How is this equation obtained? $int_0^infty fracx^s-1 dxe^x-1=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $ [duplicate]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$
2 answers
This equation:
$$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1 dx=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
was used by Riemann in his famous paper from 1859.
Seemingly it follows from:
$$ int_0^infty e^-nxx^s-1dx= fracPi(s-1)n^s$$
a result achieved by repeated integration by parts. How does the first equation follows from the second?
integration prime-numbers riemann-zeta
marked as duplicate by Simply Beautiful Art, Lord Shark the Unknown, max_zorn, amWhy
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Aug 17 at 11:12
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$
2 answers
This equation:
$$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1 dx=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
was used by Riemann in his famous paper from 1859.
Seemingly it follows from:
$$ int_0^infty e^-nxx^s-1dx= fracPi(s-1)n^s$$
a result achieved by repeated integration by parts. How does the first equation follows from the second?
integration prime-numbers riemann-zeta
marked as duplicate by Simply Beautiful Art, Lord Shark the Unknown, max_zorn, amWhy
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Aug 17 at 11:12
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:26
Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:27
Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:36
What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:42
The termwise integration
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:43
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$
2 answers
This equation:
$$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1 dx=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
was used by Riemann in his famous paper from 1859.
Seemingly it follows from:
$$ int_0^infty e^-nxx^s-1dx= fracPi(s-1)n^s$$
a result achieved by repeated integration by parts. How does the first equation follows from the second?
integration prime-numbers riemann-zeta
This question already has an answer here:
Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$
2 answers
This equation:
$$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1 dx=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
was used by Riemann in his famous paper from 1859.
Seemingly it follows from:
$$ int_0^infty e^-nxx^s-1dx= fracPi(s-1)n^s$$
a result achieved by repeated integration by parts. How does the first equation follows from the second?
This question already has an answer here:
Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$
2 answers
integration prime-numbers riemann-zeta
edited Aug 16 at 9:34
tmaths
1,332113
1,332113
asked Aug 16 at 9:23
Mister Set
504210
504210
marked as duplicate by Simply Beautiful Art, Lord Shark the Unknown, max_zorn, amWhy
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Aug 17 at 11:12
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Simply Beautiful Art, Lord Shark the Unknown, max_zorn, amWhy
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Aug 17 at 11:12
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:26
Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:27
Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:36
What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:42
The termwise integration
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:43
 |Â
show 1 more comment
To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:26
Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:27
Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:36
What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:42
The termwise integration
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:43
To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:26
To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:26
Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:27
Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:27
Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:36
Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:36
What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:42
What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:42
The termwise integration
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:43
The termwise integration
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:43
 |Â
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :
$$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$
You can also write :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$
And, you can write (geometric series) :
$$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$
which leads to
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$
We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :
$$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$
so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$
Which is exactly :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:56
@MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 10:23
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$
First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$
answered Aug 16 at 9:45
Davide Morgante
2,357322
2,357322
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :
$$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$
You can also write :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$
And, you can write (geometric series) :
$$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$
which leads to
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$
We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :
$$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$
so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$
Which is exactly :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:56
@MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 10:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :
$$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$
You can also write :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$
And, you can write (geometric series) :
$$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$
which leads to
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$
We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :
$$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$
so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$
Which is exactly :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:56
@MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 10:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :
$$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$
You can also write :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$
And, you can write (geometric series) :
$$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$
which leads to
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$
We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :
$$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$
so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$
Which is exactly :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :
$$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$
You can also write :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$
And, you can write (geometric series) :
$$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$
which leads to
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$
We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :
$$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$
so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$
Which is exactly :
$$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
edited Aug 16 at 10:07
answered Aug 16 at 9:43
tmaths
1,332113
1,332113
Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:56
@MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 10:23
add a comment |Â
Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:56
@MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 10:23
Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:56
Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:56
@MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 10:23
@MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 10:23
add a comment |Â
To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:26
Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:27
Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:36
What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
â metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:42
The termwise integration
â Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:43