What is the difference between php and php7.2 packages?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Shall I install both of them and both of its modules?
apt-cache depends php
php
Depends: php7.2
And there is two packages for php cli:
apt-cache policy php7.2-cli
php7.2-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 7.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.2
Version table:
7.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 500
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 Packages
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages
7.2.3-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
The next one:
apt-cache policy php-cli
php-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:7.2+60ubuntu1
Version table:
1:7.2+60ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386 Packages
apt package-management repository
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Shall I install both of them and both of its modules?
apt-cache depends php
php
Depends: php7.2
And there is two packages for php cli:
apt-cache policy php7.2-cli
php7.2-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 7.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.2
Version table:
7.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 500
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 Packages
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages
7.2.3-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
The next one:
apt-cache policy php-cli
php-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:7.2+60ubuntu1
Version table:
1:7.2+60ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386 Packages
apt package-management repository
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Shall I install both of them and both of its modules?
apt-cache depends php
php
Depends: php7.2
And there is two packages for php cli:
apt-cache policy php7.2-cli
php7.2-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 7.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.2
Version table:
7.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 500
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 Packages
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages
7.2.3-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
The next one:
apt-cache policy php-cli
php-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:7.2+60ubuntu1
Version table:
1:7.2+60ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386 Packages
apt package-management repository
Shall I install both of them and both of its modules?
apt-cache depends php
php
Depends: php7.2
And there is two packages for php cli:
apt-cache policy php7.2-cli
php7.2-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 7.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.2
Version table:
7.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 500
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 Packages
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages
7.2.3-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
The next one:
apt-cache policy php-cli
php-cli:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:7.2+60ubuntu1
Version table:
1:7.2+60ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386 Packages
apt package-management repository
edited Aug 28 at 17:13
Braiam
49.9k20130213
49.9k20130213
asked Aug 28 at 13:19
Daniyal
5032929
5032929
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
php
is a meta package. It does not contain any software, but just links to the "correct" package via its dependency/ies.
From apt show php
:
This package is a dependency package, which depends on Debian's default
PHP version (currently 7.0).
(7.0, because I'm using 16.04)
So it is up to you whether to install php
or php7.2
. But note: with the next release upgrade, php
might get upgraded to the next version, while with php7.2
, the version is fixed which might lead to some issues after upgrading.
For the normal userî is is recommended to install the meta-package.
There are also meta-packages depending on multiple other packages, so you can install a whole software bundle with just one meta-package, e.g. unity-desktop
.
From help.ubuntu.com:
One of the handy features of apt (the packaging system used by Ubuntu) is the use of metapackages. These packages do not contain actual software, they simply depend on other packages to be installed. This setup allows entire sets of software to be installed by selecting only the appropriate metapackage
Links:
- Ubuntu Help: MetaPackages
- Related Question: What is the difference between a meta-package and a package?
It's actually recommended to install the metapackages instead of the individual packages themselves so that upgrading between releases goes more smoothly and updates PHP properly without problems. This was something strongly mentioned and discussed in the 16.04 and 18.04 cycles among the server team
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:45
Thanks, I updated the answer to point this out. Do you have a link to that discussion ?
â RoVo
Aug 28 at 13:50
Unfortunately not, it was during IRC discussions about the PHP transitions back in the 16.04 cycles on an unlogged channel. We had a lot of discussions about package transisions back in 16.04's dev cycle, but the general thought nowadays is to just install the metapackage
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The php-*
packages are metapackages which depend on the corresponding php7.2-*
packages, the latter providing the actual PHP software.
The purpose of those metapackages is to make upgrades smoother: when you upgrade to a newer Ubuntu release which provides, say, PHP 7.3, the php-*
packages will be upgraded to the newer versions, which of course will depend on the new php7.3-*
packages. Thus the new php7.3-*
packages will be automatically installed, and the old php7.2-*
ones will be marked as no longer used (and to be removed with apt autoremove
).
If you install only the php7.2-*
packages, they will work fine for now, but later you would need to install the packages for newer PHP versions manually, so yes, it is recommended to install the php-*
ones.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
php
is a meta package. It does not contain any software, but just links to the "correct" package via its dependency/ies.
From apt show php
:
This package is a dependency package, which depends on Debian's default
PHP version (currently 7.0).
(7.0, because I'm using 16.04)
So it is up to you whether to install php
or php7.2
. But note: with the next release upgrade, php
might get upgraded to the next version, while with php7.2
, the version is fixed which might lead to some issues after upgrading.
For the normal userî is is recommended to install the meta-package.
There are also meta-packages depending on multiple other packages, so you can install a whole software bundle with just one meta-package, e.g. unity-desktop
.
From help.ubuntu.com:
One of the handy features of apt (the packaging system used by Ubuntu) is the use of metapackages. These packages do not contain actual software, they simply depend on other packages to be installed. This setup allows entire sets of software to be installed by selecting only the appropriate metapackage
Links:
- Ubuntu Help: MetaPackages
- Related Question: What is the difference between a meta-package and a package?
It's actually recommended to install the metapackages instead of the individual packages themselves so that upgrading between releases goes more smoothly and updates PHP properly without problems. This was something strongly mentioned and discussed in the 16.04 and 18.04 cycles among the server team
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:45
Thanks, I updated the answer to point this out. Do you have a link to that discussion ?
â RoVo
Aug 28 at 13:50
Unfortunately not, it was during IRC discussions about the PHP transitions back in the 16.04 cycles on an unlogged channel. We had a lot of discussions about package transisions back in 16.04's dev cycle, but the general thought nowadays is to just install the metapackage
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
php
is a meta package. It does not contain any software, but just links to the "correct" package via its dependency/ies.
From apt show php
:
This package is a dependency package, which depends on Debian's default
PHP version (currently 7.0).
(7.0, because I'm using 16.04)
So it is up to you whether to install php
or php7.2
. But note: with the next release upgrade, php
might get upgraded to the next version, while with php7.2
, the version is fixed which might lead to some issues after upgrading.
For the normal userî is is recommended to install the meta-package.
There are also meta-packages depending on multiple other packages, so you can install a whole software bundle with just one meta-package, e.g. unity-desktop
.
From help.ubuntu.com:
One of the handy features of apt (the packaging system used by Ubuntu) is the use of metapackages. These packages do not contain actual software, they simply depend on other packages to be installed. This setup allows entire sets of software to be installed by selecting only the appropriate metapackage
Links:
- Ubuntu Help: MetaPackages
- Related Question: What is the difference between a meta-package and a package?
It's actually recommended to install the metapackages instead of the individual packages themselves so that upgrading between releases goes more smoothly and updates PHP properly without problems. This was something strongly mentioned and discussed in the 16.04 and 18.04 cycles among the server team
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:45
Thanks, I updated the answer to point this out. Do you have a link to that discussion ?
â RoVo
Aug 28 at 13:50
Unfortunately not, it was during IRC discussions about the PHP transitions back in the 16.04 cycles on an unlogged channel. We had a lot of discussions about package transisions back in 16.04's dev cycle, but the general thought nowadays is to just install the metapackage
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
php
is a meta package. It does not contain any software, but just links to the "correct" package via its dependency/ies.
From apt show php
:
This package is a dependency package, which depends on Debian's default
PHP version (currently 7.0).
(7.0, because I'm using 16.04)
So it is up to you whether to install php
or php7.2
. But note: with the next release upgrade, php
might get upgraded to the next version, while with php7.2
, the version is fixed which might lead to some issues after upgrading.
For the normal userî is is recommended to install the meta-package.
There are also meta-packages depending on multiple other packages, so you can install a whole software bundle with just one meta-package, e.g. unity-desktop
.
From help.ubuntu.com:
One of the handy features of apt (the packaging system used by Ubuntu) is the use of metapackages. These packages do not contain actual software, they simply depend on other packages to be installed. This setup allows entire sets of software to be installed by selecting only the appropriate metapackage
Links:
- Ubuntu Help: MetaPackages
- Related Question: What is the difference between a meta-package and a package?
php
is a meta package. It does not contain any software, but just links to the "correct" package via its dependency/ies.
From apt show php
:
This package is a dependency package, which depends on Debian's default
PHP version (currently 7.0).
(7.0, because I'm using 16.04)
So it is up to you whether to install php
or php7.2
. But note: with the next release upgrade, php
might get upgraded to the next version, while with php7.2
, the version is fixed which might lead to some issues after upgrading.
For the normal userî is is recommended to install the meta-package.
There are also meta-packages depending on multiple other packages, so you can install a whole software bundle with just one meta-package, e.g. unity-desktop
.
From help.ubuntu.com:
One of the handy features of apt (the packaging system used by Ubuntu) is the use of metapackages. These packages do not contain actual software, they simply depend on other packages to be installed. This setup allows entire sets of software to be installed by selecting only the appropriate metapackage
Links:
- Ubuntu Help: MetaPackages
- Related Question: What is the difference between a meta-package and a package?
edited Aug 28 at 13:47
answered Aug 28 at 13:24
RoVo
5,4921236
5,4921236
It's actually recommended to install the metapackages instead of the individual packages themselves so that upgrading between releases goes more smoothly and updates PHP properly without problems. This was something strongly mentioned and discussed in the 16.04 and 18.04 cycles among the server team
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:45
Thanks, I updated the answer to point this out. Do you have a link to that discussion ?
â RoVo
Aug 28 at 13:50
Unfortunately not, it was during IRC discussions about the PHP transitions back in the 16.04 cycles on an unlogged channel. We had a lot of discussions about package transisions back in 16.04's dev cycle, but the general thought nowadays is to just install the metapackage
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:55
add a comment |Â
It's actually recommended to install the metapackages instead of the individual packages themselves so that upgrading between releases goes more smoothly and updates PHP properly without problems. This was something strongly mentioned and discussed in the 16.04 and 18.04 cycles among the server team
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:45
Thanks, I updated the answer to point this out. Do you have a link to that discussion ?
â RoVo
Aug 28 at 13:50
Unfortunately not, it was during IRC discussions about the PHP transitions back in the 16.04 cycles on an unlogged channel. We had a lot of discussions about package transisions back in 16.04's dev cycle, but the general thought nowadays is to just install the metapackage
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:55
It's actually recommended to install the metapackages instead of the individual packages themselves so that upgrading between releases goes more smoothly and updates PHP properly without problems. This was something strongly mentioned and discussed in the 16.04 and 18.04 cycles among the server team
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:45
It's actually recommended to install the metapackages instead of the individual packages themselves so that upgrading between releases goes more smoothly and updates PHP properly without problems. This was something strongly mentioned and discussed in the 16.04 and 18.04 cycles among the server team
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:45
Thanks, I updated the answer to point this out. Do you have a link to that discussion ?
â RoVo
Aug 28 at 13:50
Thanks, I updated the answer to point this out. Do you have a link to that discussion ?
â RoVo
Aug 28 at 13:50
Unfortunately not, it was during IRC discussions about the PHP transitions back in the 16.04 cycles on an unlogged channel. We had a lot of discussions about package transisions back in 16.04's dev cycle, but the general thought nowadays is to just install the metapackage
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:55
Unfortunately not, it was during IRC discussions about the PHP transitions back in the 16.04 cycles on an unlogged channel. We had a lot of discussions about package transisions back in 16.04's dev cycle, but the general thought nowadays is to just install the metapackage
â Thomas Wardâ¦
Aug 28 at 13:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The php-*
packages are metapackages which depend on the corresponding php7.2-*
packages, the latter providing the actual PHP software.
The purpose of those metapackages is to make upgrades smoother: when you upgrade to a newer Ubuntu release which provides, say, PHP 7.3, the php-*
packages will be upgraded to the newer versions, which of course will depend on the new php7.3-*
packages. Thus the new php7.3-*
packages will be automatically installed, and the old php7.2-*
ones will be marked as no longer used (and to be removed with apt autoremove
).
If you install only the php7.2-*
packages, they will work fine for now, but later you would need to install the packages for newer PHP versions manually, so yes, it is recommended to install the php-*
ones.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The php-*
packages are metapackages which depend on the corresponding php7.2-*
packages, the latter providing the actual PHP software.
The purpose of those metapackages is to make upgrades smoother: when you upgrade to a newer Ubuntu release which provides, say, PHP 7.3, the php-*
packages will be upgraded to the newer versions, which of course will depend on the new php7.3-*
packages. Thus the new php7.3-*
packages will be automatically installed, and the old php7.2-*
ones will be marked as no longer used (and to be removed with apt autoremove
).
If you install only the php7.2-*
packages, they will work fine for now, but later you would need to install the packages for newer PHP versions manually, so yes, it is recommended to install the php-*
ones.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The php-*
packages are metapackages which depend on the corresponding php7.2-*
packages, the latter providing the actual PHP software.
The purpose of those metapackages is to make upgrades smoother: when you upgrade to a newer Ubuntu release which provides, say, PHP 7.3, the php-*
packages will be upgraded to the newer versions, which of course will depend on the new php7.3-*
packages. Thus the new php7.3-*
packages will be automatically installed, and the old php7.2-*
ones will be marked as no longer used (and to be removed with apt autoremove
).
If you install only the php7.2-*
packages, they will work fine for now, but later you would need to install the packages for newer PHP versions manually, so yes, it is recommended to install the php-*
ones.
The php-*
packages are metapackages which depend on the corresponding php7.2-*
packages, the latter providing the actual PHP software.
The purpose of those metapackages is to make upgrades smoother: when you upgrade to a newer Ubuntu release which provides, say, PHP 7.3, the php-*
packages will be upgraded to the newer versions, which of course will depend on the new php7.3-*
packages. Thus the new php7.3-*
packages will be automatically installed, and the old php7.2-*
ones will be marked as no longer used (and to be removed with apt autoremove
).
If you install only the php7.2-*
packages, they will work fine for now, but later you would need to install the packages for newer PHP versions manually, so yes, it is recommended to install the php-*
ones.
answered Aug 28 at 13:28
fkraiem
8,43321727
8,43321727
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1069744%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-php-and-php7-2-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password