What is the group-like structure on $x^2+y^2+z^2-2xyz=1$?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
(Background: this is inspired by Chebyshev polynomials and expanding a function as a Chebyshev series.)
Solving for $ z $ gives
$$
z=xy pm sqrt(1-x^2)(1-y^2),
$$
where $-1leq x,y leq 1$. Now choose the positive square root and call it $ xoplus y$.
(Alternatively, we can define $xoplus y=cos(arccos(x)+arccos(y))$.)
We can check commutativity, identity ($1$), inverses ($-x$). Associativity is might be a bit harder, but I reckon it works.
The defining equation is a cubic, hence, it reminds me of the group structure of an elliptic curve, but an elliptic curve has two variables and the group law is defined by intersection with a line, while this equation has three variable, one is the "sum" of the other two.
Question
Has anyone seen a structure like this before?
algebraic-geometry reference-request elliptic-curves chebyshev-polynomials
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
(Background: this is inspired by Chebyshev polynomials and expanding a function as a Chebyshev series.)
Solving for $ z $ gives
$$
z=xy pm sqrt(1-x^2)(1-y^2),
$$
where $-1leq x,y leq 1$. Now choose the positive square root and call it $ xoplus y$.
(Alternatively, we can define $xoplus y=cos(arccos(x)+arccos(y))$.)
We can check commutativity, identity ($1$), inverses ($-x$). Associativity is might be a bit harder, but I reckon it works.
The defining equation is a cubic, hence, it reminds me of the group structure of an elliptic curve, but an elliptic curve has two variables and the group law is defined by intersection with a line, while this equation has three variable, one is the "sum" of the other two.
Question
Has anyone seen a structure like this before?
algebraic-geometry reference-request elliptic-curves chebyshev-polynomials
2
how is $-x$ the inverse of $x$ ?
â mercio
Aug 13 at 12:01
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
(Background: this is inspired by Chebyshev polynomials and expanding a function as a Chebyshev series.)
Solving for $ z $ gives
$$
z=xy pm sqrt(1-x^2)(1-y^2),
$$
where $-1leq x,y leq 1$. Now choose the positive square root and call it $ xoplus y$.
(Alternatively, we can define $xoplus y=cos(arccos(x)+arccos(y))$.)
We can check commutativity, identity ($1$), inverses ($-x$). Associativity is might be a bit harder, but I reckon it works.
The defining equation is a cubic, hence, it reminds me of the group structure of an elliptic curve, but an elliptic curve has two variables and the group law is defined by intersection with a line, while this equation has three variable, one is the "sum" of the other two.
Question
Has anyone seen a structure like this before?
algebraic-geometry reference-request elliptic-curves chebyshev-polynomials
(Background: this is inspired by Chebyshev polynomials and expanding a function as a Chebyshev series.)
Solving for $ z $ gives
$$
z=xy pm sqrt(1-x^2)(1-y^2),
$$
where $-1leq x,y leq 1$. Now choose the positive square root and call it $ xoplus y$.
(Alternatively, we can define $xoplus y=cos(arccos(x)+arccos(y))$.)
We can check commutativity, identity ($1$), inverses ($-x$). Associativity is might be a bit harder, but I reckon it works.
The defining equation is a cubic, hence, it reminds me of the group structure of an elliptic curve, but an elliptic curve has two variables and the group law is defined by intersection with a line, while this equation has three variable, one is the "sum" of the other two.
Question
Has anyone seen a structure like this before?
algebraic-geometry reference-request elliptic-curves chebyshev-polynomials
edited Aug 13 at 12:34
asked Aug 13 at 10:57
pdmclean
292214
292214
2
how is $-x$ the inverse of $x$ ?
â mercio
Aug 13 at 12:01
add a comment |Â
2
how is $-x$ the inverse of $x$ ?
â mercio
Aug 13 at 12:01
2
2
how is $-x$ the inverse of $x$ ?
â mercio
Aug 13 at 12:01
how is $-x$ the inverse of $x$ ?
â mercio
Aug 13 at 12:01
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
At first glance it seems to be the same as Cayley's nodal cubic surface. Although there it is described by the (projective) equation $$wxy+xyz+wxz+wyz=0.$$ How, then, do obtain my version of it (if, in fact, they are the same.)
Here is a page which seems to derive my equation from Cayley's.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This is better understood by considering the roots of unity. Suppose
$, u_n = r_n + s_nsqrt-1 ,$ for $, n=1,2,3 ,$ be three roots of unity such that $, u_3 = u_1 u_2. ,$ Then
$, r_1^2 + r_2^2 + r_3^2 - 2 r_1 r_2 r_3 = 1. ,$ The same equation is true if $, u_3 = u_1/u_2 ,$ or $, u_3 = u_2/u_1. ,$ Or more symmetrically if $, u_1u_2u_3 = 1.,$ The reason is that given only the real part of a root of unity, there are two possible values for the imaginary part. The roots of unity form a multiplicative group, but if we only have the real part, the group operation is two-valued.
The case of addition of points on elliptic curves is very appropriate. The group operation there is related to three points on a line, but not in the obvious way. That is, the third point is not the sum of the other two, but rather the negative of the sum. Another way to state it is that the sum of all three points is the identity. Also, given only the $,x,$ coordinate of a point, there are two values for the $,y,$ coordinate. There is some similarity between "adding" points on the unit circle and points on an elliptic curve.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Added: for real $x,y,z geq 1$ we get all
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh ; (t+u).$$
Actually, as $cosh$ is even, we could demand $t+u+v=0$ with solution
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh v.$$
Easy to check that this satisfies $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 + 2 xyz.$
Multiplying the variables by $i$ preserves the identity, while $cosh it = cos t,$ so we get
$$x = cos t, ; ; y = cos u, ; ; z = cos ; (t+u)$$
for $|x|,|y|,|z| leq 1.$
Not sure yet whether having, say, $z geq 1$ forces both $x,y geq 1.$ Notice that there is no benefit to having two negative values, we can just negate both.. Of course, you might like negative numbers. Matter of taste.
We might have the entire surface with these and then $(-x,-y,-z)$
for the $cosh$ part. Note the gradient being $0$ at the point $(1,1,1)$
of the surface.
There are three involutions; by alternating these one may travel around the surface.
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto ( 2yz-x,y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,2zx-y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,y,2xy-z) $$
Not sure why you are interested in $|x| leq 1.$ For any $t$ we get a solution
$$ (t,t,1) , $$ then the third involution takes us to
$$ (t,t,2t^2 - 1) $$ A different involution ( and re-ordering) takes us to
$$ ( t, 2t^2 - 1, 4 t^3 - 3 t ) $$
which reminds me of $(cos theta, ; cos 2 theta, ; cos 3 theta)$
but also the more useful
$$(cosh w, ; cosh 2 w, ; cosh 3 w).$$
This aspect is very successful: given integers $1 leq m < n,$ and positive real $w,$ we get an ordered solution
$$ ( cosh mw, ; cosh nw, ; ; cosh , (m+n)w ) $$
which explains the repetitions of numbers such as $5042,$ which is $cosh 7w$ when $cosh w = 2.$
Here are some solutions with positive integer entries that are distinct:
26 7 2
97 26 2
99 17 3
244 31 4
362 97 2
362 26 7
485 49 5
577 99 3
846 71 6
1351 362 2
1351 97 7
1921 244 4
2024 127 8
2889 161 9
3219 1933 1727
3363 577 3
3363 99 17
3510 2145 1998
3551 3287 2025
3614 3218 1663
3970 199 10
4015 3409 1727
4095 3569 3087
4097 3203 2947
4127 3417 3047
4237 4115 2095
4247 4183 2177
4299 4149 4095
4446 3130 927
4754 4665 582
4801 485 5
5042 1351 2
5042 362 7
5042 97 26
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
You also can have
⢠$(2,3,6pmsqrt24)$ so all three are greater than 1.
⢠$(-2,-3,6pmsqrt24$
⢠$(1,y,y)$
⢠$(-1,y,-y)$
Remember $cos(a+b)=cos acos b -sin asin b$ so the choice of square-root might get tricky.
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
At first glance it seems to be the same as Cayley's nodal cubic surface. Although there it is described by the (projective) equation $$wxy+xyz+wxz+wyz=0.$$ How, then, do obtain my version of it (if, in fact, they are the same.)
Here is a page which seems to derive my equation from Cayley's.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
At first glance it seems to be the same as Cayley's nodal cubic surface. Although there it is described by the (projective) equation $$wxy+xyz+wxz+wyz=0.$$ How, then, do obtain my version of it (if, in fact, they are the same.)
Here is a page which seems to derive my equation from Cayley's.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
At first glance it seems to be the same as Cayley's nodal cubic surface. Although there it is described by the (projective) equation $$wxy+xyz+wxz+wyz=0.$$ How, then, do obtain my version of it (if, in fact, they are the same.)
Here is a page which seems to derive my equation from Cayley's.
At first glance it seems to be the same as Cayley's nodal cubic surface. Although there it is described by the (projective) equation $$wxy+xyz+wxz+wyz=0.$$ How, then, do obtain my version of it (if, in fact, they are the same.)
Here is a page which seems to derive my equation from Cayley's.
edited Aug 13 at 12:25
answered Aug 13 at 11:55
pdmclean
292214
292214
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This is better understood by considering the roots of unity. Suppose
$, u_n = r_n + s_nsqrt-1 ,$ for $, n=1,2,3 ,$ be three roots of unity such that $, u_3 = u_1 u_2. ,$ Then
$, r_1^2 + r_2^2 + r_3^2 - 2 r_1 r_2 r_3 = 1. ,$ The same equation is true if $, u_3 = u_1/u_2 ,$ or $, u_3 = u_2/u_1. ,$ Or more symmetrically if $, u_1u_2u_3 = 1.,$ The reason is that given only the real part of a root of unity, there are two possible values for the imaginary part. The roots of unity form a multiplicative group, but if we only have the real part, the group operation is two-valued.
The case of addition of points on elliptic curves is very appropriate. The group operation there is related to three points on a line, but not in the obvious way. That is, the third point is not the sum of the other two, but rather the negative of the sum. Another way to state it is that the sum of all three points is the identity. Also, given only the $,x,$ coordinate of a point, there are two values for the $,y,$ coordinate. There is some similarity between "adding" points on the unit circle and points on an elliptic curve.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This is better understood by considering the roots of unity. Suppose
$, u_n = r_n + s_nsqrt-1 ,$ for $, n=1,2,3 ,$ be three roots of unity such that $, u_3 = u_1 u_2. ,$ Then
$, r_1^2 + r_2^2 + r_3^2 - 2 r_1 r_2 r_3 = 1. ,$ The same equation is true if $, u_3 = u_1/u_2 ,$ or $, u_3 = u_2/u_1. ,$ Or more symmetrically if $, u_1u_2u_3 = 1.,$ The reason is that given only the real part of a root of unity, there are two possible values for the imaginary part. The roots of unity form a multiplicative group, but if we only have the real part, the group operation is two-valued.
The case of addition of points on elliptic curves is very appropriate. The group operation there is related to three points on a line, but not in the obvious way. That is, the third point is not the sum of the other two, but rather the negative of the sum. Another way to state it is that the sum of all three points is the identity. Also, given only the $,x,$ coordinate of a point, there are two values for the $,y,$ coordinate. There is some similarity between "adding" points on the unit circle and points on an elliptic curve.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This is better understood by considering the roots of unity. Suppose
$, u_n = r_n + s_nsqrt-1 ,$ for $, n=1,2,3 ,$ be three roots of unity such that $, u_3 = u_1 u_2. ,$ Then
$, r_1^2 + r_2^2 + r_3^2 - 2 r_1 r_2 r_3 = 1. ,$ The same equation is true if $, u_3 = u_1/u_2 ,$ or $, u_3 = u_2/u_1. ,$ Or more symmetrically if $, u_1u_2u_3 = 1.,$ The reason is that given only the real part of a root of unity, there are two possible values for the imaginary part. The roots of unity form a multiplicative group, but if we only have the real part, the group operation is two-valued.
The case of addition of points on elliptic curves is very appropriate. The group operation there is related to three points on a line, but not in the obvious way. That is, the third point is not the sum of the other two, but rather the negative of the sum. Another way to state it is that the sum of all three points is the identity. Also, given only the $,x,$ coordinate of a point, there are two values for the $,y,$ coordinate. There is some similarity between "adding" points on the unit circle and points on an elliptic curve.
This is better understood by considering the roots of unity. Suppose
$, u_n = r_n + s_nsqrt-1 ,$ for $, n=1,2,3 ,$ be three roots of unity such that $, u_3 = u_1 u_2. ,$ Then
$, r_1^2 + r_2^2 + r_3^2 - 2 r_1 r_2 r_3 = 1. ,$ The same equation is true if $, u_3 = u_1/u_2 ,$ or $, u_3 = u_2/u_1. ,$ Or more symmetrically if $, u_1u_2u_3 = 1.,$ The reason is that given only the real part of a root of unity, there are two possible values for the imaginary part. The roots of unity form a multiplicative group, but if we only have the real part, the group operation is two-valued.
The case of addition of points on elliptic curves is very appropriate. The group operation there is related to three points on a line, but not in the obvious way. That is, the third point is not the sum of the other two, but rather the negative of the sum. Another way to state it is that the sum of all three points is the identity. Also, given only the $,x,$ coordinate of a point, there are two values for the $,y,$ coordinate. There is some similarity between "adding" points on the unit circle and points on an elliptic curve.
edited Aug 13 at 14:29
answered Aug 13 at 11:39
Somos
11.7k11033
11.7k11033
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Added: for real $x,y,z geq 1$ we get all
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh ; (t+u).$$
Actually, as $cosh$ is even, we could demand $t+u+v=0$ with solution
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh v.$$
Easy to check that this satisfies $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 + 2 xyz.$
Multiplying the variables by $i$ preserves the identity, while $cosh it = cos t,$ so we get
$$x = cos t, ; ; y = cos u, ; ; z = cos ; (t+u)$$
for $|x|,|y|,|z| leq 1.$
Not sure yet whether having, say, $z geq 1$ forces both $x,y geq 1.$ Notice that there is no benefit to having two negative values, we can just negate both.. Of course, you might like negative numbers. Matter of taste.
We might have the entire surface with these and then $(-x,-y,-z)$
for the $cosh$ part. Note the gradient being $0$ at the point $(1,1,1)$
of the surface.
There are three involutions; by alternating these one may travel around the surface.
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto ( 2yz-x,y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,2zx-y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,y,2xy-z) $$
Not sure why you are interested in $|x| leq 1.$ For any $t$ we get a solution
$$ (t,t,1) , $$ then the third involution takes us to
$$ (t,t,2t^2 - 1) $$ A different involution ( and re-ordering) takes us to
$$ ( t, 2t^2 - 1, 4 t^3 - 3 t ) $$
which reminds me of $(cos theta, ; cos 2 theta, ; cos 3 theta)$
but also the more useful
$$(cosh w, ; cosh 2 w, ; cosh 3 w).$$
This aspect is very successful: given integers $1 leq m < n,$ and positive real $w,$ we get an ordered solution
$$ ( cosh mw, ; cosh nw, ; ; cosh , (m+n)w ) $$
which explains the repetitions of numbers such as $5042,$ which is $cosh 7w$ when $cosh w = 2.$
Here are some solutions with positive integer entries that are distinct:
26 7 2
97 26 2
99 17 3
244 31 4
362 97 2
362 26 7
485 49 5
577 99 3
846 71 6
1351 362 2
1351 97 7
1921 244 4
2024 127 8
2889 161 9
3219 1933 1727
3363 577 3
3363 99 17
3510 2145 1998
3551 3287 2025
3614 3218 1663
3970 199 10
4015 3409 1727
4095 3569 3087
4097 3203 2947
4127 3417 3047
4237 4115 2095
4247 4183 2177
4299 4149 4095
4446 3130 927
4754 4665 582
4801 485 5
5042 1351 2
5042 362 7
5042 97 26
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Added: for real $x,y,z geq 1$ we get all
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh ; (t+u).$$
Actually, as $cosh$ is even, we could demand $t+u+v=0$ with solution
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh v.$$
Easy to check that this satisfies $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 + 2 xyz.$
Multiplying the variables by $i$ preserves the identity, while $cosh it = cos t,$ so we get
$$x = cos t, ; ; y = cos u, ; ; z = cos ; (t+u)$$
for $|x|,|y|,|z| leq 1.$
Not sure yet whether having, say, $z geq 1$ forces both $x,y geq 1.$ Notice that there is no benefit to having two negative values, we can just negate both.. Of course, you might like negative numbers. Matter of taste.
We might have the entire surface with these and then $(-x,-y,-z)$
for the $cosh$ part. Note the gradient being $0$ at the point $(1,1,1)$
of the surface.
There are three involutions; by alternating these one may travel around the surface.
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto ( 2yz-x,y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,2zx-y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,y,2xy-z) $$
Not sure why you are interested in $|x| leq 1.$ For any $t$ we get a solution
$$ (t,t,1) , $$ then the third involution takes us to
$$ (t,t,2t^2 - 1) $$ A different involution ( and re-ordering) takes us to
$$ ( t, 2t^2 - 1, 4 t^3 - 3 t ) $$
which reminds me of $(cos theta, ; cos 2 theta, ; cos 3 theta)$
but also the more useful
$$(cosh w, ; cosh 2 w, ; cosh 3 w).$$
This aspect is very successful: given integers $1 leq m < n,$ and positive real $w,$ we get an ordered solution
$$ ( cosh mw, ; cosh nw, ; ; cosh , (m+n)w ) $$
which explains the repetitions of numbers such as $5042,$ which is $cosh 7w$ when $cosh w = 2.$
Here are some solutions with positive integer entries that are distinct:
26 7 2
97 26 2
99 17 3
244 31 4
362 97 2
362 26 7
485 49 5
577 99 3
846 71 6
1351 362 2
1351 97 7
1921 244 4
2024 127 8
2889 161 9
3219 1933 1727
3363 577 3
3363 99 17
3510 2145 1998
3551 3287 2025
3614 3218 1663
3970 199 10
4015 3409 1727
4095 3569 3087
4097 3203 2947
4127 3417 3047
4237 4115 2095
4247 4183 2177
4299 4149 4095
4446 3130 927
4754 4665 582
4801 485 5
5042 1351 2
5042 362 7
5042 97 26
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Added: for real $x,y,z geq 1$ we get all
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh ; (t+u).$$
Actually, as $cosh$ is even, we could demand $t+u+v=0$ with solution
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh v.$$
Easy to check that this satisfies $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 + 2 xyz.$
Multiplying the variables by $i$ preserves the identity, while $cosh it = cos t,$ so we get
$$x = cos t, ; ; y = cos u, ; ; z = cos ; (t+u)$$
for $|x|,|y|,|z| leq 1.$
Not sure yet whether having, say, $z geq 1$ forces both $x,y geq 1.$ Notice that there is no benefit to having two negative values, we can just negate both.. Of course, you might like negative numbers. Matter of taste.
We might have the entire surface with these and then $(-x,-y,-z)$
for the $cosh$ part. Note the gradient being $0$ at the point $(1,1,1)$
of the surface.
There are three involutions; by alternating these one may travel around the surface.
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto ( 2yz-x,y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,2zx-y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,y,2xy-z) $$
Not sure why you are interested in $|x| leq 1.$ For any $t$ we get a solution
$$ (t,t,1) , $$ then the third involution takes us to
$$ (t,t,2t^2 - 1) $$ A different involution ( and re-ordering) takes us to
$$ ( t, 2t^2 - 1, 4 t^3 - 3 t ) $$
which reminds me of $(cos theta, ; cos 2 theta, ; cos 3 theta)$
but also the more useful
$$(cosh w, ; cosh 2 w, ; cosh 3 w).$$
This aspect is very successful: given integers $1 leq m < n,$ and positive real $w,$ we get an ordered solution
$$ ( cosh mw, ; cosh nw, ; ; cosh , (m+n)w ) $$
which explains the repetitions of numbers such as $5042,$ which is $cosh 7w$ when $cosh w = 2.$
Here are some solutions with positive integer entries that are distinct:
26 7 2
97 26 2
99 17 3
244 31 4
362 97 2
362 26 7
485 49 5
577 99 3
846 71 6
1351 362 2
1351 97 7
1921 244 4
2024 127 8
2889 161 9
3219 1933 1727
3363 577 3
3363 99 17
3510 2145 1998
3551 3287 2025
3614 3218 1663
3970 199 10
4015 3409 1727
4095 3569 3087
4097 3203 2947
4127 3417 3047
4237 4115 2095
4247 4183 2177
4299 4149 4095
4446 3130 927
4754 4665 582
4801 485 5
5042 1351 2
5042 362 7
5042 97 26
Added: for real $x,y,z geq 1$ we get all
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh ; (t+u).$$
Actually, as $cosh$ is even, we could demand $t+u+v=0$ with solution
$$x = cosh t, ; ; y = cosh u, ; ; z = cosh v.$$
Easy to check that this satisfies $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 + 2 xyz.$
Multiplying the variables by $i$ preserves the identity, while $cosh it = cos t,$ so we get
$$x = cos t, ; ; y = cos u, ; ; z = cos ; (t+u)$$
for $|x|,|y|,|z| leq 1.$
Not sure yet whether having, say, $z geq 1$ forces both $x,y geq 1.$ Notice that there is no benefit to having two negative values, we can just negate both.. Of course, you might like negative numbers. Matter of taste.
We might have the entire surface with these and then $(-x,-y,-z)$
for the $cosh$ part. Note the gradient being $0$ at the point $(1,1,1)$
of the surface.
There are three involutions; by alternating these one may travel around the surface.
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto ( 2yz-x,y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,2zx-y,z) $$
$$ (x,y,z) mapsto (x,y,2xy-z) $$
Not sure why you are interested in $|x| leq 1.$ For any $t$ we get a solution
$$ (t,t,1) , $$ then the third involution takes us to
$$ (t,t,2t^2 - 1) $$ A different involution ( and re-ordering) takes us to
$$ ( t, 2t^2 - 1, 4 t^3 - 3 t ) $$
which reminds me of $(cos theta, ; cos 2 theta, ; cos 3 theta)$
but also the more useful
$$(cosh w, ; cosh 2 w, ; cosh 3 w).$$
This aspect is very successful: given integers $1 leq m < n,$ and positive real $w,$ we get an ordered solution
$$ ( cosh mw, ; cosh nw, ; ; cosh , (m+n)w ) $$
which explains the repetitions of numbers such as $5042,$ which is $cosh 7w$ when $cosh w = 2.$
Here are some solutions with positive integer entries that are distinct:
26 7 2
97 26 2
99 17 3
244 31 4
362 97 2
362 26 7
485 49 5
577 99 3
846 71 6
1351 362 2
1351 97 7
1921 244 4
2024 127 8
2889 161 9
3219 1933 1727
3363 577 3
3363 99 17
3510 2145 1998
3551 3287 2025
3614 3218 1663
3970 199 10
4015 3409 1727
4095 3569 3087
4097 3203 2947
4127 3417 3047
4237 4115 2095
4247 4183 2177
4299 4149 4095
4446 3130 927
4754 4665 582
4801 485 5
5042 1351 2
5042 362 7
5042 97 26
edited Aug 13 at 22:37
answered Aug 13 at 19:08
Will Jagy
97.4k595196
97.4k595196
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
You also can have
⢠$(2,3,6pmsqrt24)$ so all three are greater than 1.
⢠$(-2,-3,6pmsqrt24$
⢠$(1,y,y)$
⢠$(-1,y,-y)$
Remember $cos(a+b)=cos acos b -sin asin b$ so the choice of square-root might get tricky.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
You also can have
⢠$(2,3,6pmsqrt24)$ so all three are greater than 1.
⢠$(-2,-3,6pmsqrt24$
⢠$(1,y,y)$
⢠$(-1,y,-y)$
Remember $cos(a+b)=cos acos b -sin asin b$ so the choice of square-root might get tricky.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You also can have
⢠$(2,3,6pmsqrt24)$ so all three are greater than 1.
⢠$(-2,-3,6pmsqrt24$
⢠$(1,y,y)$
⢠$(-1,y,-y)$
Remember $cos(a+b)=cos acos b -sin asin b$ so the choice of square-root might get tricky.
You also can have
⢠$(2,3,6pmsqrt24)$ so all three are greater than 1.
⢠$(-2,-3,6pmsqrt24$
⢠$(1,y,y)$
⢠$(-1,y,-y)$
Remember $cos(a+b)=cos acos b -sin asin b$ so the choice of square-root might get tricky.
edited Aug 13 at 12:04
answered Aug 13 at 11:45
Empy2
31.9k12059
31.9k12059
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2881242%2fwhat-is-the-group-like-structure-on-x2y2z2-2xyz-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
how is $-x$ the inverse of $x$ ?
â mercio
Aug 13 at 12:01