Binary eigenvalues matrices and continued fractions

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












I'm working on rational approximation of square root function by continued fractions in the complex plane. The following kind binomial coefficients Hurwitz matrices (for $n=4$ and $6$) play important role:
$
beginpmatrix
4&4&0&0\
1&6&1&0\
0&4&4&0\
0&1&6&1
endpmatrix
$ or
$
beginpmatrix
6&20&6&0&0&0\
1&15&15&1&0&0\
0&6&20&6&0&0\
0&1&15&15&1&0\
0&0&6&20&6&0\
0&0&1&15&15&1
endpmatrix.
$
The computer tells me that the eigenvalues of these matrices turn out to be consecutive powers of $2$, $(1,2,4,8,dots)$ and as a consequence the determinants are powers of $2$ as well. I'd like to know the reason for that. (I see only that $(1,1,dots,1)$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $2^n-1$ and $(0,0,dots,1)$ is the eigenvector with eigenvalue $1$).



Also, the coefficients of the corresponding continued fractions are ratios of determinants of the principal minors of the matrices consisting of intersections of the first rows and columns. The factorizations of the determinants of the minors doesn't contain primes lager than $2n$ even though they grow exponentially. For the above examples these are:
($4$,$20$ and $64$) and ($6$, $70$, $896$, $8064$ and $32726$). (for the $n=6$ case the factorizations are
2 * 3,
2 * 5 * 7,
2^7 * 7,
2^7 * 3^2 * 7 and
2^15).
This implies that the continued fractions have coefficients that are products of small fractions and I'd like to know the reason for that too.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I'm working on rational approximation of square root function by continued fractions in the complex plane. The following kind binomial coefficients Hurwitz matrices (for $n=4$ and $6$) play important role:
    $
    beginpmatrix
    4&4&0&0\
    1&6&1&0\
    0&4&4&0\
    0&1&6&1
    endpmatrix
    $ or
    $
    beginpmatrix
    6&20&6&0&0&0\
    1&15&15&1&0&0\
    0&6&20&6&0&0\
    0&1&15&15&1&0\
    0&0&6&20&6&0\
    0&0&1&15&15&1
    endpmatrix.
    $
    The computer tells me that the eigenvalues of these matrices turn out to be consecutive powers of $2$, $(1,2,4,8,dots)$ and as a consequence the determinants are powers of $2$ as well. I'd like to know the reason for that. (I see only that $(1,1,dots,1)$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $2^n-1$ and $(0,0,dots,1)$ is the eigenvector with eigenvalue $1$).



    Also, the coefficients of the corresponding continued fractions are ratios of determinants of the principal minors of the matrices consisting of intersections of the first rows and columns. The factorizations of the determinants of the minors doesn't contain primes lager than $2n$ even though they grow exponentially. For the above examples these are:
    ($4$,$20$ and $64$) and ($6$, $70$, $896$, $8064$ and $32726$). (for the $n=6$ case the factorizations are
    2 * 3,
    2 * 5 * 7,
    2^7 * 7,
    2^7 * 3^2 * 7 and
    2^15).
    This implies that the continued fractions have coefficients that are products of small fractions and I'd like to know the reason for that too.







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I'm working on rational approximation of square root function by continued fractions in the complex plane. The following kind binomial coefficients Hurwitz matrices (for $n=4$ and $6$) play important role:
      $
      beginpmatrix
      4&4&0&0\
      1&6&1&0\
      0&4&4&0\
      0&1&6&1
      endpmatrix
      $ or
      $
      beginpmatrix
      6&20&6&0&0&0\
      1&15&15&1&0&0\
      0&6&20&6&0&0\
      0&1&15&15&1&0\
      0&0&6&20&6&0\
      0&0&1&15&15&1
      endpmatrix.
      $
      The computer tells me that the eigenvalues of these matrices turn out to be consecutive powers of $2$, $(1,2,4,8,dots)$ and as a consequence the determinants are powers of $2$ as well. I'd like to know the reason for that. (I see only that $(1,1,dots,1)$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $2^n-1$ and $(0,0,dots,1)$ is the eigenvector with eigenvalue $1$).



      Also, the coefficients of the corresponding continued fractions are ratios of determinants of the principal minors of the matrices consisting of intersections of the first rows and columns. The factorizations of the determinants of the minors doesn't contain primes lager than $2n$ even though they grow exponentially. For the above examples these are:
      ($4$,$20$ and $64$) and ($6$, $70$, $896$, $8064$ and $32726$). (for the $n=6$ case the factorizations are
      2 * 3,
      2 * 5 * 7,
      2^7 * 7,
      2^7 * 3^2 * 7 and
      2^15).
      This implies that the continued fractions have coefficients that are products of small fractions and I'd like to know the reason for that too.







      share|cite|improve this question














      I'm working on rational approximation of square root function by continued fractions in the complex plane. The following kind binomial coefficients Hurwitz matrices (for $n=4$ and $6$) play important role:
      $
      beginpmatrix
      4&4&0&0\
      1&6&1&0\
      0&4&4&0\
      0&1&6&1
      endpmatrix
      $ or
      $
      beginpmatrix
      6&20&6&0&0&0\
      1&15&15&1&0&0\
      0&6&20&6&0&0\
      0&1&15&15&1&0\
      0&0&6&20&6&0\
      0&0&1&15&15&1
      endpmatrix.
      $
      The computer tells me that the eigenvalues of these matrices turn out to be consecutive powers of $2$, $(1,2,4,8,dots)$ and as a consequence the determinants are powers of $2$ as well. I'd like to know the reason for that. (I see only that $(1,1,dots,1)$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $2^n-1$ and $(0,0,dots,1)$ is the eigenvector with eigenvalue $1$).



      Also, the coefficients of the corresponding continued fractions are ratios of determinants of the principal minors of the matrices consisting of intersections of the first rows and columns. The factorizations of the determinants of the minors doesn't contain primes lager than $2n$ even though they grow exponentially. For the above examples these are:
      ($4$,$20$ and $64$) and ($6$, $70$, $896$, $8064$ and $32726$). (for the $n=6$ case the factorizations are
      2 * 3,
      2 * 5 * 7,
      2^7 * 7,
      2^7 * 3^2 * 7 and
      2^15).
      This implies that the continued fractions have coefficients that are products of small fractions and I'd like to know the reason for that too.









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 17 at 23:49

























      asked Aug 16 at 3:54









      DVD

      353424




      353424

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884380%2fbinary-eigenvalues-matrices-and-continued-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884380%2fbinary-eigenvalues-matrices-and-continued-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?