To prove how limit exists using definition given.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The definition of a limit of a complex function goes as follows:- Let a function f be defined at all points z in some deleted neighbourhood of z°. Then the limit of f(z) as z approaches z° is a number w° . That means for each positive number ε , there is a positive number δ such that |f(z)- w°| is less than ε whenever| z-z° | lies between 0 & δ.

Now I am asked to prove



i). limiting value of ( Re z) as z tends to z° equals (Re z°).



ii). limiting value of conjugate of z equals conjugate of z° as z tends to z°.



using definition given above.



I have difficulty as I don't know how to start.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Start by noting that $mathrmRe(z)-mathrmRe(z_0) = mathrmRe(z-z_0)$ and $overlinez-overlinez_0=overlinez-z_0$. Now try to show that $|mathrmRe(z-z_0)|$, $|overlinez-z_0|$ cannot be very large if $|z-z_0|$ is small.
    – Jonathan Y.
    Jan 30 '16 at 14:46










  • Start with $|Re(z)-Re(z^o)|=|Re(z-z^o)|leq |z-z^o|$ and $|Im(z)-Im(z^o)|=|Im(z-z^o)|le |z-z^o|.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 12 at 3:36















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The definition of a limit of a complex function goes as follows:- Let a function f be defined at all points z in some deleted neighbourhood of z°. Then the limit of f(z) as z approaches z° is a number w° . That means for each positive number ε , there is a positive number δ such that |f(z)- w°| is less than ε whenever| z-z° | lies between 0 & δ.

Now I am asked to prove



i). limiting value of ( Re z) as z tends to z° equals (Re z°).



ii). limiting value of conjugate of z equals conjugate of z° as z tends to z°.



using definition given above.



I have difficulty as I don't know how to start.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Start by noting that $mathrmRe(z)-mathrmRe(z_0) = mathrmRe(z-z_0)$ and $overlinez-overlinez_0=overlinez-z_0$. Now try to show that $|mathrmRe(z-z_0)|$, $|overlinez-z_0|$ cannot be very large if $|z-z_0|$ is small.
    – Jonathan Y.
    Jan 30 '16 at 14:46










  • Start with $|Re(z)-Re(z^o)|=|Re(z-z^o)|leq |z-z^o|$ and $|Im(z)-Im(z^o)|=|Im(z-z^o)|le |z-z^o|.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 12 at 3:36













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











The definition of a limit of a complex function goes as follows:- Let a function f be defined at all points z in some deleted neighbourhood of z°. Then the limit of f(z) as z approaches z° is a number w° . That means for each positive number ε , there is a positive number δ such that |f(z)- w°| is less than ε whenever| z-z° | lies between 0 & δ.

Now I am asked to prove



i). limiting value of ( Re z) as z tends to z° equals (Re z°).



ii). limiting value of conjugate of z equals conjugate of z° as z tends to z°.



using definition given above.



I have difficulty as I don't know how to start.







share|cite|improve this question














The definition of a limit of a complex function goes as follows:- Let a function f be defined at all points z in some deleted neighbourhood of z°. Then the limit of f(z) as z approaches z° is a number w° . That means for each positive number ε , there is a positive number δ such that |f(z)- w°| is less than ε whenever| z-z° | lies between 0 & δ.

Now I am asked to prove



i). limiting value of ( Re z) as z tends to z° equals (Re z°).



ii). limiting value of conjugate of z equals conjugate of z° as z tends to z°.



using definition given above.



I have difficulty as I don't know how to start.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 30 '16 at 15:37









Martin Sleziak

43.5k6113260




43.5k6113260










asked Jan 30 '16 at 14:17









Kavita Sahu

13010




13010











  • Start by noting that $mathrmRe(z)-mathrmRe(z_0) = mathrmRe(z-z_0)$ and $overlinez-overlinez_0=overlinez-z_0$. Now try to show that $|mathrmRe(z-z_0)|$, $|overlinez-z_0|$ cannot be very large if $|z-z_0|$ is small.
    – Jonathan Y.
    Jan 30 '16 at 14:46










  • Start with $|Re(z)-Re(z^o)|=|Re(z-z^o)|leq |z-z^o|$ and $|Im(z)-Im(z^o)|=|Im(z-z^o)|le |z-z^o|.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 12 at 3:36

















  • Start by noting that $mathrmRe(z)-mathrmRe(z_0) = mathrmRe(z-z_0)$ and $overlinez-overlinez_0=overlinez-z_0$. Now try to show that $|mathrmRe(z-z_0)|$, $|overlinez-z_0|$ cannot be very large if $|z-z_0|$ is small.
    – Jonathan Y.
    Jan 30 '16 at 14:46










  • Start with $|Re(z)-Re(z^o)|=|Re(z-z^o)|leq |z-z^o|$ and $|Im(z)-Im(z^o)|=|Im(z-z^o)|le |z-z^o|.$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jul 12 at 3:36
















Start by noting that $mathrmRe(z)-mathrmRe(z_0) = mathrmRe(z-z_0)$ and $overlinez-overlinez_0=overlinez-z_0$. Now try to show that $|mathrmRe(z-z_0)|$, $|overlinez-z_0|$ cannot be very large if $|z-z_0|$ is small.
– Jonathan Y.
Jan 30 '16 at 14:46




Start by noting that $mathrmRe(z)-mathrmRe(z_0) = mathrmRe(z-z_0)$ and $overlinez-overlinez_0=overlinez-z_0$. Now try to show that $|mathrmRe(z-z_0)|$, $|overlinez-z_0|$ cannot be very large if $|z-z_0|$ is small.
– Jonathan Y.
Jan 30 '16 at 14:46












Start with $|Re(z)-Re(z^o)|=|Re(z-z^o)|leq |z-z^o|$ and $|Im(z)-Im(z^o)|=|Im(z-z^o)|le |z-z^o|.$
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 12 at 3:36





Start with $|Re(z)-Re(z^o)|=|Re(z-z^o)|leq |z-z^o|$ and $|Im(z)-Im(z^o)|=|Im(z-z^o)|le |z-z^o|.$
– DanielWainfleet
Jul 12 at 3:36











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













i) Note that as $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
$$|mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0)| le sqrt(mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0))^2 + (mathrmIm(z) - mathrmIm(z_0))^2 = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



$$textHence, lim_zto z_0 mathrmRe(z) = mathrmRe(z_0).$$



ii) As $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
$$|overlinez-overlinez_0| = |overlinez-z_0| = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



$$textHence, lim_zto z_0 overlinez = overlinez_0.$$






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1633167%2fto-prove-how-limit-exists-using-definition-given%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    i) Note that as $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
    $$|mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0)| le sqrt(mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0))^2 + (mathrmIm(z) - mathrmIm(z_0))^2 = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



    $$textHence, lim_zto z_0 mathrmRe(z) = mathrmRe(z_0).$$



    ii) As $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
    $$|overlinez-overlinez_0| = |overlinez-z_0| = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



    $$textHence, lim_zto z_0 overlinez = overlinez_0.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      i) Note that as $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
      $$|mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0)| le sqrt(mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0))^2 + (mathrmIm(z) - mathrmIm(z_0))^2 = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



      $$textHence, lim_zto z_0 mathrmRe(z) = mathrmRe(z_0).$$



      ii) As $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
      $$|overlinez-overlinez_0| = |overlinez-z_0| = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



      $$textHence, lim_zto z_0 overlinez = overlinez_0.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        i) Note that as $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
        $$|mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0)| le sqrt(mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0))^2 + (mathrmIm(z) - mathrmIm(z_0))^2 = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



        $$textHence, lim_zto z_0 mathrmRe(z) = mathrmRe(z_0).$$



        ii) As $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
        $$|overlinez-overlinez_0| = |overlinez-z_0| = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



        $$textHence, lim_zto z_0 overlinez = overlinez_0.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        i) Note that as $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
        $$|mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0)| le sqrt(mathrmRe(z) - mathrmRe(z_0))^2 + (mathrmIm(z) - mathrmIm(z_0))^2 = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



        $$textHence, lim_zto z_0 mathrmRe(z) = mathrmRe(z_0).$$



        ii) As $z to z_0$, $forall epsilon > 0,$ take $delta := epsilon$ such that $forall z: 0 < |z-z_0| < delta, $
        $$|overlinez-overlinez_0| = |overlinez-z_0| = |z-z_0|<epsilon.$$



        $$textHence, lim_zto z_0 overlinez = overlinez_0.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 30 '16 at 14:51









        GNU Supporter

        11.8k72143




        11.8k72143






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1633167%2fto-prove-how-limit-exists-using-definition-given%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Mutual Information Always Non-negative

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?