Location and nature of all the stationary points of function

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Just wanted to check if this was right before I proceed



f(x,y)=$2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$



which gives



$frac∂f∂x$ = $6x^2 + 6y^2 -150$



Then doing the same with y gives



$frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$



To find the stationary points, I have to make the derivatives 0 which gives me



$frac∂f∂x$ = $6x^2 + 6y^2 -150$ = $0$
and $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$ = $0$



rearranging $frac∂f∂x$= $0$ gives me $y^2 = -x^2 + 25$



I proceed to sub this into $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$ = $0$



This gives me $-12x^2 + 60x + 9x^2 - 225 = 0$



and putting it into quadratic eqtn and then factorising, I get $x=5$ and $x=15$



This is where I get confused, do these numbers sound right and if so, do I place the x coordinates into the original eqtn to get y coordinates?



how many stationary points in total?







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Just wanted to check if this was right before I proceed



    f(x,y)=$2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$



    which gives



    $frac∂f∂x$ = $6x^2 + 6y^2 -150$



    Then doing the same with y gives



    $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$



    To find the stationary points, I have to make the derivatives 0 which gives me



    $frac∂f∂x$ = $6x^2 + 6y^2 -150$ = $0$
    and $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$ = $0$



    rearranging $frac∂f∂x$= $0$ gives me $y^2 = -x^2 + 25$



    I proceed to sub this into $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$ = $0$



    This gives me $-12x^2 + 60x + 9x^2 - 225 = 0$



    and putting it into quadratic eqtn and then factorising, I get $x=5$ and $x=15$



    This is where I get confused, do these numbers sound right and if so, do I place the x coordinates into the original eqtn to get y coordinates?



    how many stationary points in total?







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Just wanted to check if this was right before I proceed



      f(x,y)=$2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$



      which gives



      $frac∂f∂x$ = $6x^2 + 6y^2 -150$



      Then doing the same with y gives



      $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$



      To find the stationary points, I have to make the derivatives 0 which gives me



      $frac∂f∂x$ = $6x^2 + 6y^2 -150$ = $0$
      and $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$ = $0$



      rearranging $frac∂f∂x$= $0$ gives me $y^2 = -x^2 + 25$



      I proceed to sub this into $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$ = $0$



      This gives me $-12x^2 + 60x + 9x^2 - 225 = 0$



      and putting it into quadratic eqtn and then factorising, I get $x=5$ and $x=15$



      This is where I get confused, do these numbers sound right and if so, do I place the x coordinates into the original eqtn to get y coordinates?



      how many stationary points in total?







      share|cite|improve this question












      Just wanted to check if this was right before I proceed



      f(x,y)=$2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$



      which gives



      $frac∂f∂x$ = $6x^2 + 6y^2 -150$



      Then doing the same with y gives



      $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$



      To find the stationary points, I have to make the derivatives 0 which gives me



      $frac∂f∂x$ = $6x^2 + 6y^2 -150$ = $0$
      and $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$ = $0$



      rearranging $frac∂f∂x$= $0$ gives me $y^2 = -x^2 + 25$



      I proceed to sub this into $frac∂f∂y$ = $12xy -9y^2$ = $0$



      This gives me $-12x^2 + 60x + 9x^2 - 225 = 0$



      and putting it into quadratic eqtn and then factorising, I get $x=5$ and $x=15$



      This is where I get confused, do these numbers sound right and if so, do I place the x coordinates into the original eqtn to get y coordinates?



      how many stationary points in total?









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 28 at 14:49









      John Camary

      94




      94




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          You are substituting incorrectly. Here is the right way for $f(x,y)=2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$:
          $$begincasesf_x=6x^2+6y^2-150=0\
          f_y=12xy-9y^2=0endcases Rightarrow begincasesx^2+y^2=25\ y(4x-3y)=0endcases Rightarrow \
          1) y=0 Rightarrow x^2+0^2=25 Rightarrow x=pm5;\
          2) 4x-3y=0 Rightarrow x=frac34y Rightarrow left(frac34yright)^2+y^2=25 Rightarrow y^2=16 Rightarrow y=pm 4 Rightarrow x=pm3.$$
          Hence, the stationary points are:
          $$(x,y)=(5,0), (-5,0), (3,4), (-3,-4).$$
          Note that once you set first order derivatives equal to zero, you must solve the system of equations to find $(x,y)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • How did you know to use y=0 for the first part 1)?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 16:00










          • the second equation: $y(4x-3y)=0 Rightarrow 1) y=0; 2) 4x-3y=0$.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 16:03










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. I can do this but it then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:18











          • Approximate change: $Delta fapprox f_xDelta x+f_yDelta y$ (plug $(x,y)=(0,1)). $ Exact (true) change: $f(0.005,0.998)-f(0,1)$. You must calculate both and find the difference.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 19:28


















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Your approach for finding the stationary points is right unless you also have to check the hessian matrix in the points obtained. For example let $$g(x,y)=x^2-y^2$$the only candidate for stationary point is when $(x,y)=(0,0)$ but we know that this point is not stationary (it is a saddle point). For the candidate you obtained we have $$H=beginbmatrixdfracpartial^2fpartial x^2&dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y\dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y&dfracpartial^2fpartial y^2endbmatrix_(x,y)=(5,15)=beginbmatrix12x&12y\12y&12x-18yendbmatrix$$if a point is supposed to be stationary we must have the hessian matrix semi positive definite in that point. Surely $x=15$ is invalid since $y^2$ becomes negative therefore we have two candidates$$(5,0),(-5,0)$$and $$H_(5,0)=60I>0\H_(-5,0)=-60I<0$$so $(5,0)$ is the only stationary point.



          Here is a depict of the function



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Both these posts are giving different answers which is a little confusing, can anyone spot which one is the correct solution?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:21










          • I also added an illustration of the function to prove the theory. Hope it helps...
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:23











          • Is this method similar to the Test to Determine the Nature of Stationary Points using fxx * fyy - (fxy)^2 ?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:27










          • Yes. But in a special case with $n=2$. The method of hessian is the generalized version of it when $n>2$ for example $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$ has a stationary point in $(0,0)$ because $nabla f(0,0)=0$ and $H_(0,0)=2I>0$
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:29










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. Do I do (fx)* δx + (fy) * δy It then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:41











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897352%2flocation-and-nature-of-all-the-stationary-points-of-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          You are substituting incorrectly. Here is the right way for $f(x,y)=2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$:
          $$begincasesf_x=6x^2+6y^2-150=0\
          f_y=12xy-9y^2=0endcases Rightarrow begincasesx^2+y^2=25\ y(4x-3y)=0endcases Rightarrow \
          1) y=0 Rightarrow x^2+0^2=25 Rightarrow x=pm5;\
          2) 4x-3y=0 Rightarrow x=frac34y Rightarrow left(frac34yright)^2+y^2=25 Rightarrow y^2=16 Rightarrow y=pm 4 Rightarrow x=pm3.$$
          Hence, the stationary points are:
          $$(x,y)=(5,0), (-5,0), (3,4), (-3,-4).$$
          Note that once you set first order derivatives equal to zero, you must solve the system of equations to find $(x,y)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • How did you know to use y=0 for the first part 1)?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 16:00










          • the second equation: $y(4x-3y)=0 Rightarrow 1) y=0; 2) 4x-3y=0$.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 16:03










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. I can do this but it then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:18











          • Approximate change: $Delta fapprox f_xDelta x+f_yDelta y$ (plug $(x,y)=(0,1)). $ Exact (true) change: $f(0.005,0.998)-f(0,1)$. You must calculate both and find the difference.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 19:28















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          You are substituting incorrectly. Here is the right way for $f(x,y)=2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$:
          $$begincasesf_x=6x^2+6y^2-150=0\
          f_y=12xy-9y^2=0endcases Rightarrow begincasesx^2+y^2=25\ y(4x-3y)=0endcases Rightarrow \
          1) y=0 Rightarrow x^2+0^2=25 Rightarrow x=pm5;\
          2) 4x-3y=0 Rightarrow x=frac34y Rightarrow left(frac34yright)^2+y^2=25 Rightarrow y^2=16 Rightarrow y=pm 4 Rightarrow x=pm3.$$
          Hence, the stationary points are:
          $$(x,y)=(5,0), (-5,0), (3,4), (-3,-4).$$
          Note that once you set first order derivatives equal to zero, you must solve the system of equations to find $(x,y)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • How did you know to use y=0 for the first part 1)?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 16:00










          • the second equation: $y(4x-3y)=0 Rightarrow 1) y=0; 2) 4x-3y=0$.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 16:03










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. I can do this but it then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:18











          • Approximate change: $Delta fapprox f_xDelta x+f_yDelta y$ (plug $(x,y)=(0,1)). $ Exact (true) change: $f(0.005,0.998)-f(0,1)$. You must calculate both and find the difference.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 19:28













          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          You are substituting incorrectly. Here is the right way for $f(x,y)=2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$:
          $$begincasesf_x=6x^2+6y^2-150=0\
          f_y=12xy-9y^2=0endcases Rightarrow begincasesx^2+y^2=25\ y(4x-3y)=0endcases Rightarrow \
          1) y=0 Rightarrow x^2+0^2=25 Rightarrow x=pm5;\
          2) 4x-3y=0 Rightarrow x=frac34y Rightarrow left(frac34yright)^2+y^2=25 Rightarrow y^2=16 Rightarrow y=pm 4 Rightarrow x=pm3.$$
          Hence, the stationary points are:
          $$(x,y)=(5,0), (-5,0), (3,4), (-3,-4).$$
          Note that once you set first order derivatives equal to zero, you must solve the system of equations to find $(x,y)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You are substituting incorrectly. Here is the right way for $f(x,y)=2x^3 + 6xy^2 - 3y^3 - 150x$:
          $$begincasesf_x=6x^2+6y^2-150=0\
          f_y=12xy-9y^2=0endcases Rightarrow begincasesx^2+y^2=25\ y(4x-3y)=0endcases Rightarrow \
          1) y=0 Rightarrow x^2+0^2=25 Rightarrow x=pm5;\
          2) 4x-3y=0 Rightarrow x=frac34y Rightarrow left(frac34yright)^2+y^2=25 Rightarrow y^2=16 Rightarrow y=pm 4 Rightarrow x=pm3.$$
          Hence, the stationary points are:
          $$(x,y)=(5,0), (-5,0), (3,4), (-3,-4).$$
          Note that once you set first order derivatives equal to zero, you must solve the system of equations to find $(x,y)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 28 at 15:08









          farruhota

          15.1k2734




          15.1k2734











          • How did you know to use y=0 for the first part 1)?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 16:00










          • the second equation: $y(4x-3y)=0 Rightarrow 1) y=0; 2) 4x-3y=0$.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 16:03










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. I can do this but it then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:18











          • Approximate change: $Delta fapprox f_xDelta x+f_yDelta y$ (plug $(x,y)=(0,1)). $ Exact (true) change: $f(0.005,0.998)-f(0,1)$. You must calculate both and find the difference.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 19:28

















          • How did you know to use y=0 for the first part 1)?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 16:00










          • the second equation: $y(4x-3y)=0 Rightarrow 1) y=0; 2) 4x-3y=0$.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 16:03










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. I can do this but it then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:18











          • Approximate change: $Delta fapprox f_xDelta x+f_yDelta y$ (plug $(x,y)=(0,1)). $ Exact (true) change: $f(0.005,0.998)-f(0,1)$. You must calculate both and find the difference.
            – farruhota
            Aug 28 at 19:28
















          How did you know to use y=0 for the first part 1)?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 16:00




          How did you know to use y=0 for the first part 1)?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 16:00












          the second equation: $y(4x-3y)=0 Rightarrow 1) y=0; 2) 4x-3y=0$.
          – farruhota
          Aug 28 at 16:03




          the second equation: $y(4x-3y)=0 Rightarrow 1) y=0; 2) 4x-3y=0$.
          – farruhota
          Aug 28 at 16:03












          Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. I can do this but it then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 18:18





          Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. I can do this but it then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 18:18













          Approximate change: $Delta fapprox f_xDelta x+f_yDelta y$ (plug $(x,y)=(0,1)). $ Exact (true) change: $f(0.005,0.998)-f(0,1)$. You must calculate both and find the difference.
          – farruhota
          Aug 28 at 19:28





          Approximate change: $Delta fapprox f_xDelta x+f_yDelta y$ (plug $(x,y)=(0,1)). $ Exact (true) change: $f(0.005,0.998)-f(0,1)$. You must calculate both and find the difference.
          – farruhota
          Aug 28 at 19:28











          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Your approach for finding the stationary points is right unless you also have to check the hessian matrix in the points obtained. For example let $$g(x,y)=x^2-y^2$$the only candidate for stationary point is when $(x,y)=(0,0)$ but we know that this point is not stationary (it is a saddle point). For the candidate you obtained we have $$H=beginbmatrixdfracpartial^2fpartial x^2&dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y\dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y&dfracpartial^2fpartial y^2endbmatrix_(x,y)=(5,15)=beginbmatrix12x&12y\12y&12x-18yendbmatrix$$if a point is supposed to be stationary we must have the hessian matrix semi positive definite in that point. Surely $x=15$ is invalid since $y^2$ becomes negative therefore we have two candidates$$(5,0),(-5,0)$$and $$H_(5,0)=60I>0\H_(-5,0)=-60I<0$$so $(5,0)$ is the only stationary point.



          Here is a depict of the function



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Both these posts are giving different answers which is a little confusing, can anyone spot which one is the correct solution?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:21










          • I also added an illustration of the function to prove the theory. Hope it helps...
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:23











          • Is this method similar to the Test to Determine the Nature of Stationary Points using fxx * fyy - (fxy)^2 ?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:27










          • Yes. But in a special case with $n=2$. The method of hessian is the generalized version of it when $n>2$ for example $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$ has a stationary point in $(0,0)$ because $nabla f(0,0)=0$ and $H_(0,0)=2I>0$
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:29










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. Do I do (fx)* δx + (fy) * δy It then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:41















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Your approach for finding the stationary points is right unless you also have to check the hessian matrix in the points obtained. For example let $$g(x,y)=x^2-y^2$$the only candidate for stationary point is when $(x,y)=(0,0)$ but we know that this point is not stationary (it is a saddle point). For the candidate you obtained we have $$H=beginbmatrixdfracpartial^2fpartial x^2&dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y\dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y&dfracpartial^2fpartial y^2endbmatrix_(x,y)=(5,15)=beginbmatrix12x&12y\12y&12x-18yendbmatrix$$if a point is supposed to be stationary we must have the hessian matrix semi positive definite in that point. Surely $x=15$ is invalid since $y^2$ becomes negative therefore we have two candidates$$(5,0),(-5,0)$$and $$H_(5,0)=60I>0\H_(-5,0)=-60I<0$$so $(5,0)$ is the only stationary point.



          Here is a depict of the function



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Both these posts are giving different answers which is a little confusing, can anyone spot which one is the correct solution?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:21










          • I also added an illustration of the function to prove the theory. Hope it helps...
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:23











          • Is this method similar to the Test to Determine the Nature of Stationary Points using fxx * fyy - (fxy)^2 ?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:27










          • Yes. But in a special case with $n=2$. The method of hessian is the generalized version of it when $n>2$ for example $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$ has a stationary point in $(0,0)$ because $nabla f(0,0)=0$ and $H_(0,0)=2I>0$
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:29










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. Do I do (fx)* δx + (fy) * δy It then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:41













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Your approach for finding the stationary points is right unless you also have to check the hessian matrix in the points obtained. For example let $$g(x,y)=x^2-y^2$$the only candidate for stationary point is when $(x,y)=(0,0)$ but we know that this point is not stationary (it is a saddle point). For the candidate you obtained we have $$H=beginbmatrixdfracpartial^2fpartial x^2&dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y\dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y&dfracpartial^2fpartial y^2endbmatrix_(x,y)=(5,15)=beginbmatrix12x&12y\12y&12x-18yendbmatrix$$if a point is supposed to be stationary we must have the hessian matrix semi positive definite in that point. Surely $x=15$ is invalid since $y^2$ becomes negative therefore we have two candidates$$(5,0),(-5,0)$$and $$H_(5,0)=60I>0\H_(-5,0)=-60I<0$$so $(5,0)$ is the only stationary point.



          Here is a depict of the function



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Your approach for finding the stationary points is right unless you also have to check the hessian matrix in the points obtained. For example let $$g(x,y)=x^2-y^2$$the only candidate for stationary point is when $(x,y)=(0,0)$ but we know that this point is not stationary (it is a saddle point). For the candidate you obtained we have $$H=beginbmatrixdfracpartial^2fpartial x^2&dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y\dfracpartial^2fpartial xpartial y&dfracpartial^2fpartial y^2endbmatrix_(x,y)=(5,15)=beginbmatrix12x&12y\12y&12x-18yendbmatrix$$if a point is supposed to be stationary we must have the hessian matrix semi positive definite in that point. Surely $x=15$ is invalid since $y^2$ becomes negative therefore we have two candidates$$(5,0),(-5,0)$$and $$H_(5,0)=60I>0\H_(-5,0)=-60I<0$$so $(5,0)$ is the only stationary point.



          Here is a depict of the function



          enter image description here







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 28 at 15:22

























          answered Aug 28 at 15:11









          Mostafa Ayaz

          10.1k3730




          10.1k3730











          • Both these posts are giving different answers which is a little confusing, can anyone spot which one is the correct solution?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:21










          • I also added an illustration of the function to prove the theory. Hope it helps...
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:23











          • Is this method similar to the Test to Determine the Nature of Stationary Points using fxx * fyy - (fxy)^2 ?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:27










          • Yes. But in a special case with $n=2$. The method of hessian is the generalized version of it when $n>2$ for example $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$ has a stationary point in $(0,0)$ because $nabla f(0,0)=0$ and $H_(0,0)=2I>0$
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:29










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. Do I do (fx)* δx + (fy) * δy It then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:41

















          • Both these posts are giving different answers which is a little confusing, can anyone spot which one is the correct solution?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:21










          • I also added an illustration of the function to prove the theory. Hope it helps...
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:23











          • Is this method similar to the Test to Determine the Nature of Stationary Points using fxx * fyy - (fxy)^2 ?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 15:27










          • Yes. But in a special case with $n=2$. The method of hessian is the generalized version of it when $n>2$ for example $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$ has a stationary point in $(0,0)$ because $nabla f(0,0)=0$ and $H_(0,0)=2I>0$
            – Mostafa Ayaz
            Aug 28 at 15:29










          • Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. Do I do (fx)* δx + (fy) * δy It then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
            – John Camary
            Aug 28 at 18:41
















          Both these posts are giving different answers which is a little confusing, can anyone spot which one is the correct solution?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 15:21




          Both these posts are giving different answers which is a little confusing, can anyone spot which one is the correct solution?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 15:21












          I also added an illustration of the function to prove the theory. Hope it helps...
          – Mostafa Ayaz
          Aug 28 at 15:23





          I also added an illustration of the function to prove the theory. Hope it helps...
          – Mostafa Ayaz
          Aug 28 at 15:23













          Is this method similar to the Test to Determine the Nature of Stationary Points using fxx * fyy - (fxy)^2 ?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 15:27




          Is this method similar to the Test to Determine the Nature of Stationary Points using fxx * fyy - (fxy)^2 ?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 15:27












          Yes. But in a special case with $n=2$. The method of hessian is the generalized version of it when $n>2$ for example $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$ has a stationary point in $(0,0)$ because $nabla f(0,0)=0$ and $H_(0,0)=2I>0$
          – Mostafa Ayaz
          Aug 28 at 15:29




          Yes. But in a special case with $n=2$. The method of hessian is the generalized version of it when $n>2$ for example $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$ has a stationary point in $(0,0)$ because $nabla f(0,0)=0$ and $H_(0,0)=2I>0$
          – Mostafa Ayaz
          Aug 28 at 15:29












          Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. Do I do (fx)* δx + (fy) * δy It then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 18:41





          Thank you, the 2nd part of the question also asks me use partial derivatives to estimate the change in f(x,y) at the point (0,1) by changing x by δx = 0.005 and y by δy = −0.002. Do I do (fx)* δx + (fy) * δy It then asks me to compare with true change given here : f(0.005,0.998)−f(0,1). I just don't know how to convert this into a number?
          – John Camary
          Aug 28 at 18:41


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897352%2flocation-and-nature-of-all-the-stationary-points-of-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          EsEgSWkJKeuh8EI,O,iq,jl,Jpsiwb,BEfUmywiXzN4mOffe,fXpBg,jR epgIjbo0HIKSo683
          gHIyR,LOvECI9o7Z 7,VqTn,C ES91fTxON9dE 28LVF3fgtKuyTsm2fUxYdxgxYNos NOloo,tm

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Propositional logic and tautologies

          Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility