Solve DE by Laplace transformation: $y'' + y = 8e^-2t sin t$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2












The differential equation is as follows



$$begincases
y'' + y = 8e^-2t sin t \
y(0)=0 \y'(0)=0
endcases$$



How do I solve it by Laplace transformation?



In my solution I've taken the Laplace transform of both sides and got to the solution of the transformed equation $$mathcal Ly = frac8[(s-2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ but I'm stuck, I don't know how to take the inverse Laplace transform to get the solution to the DE.







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 4




    Hello and welcome. This looks like a pretty straightforward problem. How far did you get and and where are you stuck?
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 28 at 17:07










  • I am here y(s) =8/[(s+2)^2+(1)^2】[s^2+1] and then I will apply laplace inverse to y(s) and I m not able to factorise the denominator and partial fraction so that I can get a,b,c or d value
    – Diwakar Yadav
    Aug 28 at 17:10







  • 2




    Good! Please put that into the body of your question. We have a real problem here with students just pasting their homework into the box and expecting full solutions. Showing that you're not one of those students will help you out.
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 28 at 17:20














up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2












The differential equation is as follows



$$begincases
y'' + y = 8e^-2t sin t \
y(0)=0 \y'(0)=0
endcases$$



How do I solve it by Laplace transformation?



In my solution I've taken the Laplace transform of both sides and got to the solution of the transformed equation $$mathcal Ly = frac8[(s-2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ but I'm stuck, I don't know how to take the inverse Laplace transform to get the solution to the DE.







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 4




    Hello and welcome. This looks like a pretty straightforward problem. How far did you get and and where are you stuck?
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 28 at 17:07










  • I am here y(s) =8/[(s+2)^2+(1)^2】[s^2+1] and then I will apply laplace inverse to y(s) and I m not able to factorise the denominator and partial fraction so that I can get a,b,c or d value
    – Diwakar Yadav
    Aug 28 at 17:10







  • 2




    Good! Please put that into the body of your question. We have a real problem here with students just pasting their homework into the box and expecting full solutions. Showing that you're not one of those students will help you out.
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 28 at 17:20












up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2






2





The differential equation is as follows



$$begincases
y'' + y = 8e^-2t sin t \
y(0)=0 \y'(0)=0
endcases$$



How do I solve it by Laplace transformation?



In my solution I've taken the Laplace transform of both sides and got to the solution of the transformed equation $$mathcal Ly = frac8[(s-2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ but I'm stuck, I don't know how to take the inverse Laplace transform to get the solution to the DE.







share|cite|improve this question














The differential equation is as follows



$$begincases
y'' + y = 8e^-2t sin t \
y(0)=0 \y'(0)=0
endcases$$



How do I solve it by Laplace transformation?



In my solution I've taken the Laplace transform of both sides and got to the solution of the transformed equation $$mathcal Ly = frac8[(s-2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ but I'm stuck, I don't know how to take the inverse Laplace transform to get the solution to the DE.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 28 at 18:16









Davide Morgante

2,550623




2,550623










asked Aug 28 at 17:01









Diwakar Yadav

162




162







  • 4




    Hello and welcome. This looks like a pretty straightforward problem. How far did you get and and where are you stuck?
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 28 at 17:07










  • I am here y(s) =8/[(s+2)^2+(1)^2】[s^2+1] and then I will apply laplace inverse to y(s) and I m not able to factorise the denominator and partial fraction so that I can get a,b,c or d value
    – Diwakar Yadav
    Aug 28 at 17:10







  • 2




    Good! Please put that into the body of your question. We have a real problem here with students just pasting their homework into the box and expecting full solutions. Showing that you're not one of those students will help you out.
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 28 at 17:20












  • 4




    Hello and welcome. This looks like a pretty straightforward problem. How far did you get and and where are you stuck?
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 28 at 17:07










  • I am here y(s) =8/[(s+2)^2+(1)^2】[s^2+1] and then I will apply laplace inverse to y(s) and I m not able to factorise the denominator and partial fraction so that I can get a,b,c or d value
    – Diwakar Yadav
    Aug 28 at 17:10







  • 2




    Good! Please put that into the body of your question. We have a real problem here with students just pasting their homework into the box and expecting full solutions. Showing that you're not one of those students will help you out.
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 28 at 17:20







4




4




Hello and welcome. This looks like a pretty straightforward problem. How far did you get and and where are you stuck?
– Matthew Leingang
Aug 28 at 17:07




Hello and welcome. This looks like a pretty straightforward problem. How far did you get and and where are you stuck?
– Matthew Leingang
Aug 28 at 17:07












I am here y(s) =8/[(s+2)^2+(1)^2】[s^2+1] and then I will apply laplace inverse to y(s) and I m not able to factorise the denominator and partial fraction so that I can get a,b,c or d value
– Diwakar Yadav
Aug 28 at 17:10





I am here y(s) =8/[(s+2)^2+(1)^2】[s^2+1] and then I will apply laplace inverse to y(s) and I m not able to factorise the denominator and partial fraction so that I can get a,b,c or d value
– Diwakar Yadav
Aug 28 at 17:10





2




2




Good! Please put that into the body of your question. We have a real problem here with students just pasting their homework into the box and expecting full solutions. Showing that you're not one of those students will help you out.
– Matthew Leingang
Aug 28 at 17:20




Good! Please put that into the body of your question. We have a real problem here with students just pasting their homework into the box and expecting full solutions. Showing that you're not one of those students will help you out.
– Matthew Leingang
Aug 28 at 17:20










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













There are two methods that can be used. The first being the convolution and the second being the longer, more standard, version.
Let the Laplace transform be given by
$$mathcalLy(t) = f(s) = int_0^infty e^-s t , y(t) , dt.$$
Since,
$$mathcalL y'' + y = s^2 , f - s y(0) - y'(0) + f = (s^2 + 1) , f,$$
then by convolution the solution takes the form:
beginalign
y(t) = 8 , int_0^t cos(t-u) , e^-2 u , sin(u) , du.
endalign
This is seen by
beginalign
(s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
f &= frac1s^2 + 1 , mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
&= mathcalLcos(t) cdot mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t)
endalign
and after the inversion, by convolution, the integral form, which can be calculated, is obtained.



The more standard version is:
beginalign
(s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) = frac8(s+2)^2 + 1 \
f &= frac8(s^2 + 1) , ((s+2)^2 + 1) \
&= frac1-ss^2 + 1 + fracs+3(s+2)^2 + 1 \
&= frac1s^2 + 1 - fracss^2+1 + fracs+2(s+2)^2 + 1 + frac1(s+2)^2 + 1
endalign
and leads to
$$y(t) = sin t - cos t + e^-2 t , (sin t + cos t).$$



Both methods yield the same result after some calculations are applied for the convolution case.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Hint




    Apply Laplace transform to both sides of the equation to get $$ s^2 tilde y -s underbracey(0^+) - y'(0^+)_textZero from the\textinitial conditions + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1 \[20 pt] s^2tilde y + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1$$
    Where $tilde y = mathcal Ly$. Now you can easily solve for $tilde y$ and do an inverse Laplace transform to find the solution $y$.




    By simplifying the solution you'll get $$tilde y = frac8[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ and by doing partial fraction decomposition $$tilde y = fracAs+B(s+2)^2+1+fracCs+Ds^2+1 = frac(As+B)[(s+2)^2+1]+(Cs+D)(s^2+1)[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ Now just find the values of $A,B,C,D$ and then take the inverse Laplace of the decomposed function.






    share|cite|improve this answer






















    • that I have done but failed to apply laplace inverse
      – Diwakar Yadav
      Aug 28 at 17:18










    • Try and apply long division $$tilde y = frac32(4-s^2)(1+s^2) = fracA4-s^2+fracB1+s^2$$ Just find the values of $A$ and $B$ and try taking the inverse Laplace on that
      – Davide Morgante
      Aug 28 at 17:20










    • What is Laplace of 8 e^-2t sint ? It is simple but I m confused
      – Diwakar Yadav
      Aug 28 at 17:28






    • 1




      How did u got 32/(4-s^2)(1+s^2)(1+s^2) because my answer is different
      – Diwakar Yadav
      Aug 28 at 17:36










    • Ops, i made a mistake, let me correct my answer
      – Davide Morgante
      Aug 28 at 17:49










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897486%2fsolve-de-by-laplace-transformation-y-y-8e-2t-sin-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    There are two methods that can be used. The first being the convolution and the second being the longer, more standard, version.
    Let the Laplace transform be given by
    $$mathcalLy(t) = f(s) = int_0^infty e^-s t , y(t) , dt.$$
    Since,
    $$mathcalL y'' + y = s^2 , f - s y(0) - y'(0) + f = (s^2 + 1) , f,$$
    then by convolution the solution takes the form:
    beginalign
    y(t) = 8 , int_0^t cos(t-u) , e^-2 u , sin(u) , du.
    endalign
    This is seen by
    beginalign
    (s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
    f &= frac1s^2 + 1 , mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
    &= mathcalLcos(t) cdot mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t)
    endalign
    and after the inversion, by convolution, the integral form, which can be calculated, is obtained.



    The more standard version is:
    beginalign
    (s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) = frac8(s+2)^2 + 1 \
    f &= frac8(s^2 + 1) , ((s+2)^2 + 1) \
    &= frac1-ss^2 + 1 + fracs+3(s+2)^2 + 1 \
    &= frac1s^2 + 1 - fracss^2+1 + fracs+2(s+2)^2 + 1 + frac1(s+2)^2 + 1
    endalign
    and leads to
    $$y(t) = sin t - cos t + e^-2 t , (sin t + cos t).$$



    Both methods yield the same result after some calculations are applied for the convolution case.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      There are two methods that can be used. The first being the convolution and the second being the longer, more standard, version.
      Let the Laplace transform be given by
      $$mathcalLy(t) = f(s) = int_0^infty e^-s t , y(t) , dt.$$
      Since,
      $$mathcalL y'' + y = s^2 , f - s y(0) - y'(0) + f = (s^2 + 1) , f,$$
      then by convolution the solution takes the form:
      beginalign
      y(t) = 8 , int_0^t cos(t-u) , e^-2 u , sin(u) , du.
      endalign
      This is seen by
      beginalign
      (s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
      f &= frac1s^2 + 1 , mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
      &= mathcalLcos(t) cdot mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t)
      endalign
      and after the inversion, by convolution, the integral form, which can be calculated, is obtained.



      The more standard version is:
      beginalign
      (s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) = frac8(s+2)^2 + 1 \
      f &= frac8(s^2 + 1) , ((s+2)^2 + 1) \
      &= frac1-ss^2 + 1 + fracs+3(s+2)^2 + 1 \
      &= frac1s^2 + 1 - fracss^2+1 + fracs+2(s+2)^2 + 1 + frac1(s+2)^2 + 1
      endalign
      and leads to
      $$y(t) = sin t - cos t + e^-2 t , (sin t + cos t).$$



      Both methods yield the same result after some calculations are applied for the convolution case.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        There are two methods that can be used. The first being the convolution and the second being the longer, more standard, version.
        Let the Laplace transform be given by
        $$mathcalLy(t) = f(s) = int_0^infty e^-s t , y(t) , dt.$$
        Since,
        $$mathcalL y'' + y = s^2 , f - s y(0) - y'(0) + f = (s^2 + 1) , f,$$
        then by convolution the solution takes the form:
        beginalign
        y(t) = 8 , int_0^t cos(t-u) , e^-2 u , sin(u) , du.
        endalign
        This is seen by
        beginalign
        (s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
        f &= frac1s^2 + 1 , mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
        &= mathcalLcos(t) cdot mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t)
        endalign
        and after the inversion, by convolution, the integral form, which can be calculated, is obtained.



        The more standard version is:
        beginalign
        (s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) = frac8(s+2)^2 + 1 \
        f &= frac8(s^2 + 1) , ((s+2)^2 + 1) \
        &= frac1-ss^2 + 1 + fracs+3(s+2)^2 + 1 \
        &= frac1s^2 + 1 - fracss^2+1 + fracs+2(s+2)^2 + 1 + frac1(s+2)^2 + 1
        endalign
        and leads to
        $$y(t) = sin t - cos t + e^-2 t , (sin t + cos t).$$



        Both methods yield the same result after some calculations are applied for the convolution case.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        There are two methods that can be used. The first being the convolution and the second being the longer, more standard, version.
        Let the Laplace transform be given by
        $$mathcalLy(t) = f(s) = int_0^infty e^-s t , y(t) , dt.$$
        Since,
        $$mathcalL y'' + y = s^2 , f - s y(0) - y'(0) + f = (s^2 + 1) , f,$$
        then by convolution the solution takes the form:
        beginalign
        y(t) = 8 , int_0^t cos(t-u) , e^-2 u , sin(u) , du.
        endalign
        This is seen by
        beginalign
        (s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
        f &= frac1s^2 + 1 , mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) \
        &= mathcalLcos(t) cdot mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t)
        endalign
        and after the inversion, by convolution, the integral form, which can be calculated, is obtained.



        The more standard version is:
        beginalign
        (s^2 + 1) , f &= mathcalL8 , e^-2t , sin(t) = frac8(s+2)^2 + 1 \
        f &= frac8(s^2 + 1) , ((s+2)^2 + 1) \
        &= frac1-ss^2 + 1 + fracs+3(s+2)^2 + 1 \
        &= frac1s^2 + 1 - fracss^2+1 + fracs+2(s+2)^2 + 1 + frac1(s+2)^2 + 1
        endalign
        and leads to
        $$y(t) = sin t - cos t + e^-2 t , (sin t + cos t).$$



        Both methods yield the same result after some calculations are applied for the convolution case.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 30 at 19:56









        Leucippus

        18.8k92769




        18.8k92769




















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Hint




            Apply Laplace transform to both sides of the equation to get $$ s^2 tilde y -s underbracey(0^+) - y'(0^+)_textZero from the\textinitial conditions + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1 \[20 pt] s^2tilde y + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1$$
            Where $tilde y = mathcal Ly$. Now you can easily solve for $tilde y$ and do an inverse Laplace transform to find the solution $y$.




            By simplifying the solution you'll get $$tilde y = frac8[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ and by doing partial fraction decomposition $$tilde y = fracAs+B(s+2)^2+1+fracCs+Ds^2+1 = frac(As+B)[(s+2)^2+1]+(Cs+D)(s^2+1)[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ Now just find the values of $A,B,C,D$ and then take the inverse Laplace of the decomposed function.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • that I have done but failed to apply laplace inverse
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:18










            • Try and apply long division $$tilde y = frac32(4-s^2)(1+s^2) = fracA4-s^2+fracB1+s^2$$ Just find the values of $A$ and $B$ and try taking the inverse Laplace on that
              – Davide Morgante
              Aug 28 at 17:20










            • What is Laplace of 8 e^-2t sint ? It is simple but I m confused
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:28






            • 1




              How did u got 32/(4-s^2)(1+s^2)(1+s^2) because my answer is different
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:36










            • Ops, i made a mistake, let me correct my answer
              – Davide Morgante
              Aug 28 at 17:49














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Hint




            Apply Laplace transform to both sides of the equation to get $$ s^2 tilde y -s underbracey(0^+) - y'(0^+)_textZero from the\textinitial conditions + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1 \[20 pt] s^2tilde y + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1$$
            Where $tilde y = mathcal Ly$. Now you can easily solve for $tilde y$ and do an inverse Laplace transform to find the solution $y$.




            By simplifying the solution you'll get $$tilde y = frac8[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ and by doing partial fraction decomposition $$tilde y = fracAs+B(s+2)^2+1+fracCs+Ds^2+1 = frac(As+B)[(s+2)^2+1]+(Cs+D)(s^2+1)[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ Now just find the values of $A,B,C,D$ and then take the inverse Laplace of the decomposed function.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • that I have done but failed to apply laplace inverse
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:18










            • Try and apply long division $$tilde y = frac32(4-s^2)(1+s^2) = fracA4-s^2+fracB1+s^2$$ Just find the values of $A$ and $B$ and try taking the inverse Laplace on that
              – Davide Morgante
              Aug 28 at 17:20










            • What is Laplace of 8 e^-2t sint ? It is simple but I m confused
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:28






            • 1




              How did u got 32/(4-s^2)(1+s^2)(1+s^2) because my answer is different
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:36










            • Ops, i made a mistake, let me correct my answer
              – Davide Morgante
              Aug 28 at 17:49












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Hint




            Apply Laplace transform to both sides of the equation to get $$ s^2 tilde y -s underbracey(0^+) - y'(0^+)_textZero from the\textinitial conditions + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1 \[20 pt] s^2tilde y + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1$$
            Where $tilde y = mathcal Ly$. Now you can easily solve for $tilde y$ and do an inverse Laplace transform to find the solution $y$.




            By simplifying the solution you'll get $$tilde y = frac8[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ and by doing partial fraction decomposition $$tilde y = fracAs+B(s+2)^2+1+fracCs+Ds^2+1 = frac(As+B)[(s+2)^2+1]+(Cs+D)(s^2+1)[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ Now just find the values of $A,B,C,D$ and then take the inverse Laplace of the decomposed function.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Hint




            Apply Laplace transform to both sides of the equation to get $$ s^2 tilde y -s underbracey(0^+) - y'(0^+)_textZero from the\textinitial conditions + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1 \[20 pt] s^2tilde y + tilde y = frac8(s+2)^2+1$$
            Where $tilde y = mathcal Ly$. Now you can easily solve for $tilde y$ and do an inverse Laplace transform to find the solution $y$.




            By simplifying the solution you'll get $$tilde y = frac8[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ and by doing partial fraction decomposition $$tilde y = fracAs+B(s+2)^2+1+fracCs+Ds^2+1 = frac(As+B)[(s+2)^2+1]+(Cs+D)(s^2+1)[(s+2)^2+1](s^2+1)$$ Now just find the values of $A,B,C,D$ and then take the inverse Laplace of the decomposed function.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 28 at 18:04

























            answered Aug 28 at 17:08









            Davide Morgante

            2,550623




            2,550623











            • that I have done but failed to apply laplace inverse
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:18










            • Try and apply long division $$tilde y = frac32(4-s^2)(1+s^2) = fracA4-s^2+fracB1+s^2$$ Just find the values of $A$ and $B$ and try taking the inverse Laplace on that
              – Davide Morgante
              Aug 28 at 17:20










            • What is Laplace of 8 e^-2t sint ? It is simple but I m confused
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:28






            • 1




              How did u got 32/(4-s^2)(1+s^2)(1+s^2) because my answer is different
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:36










            • Ops, i made a mistake, let me correct my answer
              – Davide Morgante
              Aug 28 at 17:49
















            • that I have done but failed to apply laplace inverse
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:18










            • Try and apply long division $$tilde y = frac32(4-s^2)(1+s^2) = fracA4-s^2+fracB1+s^2$$ Just find the values of $A$ and $B$ and try taking the inverse Laplace on that
              – Davide Morgante
              Aug 28 at 17:20










            • What is Laplace of 8 e^-2t sint ? It is simple but I m confused
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:28






            • 1




              How did u got 32/(4-s^2)(1+s^2)(1+s^2) because my answer is different
              – Diwakar Yadav
              Aug 28 at 17:36










            • Ops, i made a mistake, let me correct my answer
              – Davide Morgante
              Aug 28 at 17:49















            that I have done but failed to apply laplace inverse
            – Diwakar Yadav
            Aug 28 at 17:18




            that I have done but failed to apply laplace inverse
            – Diwakar Yadav
            Aug 28 at 17:18












            Try and apply long division $$tilde y = frac32(4-s^2)(1+s^2) = fracA4-s^2+fracB1+s^2$$ Just find the values of $A$ and $B$ and try taking the inverse Laplace on that
            – Davide Morgante
            Aug 28 at 17:20




            Try and apply long division $$tilde y = frac32(4-s^2)(1+s^2) = fracA4-s^2+fracB1+s^2$$ Just find the values of $A$ and $B$ and try taking the inverse Laplace on that
            – Davide Morgante
            Aug 28 at 17:20












            What is Laplace of 8 e^-2t sint ? It is simple but I m confused
            – Diwakar Yadav
            Aug 28 at 17:28




            What is Laplace of 8 e^-2t sint ? It is simple but I m confused
            – Diwakar Yadav
            Aug 28 at 17:28




            1




            1




            How did u got 32/(4-s^2)(1+s^2)(1+s^2) because my answer is different
            – Diwakar Yadav
            Aug 28 at 17:36




            How did u got 32/(4-s^2)(1+s^2)(1+s^2) because my answer is different
            – Diwakar Yadav
            Aug 28 at 17:36












            Ops, i made a mistake, let me correct my answer
            – Davide Morgante
            Aug 28 at 17:49




            Ops, i made a mistake, let me correct my answer
            – Davide Morgante
            Aug 28 at 17:49

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2897486%2fsolve-de-by-laplace-transformation-y-y-8e-2t-sin-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?