What is the verb that describes the process of forming an interpretation?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












"Formal Semantics", "The Semantics of Logic" and "Model-Theoretic Semantics" are names for the process of forming interpretations, but I am looking for a verb that describes what I am doing when I study a set of sentences and form an interpretation that holds for those sentences.



e.g. If someone is 'running', it is easy to form a conception of what that person is doing. So what I am after is a verb that describes the process of applying Model-Theoretic Semantics to form an interpretation.



e.g. I do not want to say "I am Model-Theoretic Semanticing", and I do not want to say, in a long-winded way, "I am applying Model-Theoretic Semantics to formulate an interpretation". I am looking for a simpler verb, like 'interpretation-forming' for example.



I would appreciate it if anyone knows of such a verb, and I would like to also posit that if no such verb exists, then where over 100 years has past since Principia Mathematica was released, it is probably about time that logic has such a word.



Many thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 3




    Ummm.... "interpreting"?
    – David G. Stork
    Aug 16 at 3:14










  • Maybe 'observing'?
    – Dean Yang
    Aug 16 at 3:19










  • Whatever you say. I'd avoid the use of the word "semantics", as it has been over-used (at least in computer science) to the point where it has more or less lost all meaning (which is quite surprising as it means "meaning"!).
    – Rob Arthan
    Aug 16 at 9:12











  • Hi Dean, I like your approach..."observing an interpretation". For instance if I have a set of sentences of which could either apply to a FOL under finite model theory or operate over an infinite model, then when I "observe" the later, that's the interpretation I acknowledge/form-in-my-mind/choose. I'll go with that nomenclature for now. Thank you, much appreciated.
    – Viev
    Aug 17 at 0:47














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












"Formal Semantics", "The Semantics of Logic" and "Model-Theoretic Semantics" are names for the process of forming interpretations, but I am looking for a verb that describes what I am doing when I study a set of sentences and form an interpretation that holds for those sentences.



e.g. If someone is 'running', it is easy to form a conception of what that person is doing. So what I am after is a verb that describes the process of applying Model-Theoretic Semantics to form an interpretation.



e.g. I do not want to say "I am Model-Theoretic Semanticing", and I do not want to say, in a long-winded way, "I am applying Model-Theoretic Semantics to formulate an interpretation". I am looking for a simpler verb, like 'interpretation-forming' for example.



I would appreciate it if anyone knows of such a verb, and I would like to also posit that if no such verb exists, then where over 100 years has past since Principia Mathematica was released, it is probably about time that logic has such a word.



Many thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 3




    Ummm.... "interpreting"?
    – David G. Stork
    Aug 16 at 3:14










  • Maybe 'observing'?
    – Dean Yang
    Aug 16 at 3:19










  • Whatever you say. I'd avoid the use of the word "semantics", as it has been over-used (at least in computer science) to the point where it has more or less lost all meaning (which is quite surprising as it means "meaning"!).
    – Rob Arthan
    Aug 16 at 9:12











  • Hi Dean, I like your approach..."observing an interpretation". For instance if I have a set of sentences of which could either apply to a FOL under finite model theory or operate over an infinite model, then when I "observe" the later, that's the interpretation I acknowledge/form-in-my-mind/choose. I'll go with that nomenclature for now. Thank you, much appreciated.
    – Viev
    Aug 17 at 0:47












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











"Formal Semantics", "The Semantics of Logic" and "Model-Theoretic Semantics" are names for the process of forming interpretations, but I am looking for a verb that describes what I am doing when I study a set of sentences and form an interpretation that holds for those sentences.



e.g. If someone is 'running', it is easy to form a conception of what that person is doing. So what I am after is a verb that describes the process of applying Model-Theoretic Semantics to form an interpretation.



e.g. I do not want to say "I am Model-Theoretic Semanticing", and I do not want to say, in a long-winded way, "I am applying Model-Theoretic Semantics to formulate an interpretation". I am looking for a simpler verb, like 'interpretation-forming' for example.



I would appreciate it if anyone knows of such a verb, and I would like to also posit that if no such verb exists, then where over 100 years has past since Principia Mathematica was released, it is probably about time that logic has such a word.



Many thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question












"Formal Semantics", "The Semantics of Logic" and "Model-Theoretic Semantics" are names for the process of forming interpretations, but I am looking for a verb that describes what I am doing when I study a set of sentences and form an interpretation that holds for those sentences.



e.g. If someone is 'running', it is easy to form a conception of what that person is doing. So what I am after is a verb that describes the process of applying Model-Theoretic Semantics to form an interpretation.



e.g. I do not want to say "I am Model-Theoretic Semanticing", and I do not want to say, in a long-winded way, "I am applying Model-Theoretic Semantics to formulate an interpretation". I am looking for a simpler verb, like 'interpretation-forming' for example.



I would appreciate it if anyone knows of such a verb, and I would like to also posit that if no such verb exists, then where over 100 years has past since Principia Mathematica was released, it is probably about time that logic has such a word.



Many thanks in advance.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 16 at 2:59









Viev

111




111







  • 3




    Ummm.... "interpreting"?
    – David G. Stork
    Aug 16 at 3:14










  • Maybe 'observing'?
    – Dean Yang
    Aug 16 at 3:19










  • Whatever you say. I'd avoid the use of the word "semantics", as it has been over-used (at least in computer science) to the point where it has more or less lost all meaning (which is quite surprising as it means "meaning"!).
    – Rob Arthan
    Aug 16 at 9:12











  • Hi Dean, I like your approach..."observing an interpretation". For instance if I have a set of sentences of which could either apply to a FOL under finite model theory or operate over an infinite model, then when I "observe" the later, that's the interpretation I acknowledge/form-in-my-mind/choose. I'll go with that nomenclature for now. Thank you, much appreciated.
    – Viev
    Aug 17 at 0:47












  • 3




    Ummm.... "interpreting"?
    – David G. Stork
    Aug 16 at 3:14










  • Maybe 'observing'?
    – Dean Yang
    Aug 16 at 3:19










  • Whatever you say. I'd avoid the use of the word "semantics", as it has been over-used (at least in computer science) to the point where it has more or less lost all meaning (which is quite surprising as it means "meaning"!).
    – Rob Arthan
    Aug 16 at 9:12











  • Hi Dean, I like your approach..."observing an interpretation". For instance if I have a set of sentences of which could either apply to a FOL under finite model theory or operate over an infinite model, then when I "observe" the later, that's the interpretation I acknowledge/form-in-my-mind/choose. I'll go with that nomenclature for now. Thank you, much appreciated.
    – Viev
    Aug 17 at 0:47







3




3




Ummm.... "interpreting"?
– David G. Stork
Aug 16 at 3:14




Ummm.... "interpreting"?
– David G. Stork
Aug 16 at 3:14












Maybe 'observing'?
– Dean Yang
Aug 16 at 3:19




Maybe 'observing'?
– Dean Yang
Aug 16 at 3:19












Whatever you say. I'd avoid the use of the word "semantics", as it has been over-used (at least in computer science) to the point where it has more or less lost all meaning (which is quite surprising as it means "meaning"!).
– Rob Arthan
Aug 16 at 9:12





Whatever you say. I'd avoid the use of the word "semantics", as it has been over-used (at least in computer science) to the point where it has more or less lost all meaning (which is quite surprising as it means "meaning"!).
– Rob Arthan
Aug 16 at 9:12













Hi Dean, I like your approach..."observing an interpretation". For instance if I have a set of sentences of which could either apply to a FOL under finite model theory or operate over an infinite model, then when I "observe" the later, that's the interpretation I acknowledge/form-in-my-mind/choose. I'll go with that nomenclature for now. Thank you, much appreciated.
– Viev
Aug 17 at 0:47




Hi Dean, I like your approach..."observing an interpretation". For instance if I have a set of sentences of which could either apply to a FOL under finite model theory or operate over an infinite model, then when I "observe" the later, that's the interpretation I acknowledge/form-in-my-mind/choose. I'll go with that nomenclature for now. Thank you, much appreciated.
– Viev
Aug 17 at 0:47















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884343%2fwhat-is-the-verb-that-describes-the-process-of-forming-an-interpretation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884343%2fwhat-is-the-verb-that-describes-the-process-of-forming-an-interpretation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards