Does a solution exist for this problem?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose let's say I know $tau > 0$ and $rho > 0$. I am looking for a non-trivial solution $eta, delta, omega$ all constants (independent of $t$) and greater than zero, such that:



$$
tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-omega t.
$$



Please note that $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ will constitute a trivial case and I am not looking for that. And to reiterate, I need a solution independent of $t$. Is a solution possible at all? My apologies if the question sounds silly.







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose let's say I know $tau > 0$ and $rho > 0$. I am looking for a non-trivial solution $eta, delta, omega$ all constants (independent of $t$) and greater than zero, such that:



    $$
    tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-omega t.
    $$



    Please note that $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ will constitute a trivial case and I am not looking for that. And to reiterate, I need a solution independent of $t$. Is a solution possible at all? My apologies if the question sounds silly.







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose let's say I know $tau > 0$ and $rho > 0$. I am looking for a non-trivial solution $eta, delta, omega$ all constants (independent of $t$) and greater than zero, such that:



      $$
      tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-omega t.
      $$



      Please note that $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ will constitute a trivial case and I am not looking for that. And to reiterate, I need a solution independent of $t$. Is a solution possible at all? My apologies if the question sounds silly.







      share|cite|improve this question












      Suppose let's say I know $tau > 0$ and $rho > 0$. I am looking for a non-trivial solution $eta, delta, omega$ all constants (independent of $t$) and greater than zero, such that:



      $$
      tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-omega t.
      $$



      Please note that $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ will constitute a trivial case and I am not looking for that. And to reiterate, I need a solution independent of $t$. Is a solution possible at all? My apologies if the question sounds silly.









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 16 at 2:32









      user2167741

      1059




      1059




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          I guess you want some $(eta,delta,omega)$ such that $tau e^-rho t-delta e^-omega t=eta$ for all $t$. In particular, the identity must pass to derivatives, which means that for all $t$ $$-taurho e^-rho t+omegadelta e^-omega t=0\ e^(omega-rho)t=fracomegadeltataurho$$ Since $e^at$ is a constant function if and only if $a=0$, we know that $omega=rho$ and thus $delta=tau$. Putting this back in the first equation, $eta=0$ as well.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Terrific! Thanks!
            – user2167741
            Aug 16 at 2:47

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Consider $f(t)=e^-tau t, g(t)=e^-omega t.$ We have that the Wronskian of $f$ and $g$ is



          $$W(f,g)(t)=beginvmatrixe^-rho t& -rho e^-rho t\ e^-omega t & -omega e^-omega tendvmatrix =(rho -omega)e^-(rho+omega)t.$$



          It is different from zero unless $rho=omega.$ That is, the functions $f,g$ are linearly independent (and thus there is no solution) unless $rho=omega.$



          Assume $omega=rho.$ Then we have



          $$tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-rho tiff (tau-delta)e^-rho t=eta. $$ Since $e^-rho t$ is not constant it must be $tau =delta$ and, in such a case, $eta=0.$ Thus $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ is the only solution.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884326%2fdoes-a-solution-exist-for-this-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            I guess you want some $(eta,delta,omega)$ such that $tau e^-rho t-delta e^-omega t=eta$ for all $t$. In particular, the identity must pass to derivatives, which means that for all $t$ $$-taurho e^-rho t+omegadelta e^-omega t=0\ e^(omega-rho)t=fracomegadeltataurho$$ Since $e^at$ is a constant function if and only if $a=0$, we know that $omega=rho$ and thus $delta=tau$. Putting this back in the first equation, $eta=0$ as well.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Terrific! Thanks!
              – user2167741
              Aug 16 at 2:47














            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            I guess you want some $(eta,delta,omega)$ such that $tau e^-rho t-delta e^-omega t=eta$ for all $t$. In particular, the identity must pass to derivatives, which means that for all $t$ $$-taurho e^-rho t+omegadelta e^-omega t=0\ e^(omega-rho)t=fracomegadeltataurho$$ Since $e^at$ is a constant function if and only if $a=0$, we know that $omega=rho$ and thus $delta=tau$. Putting this back in the first equation, $eta=0$ as well.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Terrific! Thanks!
              – user2167741
              Aug 16 at 2:47












            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted






            I guess you want some $(eta,delta,omega)$ such that $tau e^-rho t-delta e^-omega t=eta$ for all $t$. In particular, the identity must pass to derivatives, which means that for all $t$ $$-taurho e^-rho t+omegadelta e^-omega t=0\ e^(omega-rho)t=fracomegadeltataurho$$ Since $e^at$ is a constant function if and only if $a=0$, we know that $omega=rho$ and thus $delta=tau$. Putting this back in the first equation, $eta=0$ as well.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            I guess you want some $(eta,delta,omega)$ such that $tau e^-rho t-delta e^-omega t=eta$ for all $t$. In particular, the identity must pass to derivatives, which means that for all $t$ $$-taurho e^-rho t+omegadelta e^-omega t=0\ e^(omega-rho)t=fracomegadeltataurho$$ Since $e^at$ is a constant function if and only if $a=0$, we know that $omega=rho$ and thus $delta=tau$. Putting this back in the first equation, $eta=0$ as well.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Aug 16 at 2:45









            Saucy O'Path

            3,164323




            3,164323











            • Terrific! Thanks!
              – user2167741
              Aug 16 at 2:47
















            • Terrific! Thanks!
              – user2167741
              Aug 16 at 2:47















            Terrific! Thanks!
            – user2167741
            Aug 16 at 2:47




            Terrific! Thanks!
            – user2167741
            Aug 16 at 2:47










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Consider $f(t)=e^-tau t, g(t)=e^-omega t.$ We have that the Wronskian of $f$ and $g$ is



            $$W(f,g)(t)=beginvmatrixe^-rho t& -rho e^-rho t\ e^-omega t & -omega e^-omega tendvmatrix =(rho -omega)e^-(rho+omega)t.$$



            It is different from zero unless $rho=omega.$ That is, the functions $f,g$ are linearly independent (and thus there is no solution) unless $rho=omega.$



            Assume $omega=rho.$ Then we have



            $$tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-rho tiff (tau-delta)e^-rho t=eta. $$ Since $e^-rho t$ is not constant it must be $tau =delta$ and, in such a case, $eta=0.$ Thus $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ is the only solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Consider $f(t)=e^-tau t, g(t)=e^-omega t.$ We have that the Wronskian of $f$ and $g$ is



              $$W(f,g)(t)=beginvmatrixe^-rho t& -rho e^-rho t\ e^-omega t & -omega e^-omega tendvmatrix =(rho -omega)e^-(rho+omega)t.$$



              It is different from zero unless $rho=omega.$ That is, the functions $f,g$ are linearly independent (and thus there is no solution) unless $rho=omega.$



              Assume $omega=rho.$ Then we have



              $$tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-rho tiff (tau-delta)e^-rho t=eta. $$ Since $e^-rho t$ is not constant it must be $tau =delta$ and, in such a case, $eta=0.$ Thus $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ is the only solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Consider $f(t)=e^-tau t, g(t)=e^-omega t.$ We have that the Wronskian of $f$ and $g$ is



                $$W(f,g)(t)=beginvmatrixe^-rho t& -rho e^-rho t\ e^-omega t & -omega e^-omega tendvmatrix =(rho -omega)e^-(rho+omega)t.$$



                It is different from zero unless $rho=omega.$ That is, the functions $f,g$ are linearly independent (and thus there is no solution) unless $rho=omega.$



                Assume $omega=rho.$ Then we have



                $$tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-rho tiff (tau-delta)e^-rho t=eta. $$ Since $e^-rho t$ is not constant it must be $tau =delta$ and, in such a case, $eta=0.$ Thus $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ is the only solution.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Consider $f(t)=e^-tau t, g(t)=e^-omega t.$ We have that the Wronskian of $f$ and $g$ is



                $$W(f,g)(t)=beginvmatrixe^-rho t& -rho e^-rho t\ e^-omega t & -omega e^-omega tendvmatrix =(rho -omega)e^-(rho+omega)t.$$



                It is different from zero unless $rho=omega.$ That is, the functions $f,g$ are linearly independent (and thus there is no solution) unless $rho=omega.$



                Assume $omega=rho.$ Then we have



                $$tau e^-rho t = eta +delta e^-rho tiff (tau-delta)e^-rho t=eta. $$ Since $e^-rho t$ is not constant it must be $tau =delta$ and, in such a case, $eta=0.$ Thus $(eta, delta, omega) = (0,tau,rho)$ is the only solution.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 16 at 2:47









                mfl

                24.7k12040




                24.7k12040






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884326%2fdoes-a-solution-exist-for-this-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    1st Magritte Awards