Partial derivative of $xyfracx^2-y^2x^2+y^2$ [duplicate]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Show that both mixed partial derivatives exist at the origin but are not equal
1 answer
I am asked to show, that
$f(x,y)=begincases xyfracx^2-y^2x^2+y^2spacetextfor, (x,y)neq (0,0)\ 0spacetextfor, (x,y)=(0,0)endcases$
is everywhere two times partial differentiable, but it is still $D_1D_2f(0,0)neq D_2D_1 f(0,0)$
But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$ hence it should be equal?
I calculated $fracpartial^2 f(x,y)partial xpartial y$ and $fracpartial^2 f(x,y)partial ypartial x$ and I got in both cases the same result (for $(x,y)neq (0,0)$) which is:
$fracx^6+9x^4y^2-9x^2y^4-y^6(x^2+y^2)^3$
Wolframalpha says, that this is correct.
So is there a mistake in the task? Or do I not understand it?
Also, when I want to show, that $f$ is everywhere two times partial differentiable. Is it enough to calculate $fracpartial^2 fpartial^2 x$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial^2 y$ and not needed to go by the definition, since we know, that this function is differentiable as a function in $mathbbR$?
What do you think?
Thanks in advance.
partial-derivative
marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, Sil, Adrian Keister, amWhy, Lord Shark the Unknown Aug 14 at 2:25
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Show that both mixed partial derivatives exist at the origin but are not equal
1 answer
I am asked to show, that
$f(x,y)=begincases xyfracx^2-y^2x^2+y^2spacetextfor, (x,y)neq (0,0)\ 0spacetextfor, (x,y)=(0,0)endcases$
is everywhere two times partial differentiable, but it is still $D_1D_2f(0,0)neq D_2D_1 f(0,0)$
But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$ hence it should be equal?
I calculated $fracpartial^2 f(x,y)partial xpartial y$ and $fracpartial^2 f(x,y)partial ypartial x$ and I got in both cases the same result (for $(x,y)neq (0,0)$) which is:
$fracx^6+9x^4y^2-9x^2y^4-y^6(x^2+y^2)^3$
Wolframalpha says, that this is correct.
So is there a mistake in the task? Or do I not understand it?
Also, when I want to show, that $f$ is everywhere two times partial differentiable. Is it enough to calculate $fracpartial^2 fpartial^2 x$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial^2 y$ and not needed to go by the definition, since we know, that this function is differentiable as a function in $mathbbR$?
What do you think?
Thanks in advance.
partial-derivative
marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, Sil, Adrian Keister, amWhy, Lord Shark the Unknown Aug 14 at 2:25
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
This is Peano's counter-example which shows that being twice differentiable is not the same as having all partial derivatives of order two. The hypotheses of Schwarz' theorem are a sufficient condition for this to happen.
â Bernard
Aug 13 at 10:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Show that both mixed partial derivatives exist at the origin but are not equal
1 answer
I am asked to show, that
$f(x,y)=begincases xyfracx^2-y^2x^2+y^2spacetextfor, (x,y)neq (0,0)\ 0spacetextfor, (x,y)=(0,0)endcases$
is everywhere two times partial differentiable, but it is still $D_1D_2f(0,0)neq D_2D_1 f(0,0)$
But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$ hence it should be equal?
I calculated $fracpartial^2 f(x,y)partial xpartial y$ and $fracpartial^2 f(x,y)partial ypartial x$ and I got in both cases the same result (for $(x,y)neq (0,0)$) which is:
$fracx^6+9x^4y^2-9x^2y^4-y^6(x^2+y^2)^3$
Wolframalpha says, that this is correct.
So is there a mistake in the task? Or do I not understand it?
Also, when I want to show, that $f$ is everywhere two times partial differentiable. Is it enough to calculate $fracpartial^2 fpartial^2 x$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial^2 y$ and not needed to go by the definition, since we know, that this function is differentiable as a function in $mathbbR$?
What do you think?
Thanks in advance.
partial-derivative
This question already has an answer here:
Show that both mixed partial derivatives exist at the origin but are not equal
1 answer
I am asked to show, that
$f(x,y)=begincases xyfracx^2-y^2x^2+y^2spacetextfor, (x,y)neq (0,0)\ 0spacetextfor, (x,y)=(0,0)endcases$
is everywhere two times partial differentiable, but it is still $D_1D_2f(0,0)neq D_2D_1 f(0,0)$
But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$ hence it should be equal?
I calculated $fracpartial^2 f(x,y)partial xpartial y$ and $fracpartial^2 f(x,y)partial ypartial x$ and I got in both cases the same result (for $(x,y)neq (0,0)$) which is:
$fracx^6+9x^4y^2-9x^2y^4-y^6(x^2+y^2)^3$
Wolframalpha says, that this is correct.
So is there a mistake in the task? Or do I not understand it?
Also, when I want to show, that $f$ is everywhere two times partial differentiable. Is it enough to calculate $fracpartial^2 fpartial^2 x$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial^2 y$ and not needed to go by the definition, since we know, that this function is differentiable as a function in $mathbbR$?
What do you think?
Thanks in advance.
This question already has an answer here:
Show that both mixed partial derivatives exist at the origin but are not equal
1 answer
partial-derivative
asked Aug 13 at 9:39
Cornman
2,61921128
2,61921128
marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, Sil, Adrian Keister, amWhy, Lord Shark the Unknown Aug 14 at 2:25
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, Sil, Adrian Keister, amWhy, Lord Shark the Unknown Aug 14 at 2:25
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
This is Peano's counter-example which shows that being twice differentiable is not the same as having all partial derivatives of order two. The hypotheses of Schwarz' theorem are a sufficient condition for this to happen.
â Bernard
Aug 13 at 10:25
add a comment |Â
This is Peano's counter-example which shows that being twice differentiable is not the same as having all partial derivatives of order two. The hypotheses of Schwarz' theorem are a sufficient condition for this to happen.
â Bernard
Aug 13 at 10:25
This is Peano's counter-example which shows that being twice differentiable is not the same as having all partial derivatives of order two. The hypotheses of Schwarz' theorem are a sufficient condition for this to happen.
â Bernard
Aug 13 at 10:25
This is Peano's counter-example which shows that being twice differentiable is not the same as having all partial derivatives of order two. The hypotheses of Schwarz' theorem are a sufficient condition for this to happen.
â Bernard
Aug 13 at 10:25
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The limit definition of partial derivative at $(x,y)=(0,0)$:
$$f_x(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial x(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0+h,0)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac(0+h)cdot 0cdot ((0+h)^2-0^2)(0+h)^2+0^2-0h=0;\
f_y(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial y(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0,0+h)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac0cdot(0+h)cdot (0^2-(0+h)^2)0^2+(0+h)^2-0h=0.$$
Note that:
$$f_x(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial x=fracpartial fpartial xleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracy(x^4+4x^2y^2-y^4)(x^2+y^2)^2;\
f_y(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial y=fracpartial fpartial yleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracx^5-4x^3y^2-xy^4(x^2+y^2)^2.\
$$
The partial derivative of partial derivative:
$$fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_x(0,0+h)-f_x(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)(0^4+4cdot 0^2(0+h)^2-(0+h)^4)(0^2+(0+h)^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frac-h^5h^5=-1;\
fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_y(0+h,0)-f_y(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)^5-4(0+h)^3cdot 0^2-(0+h)cdot 0^4((0+h)^2+0^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frach^5h^5=1.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
First a comment
You wrote But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$...
How can you induce an affirmation on second derivatives of a map based on its value at a point?
Second regarding partial second derivatives
You have for $(x,y)neq(0,0)$
$$begincases
fracpartial fpartial x(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(3x^2y-y^3)+2x^2y(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2\
fracpartial fpartial y(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(x^3-3x y^2)+2xy^2(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2
endcases$$
In particular
$$beginalign*
fracpartial fpartial x(0,y) &= -y text for y neq 0\
fracpartial fpartial x(x,0) &= x text for x neq 0
endalign*$$
which implies
$$
fracpartial^2 fpartial x partial y(0,0) =1 neq -1 = fracpartial^2 fpartial y partial x(0,0)$$
You can have a look here for more details.
Isn't there a typo here and on your website? Don't you mean $fracpartial fpartial y(x,0)=x$ for $xneq 0$
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:26
Also should it not be $fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y (0,0)=-1$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=1$?
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:28
YouâÂÂre right. IâÂÂll edit my answer.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 11:17
Regarding your question Also should it not be..., the answer is negative. What I wrote is correct.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The limit definition of partial derivative at $(x,y)=(0,0)$:
$$f_x(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial x(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0+h,0)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac(0+h)cdot 0cdot ((0+h)^2-0^2)(0+h)^2+0^2-0h=0;\
f_y(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial y(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0,0+h)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac0cdot(0+h)cdot (0^2-(0+h)^2)0^2+(0+h)^2-0h=0.$$
Note that:
$$f_x(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial x=fracpartial fpartial xleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracy(x^4+4x^2y^2-y^4)(x^2+y^2)^2;\
f_y(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial y=fracpartial fpartial yleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracx^5-4x^3y^2-xy^4(x^2+y^2)^2.\
$$
The partial derivative of partial derivative:
$$fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_x(0,0+h)-f_x(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)(0^4+4cdot 0^2(0+h)^2-(0+h)^4)(0^2+(0+h)^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frac-h^5h^5=-1;\
fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_y(0+h,0)-f_y(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)^5-4(0+h)^3cdot 0^2-(0+h)cdot 0^4((0+h)^2+0^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frach^5h^5=1.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The limit definition of partial derivative at $(x,y)=(0,0)$:
$$f_x(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial x(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0+h,0)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac(0+h)cdot 0cdot ((0+h)^2-0^2)(0+h)^2+0^2-0h=0;\
f_y(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial y(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0,0+h)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac0cdot(0+h)cdot (0^2-(0+h)^2)0^2+(0+h)^2-0h=0.$$
Note that:
$$f_x(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial x=fracpartial fpartial xleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracy(x^4+4x^2y^2-y^4)(x^2+y^2)^2;\
f_y(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial y=fracpartial fpartial yleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracx^5-4x^3y^2-xy^4(x^2+y^2)^2.\
$$
The partial derivative of partial derivative:
$$fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_x(0,0+h)-f_x(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)(0^4+4cdot 0^2(0+h)^2-(0+h)^4)(0^2+(0+h)^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frac-h^5h^5=-1;\
fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_y(0+h,0)-f_y(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)^5-4(0+h)^3cdot 0^2-(0+h)cdot 0^4((0+h)^2+0^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frach^5h^5=1.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The limit definition of partial derivative at $(x,y)=(0,0)$:
$$f_x(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial x(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0+h,0)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac(0+h)cdot 0cdot ((0+h)^2-0^2)(0+h)^2+0^2-0h=0;\
f_y(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial y(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0,0+h)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac0cdot(0+h)cdot (0^2-(0+h)^2)0^2+(0+h)^2-0h=0.$$
Note that:
$$f_x(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial x=fracpartial fpartial xleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracy(x^4+4x^2y^2-y^4)(x^2+y^2)^2;\
f_y(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial y=fracpartial fpartial yleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracx^5-4x^3y^2-xy^4(x^2+y^2)^2.\
$$
The partial derivative of partial derivative:
$$fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_x(0,0+h)-f_x(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)(0^4+4cdot 0^2(0+h)^2-(0+h)^4)(0^2+(0+h)^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frac-h^5h^5=-1;\
fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_y(0+h,0)-f_y(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)^5-4(0+h)^3cdot 0^2-(0+h)cdot 0^4((0+h)^2+0^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frach^5h^5=1.$$
The limit definition of partial derivative at $(x,y)=(0,0)$:
$$f_x(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial x(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0+h,0)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac(0+h)cdot 0cdot ((0+h)^2-0^2)(0+h)^2+0^2-0h=0;\
f_y(0,0)=fracpartial fpartial y(0,0)=lim_hto 0 fracf(0,0+h)-f(0,0)h=fracfrac0cdot(0+h)cdot (0^2-(0+h)^2)0^2+(0+h)^2-0h=0.$$
Note that:
$$f_x(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial x=fracpartial fpartial xleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracy(x^4+4x^2y^2-y^4)(x^2+y^2)^2;\
f_y(x,y)=fracpartial fpartial y=fracpartial fpartial yleft(fracx^3y-xy^3x^2+y^2right)=fracx^5-4x^3y^2-xy^4(x^2+y^2)^2.\
$$
The partial derivative of partial derivative:
$$fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_x(0,0+h)-f_x(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)(0^4+4cdot 0^2(0+h)^2-(0+h)^4)(0^2+(0+h)^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frac-h^5h^5=-1;\
fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=
lim_hto 0 fracf_y(0+h,0)-f_y(0,0)h=\
lim_hto 0 fracfrac(0+h)^5-4(0+h)^3cdot 0^2-(0+h)cdot 0^4((0+h)^2+0^2)^2-0h=lim_hto 0 frach^5h^5=1.$$
answered Aug 13 at 11:02
farruhota
13.9k2632
13.9k2632
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
First a comment
You wrote But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$...
How can you induce an affirmation on second derivatives of a map based on its value at a point?
Second regarding partial second derivatives
You have for $(x,y)neq(0,0)$
$$begincases
fracpartial fpartial x(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(3x^2y-y^3)+2x^2y(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2\
fracpartial fpartial y(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(x^3-3x y^2)+2xy^2(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2
endcases$$
In particular
$$beginalign*
fracpartial fpartial x(0,y) &= -y text for y neq 0\
fracpartial fpartial x(x,0) &= x text for x neq 0
endalign*$$
which implies
$$
fracpartial^2 fpartial x partial y(0,0) =1 neq -1 = fracpartial^2 fpartial y partial x(0,0)$$
You can have a look here for more details.
Isn't there a typo here and on your website? Don't you mean $fracpartial fpartial y(x,0)=x$ for $xneq 0$
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:26
Also should it not be $fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y (0,0)=-1$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=1$?
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:28
YouâÂÂre right. IâÂÂll edit my answer.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 11:17
Regarding your question Also should it not be..., the answer is negative. What I wrote is correct.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
First a comment
You wrote But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$...
How can you induce an affirmation on second derivatives of a map based on its value at a point?
Second regarding partial second derivatives
You have for $(x,y)neq(0,0)$
$$begincases
fracpartial fpartial x(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(3x^2y-y^3)+2x^2y(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2\
fracpartial fpartial y(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(x^3-3x y^2)+2xy^2(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2
endcases$$
In particular
$$beginalign*
fracpartial fpartial x(0,y) &= -y text for y neq 0\
fracpartial fpartial x(x,0) &= x text for x neq 0
endalign*$$
which implies
$$
fracpartial^2 fpartial x partial y(0,0) =1 neq -1 = fracpartial^2 fpartial y partial x(0,0)$$
You can have a look here for more details.
Isn't there a typo here and on your website? Don't you mean $fracpartial fpartial y(x,0)=x$ for $xneq 0$
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:26
Also should it not be $fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y (0,0)=-1$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=1$?
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:28
YouâÂÂre right. IâÂÂll edit my answer.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 11:17
Regarding your question Also should it not be..., the answer is negative. What I wrote is correct.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
First a comment
You wrote But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$...
How can you induce an affirmation on second derivatives of a map based on its value at a point?
Second regarding partial second derivatives
You have for $(x,y)neq(0,0)$
$$begincases
fracpartial fpartial x(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(3x^2y-y^3)+2x^2y(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2\
fracpartial fpartial y(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(x^3-3x y^2)+2xy^2(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2
endcases$$
In particular
$$beginalign*
fracpartial fpartial x(0,y) &= -y text for y neq 0\
fracpartial fpartial x(x,0) &= x text for x neq 0
endalign*$$
which implies
$$
fracpartial^2 fpartial x partial y(0,0) =1 neq -1 = fracpartial^2 fpartial y partial x(0,0)$$
You can have a look here for more details.
First a comment
You wrote But this does not make much sense in my opinion. Since $f(0,0)=0$...
How can you induce an affirmation on second derivatives of a map based on its value at a point?
Second regarding partial second derivatives
You have for $(x,y)neq(0,0)$
$$begincases
fracpartial fpartial x(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(3x^2y-y^3)+2x^2y(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2\
fracpartial fpartial y(x,y) = frac(x^2+y^2)(x^3-3x y^2)+2xy^2(y^2-x^2)(x^2+y^2)^2
endcases$$
In particular
$$beginalign*
fracpartial fpartial x(0,y) &= -y text for y neq 0\
fracpartial fpartial x(x,0) &= x text for x neq 0
endalign*$$
which implies
$$
fracpartial^2 fpartial x partial y(0,0) =1 neq -1 = fracpartial^2 fpartial y partial x(0,0)$$
You can have a look here for more details.
edited Aug 13 at 11:18
answered Aug 13 at 10:16
mathcounterexamples.net
25k21754
25k21754
Isn't there a typo here and on your website? Don't you mean $fracpartial fpartial y(x,0)=x$ for $xneq 0$
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:26
Also should it not be $fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y (0,0)=-1$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=1$?
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:28
YouâÂÂre right. IâÂÂll edit my answer.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 11:17
Regarding your question Also should it not be..., the answer is negative. What I wrote is correct.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
Isn't there a typo here and on your website? Don't you mean $fracpartial fpartial y(x,0)=x$ for $xneq 0$
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:26
Also should it not be $fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y (0,0)=-1$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=1$?
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:28
YouâÂÂre right. IâÂÂll edit my answer.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 11:17
Regarding your question Also should it not be..., the answer is negative. What I wrote is correct.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 15:44
Isn't there a typo here and on your website? Don't you mean $fracpartial fpartial y(x,0)=x$ for $xneq 0$
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:26
Isn't there a typo here and on your website? Don't you mean $fracpartial fpartial y(x,0)=x$ for $xneq 0$
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:26
Also should it not be $fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y (0,0)=-1$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=1$?
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:28
Also should it not be $fracpartial^2 fpartial xpartial y (0,0)=-1$ and $fracpartial^2 fpartial ypartial x(0,0)=1$?
â Cornman
Aug 13 at 10:28
YouâÂÂre right. IâÂÂll edit my answer.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 11:17
YouâÂÂre right. IâÂÂll edit my answer.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 11:17
Regarding your question Also should it not be..., the answer is negative. What I wrote is correct.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 15:44
Regarding your question Also should it not be..., the answer is negative. What I wrote is correct.
â mathcounterexamples.net
Aug 13 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
This is Peano's counter-example which shows that being twice differentiable is not the same as having all partial derivatives of order two. The hypotheses of Schwarz' theorem are a sufficient condition for this to happen.
â Bernard
Aug 13 at 10:25