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’
Required result follows.
This is slightly complicated because a lot of construction is necessary.
Produce PZ to cut BC produced at N. Produce PX to cut AC produced at U.
Through P, draw a line parallel to AB cutting BC at $B_1$, BD at B’, AE at A’ and AC at $A_2$.
Through A’, draw a line parallel to AC cutting AB at $A_1$, PU at M, BC at $C_2$, and PN at Z’ (such that $angle PZ’C_2 = 90^0$). After joining MN, we found that $C_2$ is the orthocenter of $triangle PMN$ and therefore, $PC_2$ produced is perpendicular to MN at J.
Through B’, draw a line parallel to BC cutting AB at $B_2$, PU at H (such that $angle UHB_2 = 90^0$), $A_1C_2$ at C’, and PZ produced at K. After joining UK, we found that $triangle PUK$ has the orthocenter located at $C_1$.
Through the above construction, we have:-
(1) $AA_1A’A_2$, $BB_1B’B_2$, and $CC_1C’C_2$ are rhombuses;
(2) $triangle A’B’C’$ is a miniature of $triangle ABC$ with I serving as the in-centers for both triangles and therefore CC’I is a straight line (proof skipped) cutting PJ at Q and PM at R; and
(3) NMXZ’ is cyclic.
From (1), $theta = theta’$ implies $phi = phi’$ through congruence.
From (3), $phi = phi_1$. Then, MN // XZ’.
Further, all angles marked in red are equal. This means PX = PZ’.
Also from (1), since these rhombuses have equal altitudes, we have PY = … = ZZ’
Required result follows.
answered Aug 20 at 22:53


Mick
11.5k21540
11.5k21540
wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24
@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26
add a comment |Â
wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24
@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26
wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24
wow - kudos to you
– Plato
Aug 21 at 11:24
@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26
@Plato Hope that helps.
– Mick
Aug 21 at 15:26
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2882211%2fprove-that-pxpy-pz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
This is an instant-kill via trilinear coordinates. Do you know them?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 14 at 8:41