Prob. 12, Sec. 5.2, in Bartle & Sherbert's INTRO TO REAL ANALYSIS: Continuity of additive functions
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Here is Prob. 12, Sec. 5.2, in the book Introduction To Real Analysis by Robert G. Bartle & Donald R. Sherbert, 4th edition:
A function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ is said to be additive if $f(x+y)= f(x) + f(y)$ for all $x, y$ in $mathbbR$. Prove that if $f$ is continuous at some point $x_0$, then it is continuous at every point of $mathbbR$.
My Attempt:
Let $c$ be an arbitrary real number.
First suppose that $x_0 = 0$. As $f$ is continuous at the point $0$, so given any real number $varepsilon > 0$ we can find a real number $delta > 0$ such that
$$lvert f(x) rvert = lvert f(x) - 0 rvert = lvert f(x) - f(0) rvert < varepsilon $$
for all $x in mathbbR$ for which
$$ lvert x rvert = lvert x-0 rvert < delta. $$
Then
$$ lvert f(x) - f(c) rvert = lvert f( x - c ) rvert < varepsilon $$
for all $x in mathbbR$ such that
$$ lvert x-c rvert < delta. $$
Thus it follows that $f$ is continuous at every point $c in mathbbR$.
Am I right?
Now let us suppose that $x_0 neq 0$. As $f$ is continuous at $x_0$, so, for every real number $varepsilon > 0$ we can find a real number $delta > 0$ such that
$$ leftlvert f left(x - x_0 right) rightrvert = leftlvert f(x) - f left( x_0 right) rightrvert <
varepsilon $$
for all real numbers $x$ which satisfy
$$ leftlvert x- x_0 rightrvert < delta. $$
Now if we could show from here that $f$ is continuous at $0$, then as before we will have managed to show that $f$ is continuous at every real number $c$.
What next? How to proceed from here to show that our function $f$ is continuous at $0$? Or, is there any other route?
real-analysis limits continuity
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Here is Prob. 12, Sec. 5.2, in the book Introduction To Real Analysis by Robert G. Bartle & Donald R. Sherbert, 4th edition:
A function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ is said to be additive if $f(x+y)= f(x) + f(y)$ for all $x, y$ in $mathbbR$. Prove that if $f$ is continuous at some point $x_0$, then it is continuous at every point of $mathbbR$.
My Attempt:
Let $c$ be an arbitrary real number.
First suppose that $x_0 = 0$. As $f$ is continuous at the point $0$, so given any real number $varepsilon > 0$ we can find a real number $delta > 0$ such that
$$lvert f(x) rvert = lvert f(x) - 0 rvert = lvert f(x) - f(0) rvert < varepsilon $$
for all $x in mathbbR$ for which
$$ lvert x rvert = lvert x-0 rvert < delta. $$
Then
$$ lvert f(x) - f(c) rvert = lvert f( x - c ) rvert < varepsilon $$
for all $x in mathbbR$ such that
$$ lvert x-c rvert < delta. $$
Thus it follows that $f$ is continuous at every point $c in mathbbR$.
Am I right?
Now let us suppose that $x_0 neq 0$. As $f$ is continuous at $x_0$, so, for every real number $varepsilon > 0$ we can find a real number $delta > 0$ such that
$$ leftlvert f left(x - x_0 right) rightrvert = leftlvert f(x) - f left( x_0 right) rightrvert <
varepsilon $$
for all real numbers $x$ which satisfy
$$ leftlvert x- x_0 rightrvert < delta. $$
Now if we could show from here that $f$ is continuous at $0$, then as before we will have managed to show that $f$ is continuous at every real number $c$.
What next? How to proceed from here to show that our function $f$ is continuous at $0$? Or, is there any other route?
real-analysis limits continuity
1
Would you agree that a systematic call to check your work is associated much more closely with "seeking personal advice" rather than just asking mathematical questions?
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 12:20
@uniquesolution I'm sorry but do you disapprove of my asking questions in the manner I do? What if I arrive at a wrong conclusion during the steps of my proof? Hence my asking "Am I right?"!
â Saaqib Mahmood
Aug 14 at 13:05
I appreciate your keen efforts to study mathematics. I do think however that it takes some non-trivial presumptuousness to bombard this site with requests to practically tutor your self-study. I think that this site is not the place for that, and that's why I think such posts as yours ought to be closed on the grounds that they seek personal advice.
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 14:08
1
@uniquesolution asking to check oneâÂÂs work does not come under âÂÂseeking personal adviceâÂÂ. There is even a tag called proof-verification for the same.
â Brahadeesh
Aug 14 at 19:42
1
@uniquesolution that is pretty clearly not the intended use of the seeking personal advice close button.
â spaceisdarkgreen
Aug 14 at 19:44
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Here is Prob. 12, Sec. 5.2, in the book Introduction To Real Analysis by Robert G. Bartle & Donald R. Sherbert, 4th edition:
A function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ is said to be additive if $f(x+y)= f(x) + f(y)$ for all $x, y$ in $mathbbR$. Prove that if $f$ is continuous at some point $x_0$, then it is continuous at every point of $mathbbR$.
My Attempt:
Let $c$ be an arbitrary real number.
First suppose that $x_0 = 0$. As $f$ is continuous at the point $0$, so given any real number $varepsilon > 0$ we can find a real number $delta > 0$ such that
$$lvert f(x) rvert = lvert f(x) - 0 rvert = lvert f(x) - f(0) rvert < varepsilon $$
for all $x in mathbbR$ for which
$$ lvert x rvert = lvert x-0 rvert < delta. $$
Then
$$ lvert f(x) - f(c) rvert = lvert f( x - c ) rvert < varepsilon $$
for all $x in mathbbR$ such that
$$ lvert x-c rvert < delta. $$
Thus it follows that $f$ is continuous at every point $c in mathbbR$.
Am I right?
Now let us suppose that $x_0 neq 0$. As $f$ is continuous at $x_0$, so, for every real number $varepsilon > 0$ we can find a real number $delta > 0$ such that
$$ leftlvert f left(x - x_0 right) rightrvert = leftlvert f(x) - f left( x_0 right) rightrvert <
varepsilon $$
for all real numbers $x$ which satisfy
$$ leftlvert x- x_0 rightrvert < delta. $$
Now if we could show from here that $f$ is continuous at $0$, then as before we will have managed to show that $f$ is continuous at every real number $c$.
What next? How to proceed from here to show that our function $f$ is continuous at $0$? Or, is there any other route?
real-analysis limits continuity
Here is Prob. 12, Sec. 5.2, in the book Introduction To Real Analysis by Robert G. Bartle & Donald R. Sherbert, 4th edition:
A function $f colon mathbbR to mathbbR$ is said to be additive if $f(x+y)= f(x) + f(y)$ for all $x, y$ in $mathbbR$. Prove that if $f$ is continuous at some point $x_0$, then it is continuous at every point of $mathbbR$.
My Attempt:
Let $c$ be an arbitrary real number.
First suppose that $x_0 = 0$. As $f$ is continuous at the point $0$, so given any real number $varepsilon > 0$ we can find a real number $delta > 0$ such that
$$lvert f(x) rvert = lvert f(x) - 0 rvert = lvert f(x) - f(0) rvert < varepsilon $$
for all $x in mathbbR$ for which
$$ lvert x rvert = lvert x-0 rvert < delta. $$
Then
$$ lvert f(x) - f(c) rvert = lvert f( x - c ) rvert < varepsilon $$
for all $x in mathbbR$ such that
$$ lvert x-c rvert < delta. $$
Thus it follows that $f$ is continuous at every point $c in mathbbR$.
Am I right?
Now let us suppose that $x_0 neq 0$. As $f$ is continuous at $x_0$, so, for every real number $varepsilon > 0$ we can find a real number $delta > 0$ such that
$$ leftlvert f left(x - x_0 right) rightrvert = leftlvert f(x) - f left( x_0 right) rightrvert <
varepsilon $$
for all real numbers $x$ which satisfy
$$ leftlvert x- x_0 rightrvert < delta. $$
Now if we could show from here that $f$ is continuous at $0$, then as before we will have managed to show that $f$ is continuous at every real number $c$.
What next? How to proceed from here to show that our function $f$ is continuous at $0$? Or, is there any other route?
real-analysis limits continuity
edited Aug 14 at 18:22
John Ma
37.5k93669
37.5k93669
asked Aug 14 at 11:55
Saaqib Mahmood
7,18542169
7,18542169
1
Would you agree that a systematic call to check your work is associated much more closely with "seeking personal advice" rather than just asking mathematical questions?
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 12:20
@uniquesolution I'm sorry but do you disapprove of my asking questions in the manner I do? What if I arrive at a wrong conclusion during the steps of my proof? Hence my asking "Am I right?"!
â Saaqib Mahmood
Aug 14 at 13:05
I appreciate your keen efforts to study mathematics. I do think however that it takes some non-trivial presumptuousness to bombard this site with requests to practically tutor your self-study. I think that this site is not the place for that, and that's why I think such posts as yours ought to be closed on the grounds that they seek personal advice.
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 14:08
1
@uniquesolution asking to check oneâÂÂs work does not come under âÂÂseeking personal adviceâÂÂ. There is even a tag called proof-verification for the same.
â Brahadeesh
Aug 14 at 19:42
1
@uniquesolution that is pretty clearly not the intended use of the seeking personal advice close button.
â spaceisdarkgreen
Aug 14 at 19:44
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1
Would you agree that a systematic call to check your work is associated much more closely with "seeking personal advice" rather than just asking mathematical questions?
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 12:20
@uniquesolution I'm sorry but do you disapprove of my asking questions in the manner I do? What if I arrive at a wrong conclusion during the steps of my proof? Hence my asking "Am I right?"!
â Saaqib Mahmood
Aug 14 at 13:05
I appreciate your keen efforts to study mathematics. I do think however that it takes some non-trivial presumptuousness to bombard this site with requests to practically tutor your self-study. I think that this site is not the place for that, and that's why I think such posts as yours ought to be closed on the grounds that they seek personal advice.
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 14:08
1
@uniquesolution asking to check oneâÂÂs work does not come under âÂÂseeking personal adviceâÂÂ. There is even a tag called proof-verification for the same.
â Brahadeesh
Aug 14 at 19:42
1
@uniquesolution that is pretty clearly not the intended use of the seeking personal advice close button.
â spaceisdarkgreen
Aug 14 at 19:44
1
1
Would you agree that a systematic call to check your work is associated much more closely with "seeking personal advice" rather than just asking mathematical questions?
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 12:20
Would you agree that a systematic call to check your work is associated much more closely with "seeking personal advice" rather than just asking mathematical questions?
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 12:20
@uniquesolution I'm sorry but do you disapprove of my asking questions in the manner I do? What if I arrive at a wrong conclusion during the steps of my proof? Hence my asking "Am I right?"!
â Saaqib Mahmood
Aug 14 at 13:05
@uniquesolution I'm sorry but do you disapprove of my asking questions in the manner I do? What if I arrive at a wrong conclusion during the steps of my proof? Hence my asking "Am I right?"!
â Saaqib Mahmood
Aug 14 at 13:05
I appreciate your keen efforts to study mathematics. I do think however that it takes some non-trivial presumptuousness to bombard this site with requests to practically tutor your self-study. I think that this site is not the place for that, and that's why I think such posts as yours ought to be closed on the grounds that they seek personal advice.
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 14:08
I appreciate your keen efforts to study mathematics. I do think however that it takes some non-trivial presumptuousness to bombard this site with requests to practically tutor your self-study. I think that this site is not the place for that, and that's why I think such posts as yours ought to be closed on the grounds that they seek personal advice.
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 14:08
1
1
@uniquesolution asking to check oneâÂÂs work does not come under âÂÂseeking personal adviceâÂÂ. There is even a tag called proof-verification for the same.
â Brahadeesh
Aug 14 at 19:42
@uniquesolution asking to check oneâÂÂs work does not come under âÂÂseeking personal adviceâÂÂ. There is even a tag called proof-verification for the same.
â Brahadeesh
Aug 14 at 19:42
1
1
@uniquesolution that is pretty clearly not the intended use of the seeking personal advice close button.
â spaceisdarkgreen
Aug 14 at 19:44
@uniquesolution that is pretty clearly not the intended use of the seeking personal advice close button.
â spaceisdarkgreen
Aug 14 at 19:44
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You are almost there. Let $| t-0 | = |t| < delta$, where $delta$ is the one you have in the second box. Then $t + x_0 = xin mathbbR$, so $|t| = |x - x_0| < delta$.
Thus, $|f(t) - f(0)| = |f(t)| = |f(x-x_0)| = |f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$ for $|t| < delta$.
So $f$ is continuous at $0$.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You are almost there. Let $| t-0 | = |t| < delta$, where $delta$ is the one you have in the second box. Then $t + x_0 = xin mathbbR$, so $|t| = |x - x_0| < delta$.
Thus, $|f(t) - f(0)| = |f(t)| = |f(x-x_0)| = |f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$ for $|t| < delta$.
So $f$ is continuous at $0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You are almost there. Let $| t-0 | = |t| < delta$, where $delta$ is the one you have in the second box. Then $t + x_0 = xin mathbbR$, so $|t| = |x - x_0| < delta$.
Thus, $|f(t) - f(0)| = |f(t)| = |f(x-x_0)| = |f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$ for $|t| < delta$.
So $f$ is continuous at $0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You are almost there. Let $| t-0 | = |t| < delta$, where $delta$ is the one you have in the second box. Then $t + x_0 = xin mathbbR$, so $|t| = |x - x_0| < delta$.
Thus, $|f(t) - f(0)| = |f(t)| = |f(x-x_0)| = |f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$ for $|t| < delta$.
So $f$ is continuous at $0$.
You are almost there. Let $| t-0 | = |t| < delta$, where $delta$ is the one you have in the second box. Then $t + x_0 = xin mathbbR$, so $|t| = |x - x_0| < delta$.
Thus, $|f(t) - f(0)| = |f(t)| = |f(x-x_0)| = |f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$ for $|t| < delta$.
So $f$ is continuous at $0$.
answered Aug 14 at 19:09
CptQ
812
812
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2882366%2fprob-12-sec-5-2-in-bartle-sherberts-intro-to-real-analysis-continuity-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Would you agree that a systematic call to check your work is associated much more closely with "seeking personal advice" rather than just asking mathematical questions?
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 12:20
@uniquesolution I'm sorry but do you disapprove of my asking questions in the manner I do? What if I arrive at a wrong conclusion during the steps of my proof? Hence my asking "Am I right?"!
â Saaqib Mahmood
Aug 14 at 13:05
I appreciate your keen efforts to study mathematics. I do think however that it takes some non-trivial presumptuousness to bombard this site with requests to practically tutor your self-study. I think that this site is not the place for that, and that's why I think such posts as yours ought to be closed on the grounds that they seek personal advice.
â uniquesolution
Aug 14 at 14:08
1
@uniquesolution asking to check oneâÂÂs work does not come under âÂÂseeking personal adviceâÂÂ. There is even a tag called proof-verification for the same.
â Brahadeesh
Aug 14 at 19:42
1
@uniquesolution that is pretty clearly not the intended use of the seeking personal advice close button.
â spaceisdarkgreen
Aug 14 at 19:44