ring contains a subring isomorphic to $Z$ implies it is integral domain?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If a ring contains a subring isomorphic to $Z$,does it necessarily imply that the ring must be an integral domain?
I know that it must have characteristic 0.However I cannot proceed further.
ring-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If a ring contains a subring isomorphic to $Z$,does it necessarily imply that the ring must be an integral domain?
I know that it must have characteristic 0.However I cannot proceed further.
ring-theory
This means every algebra over a field is an integral domain. Counter-example: $K[X]/(X^2)$.
â Bernard
Aug 28 at 14:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If a ring contains a subring isomorphic to $Z$,does it necessarily imply that the ring must be an integral domain?
I know that it must have characteristic 0.However I cannot proceed further.
ring-theory
If a ring contains a subring isomorphic to $Z$,does it necessarily imply that the ring must be an integral domain?
I know that it must have characteristic 0.However I cannot proceed further.
ring-theory
asked Aug 28 at 14:34
Anwi
338112
338112
This means every algebra over a field is an integral domain. Counter-example: $K[X]/(X^2)$.
â Bernard
Aug 28 at 14:36
add a comment |Â
This means every algebra over a field is an integral domain. Counter-example: $K[X]/(X^2)$.
â Bernard
Aug 28 at 14:36
This means every algebra over a field is an integral domain. Counter-example: $K[X]/(X^2)$.
â Bernard
Aug 28 at 14:36
This means every algebra over a field is an integral domain. Counter-example: $K[X]/(X^2)$.
â Bernard
Aug 28 at 14:36
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
In general, no. Take $mathbbZtimes R$, where $R$ is a unit ring. It is not an integral domain, since $(1,0).(0,1)=(0,0)=0$. But it contains a subring isomorphic to the integers.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
No; consider the ring $mathbb Z[epsilon]/(epsilon^2)$. That is, the ring consisting of elements of the form
$$
a + bepsilonqquad a,binmathbb Z,
$$
with obvious addition and multiplication given by
$$
(a + bepsilon)(c + depsilon) = ac + (ad + bc)epsilon.
$$
Then $epsilon^2 = 0$, even though $epsilon neq 0$.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
In general, no. Take $mathbbZtimes R$, where $R$ is a unit ring. It is not an integral domain, since $(1,0).(0,1)=(0,0)=0$. But it contains a subring isomorphic to the integers.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
In general, no. Take $mathbbZtimes R$, where $R$ is a unit ring. It is not an integral domain, since $(1,0).(0,1)=(0,0)=0$. But it contains a subring isomorphic to the integers.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
In general, no. Take $mathbbZtimes R$, where $R$ is a unit ring. It is not an integral domain, since $(1,0).(0,1)=(0,0)=0$. But it contains a subring isomorphic to the integers.
In general, no. Take $mathbbZtimes R$, where $R$ is a unit ring. It is not an integral domain, since $(1,0).(0,1)=(0,0)=0$. But it contains a subring isomorphic to the integers.
answered Aug 28 at 14:37
José Carlos Santos
120k16101182
120k16101182
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
No; consider the ring $mathbb Z[epsilon]/(epsilon^2)$. That is, the ring consisting of elements of the form
$$
a + bepsilonqquad a,binmathbb Z,
$$
with obvious addition and multiplication given by
$$
(a + bepsilon)(c + depsilon) = ac + (ad + bc)epsilon.
$$
Then $epsilon^2 = 0$, even though $epsilon neq 0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
No; consider the ring $mathbb Z[epsilon]/(epsilon^2)$. That is, the ring consisting of elements of the form
$$
a + bepsilonqquad a,binmathbb Z,
$$
with obvious addition and multiplication given by
$$
(a + bepsilon)(c + depsilon) = ac + (ad + bc)epsilon.
$$
Then $epsilon^2 = 0$, even though $epsilon neq 0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
No; consider the ring $mathbb Z[epsilon]/(epsilon^2)$. That is, the ring consisting of elements of the form
$$
a + bepsilonqquad a,binmathbb Z,
$$
with obvious addition and multiplication given by
$$
(a + bepsilon)(c + depsilon) = ac + (ad + bc)epsilon.
$$
Then $epsilon^2 = 0$, even though $epsilon neq 0$.
No; consider the ring $mathbb Z[epsilon]/(epsilon^2)$. That is, the ring consisting of elements of the form
$$
a + bepsilonqquad a,binmathbb Z,
$$
with obvious addition and multiplication given by
$$
(a + bepsilon)(c + depsilon) = ac + (ad + bc)epsilon.
$$
Then $epsilon^2 = 0$, even though $epsilon neq 0$.
answered Aug 28 at 14:36
Mees de Vries
14.1k12348
14.1k12348
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897332%2fring-contains-a-subring-isomorphic-to-z-implies-it-is-integral-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
This means every algebra over a field is an integral domain. Counter-example: $K[X]/(X^2)$.
â Bernard
Aug 28 at 14:36