Order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to find the order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$. I have this result
Let
$$f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n$$
be an entire function, non-constant and with finite order. Then, the order is given by
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log.$$
I've tried to apply this previous theorem to get (using Stirling's approximation)
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log=
limsup_nto infty fracnlog n(2n+1)log(2n+1)-2n-1=frac12.$$
However, the result should be $1$. I suspect that I cannot use this result because $a_2n=0$ is this case, and this will give problems in the expression.
How should I proceed?
complex-analysis entire-functions
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to find the order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$. I have this result
Let
$$f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n$$
be an entire function, non-constant and with finite order. Then, the order is given by
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log.$$
I've tried to apply this previous theorem to get (using Stirling's approximation)
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log=
limsup_nto infty fracnlog n(2n+1)log(2n+1)-2n-1=frac12.$$
However, the result should be $1$. I suspect that I cannot use this result because $a_2n=0$ is this case, and this will give problems in the expression.
How should I proceed?
complex-analysis entire-functions
I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
â Mostafa Ayaz
Aug 28 at 15:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to find the order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$. I have this result
Let
$$f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n$$
be an entire function, non-constant and with finite order. Then, the order is given by
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log.$$
I've tried to apply this previous theorem to get (using Stirling's approximation)
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log=
limsup_nto infty fracnlog n(2n+1)log(2n+1)-2n-1=frac12.$$
However, the result should be $1$. I suspect that I cannot use this result because $a_2n=0$ is this case, and this will give problems in the expression.
How should I proceed?
complex-analysis entire-functions
I want to find the order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$. I have this result
Let
$$f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n$$
be an entire function, non-constant and with finite order. Then, the order is given by
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log.$$
I've tried to apply this previous theorem to get (using Stirling's approximation)
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log=
limsup_nto infty fracnlog n(2n+1)log(2n+1)-2n-1=frac12.$$
However, the result should be $1$. I suspect that I cannot use this result because $a_2n=0$ is this case, and this will give problems in the expression.
How should I proceed?
complex-analysis entire-functions
asked Aug 28 at 15:40
user326159
1,179722
1,179722
I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
â Mostafa Ayaz
Aug 28 at 15:51
add a comment |Â
I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
â Mostafa Ayaz
Aug 28 at 15:51
I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
â Mostafa Ayaz
Aug 28 at 15:51
I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
â Mostafa Ayaz
Aug 28 at 15:51
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as
$$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
$$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.
P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as
$$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
$$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.
P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as
$$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
$$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.
P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as
$$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
$$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.
P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$
First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as
$$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
$$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.
P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$
answered Aug 28 at 15:49
João Ramos
1,044719
1,044719
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897414%2forder-of-the-entire-function-fz-sinz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
â Mostafa Ayaz
Aug 28 at 15:51