If $A$ is absolutely flat then every primary ideal is maximal
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.
If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.
This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.
Attempt:
Suppose $mathfrakq$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $xin A-mathfrakq.$ Then $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is non-zero since $xnotinmathfrakq$
Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.
Then as $xinlangle xrangle=langle x^2rangle$, we have $x=ax^2$ for some $ain A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0inmathfrakq$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^ninmathfrakq$ for some integer $n>0$ since $xnotinmathfrakq.$
Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^n=bar0$ in $A/mathfrakq$. It follows that $barabarx-bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is nilpotent and thus $barabarx=(barabarx-bar1)+bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is unit which implies $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is unit. Therefore, $A/mathfrakq$ is a field. It follows that $mathfrakq$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.
I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.
abstract-algebra proof-verification commutative-algebra
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.
If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.
This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.
Attempt:
Suppose $mathfrakq$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $xin A-mathfrakq.$ Then $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is non-zero since $xnotinmathfrakq$
Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.
Then as $xinlangle xrangle=langle x^2rangle$, we have $x=ax^2$ for some $ain A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0inmathfrakq$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^ninmathfrakq$ for some integer $n>0$ since $xnotinmathfrakq.$
Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^n=bar0$ in $A/mathfrakq$. It follows that $barabarx-bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is nilpotent and thus $barabarx=(barabarx-bar1)+bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is unit which implies $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is unit. Therefore, $A/mathfrakq$ is a field. It follows that $mathfrakq$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.
I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.
abstract-algebra proof-verification commutative-algebra
Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
â rschwieb
Aug 16 at 13:54
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.
If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.
This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.
Attempt:
Suppose $mathfrakq$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $xin A-mathfrakq.$ Then $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is non-zero since $xnotinmathfrakq$
Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.
Then as $xinlangle xrangle=langle x^2rangle$, we have $x=ax^2$ for some $ain A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0inmathfrakq$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^ninmathfrakq$ for some integer $n>0$ since $xnotinmathfrakq.$
Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^n=bar0$ in $A/mathfrakq$. It follows that $barabarx-bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is nilpotent and thus $barabarx=(barabarx-bar1)+bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is unit which implies $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is unit. Therefore, $A/mathfrakq$ is a field. It follows that $mathfrakq$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.
I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.
abstract-algebra proof-verification commutative-algebra
Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.
If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.
This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.
Attempt:
Suppose $mathfrakq$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $xin A-mathfrakq.$ Then $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is non-zero since $xnotinmathfrakq$
Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.
Then as $xinlangle xrangle=langle x^2rangle$, we have $x=ax^2$ for some $ain A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0inmathfrakq$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^ninmathfrakq$ for some integer $n>0$ since $xnotinmathfrakq.$
Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^n=bar0$ in $A/mathfrakq$. It follows that $barabarx-bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is nilpotent and thus $barabarx=(barabarx-bar1)+bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is unit which implies $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is unit. Therefore, $A/mathfrakq$ is a field. It follows that $mathfrakq$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.
I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.
abstract-algebra proof-verification commutative-algebra
asked Aug 16 at 6:14
user1992
6671410
6671410
Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
â rschwieb
Aug 16 at 13:54
add a comment |Â
Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
â rschwieb
Aug 16 at 13:54
Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
â rschwieb
Aug 16 at 13:54
Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
â rschwieb
Aug 16 at 13:54
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.
Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.
Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.
Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.
Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?
This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.
Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?
answered Aug 16 at 6:44
A. Pongrácz
3,827625
3,827625
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884454%2fif-a-is-absolutely-flat-then-every-primary-ideal-is-maximal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
â rschwieb
Aug 16 at 13:54