Order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to find the order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$. I have this result




Let
$$f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n$$
be an entire function, non-constant and with finite order. Then, the order is given by
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log.$$




I've tried to apply this previous theorem to get (using Stirling's approximation)
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log=
limsup_nto infty fracnlog n(2n+1)log(2n+1)-2n-1=frac12.$$
However, the result should be $1$. I suspect that I cannot use this result because $a_2n=0$ is this case, and this will give problems in the expression.



How should I proceed?







share|cite|improve this question




















  • I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Aug 28 at 15:51














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to find the order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$. I have this result




Let
$$f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n$$
be an entire function, non-constant and with finite order. Then, the order is given by
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log.$$




I've tried to apply this previous theorem to get (using Stirling's approximation)
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log=
limsup_nto infty fracnlog n(2n+1)log(2n+1)-2n-1=frac12.$$
However, the result should be $1$. I suspect that I cannot use this result because $a_2n=0$ is this case, and this will give problems in the expression.



How should I proceed?







share|cite|improve this question




















  • I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Aug 28 at 15:51












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I want to find the order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$. I have this result




Let
$$f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n$$
be an entire function, non-constant and with finite order. Then, the order is given by
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log.$$




I've tried to apply this previous theorem to get (using Stirling's approximation)
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log=
limsup_nto infty fracnlog n(2n+1)log(2n+1)-2n-1=frac12.$$
However, the result should be $1$. I suspect that I cannot use this result because $a_2n=0$ is this case, and this will give problems in the expression.



How should I proceed?







share|cite|improve this question












I want to find the order of the entire function $f(z)=sin(z)$. I have this result




Let
$$f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n$$
be an entire function, non-constant and with finite order. Then, the order is given by
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log.$$




I've tried to apply this previous theorem to get (using Stirling's approximation)
$$lambda=limsup_nto infty fracnlog n-log=
limsup_nto infty fracnlog n(2n+1)log(2n+1)-2n-1=frac12.$$
However, the result should be $1$. I suspect that I cannot use this result because $a_2n=0$ is this case, and this will give problems in the expression.



How should I proceed?









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 28 at 15:40









user326159

1,179722




1,179722











  • I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Aug 28 at 15:51
















  • I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Aug 28 at 15:51















I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
– Mostafa Ayaz
Aug 28 at 15:51




I think you have missed a $sqrt2pi n$ in Stirling's approximation
– Mostafa Ayaz
Aug 28 at 15:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as



$$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
$$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.



P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897414%2forder-of-the-entire-function-fz-sinz%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as



    $$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
    for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
    $$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
    where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.



    P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as



      $$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
      for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
      $$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
      where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.



      P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as



        $$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
        for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
        $$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
        where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.



        P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        First of all, the order of $sin(z)$ is the same as the order of $fracsin(z)z.$ This, in turn, can be written as



        $$ fracsin(z)z = g(z^2),$$
        for some entire $g$. Thus, the order of $sin(z)$ is twice the order of this $g$. But, from the Taylor coefficients of the sine function, we know that this $g$ can be written as
        $$ g(z) = sum_n=0^infty b_n z^n,$$
        where $b_n = frac(-1)^n(2n+1)!.$ Now you are allowed to use your result, together with Stirling's formula, to conclude.



        P.S.: Notice also that the way you applied this result is slightly inaccurate, due to the fact that the given approximation holds only for $a_2n$, which implies there should be a $(2n)log(2n)$ in the numerator instead of $n log n.$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 28 at 15:49









        João Ramos

        1,044719




        1,044719



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897414%2forder-of-the-entire-function-fz-sinz%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Carbon dioxide

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?