Minimal sufficient statistic for $theta$ where $f(x;theta)=fracbeta^32e^-beta(x-theta)(x-theta)^2mathbf1_xgetheta$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have this density function for which I am not able to find a minimal sufficient statistic, as required. It does not belong to the exponential families distribution as the support depend also on the parameter, and with the Lehmann Scheffé approach I am not able to separate the random variable $X$ from the parameter $theta$.
$$f(x;theta)=fracbeta^32e^-beta(x-theta)(x-theta)^2 mathbf1_xgetheta, quad betatext known$$
statistics data-sufficiency
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have this density function for which I am not able to find a minimal sufficient statistic, as required. It does not belong to the exponential families distribution as the support depend also on the parameter, and with the Lehmann Scheffé approach I am not able to separate the random variable $X$ from the parameter $theta$.
$$f(x;theta)=fracbeta^32e^-beta(x-theta)(x-theta)^2 mathbf1_xgetheta, quad betatext known$$
statistics data-sufficiency
Please include your work, whatever you have tried and stick to one question per post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 16 at 14:47
Ok, thanks. I posted here the correct question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2886982/â¦
â Lucas
Aug 18 at 18:28
1
I have edited this post to include a single question since you already asked the second question in a separate post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 6:16
1
Your distribution is a shifted gamma with shape parameter $alpha = 3$, rate parameter $beta$, and location parameter $theta$. It is my suspicion that no data reduction is possible; that is to say, the minimal sufficient statistic comprises the sample itself.
â heropup
Aug 19 at 7:48
@MichaelHardy Since $beta$ is known, it it supposed to be fixed. So the family is only indexed by $theta$.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 19:35
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I have this density function for which I am not able to find a minimal sufficient statistic, as required. It does not belong to the exponential families distribution as the support depend also on the parameter, and with the Lehmann Scheffé approach I am not able to separate the random variable $X$ from the parameter $theta$.
$$f(x;theta)=fracbeta^32e^-beta(x-theta)(x-theta)^2 mathbf1_xgetheta, quad betatext known$$
statistics data-sufficiency
I have this density function for which I am not able to find a minimal sufficient statistic, as required. It does not belong to the exponential families distribution as the support depend also on the parameter, and with the Lehmann Scheffé approach I am not able to separate the random variable $X$ from the parameter $theta$.
$$f(x;theta)=fracbeta^32e^-beta(x-theta)(x-theta)^2 mathbf1_xgetheta, quad betatext known$$
statistics data-sufficiency
edited Aug 19 at 18:51
Michael Hardy
205k23187463
205k23187463
asked Aug 16 at 10:27
Lucas
232
232
Please include your work, whatever you have tried and stick to one question per post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 16 at 14:47
Ok, thanks. I posted here the correct question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2886982/â¦
â Lucas
Aug 18 at 18:28
1
I have edited this post to include a single question since you already asked the second question in a separate post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 6:16
1
Your distribution is a shifted gamma with shape parameter $alpha = 3$, rate parameter $beta$, and location parameter $theta$. It is my suspicion that no data reduction is possible; that is to say, the minimal sufficient statistic comprises the sample itself.
â heropup
Aug 19 at 7:48
@MichaelHardy Since $beta$ is known, it it supposed to be fixed. So the family is only indexed by $theta$.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 19:35
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Please include your work, whatever you have tried and stick to one question per post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 16 at 14:47
Ok, thanks. I posted here the correct question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2886982/â¦
â Lucas
Aug 18 at 18:28
1
I have edited this post to include a single question since you already asked the second question in a separate post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 6:16
1
Your distribution is a shifted gamma with shape parameter $alpha = 3$, rate parameter $beta$, and location parameter $theta$. It is my suspicion that no data reduction is possible; that is to say, the minimal sufficient statistic comprises the sample itself.
â heropup
Aug 19 at 7:48
@MichaelHardy Since $beta$ is known, it it supposed to be fixed. So the family is only indexed by $theta$.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 19:35
Please include your work, whatever you have tried and stick to one question per post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 16 at 14:47
Please include your work, whatever you have tried and stick to one question per post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 16 at 14:47
Ok, thanks. I posted here the correct question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2886982/â¦
â Lucas
Aug 18 at 18:28
Ok, thanks. I posted here the correct question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2886982/â¦
â Lucas
Aug 18 at 18:28
1
1
I have edited this post to include a single question since you already asked the second question in a separate post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 6:16
I have edited this post to include a single question since you already asked the second question in a separate post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 6:16
1
1
Your distribution is a shifted gamma with shape parameter $alpha = 3$, rate parameter $beta$, and location parameter $theta$. It is my suspicion that no data reduction is possible; that is to say, the minimal sufficient statistic comprises the sample itself.
â heropup
Aug 19 at 7:48
Your distribution is a shifted gamma with shape parameter $alpha = 3$, rate parameter $beta$, and location parameter $theta$. It is my suspicion that no data reduction is possible; that is to say, the minimal sufficient statistic comprises the sample itself.
â heropup
Aug 19 at 7:48
@MichaelHardy Since $beta$ is known, it it supposed to be fixed. So the family is only indexed by $theta$.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 19:35
@MichaelHardy Since $beta$ is known, it it supposed to be fixed. So the family is only indexed by $theta$.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 19:35
 |Â
show 1 more comment
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884639%2fminimal-sufficient-statistic-for-theta-where-fx-theta-frac-beta32e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Please include your work, whatever you have tried and stick to one question per post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 16 at 14:47
Ok, thanks. I posted here the correct question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2886982/â¦
â Lucas
Aug 18 at 18:28
1
I have edited this post to include a single question since you already asked the second question in a separate post.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 6:16
1
Your distribution is a shifted gamma with shape parameter $alpha = 3$, rate parameter $beta$, and location parameter $theta$. It is my suspicion that no data reduction is possible; that is to say, the minimal sufficient statistic comprises the sample itself.
â heropup
Aug 19 at 7:48
@MichaelHardy Since $beta$ is known, it it supposed to be fixed. So the family is only indexed by $theta$.
â StubbornAtom
Aug 19 at 19:35