Why does $ell_p$ have infinitely many linearly independent vectors when it equals its double dual (and so is finite dimensional)?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $ell_p$ with $p in (1,infty)$ be the space of sequences which have finite $p$-norm, i.e. $(sumlimits_n=1^infty |x_n|^p)^frac1p$ is finite. Let $(ell_p)^*$ be the dual space of $ell_p$. I have just proven that we have that $(ell_p)^* = ell_q$ where $frac1p+frac1q = 1$. This then implies $(ell_p)^** = (ell_q)^* = ell_p$.



As the double dual space equals the primal space this implies (assuming AC) that $ell_p$ is finite dimensional. However if we look at the sequences $e_i$ which are $1$ in their $i^th$ position and $0$ elsewhere we notice that they belong to $ell_p$ and are linearly independent. But we have just found infinitely many linearly independent vectors in a finite dimensional space, a contradiction.



This means I must be making a mistake somewhere, however I can't quite see where, can someone please tell me where my reasoning goes wrong?







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    For a normed space, $X^**cong X$ does not imply that $X$ is finite-dimensional.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 14:15










  • For further details you may wanna look at this.
    – metamorphy
    Aug 28 at 14:22















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $ell_p$ with $p in (1,infty)$ be the space of sequences which have finite $p$-norm, i.e. $(sumlimits_n=1^infty |x_n|^p)^frac1p$ is finite. Let $(ell_p)^*$ be the dual space of $ell_p$. I have just proven that we have that $(ell_p)^* = ell_q$ where $frac1p+frac1q = 1$. This then implies $(ell_p)^** = (ell_q)^* = ell_p$.



As the double dual space equals the primal space this implies (assuming AC) that $ell_p$ is finite dimensional. However if we look at the sequences $e_i$ which are $1$ in their $i^th$ position and $0$ elsewhere we notice that they belong to $ell_p$ and are linearly independent. But we have just found infinitely many linearly independent vectors in a finite dimensional space, a contradiction.



This means I must be making a mistake somewhere, however I can't quite see where, can someone please tell me where my reasoning goes wrong?







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    For a normed space, $X^**cong X$ does not imply that $X$ is finite-dimensional.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 14:15










  • For further details you may wanna look at this.
    – metamorphy
    Aug 28 at 14:22













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $ell_p$ with $p in (1,infty)$ be the space of sequences which have finite $p$-norm, i.e. $(sumlimits_n=1^infty |x_n|^p)^frac1p$ is finite. Let $(ell_p)^*$ be the dual space of $ell_p$. I have just proven that we have that $(ell_p)^* = ell_q$ where $frac1p+frac1q = 1$. This then implies $(ell_p)^** = (ell_q)^* = ell_p$.



As the double dual space equals the primal space this implies (assuming AC) that $ell_p$ is finite dimensional. However if we look at the sequences $e_i$ which are $1$ in their $i^th$ position and $0$ elsewhere we notice that they belong to $ell_p$ and are linearly independent. But we have just found infinitely many linearly independent vectors in a finite dimensional space, a contradiction.



This means I must be making a mistake somewhere, however I can't quite see where, can someone please tell me where my reasoning goes wrong?







share|cite|improve this question












Let $ell_p$ with $p in (1,infty)$ be the space of sequences which have finite $p$-norm, i.e. $(sumlimits_n=1^infty |x_n|^p)^frac1p$ is finite. Let $(ell_p)^*$ be the dual space of $ell_p$. I have just proven that we have that $(ell_p)^* = ell_q$ where $frac1p+frac1q = 1$. This then implies $(ell_p)^** = (ell_q)^* = ell_p$.



As the double dual space equals the primal space this implies (assuming AC) that $ell_p$ is finite dimensional. However if we look at the sequences $e_i$ which are $1$ in their $i^th$ position and $0$ elsewhere we notice that they belong to $ell_p$ and are linearly independent. But we have just found infinitely many linearly independent vectors in a finite dimensional space, a contradiction.



This means I must be making a mistake somewhere, however I can't quite see where, can someone please tell me where my reasoning goes wrong?









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 28 at 14:08









Abdul Hadi Khan

421415




421415







  • 1




    For a normed space, $X^**cong X$ does not imply that $X$ is finite-dimensional.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 14:15










  • For further details you may wanna look at this.
    – metamorphy
    Aug 28 at 14:22













  • 1




    For a normed space, $X^**cong X$ does not imply that $X$ is finite-dimensional.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 14:15










  • For further details you may wanna look at this.
    – metamorphy
    Aug 28 at 14:22








1




1




For a normed space, $X^**cong X$ does not imply that $X$ is finite-dimensional.
– Aweygan
Aug 28 at 14:15




For a normed space, $X^**cong X$ does not imply that $X$ is finite-dimensional.
– Aweygan
Aug 28 at 14:15












For further details you may wanna look at this.
– metamorphy
Aug 28 at 14:22





For further details you may wanna look at this.
– metamorphy
Aug 28 at 14:22











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










There is no contradiction. One of the statements is about algebraic duals (the fact that a vector space is isomorphic to its double algebraic dual if and only if it is finite dimensional) whereas the other is about topological duals ($ell^p$ is isomorphic to its double topological dual when $pin (1,infty)$).



Indeed the topological dual may be strictly smaller than the algebraic dual when the dimension is infinite, because not all linear functionals are continuous. Because of this, the topological dual (and the double topological dual) need not be strictly bigger than the initial space. In particular, it is possible for an infinite dimensional normed space to be isomorphic to its double topological dual.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897303%2fwhy-does-ell-p-have-infinitely-many-linearly-independent-vectors-when-it-equa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    There is no contradiction. One of the statements is about algebraic duals (the fact that a vector space is isomorphic to its double algebraic dual if and only if it is finite dimensional) whereas the other is about topological duals ($ell^p$ is isomorphic to its double topological dual when $pin (1,infty)$).



    Indeed the topological dual may be strictly smaller than the algebraic dual when the dimension is infinite, because not all linear functionals are continuous. Because of this, the topological dual (and the double topological dual) need not be strictly bigger than the initial space. In particular, it is possible for an infinite dimensional normed space to be isomorphic to its double topological dual.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      There is no contradiction. One of the statements is about algebraic duals (the fact that a vector space is isomorphic to its double algebraic dual if and only if it is finite dimensional) whereas the other is about topological duals ($ell^p$ is isomorphic to its double topological dual when $pin (1,infty)$).



      Indeed the topological dual may be strictly smaller than the algebraic dual when the dimension is infinite, because not all linear functionals are continuous. Because of this, the topological dual (and the double topological dual) need not be strictly bigger than the initial space. In particular, it is possible for an infinite dimensional normed space to be isomorphic to its double topological dual.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        There is no contradiction. One of the statements is about algebraic duals (the fact that a vector space is isomorphic to its double algebraic dual if and only if it is finite dimensional) whereas the other is about topological duals ($ell^p$ is isomorphic to its double topological dual when $pin (1,infty)$).



        Indeed the topological dual may be strictly smaller than the algebraic dual when the dimension is infinite, because not all linear functionals are continuous. Because of this, the topological dual (and the double topological dual) need not be strictly bigger than the initial space. In particular, it is possible for an infinite dimensional normed space to be isomorphic to its double topological dual.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        There is no contradiction. One of the statements is about algebraic duals (the fact that a vector space is isomorphic to its double algebraic dual if and only if it is finite dimensional) whereas the other is about topological duals ($ell^p$ is isomorphic to its double topological dual when $pin (1,infty)$).



        Indeed the topological dual may be strictly smaller than the algebraic dual when the dimension is infinite, because not all linear functionals are continuous. Because of this, the topological dual (and the double topological dual) need not be strictly bigger than the initial space. In particular, it is possible for an infinite dimensional normed space to be isomorphic to its double topological dual.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 28 at 14:26









        Lorenzo Quarisa

        2,734315




        2,734315



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897303%2fwhy-does-ell-p-have-infinitely-many-linearly-independent-vectors-when-it-equa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Mutual Information Always Non-negative

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?