How to find out whether a matrix to the $4$th power is the identity matrix?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3












Last semester, I was following a Linear Algebra course and in the exam of that course, the following question was asked:



Of the following 5 matrices A, how many of them satisfy $A^4 = I$ ?
$$beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfracsqrt22&fracsqrt22\-fracsqrt22&fracsqrt22endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfracsqrt22&fracsqrt22\-fracsqrt22&-fracsqrt22endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfrac12&-fracsqrt32\fracsqrt32&frac12endbmatrix, beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix $$



I answered this question by doing all the calculations to the power of 4, and as you would expect, this took way too much time but I eventually figured out the correct answer which is 2 of them, which are the following matrices:



$$beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix and beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix $$



I'm taking the exam again and was wondering if there's a different and easier way to solve such a question?







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    A possible lead would to see if $det(A)^4 = 1$. But this may not give you the correct answer but can point in you in the right direction.
    – Good Morning Captain
    Aug 13 at 8:04






  • 5




    The key is that all of them are rotational matrices.
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 13 at 8:05






  • 5




    Except the one in the middle. That one has rank 1 (duplicated column) so its fourth power cannot be the identity matrix.
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 13 at 8:06










  • @KennyLau Can you maybe elaborate on how that helps?
    – Abdul Malek Altawekji
    Aug 13 at 8:11










  • @KennyLau I was about to point out that too, but according to wikipedia, the first one doesn't follow the rotation matrix pattern either.
    – F.Carette
    Aug 13 at 8:13














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3












Last semester, I was following a Linear Algebra course and in the exam of that course, the following question was asked:



Of the following 5 matrices A, how many of them satisfy $A^4 = I$ ?
$$beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfracsqrt22&fracsqrt22\-fracsqrt22&fracsqrt22endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfracsqrt22&fracsqrt22\-fracsqrt22&-fracsqrt22endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfrac12&-fracsqrt32\fracsqrt32&frac12endbmatrix, beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix $$



I answered this question by doing all the calculations to the power of 4, and as you would expect, this took way too much time but I eventually figured out the correct answer which is 2 of them, which are the following matrices:



$$beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix and beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix $$



I'm taking the exam again and was wondering if there's a different and easier way to solve such a question?







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    A possible lead would to see if $det(A)^4 = 1$. But this may not give you the correct answer but can point in you in the right direction.
    – Good Morning Captain
    Aug 13 at 8:04






  • 5




    The key is that all of them are rotational matrices.
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 13 at 8:05






  • 5




    Except the one in the middle. That one has rank 1 (duplicated column) so its fourth power cannot be the identity matrix.
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 13 at 8:06










  • @KennyLau Can you maybe elaborate on how that helps?
    – Abdul Malek Altawekji
    Aug 13 at 8:11










  • @KennyLau I was about to point out that too, but according to wikipedia, the first one doesn't follow the rotation matrix pattern either.
    – F.Carette
    Aug 13 at 8:13












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3






3





Last semester, I was following a Linear Algebra course and in the exam of that course, the following question was asked:



Of the following 5 matrices A, how many of them satisfy $A^4 = I$ ?
$$beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfracsqrt22&fracsqrt22\-fracsqrt22&fracsqrt22endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfracsqrt22&fracsqrt22\-fracsqrt22&-fracsqrt22endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfrac12&-fracsqrt32\fracsqrt32&frac12endbmatrix, beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix $$



I answered this question by doing all the calculations to the power of 4, and as you would expect, this took way too much time but I eventually figured out the correct answer which is 2 of them, which are the following matrices:



$$beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix and beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix $$



I'm taking the exam again and was wondering if there's a different and easier way to solve such a question?







share|cite|improve this question














Last semester, I was following a Linear Algebra course and in the exam of that course, the following question was asked:



Of the following 5 matrices A, how many of them satisfy $A^4 = I$ ?
$$beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfracsqrt22&fracsqrt22\-fracsqrt22&fracsqrt22endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfracsqrt22&fracsqrt22\-fracsqrt22&-fracsqrt22endbmatrix, beginbmatrixfrac12&-fracsqrt32\fracsqrt32&frac12endbmatrix, beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix $$



I answered this question by doing all the calculations to the power of 4, and as you would expect, this took way too much time but I eventually figured out the correct answer which is 2 of them, which are the following matrices:



$$beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix and beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix $$



I'm taking the exam again and was wondering if there's a different and easier way to solve such a question?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 13 at 15:15









user21820

35.9k440138




35.9k440138










asked Aug 13 at 7:54









Abdul Malek Altawekji

317115




317115







  • 2




    A possible lead would to see if $det(A)^4 = 1$. But this may not give you the correct answer but can point in you in the right direction.
    – Good Morning Captain
    Aug 13 at 8:04






  • 5




    The key is that all of them are rotational matrices.
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 13 at 8:05






  • 5




    Except the one in the middle. That one has rank 1 (duplicated column) so its fourth power cannot be the identity matrix.
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 13 at 8:06










  • @KennyLau Can you maybe elaborate on how that helps?
    – Abdul Malek Altawekji
    Aug 13 at 8:11










  • @KennyLau I was about to point out that too, but according to wikipedia, the first one doesn't follow the rotation matrix pattern either.
    – F.Carette
    Aug 13 at 8:13












  • 2




    A possible lead would to see if $det(A)^4 = 1$. But this may not give you the correct answer but can point in you in the right direction.
    – Good Morning Captain
    Aug 13 at 8:04






  • 5




    The key is that all of them are rotational matrices.
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 13 at 8:05






  • 5




    Except the one in the middle. That one has rank 1 (duplicated column) so its fourth power cannot be the identity matrix.
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 13 at 8:06










  • @KennyLau Can you maybe elaborate on how that helps?
    – Abdul Malek Altawekji
    Aug 13 at 8:11










  • @KennyLau I was about to point out that too, but according to wikipedia, the first one doesn't follow the rotation matrix pattern either.
    – F.Carette
    Aug 13 at 8:13







2




2




A possible lead would to see if $det(A)^4 = 1$. But this may not give you the correct answer but can point in you in the right direction.
– Good Morning Captain
Aug 13 at 8:04




A possible lead would to see if $det(A)^4 = 1$. But this may not give you the correct answer but can point in you in the right direction.
– Good Morning Captain
Aug 13 at 8:04




5




5




The key is that all of them are rotational matrices.
– Kenny Lau
Aug 13 at 8:05




The key is that all of them are rotational matrices.
– Kenny Lau
Aug 13 at 8:05




5




5




Except the one in the middle. That one has rank 1 (duplicated column) so its fourth power cannot be the identity matrix.
– Kenny Lau
Aug 13 at 8:06




Except the one in the middle. That one has rank 1 (duplicated column) so its fourth power cannot be the identity matrix.
– Kenny Lau
Aug 13 at 8:06












@KennyLau Can you maybe elaborate on how that helps?
– Abdul Malek Altawekji
Aug 13 at 8:11




@KennyLau Can you maybe elaborate on how that helps?
– Abdul Malek Altawekji
Aug 13 at 8:11












@KennyLau I was about to point out that too, but according to wikipedia, the first one doesn't follow the rotation matrix pattern either.
– F.Carette
Aug 13 at 8:13




@KennyLau I was about to point out that too, but according to wikipedia, the first one doesn't follow the rotation matrix pattern either.
– F.Carette
Aug 13 at 8:13










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
9
down vote



accepted










Here's how I would have approached the problem.



(1) Since this matrix is diagonal, we can calculate
$$
beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4=beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix=beginbmatrix1&0\0&1endbmatrix
$$
so this matrix satisfies $A^4=I$.



(2) For this matrix, I notice that $sqrt2/2$ appears a lot, so my brain goes to the fact that $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4)=sqrt2/2$. Thinking of this matrix as corresponding to a linear transformation in the plane, I took a look at the form for a rotation matrix:
$$
beginbmatrixcos(theta)&-sin(theta)\sin(theta)&cos(theta)endbmatrix.
$$
This tells me that our matrix corresponds to a rotation by $-pi/4$, so $A^4$ corresponds to composing this rotation by itself four times, resulting in rotating by $-pi$. Since, in general, rotating a vector by $-pi$ doesn't result in the same vector, it follows that $A^4neq I$.



(3) Here I noticed that the bottom row is a scalar multiple of the top row, so the matrix cannot be invertible. You can justify this by realizing this means the rows are not linearly independent, or simply by computing the determinant and seeing that it's zero. Since the matrix is not invertible, it is impossible that $A^4=I$. We can see this in a few ways: first, the properties of determinants tell me that $A^4=I$ implies that $det(A)^4=det(I)=1$ and so $det(A)neq0$, which we know isn't true for our $A$ since it's not invertible; second, $A^4=I$ can be written as $A(A^3)=I$, and this would imply that $A$ is invertible with $A^-1=A^3$, but $A$ isn't invertible.



(4) Like with (2), I see $1/2$ and $sqrt3/2$, so I think of rotation matrices and see that this matrix corresponds to a rotation by $pi/3$. Again, since for a vector $vinmathbbR^2$, $A^4v$ is an application of $A$ to the vector $v$ four times, it follows that $A^4$ corresponds to a rotation by $4pi/3$. Thus, $A^4vneq v$ for a general $v$.



(5) Correcting my answer thanks to the comments below, if one did not wish to do the matrix multiplication, one could again realize that the matrix is a rotation matrix corresponding to $theta=pi/2.$ As applying this rotation four times to any vector results in a rotation by $2pi$, or, equivalently, no rotation at all, we have that $A^4=I$.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Great answer. Although it has been accepted, I have trouble understanding how you solved (5). You seem to use $(A^T)^4=I implies A^4=I^T=I$. Does it always stand, or did I miss something?
    – F.Carette
    Aug 13 at 8:51











  • Good question. I'll add some details.
    – Ryan Gibara
    Aug 13 at 8:59










  • I just realised that the $(A^T)^n=(A^n)^T$ property can be trivially deduced from the product property $(AB)^T=B^TA^T$. My bad, and thanks for the added details
    – F.Carette
    Aug 13 at 9:17











  • There, you got it. No problem!
    – Ryan Gibara
    Aug 13 at 9:44






  • 2




    Careful! The transpose of matrix 5 is not diagonal: $beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix^T = beginbmatrix0&1\-1&0endbmatrix$. But you could use the fact that the square is $-I$.
    – Rob
    Aug 13 at 10:56


















up vote
4
down vote













The first one is trivial: it is a diagonal matrix, so $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4 = beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix = I_2$.



The middle one is eliminated: it has duplicated column, so it is singular, so its fourth power is also singular, but the identity matrix is not singular.



Let $R_theta$ denote the rotational matrix of angle $theta$.



The thing with rotational matrices is that $R_varphi R_psi = R_varphi + psi$, so $(R_theta)^4 = R_4theta$.



Then, the rest of the matrices are $R_-45^circ$, $R_60^circ$, $R_90^circ$.



Therefore, their fourth powers are respectively $R_-180^circ$, $R_240^circ$, $R_360^circ$, and only the last one is the identity matrix.



Therefore the answer is the first and the fifth one.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    A more algebraic approach: $A^4=I$ means $A$ is root of the polynomial
    $$f(X):=X^4-1=(X+1)(X-1)(X+i)(X-i).$$



    This is true iff $f$ is a multiple of the minimum polynomial $m_A$ of $A$. Since $m_A$ divides the characteristic polynomial $p_A$ of $A$, in this case the characteristic polynomials are of degree $2$, and there is no scalar matrix (the only ones with minimum polynomial of degree at most $1$), in fact $m_A=p_A$ (modulo some unit). Thus we can check if $f(A)=0$ by checking if $p_A|f$.



    Matrix 1: $p_A(X)=(X-1)(X+1)$ divides $f$, so $f(A)=0$.



    Matrix 2: $p_A(X)=-fracsqrt22(X^2-2X+2)$ does not divide $f$, so $f(A)neq0$.



    Matrix 3: $p_A(X)= -fracsqrt22(X^2-2)$ does not divide $f$.



    Matrix 4: $p_A(X)=-frac12(X^2-2X+sqrt3+1)$ does not divide $f$.



    Matrix 5: $p_A(X)=X^2+1$ divides $f$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      The second, the fourth and the fifth matrices are of the form $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)$, for some $thetainmathbb R$. So, $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)^4=operatornameId_2$ if and only if $4thetain2pimathbb Z(iff 2thetainpimathbb Z)$.



      The first matrix is a diagonal one, and so it is easy to work with.



      The third matrix has determinant $0$, and therefore cannot be a solution.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















      • The first one isn't a rotational matrix.
        – Kenny Lau
        Aug 13 at 8:17










      • @KennyLau I've edited my answer. Thank you.
        – José Carlos Santos
        Aug 13 at 8:19










      • @KennyLau The first matrix is a rotation matrix; an improper rotation if you will, but a rotation nevertheless. It is not in the special orthogonal group $mathrmSO(2)$, but it is in the rotation group $mathrm O(2)$.
        – AccidentalFourierTransform
        Aug 13 at 13:53

















      up vote
      1
      down vote













      In this case for $x=4$ it is more easy to just work out the matrix multiplication but for higher values of $x$ I suggest trying to diagonalize the matrix i.e.:



      $A = CDC^-1$ with $D = diag(lambda_1,...,lambda_n)$ so the diagonal matrix with eigenvalues on the diagonal (assuming $n$ eigenvalues here) and $C = (a_1,...,a_n)$ where $A a_i = lambda_i a_i $ so $a_i$ are eigenvectors in $C$ and $C^-1$ denotes the inverse (of course you should check invertibility, for example through $det(C) neq 0$.



      Now we show what $A^x$ gives for $x in 2,3,4,...$:



      $A^x = AA....A = CDC^-1CDC^-1 .... CDC^-1= CD^x C^-1$ using $C^-1C=I$ with $I$ the identity matrix.



      So you can just try to calculate $A^x = CD^xC^-1$ since you can compare this matrix to standard rotation and reflection matrices you can immediately see the rotation axis and line of reflection.



      E.g. the first one, we see that using a standard basis $e_1,e_2$ for $mathcalR^2$ we have that $R(e_1)=e_1, R(e_2)=-e_2$. This means that we reflect all $x in mathcalR^2$ around $spane_1$. This means $lambda_1 = 1, lambda_2 = -1$ and corresponding eigenvectors are $e_1,e_2$ respectively. Now you can plug these in the equation I explained and you will see that it gives $A^4 = D^4$ therefore you can see that $D=diag(1^4,(-1)^4)=diag(1,1)=I_2 times 2$.



      The rest of the matrices can be calculated using the same approach. Try to ‘see’ eigenvalues and eigenvectors from your matrix (compare to standard rotations and so on) and use the formula I gave to you. Hope it helps, greets!






      share|cite|improve this answer





























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        I don't have much to add to the accepted answer, but I wanted to suggest that this problem is relatively easy if you start by thinking about what a matrix means as a linear transform. Draw both column vectors and look at them as transforms to $hati$ and $hatj$, and it should be clear which transforms will result in no change when applied 4 times.



        The first leaves $hati$ unchanged and negates $hatj$. Applying it a second time flips it back to the original. Flipping it 2 more times again leaves us at the original.



        The second is a clockwise rotation by 45°. Doing this 4x only takes us halfway around the circle.



        The third maps both basis vectors to the same point. So we lose a dimension, determinant is 0, matrix is not invertible, yadda yadda yadda, the point is: applying it 4x certainly isn't going to get us back to the original.



        The fourth is another rotation, again by an angle that doesn't get us back to the original.



        The fifth is the classic counterclockwise rotation by 90°. Applying it 4x takes us all the way around the circle.






        share|cite|improve this answer




















          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2881107%2fhow-to-find-out-whether-a-matrix-to-the-4th-power-is-the-identity-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          Here's how I would have approached the problem.



          (1) Since this matrix is diagonal, we can calculate
          $$
          beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4=beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix=beginbmatrix1&0\0&1endbmatrix
          $$
          so this matrix satisfies $A^4=I$.



          (2) For this matrix, I notice that $sqrt2/2$ appears a lot, so my brain goes to the fact that $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4)=sqrt2/2$. Thinking of this matrix as corresponding to a linear transformation in the plane, I took a look at the form for a rotation matrix:
          $$
          beginbmatrixcos(theta)&-sin(theta)\sin(theta)&cos(theta)endbmatrix.
          $$
          This tells me that our matrix corresponds to a rotation by $-pi/4$, so $A^4$ corresponds to composing this rotation by itself four times, resulting in rotating by $-pi$. Since, in general, rotating a vector by $-pi$ doesn't result in the same vector, it follows that $A^4neq I$.



          (3) Here I noticed that the bottom row is a scalar multiple of the top row, so the matrix cannot be invertible. You can justify this by realizing this means the rows are not linearly independent, or simply by computing the determinant and seeing that it's zero. Since the matrix is not invertible, it is impossible that $A^4=I$. We can see this in a few ways: first, the properties of determinants tell me that $A^4=I$ implies that $det(A)^4=det(I)=1$ and so $det(A)neq0$, which we know isn't true for our $A$ since it's not invertible; second, $A^4=I$ can be written as $A(A^3)=I$, and this would imply that $A$ is invertible with $A^-1=A^3$, but $A$ isn't invertible.



          (4) Like with (2), I see $1/2$ and $sqrt3/2$, so I think of rotation matrices and see that this matrix corresponds to a rotation by $pi/3$. Again, since for a vector $vinmathbbR^2$, $A^4v$ is an application of $A$ to the vector $v$ four times, it follows that $A^4$ corresponds to a rotation by $4pi/3$. Thus, $A^4vneq v$ for a general $v$.



          (5) Correcting my answer thanks to the comments below, if one did not wish to do the matrix multiplication, one could again realize that the matrix is a rotation matrix corresponding to $theta=pi/2.$ As applying this rotation four times to any vector results in a rotation by $2pi$, or, equivalently, no rotation at all, we have that $A^4=I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Great answer. Although it has been accepted, I have trouble understanding how you solved (5). You seem to use $(A^T)^4=I implies A^4=I^T=I$. Does it always stand, or did I miss something?
            – F.Carette
            Aug 13 at 8:51











          • Good question. I'll add some details.
            – Ryan Gibara
            Aug 13 at 8:59










          • I just realised that the $(A^T)^n=(A^n)^T$ property can be trivially deduced from the product property $(AB)^T=B^TA^T$. My bad, and thanks for the added details
            – F.Carette
            Aug 13 at 9:17











          • There, you got it. No problem!
            – Ryan Gibara
            Aug 13 at 9:44






          • 2




            Careful! The transpose of matrix 5 is not diagonal: $beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix^T = beginbmatrix0&1\-1&0endbmatrix$. But you could use the fact that the square is $-I$.
            – Rob
            Aug 13 at 10:56















          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          Here's how I would have approached the problem.



          (1) Since this matrix is diagonal, we can calculate
          $$
          beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4=beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix=beginbmatrix1&0\0&1endbmatrix
          $$
          so this matrix satisfies $A^4=I$.



          (2) For this matrix, I notice that $sqrt2/2$ appears a lot, so my brain goes to the fact that $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4)=sqrt2/2$. Thinking of this matrix as corresponding to a linear transformation in the plane, I took a look at the form for a rotation matrix:
          $$
          beginbmatrixcos(theta)&-sin(theta)\sin(theta)&cos(theta)endbmatrix.
          $$
          This tells me that our matrix corresponds to a rotation by $-pi/4$, so $A^4$ corresponds to composing this rotation by itself four times, resulting in rotating by $-pi$. Since, in general, rotating a vector by $-pi$ doesn't result in the same vector, it follows that $A^4neq I$.



          (3) Here I noticed that the bottom row is a scalar multiple of the top row, so the matrix cannot be invertible. You can justify this by realizing this means the rows are not linearly independent, or simply by computing the determinant and seeing that it's zero. Since the matrix is not invertible, it is impossible that $A^4=I$. We can see this in a few ways: first, the properties of determinants tell me that $A^4=I$ implies that $det(A)^4=det(I)=1$ and so $det(A)neq0$, which we know isn't true for our $A$ since it's not invertible; second, $A^4=I$ can be written as $A(A^3)=I$, and this would imply that $A$ is invertible with $A^-1=A^3$, but $A$ isn't invertible.



          (4) Like with (2), I see $1/2$ and $sqrt3/2$, so I think of rotation matrices and see that this matrix corresponds to a rotation by $pi/3$. Again, since for a vector $vinmathbbR^2$, $A^4v$ is an application of $A$ to the vector $v$ four times, it follows that $A^4$ corresponds to a rotation by $4pi/3$. Thus, $A^4vneq v$ for a general $v$.



          (5) Correcting my answer thanks to the comments below, if one did not wish to do the matrix multiplication, one could again realize that the matrix is a rotation matrix corresponding to $theta=pi/2.$ As applying this rotation four times to any vector results in a rotation by $2pi$, or, equivalently, no rotation at all, we have that $A^4=I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Great answer. Although it has been accepted, I have trouble understanding how you solved (5). You seem to use $(A^T)^4=I implies A^4=I^T=I$. Does it always stand, or did I miss something?
            – F.Carette
            Aug 13 at 8:51











          • Good question. I'll add some details.
            – Ryan Gibara
            Aug 13 at 8:59










          • I just realised that the $(A^T)^n=(A^n)^T$ property can be trivially deduced from the product property $(AB)^T=B^TA^T$. My bad, and thanks for the added details
            – F.Carette
            Aug 13 at 9:17











          • There, you got it. No problem!
            – Ryan Gibara
            Aug 13 at 9:44






          • 2




            Careful! The transpose of matrix 5 is not diagonal: $beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix^T = beginbmatrix0&1\-1&0endbmatrix$. But you could use the fact that the square is $-I$.
            – Rob
            Aug 13 at 10:56













          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted






          Here's how I would have approached the problem.



          (1) Since this matrix is diagonal, we can calculate
          $$
          beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4=beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix=beginbmatrix1&0\0&1endbmatrix
          $$
          so this matrix satisfies $A^4=I$.



          (2) For this matrix, I notice that $sqrt2/2$ appears a lot, so my brain goes to the fact that $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4)=sqrt2/2$. Thinking of this matrix as corresponding to a linear transformation in the plane, I took a look at the form for a rotation matrix:
          $$
          beginbmatrixcos(theta)&-sin(theta)\sin(theta)&cos(theta)endbmatrix.
          $$
          This tells me that our matrix corresponds to a rotation by $-pi/4$, so $A^4$ corresponds to composing this rotation by itself four times, resulting in rotating by $-pi$. Since, in general, rotating a vector by $-pi$ doesn't result in the same vector, it follows that $A^4neq I$.



          (3) Here I noticed that the bottom row is a scalar multiple of the top row, so the matrix cannot be invertible. You can justify this by realizing this means the rows are not linearly independent, or simply by computing the determinant and seeing that it's zero. Since the matrix is not invertible, it is impossible that $A^4=I$. We can see this in a few ways: first, the properties of determinants tell me that $A^4=I$ implies that $det(A)^4=det(I)=1$ and so $det(A)neq0$, which we know isn't true for our $A$ since it's not invertible; second, $A^4=I$ can be written as $A(A^3)=I$, and this would imply that $A$ is invertible with $A^-1=A^3$, but $A$ isn't invertible.



          (4) Like with (2), I see $1/2$ and $sqrt3/2$, so I think of rotation matrices and see that this matrix corresponds to a rotation by $pi/3$. Again, since for a vector $vinmathbbR^2$, $A^4v$ is an application of $A$ to the vector $v$ four times, it follows that $A^4$ corresponds to a rotation by $4pi/3$. Thus, $A^4vneq v$ for a general $v$.



          (5) Correcting my answer thanks to the comments below, if one did not wish to do the matrix multiplication, one could again realize that the matrix is a rotation matrix corresponding to $theta=pi/2.$ As applying this rotation four times to any vector results in a rotation by $2pi$, or, equivalently, no rotation at all, we have that $A^4=I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Here's how I would have approached the problem.



          (1) Since this matrix is diagonal, we can calculate
          $$
          beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4=beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix=beginbmatrix1&0\0&1endbmatrix
          $$
          so this matrix satisfies $A^4=I$.



          (2) For this matrix, I notice that $sqrt2/2$ appears a lot, so my brain goes to the fact that $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4)=sqrt2/2$. Thinking of this matrix as corresponding to a linear transformation in the plane, I took a look at the form for a rotation matrix:
          $$
          beginbmatrixcos(theta)&-sin(theta)\sin(theta)&cos(theta)endbmatrix.
          $$
          This tells me that our matrix corresponds to a rotation by $-pi/4$, so $A^4$ corresponds to composing this rotation by itself four times, resulting in rotating by $-pi$. Since, in general, rotating a vector by $-pi$ doesn't result in the same vector, it follows that $A^4neq I$.



          (3) Here I noticed that the bottom row is a scalar multiple of the top row, so the matrix cannot be invertible. You can justify this by realizing this means the rows are not linearly independent, or simply by computing the determinant and seeing that it's zero. Since the matrix is not invertible, it is impossible that $A^4=I$. We can see this in a few ways: first, the properties of determinants tell me that $A^4=I$ implies that $det(A)^4=det(I)=1$ and so $det(A)neq0$, which we know isn't true for our $A$ since it's not invertible; second, $A^4=I$ can be written as $A(A^3)=I$, and this would imply that $A$ is invertible with $A^-1=A^3$, but $A$ isn't invertible.



          (4) Like with (2), I see $1/2$ and $sqrt3/2$, so I think of rotation matrices and see that this matrix corresponds to a rotation by $pi/3$. Again, since for a vector $vinmathbbR^2$, $A^4v$ is an application of $A$ to the vector $v$ four times, it follows that $A^4$ corresponds to a rotation by $4pi/3$. Thus, $A^4vneq v$ for a general $v$.



          (5) Correcting my answer thanks to the comments below, if one did not wish to do the matrix multiplication, one could again realize that the matrix is a rotation matrix corresponding to $theta=pi/2.$ As applying this rotation four times to any vector results in a rotation by $2pi$, or, equivalently, no rotation at all, we have that $A^4=I$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 13 at 14:15

























          answered Aug 13 at 8:27









          Ryan Gibara

          484410




          484410











          • Great answer. Although it has been accepted, I have trouble understanding how you solved (5). You seem to use $(A^T)^4=I implies A^4=I^T=I$. Does it always stand, or did I miss something?
            – F.Carette
            Aug 13 at 8:51











          • Good question. I'll add some details.
            – Ryan Gibara
            Aug 13 at 8:59










          • I just realised that the $(A^T)^n=(A^n)^T$ property can be trivially deduced from the product property $(AB)^T=B^TA^T$. My bad, and thanks for the added details
            – F.Carette
            Aug 13 at 9:17











          • There, you got it. No problem!
            – Ryan Gibara
            Aug 13 at 9:44






          • 2




            Careful! The transpose of matrix 5 is not diagonal: $beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix^T = beginbmatrix0&1\-1&0endbmatrix$. But you could use the fact that the square is $-I$.
            – Rob
            Aug 13 at 10:56

















          • Great answer. Although it has been accepted, I have trouble understanding how you solved (5). You seem to use $(A^T)^4=I implies A^4=I^T=I$. Does it always stand, or did I miss something?
            – F.Carette
            Aug 13 at 8:51











          • Good question. I'll add some details.
            – Ryan Gibara
            Aug 13 at 8:59










          • I just realised that the $(A^T)^n=(A^n)^T$ property can be trivially deduced from the product property $(AB)^T=B^TA^T$. My bad, and thanks for the added details
            – F.Carette
            Aug 13 at 9:17











          • There, you got it. No problem!
            – Ryan Gibara
            Aug 13 at 9:44






          • 2




            Careful! The transpose of matrix 5 is not diagonal: $beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix^T = beginbmatrix0&1\-1&0endbmatrix$. But you could use the fact that the square is $-I$.
            – Rob
            Aug 13 at 10:56
















          Great answer. Although it has been accepted, I have trouble understanding how you solved (5). You seem to use $(A^T)^4=I implies A^4=I^T=I$. Does it always stand, or did I miss something?
          – F.Carette
          Aug 13 at 8:51





          Great answer. Although it has been accepted, I have trouble understanding how you solved (5). You seem to use $(A^T)^4=I implies A^4=I^T=I$. Does it always stand, or did I miss something?
          – F.Carette
          Aug 13 at 8:51













          Good question. I'll add some details.
          – Ryan Gibara
          Aug 13 at 8:59




          Good question. I'll add some details.
          – Ryan Gibara
          Aug 13 at 8:59












          I just realised that the $(A^T)^n=(A^n)^T$ property can be trivially deduced from the product property $(AB)^T=B^TA^T$. My bad, and thanks for the added details
          – F.Carette
          Aug 13 at 9:17





          I just realised that the $(A^T)^n=(A^n)^T$ property can be trivially deduced from the product property $(AB)^T=B^TA^T$. My bad, and thanks for the added details
          – F.Carette
          Aug 13 at 9:17













          There, you got it. No problem!
          – Ryan Gibara
          Aug 13 at 9:44




          There, you got it. No problem!
          – Ryan Gibara
          Aug 13 at 9:44




          2




          2




          Careful! The transpose of matrix 5 is not diagonal: $beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix^T = beginbmatrix0&1\-1&0endbmatrix$. But you could use the fact that the square is $-I$.
          – Rob
          Aug 13 at 10:56





          Careful! The transpose of matrix 5 is not diagonal: $beginbmatrix0&-1\1&0endbmatrix^T = beginbmatrix0&1\-1&0endbmatrix$. But you could use the fact that the square is $-I$.
          – Rob
          Aug 13 at 10:56











          up vote
          4
          down vote













          The first one is trivial: it is a diagonal matrix, so $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4 = beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix = I_2$.



          The middle one is eliminated: it has duplicated column, so it is singular, so its fourth power is also singular, but the identity matrix is not singular.



          Let $R_theta$ denote the rotational matrix of angle $theta$.



          The thing with rotational matrices is that $R_varphi R_psi = R_varphi + psi$, so $(R_theta)^4 = R_4theta$.



          Then, the rest of the matrices are $R_-45^circ$, $R_60^circ$, $R_90^circ$.



          Therefore, their fourth powers are respectively $R_-180^circ$, $R_240^circ$, $R_360^circ$, and only the last one is the identity matrix.



          Therefore the answer is the first and the fifth one.






          share|cite|improve this answer
























            up vote
            4
            down vote













            The first one is trivial: it is a diagonal matrix, so $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4 = beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix = I_2$.



            The middle one is eliminated: it has duplicated column, so it is singular, so its fourth power is also singular, but the identity matrix is not singular.



            Let $R_theta$ denote the rotational matrix of angle $theta$.



            The thing with rotational matrices is that $R_varphi R_psi = R_varphi + psi$, so $(R_theta)^4 = R_4theta$.



            Then, the rest of the matrices are $R_-45^circ$, $R_60^circ$, $R_90^circ$.



            Therefore, their fourth powers are respectively $R_-180^circ$, $R_240^circ$, $R_360^circ$, and only the last one is the identity matrix.



            Therefore the answer is the first and the fifth one.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















              up vote
              4
              down vote










              up vote
              4
              down vote









              The first one is trivial: it is a diagonal matrix, so $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4 = beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix = I_2$.



              The middle one is eliminated: it has duplicated column, so it is singular, so its fourth power is also singular, but the identity matrix is not singular.



              Let $R_theta$ denote the rotational matrix of angle $theta$.



              The thing with rotational matrices is that $R_varphi R_psi = R_varphi + psi$, so $(R_theta)^4 = R_4theta$.



              Then, the rest of the matrices are $R_-45^circ$, $R_60^circ$, $R_90^circ$.



              Therefore, their fourth powers are respectively $R_-180^circ$, $R_240^circ$, $R_360^circ$, and only the last one is the identity matrix.



              Therefore the answer is the first and the fifth one.






              share|cite|improve this answer












              The first one is trivial: it is a diagonal matrix, so $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix^4 = beginbmatrix1^4&0\0&(-1)^4endbmatrix = I_2$.



              The middle one is eliminated: it has duplicated column, so it is singular, so its fourth power is also singular, but the identity matrix is not singular.



              Let $R_theta$ denote the rotational matrix of angle $theta$.



              The thing with rotational matrices is that $R_varphi R_psi = R_varphi + psi$, so $(R_theta)^4 = R_4theta$.



              Then, the rest of the matrices are $R_-45^circ$, $R_60^circ$, $R_90^circ$.



              Therefore, their fourth powers are respectively $R_-180^circ$, $R_240^circ$, $R_360^circ$, and only the last one is the identity matrix.



              Therefore the answer is the first and the fifth one.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Aug 13 at 8:15









              Kenny Lau

              18.9k2157




              18.9k2157




















                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  A more algebraic approach: $A^4=I$ means $A$ is root of the polynomial
                  $$f(X):=X^4-1=(X+1)(X-1)(X+i)(X-i).$$



                  This is true iff $f$ is a multiple of the minimum polynomial $m_A$ of $A$. Since $m_A$ divides the characteristic polynomial $p_A$ of $A$, in this case the characteristic polynomials are of degree $2$, and there is no scalar matrix (the only ones with minimum polynomial of degree at most $1$), in fact $m_A=p_A$ (modulo some unit). Thus we can check if $f(A)=0$ by checking if $p_A|f$.



                  Matrix 1: $p_A(X)=(X-1)(X+1)$ divides $f$, so $f(A)=0$.



                  Matrix 2: $p_A(X)=-fracsqrt22(X^2-2X+2)$ does not divide $f$, so $f(A)neq0$.



                  Matrix 3: $p_A(X)= -fracsqrt22(X^2-2)$ does not divide $f$.



                  Matrix 4: $p_A(X)=-frac12(X^2-2X+sqrt3+1)$ does not divide $f$.



                  Matrix 5: $p_A(X)=X^2+1$ divides $f$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer


























                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote













                    A more algebraic approach: $A^4=I$ means $A$ is root of the polynomial
                    $$f(X):=X^4-1=(X+1)(X-1)(X+i)(X-i).$$



                    This is true iff $f$ is a multiple of the minimum polynomial $m_A$ of $A$. Since $m_A$ divides the characteristic polynomial $p_A$ of $A$, in this case the characteristic polynomials are of degree $2$, and there is no scalar matrix (the only ones with minimum polynomial of degree at most $1$), in fact $m_A=p_A$ (modulo some unit). Thus we can check if $f(A)=0$ by checking if $p_A|f$.



                    Matrix 1: $p_A(X)=(X-1)(X+1)$ divides $f$, so $f(A)=0$.



                    Matrix 2: $p_A(X)=-fracsqrt22(X^2-2X+2)$ does not divide $f$, so $f(A)neq0$.



                    Matrix 3: $p_A(X)= -fracsqrt22(X^2-2)$ does not divide $f$.



                    Matrix 4: $p_A(X)=-frac12(X^2-2X+sqrt3+1)$ does not divide $f$.



                    Matrix 5: $p_A(X)=X^2+1$ divides $f$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer
























                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote









                      A more algebraic approach: $A^4=I$ means $A$ is root of the polynomial
                      $$f(X):=X^4-1=(X+1)(X-1)(X+i)(X-i).$$



                      This is true iff $f$ is a multiple of the minimum polynomial $m_A$ of $A$. Since $m_A$ divides the characteristic polynomial $p_A$ of $A$, in this case the characteristic polynomials are of degree $2$, and there is no scalar matrix (the only ones with minimum polynomial of degree at most $1$), in fact $m_A=p_A$ (modulo some unit). Thus we can check if $f(A)=0$ by checking if $p_A|f$.



                      Matrix 1: $p_A(X)=(X-1)(X+1)$ divides $f$, so $f(A)=0$.



                      Matrix 2: $p_A(X)=-fracsqrt22(X^2-2X+2)$ does not divide $f$, so $f(A)neq0$.



                      Matrix 3: $p_A(X)= -fracsqrt22(X^2-2)$ does not divide $f$.



                      Matrix 4: $p_A(X)=-frac12(X^2-2X+sqrt3+1)$ does not divide $f$.



                      Matrix 5: $p_A(X)=X^2+1$ divides $f$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      A more algebraic approach: $A^4=I$ means $A$ is root of the polynomial
                      $$f(X):=X^4-1=(X+1)(X-1)(X+i)(X-i).$$



                      This is true iff $f$ is a multiple of the minimum polynomial $m_A$ of $A$. Since $m_A$ divides the characteristic polynomial $p_A$ of $A$, in this case the characteristic polynomials are of degree $2$, and there is no scalar matrix (the only ones with minimum polynomial of degree at most $1$), in fact $m_A=p_A$ (modulo some unit). Thus we can check if $f(A)=0$ by checking if $p_A|f$.



                      Matrix 1: $p_A(X)=(X-1)(X+1)$ divides $f$, so $f(A)=0$.



                      Matrix 2: $p_A(X)=-fracsqrt22(X^2-2X+2)$ does not divide $f$, so $f(A)neq0$.



                      Matrix 3: $p_A(X)= -fracsqrt22(X^2-2)$ does not divide $f$.



                      Matrix 4: $p_A(X)=-frac12(X^2-2X+sqrt3+1)$ does not divide $f$.



                      Matrix 5: $p_A(X)=X^2+1$ divides $f$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Aug 13 at 9:13

























                      answered Aug 13 at 8:51









                      Jose Brox

                      1,9051820




                      1,9051820




















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          The second, the fourth and the fifth matrices are of the form $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)$, for some $thetainmathbb R$. So, $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)^4=operatornameId_2$ if and only if $4thetain2pimathbb Z(iff 2thetainpimathbb Z)$.



                          The first matrix is a diagonal one, and so it is easy to work with.



                          The third matrix has determinant $0$, and therefore cannot be a solution.






                          share|cite|improve this answer






















                          • The first one isn't a rotational matrix.
                            – Kenny Lau
                            Aug 13 at 8:17










                          • @KennyLau I've edited my answer. Thank you.
                            – José Carlos Santos
                            Aug 13 at 8:19










                          • @KennyLau The first matrix is a rotation matrix; an improper rotation if you will, but a rotation nevertheless. It is not in the special orthogonal group $mathrmSO(2)$, but it is in the rotation group $mathrm O(2)$.
                            – AccidentalFourierTransform
                            Aug 13 at 13:53














                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          The second, the fourth and the fifth matrices are of the form $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)$, for some $thetainmathbb R$. So, $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)^4=operatornameId_2$ if and only if $4thetain2pimathbb Z(iff 2thetainpimathbb Z)$.



                          The first matrix is a diagonal one, and so it is easy to work with.



                          The third matrix has determinant $0$, and therefore cannot be a solution.






                          share|cite|improve this answer






















                          • The first one isn't a rotational matrix.
                            – Kenny Lau
                            Aug 13 at 8:17










                          • @KennyLau I've edited my answer. Thank you.
                            – José Carlos Santos
                            Aug 13 at 8:19










                          • @KennyLau The first matrix is a rotation matrix; an improper rotation if you will, but a rotation nevertheless. It is not in the special orthogonal group $mathrmSO(2)$, but it is in the rotation group $mathrm O(2)$.
                            – AccidentalFourierTransform
                            Aug 13 at 13:53












                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          The second, the fourth and the fifth matrices are of the form $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)$, for some $thetainmathbb R$. So, $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)^4=operatornameId_2$ if and only if $4thetain2pimathbb Z(iff 2thetainpimathbb Z)$.



                          The first matrix is a diagonal one, and so it is easy to work with.



                          The third matrix has determinant $0$, and therefore cannot be a solution.






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          The second, the fourth and the fifth matrices are of the form $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)$, for some $thetainmathbb R$. So, $left(beginsmallmatrixcostheta&-sintheta\sintheta&costhetaendsmallmatrixright)^4=operatornameId_2$ if and only if $4thetain2pimathbb Z(iff 2thetainpimathbb Z)$.



                          The first matrix is a diagonal one, and so it is easy to work with.



                          The third matrix has determinant $0$, and therefore cannot be a solution.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Aug 13 at 8:19

























                          answered Aug 13 at 8:16









                          José Carlos Santos

                          116k1699178




                          116k1699178











                          • The first one isn't a rotational matrix.
                            – Kenny Lau
                            Aug 13 at 8:17










                          • @KennyLau I've edited my answer. Thank you.
                            – José Carlos Santos
                            Aug 13 at 8:19










                          • @KennyLau The first matrix is a rotation matrix; an improper rotation if you will, but a rotation nevertheless. It is not in the special orthogonal group $mathrmSO(2)$, but it is in the rotation group $mathrm O(2)$.
                            – AccidentalFourierTransform
                            Aug 13 at 13:53
















                          • The first one isn't a rotational matrix.
                            – Kenny Lau
                            Aug 13 at 8:17










                          • @KennyLau I've edited my answer. Thank you.
                            – José Carlos Santos
                            Aug 13 at 8:19










                          • @KennyLau The first matrix is a rotation matrix; an improper rotation if you will, but a rotation nevertheless. It is not in the special orthogonal group $mathrmSO(2)$, but it is in the rotation group $mathrm O(2)$.
                            – AccidentalFourierTransform
                            Aug 13 at 13:53















                          The first one isn't a rotational matrix.
                          – Kenny Lau
                          Aug 13 at 8:17




                          The first one isn't a rotational matrix.
                          – Kenny Lau
                          Aug 13 at 8:17












                          @KennyLau I've edited my answer. Thank you.
                          – José Carlos Santos
                          Aug 13 at 8:19




                          @KennyLau I've edited my answer. Thank you.
                          – José Carlos Santos
                          Aug 13 at 8:19












                          @KennyLau The first matrix is a rotation matrix; an improper rotation if you will, but a rotation nevertheless. It is not in the special orthogonal group $mathrmSO(2)$, but it is in the rotation group $mathrm O(2)$.
                          – AccidentalFourierTransform
                          Aug 13 at 13:53




                          @KennyLau The first matrix is a rotation matrix; an improper rotation if you will, but a rotation nevertheless. It is not in the special orthogonal group $mathrmSO(2)$, but it is in the rotation group $mathrm O(2)$.
                          – AccidentalFourierTransform
                          Aug 13 at 13:53










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          In this case for $x=4$ it is more easy to just work out the matrix multiplication but for higher values of $x$ I suggest trying to diagonalize the matrix i.e.:



                          $A = CDC^-1$ with $D = diag(lambda_1,...,lambda_n)$ so the diagonal matrix with eigenvalues on the diagonal (assuming $n$ eigenvalues here) and $C = (a_1,...,a_n)$ where $A a_i = lambda_i a_i $ so $a_i$ are eigenvectors in $C$ and $C^-1$ denotes the inverse (of course you should check invertibility, for example through $det(C) neq 0$.



                          Now we show what $A^x$ gives for $x in 2,3,4,...$:



                          $A^x = AA....A = CDC^-1CDC^-1 .... CDC^-1= CD^x C^-1$ using $C^-1C=I$ with $I$ the identity matrix.



                          So you can just try to calculate $A^x = CD^xC^-1$ since you can compare this matrix to standard rotation and reflection matrices you can immediately see the rotation axis and line of reflection.



                          E.g. the first one, we see that using a standard basis $e_1,e_2$ for $mathcalR^2$ we have that $R(e_1)=e_1, R(e_2)=-e_2$. This means that we reflect all $x in mathcalR^2$ around $spane_1$. This means $lambda_1 = 1, lambda_2 = -1$ and corresponding eigenvectors are $e_1,e_2$ respectively. Now you can plug these in the equation I explained and you will see that it gives $A^4 = D^4$ therefore you can see that $D=diag(1^4,(-1)^4)=diag(1,1)=I_2 times 2$.



                          The rest of the matrices can be calculated using the same approach. Try to ‘see’ eigenvalues and eigenvectors from your matrix (compare to standard rotations and so on) and use the formula I gave to you. Hope it helps, greets!






                          share|cite|improve this answer


























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote













                            In this case for $x=4$ it is more easy to just work out the matrix multiplication but for higher values of $x$ I suggest trying to diagonalize the matrix i.e.:



                            $A = CDC^-1$ with $D = diag(lambda_1,...,lambda_n)$ so the diagonal matrix with eigenvalues on the diagonal (assuming $n$ eigenvalues here) and $C = (a_1,...,a_n)$ where $A a_i = lambda_i a_i $ so $a_i$ are eigenvectors in $C$ and $C^-1$ denotes the inverse (of course you should check invertibility, for example through $det(C) neq 0$.



                            Now we show what $A^x$ gives for $x in 2,3,4,...$:



                            $A^x = AA....A = CDC^-1CDC^-1 .... CDC^-1= CD^x C^-1$ using $C^-1C=I$ with $I$ the identity matrix.



                            So you can just try to calculate $A^x = CD^xC^-1$ since you can compare this matrix to standard rotation and reflection matrices you can immediately see the rotation axis and line of reflection.



                            E.g. the first one, we see that using a standard basis $e_1,e_2$ for $mathcalR^2$ we have that $R(e_1)=e_1, R(e_2)=-e_2$. This means that we reflect all $x in mathcalR^2$ around $spane_1$. This means $lambda_1 = 1, lambda_2 = -1$ and corresponding eigenvectors are $e_1,e_2$ respectively. Now you can plug these in the equation I explained and you will see that it gives $A^4 = D^4$ therefore you can see that $D=diag(1^4,(-1)^4)=diag(1,1)=I_2 times 2$.



                            The rest of the matrices can be calculated using the same approach. Try to ‘see’ eigenvalues and eigenvectors from your matrix (compare to standard rotations and so on) and use the formula I gave to you. Hope it helps, greets!






                            share|cite|improve this answer
























                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote









                              In this case for $x=4$ it is more easy to just work out the matrix multiplication but for higher values of $x$ I suggest trying to diagonalize the matrix i.e.:



                              $A = CDC^-1$ with $D = diag(lambda_1,...,lambda_n)$ so the diagonal matrix with eigenvalues on the diagonal (assuming $n$ eigenvalues here) and $C = (a_1,...,a_n)$ where $A a_i = lambda_i a_i $ so $a_i$ are eigenvectors in $C$ and $C^-1$ denotes the inverse (of course you should check invertibility, for example through $det(C) neq 0$.



                              Now we show what $A^x$ gives for $x in 2,3,4,...$:



                              $A^x = AA....A = CDC^-1CDC^-1 .... CDC^-1= CD^x C^-1$ using $C^-1C=I$ with $I$ the identity matrix.



                              So you can just try to calculate $A^x = CD^xC^-1$ since you can compare this matrix to standard rotation and reflection matrices you can immediately see the rotation axis and line of reflection.



                              E.g. the first one, we see that using a standard basis $e_1,e_2$ for $mathcalR^2$ we have that $R(e_1)=e_1, R(e_2)=-e_2$. This means that we reflect all $x in mathcalR^2$ around $spane_1$. This means $lambda_1 = 1, lambda_2 = -1$ and corresponding eigenvectors are $e_1,e_2$ respectively. Now you can plug these in the equation I explained and you will see that it gives $A^4 = D^4$ therefore you can see that $D=diag(1^4,(-1)^4)=diag(1,1)=I_2 times 2$.



                              The rest of the matrices can be calculated using the same approach. Try to ‘see’ eigenvalues and eigenvectors from your matrix (compare to standard rotations and so on) and use the formula I gave to you. Hope it helps, greets!






                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              In this case for $x=4$ it is more easy to just work out the matrix multiplication but for higher values of $x$ I suggest trying to diagonalize the matrix i.e.:



                              $A = CDC^-1$ with $D = diag(lambda_1,...,lambda_n)$ so the diagonal matrix with eigenvalues on the diagonal (assuming $n$ eigenvalues here) and $C = (a_1,...,a_n)$ where $A a_i = lambda_i a_i $ so $a_i$ are eigenvectors in $C$ and $C^-1$ denotes the inverse (of course you should check invertibility, for example through $det(C) neq 0$.



                              Now we show what $A^x$ gives for $x in 2,3,4,...$:



                              $A^x = AA....A = CDC^-1CDC^-1 .... CDC^-1= CD^x C^-1$ using $C^-1C=I$ with $I$ the identity matrix.



                              So you can just try to calculate $A^x = CD^xC^-1$ since you can compare this matrix to standard rotation and reflection matrices you can immediately see the rotation axis and line of reflection.



                              E.g. the first one, we see that using a standard basis $e_1,e_2$ for $mathcalR^2$ we have that $R(e_1)=e_1, R(e_2)=-e_2$. This means that we reflect all $x in mathcalR^2$ around $spane_1$. This means $lambda_1 = 1, lambda_2 = -1$ and corresponding eigenvectors are $e_1,e_2$ respectively. Now you can plug these in the equation I explained and you will see that it gives $A^4 = D^4$ therefore you can see that $D=diag(1^4,(-1)^4)=diag(1,1)=I_2 times 2$.



                              The rest of the matrices can be calculated using the same approach. Try to ‘see’ eigenvalues and eigenvectors from your matrix (compare to standard rotations and so on) and use the formula I gave to you. Hope it helps, greets!







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Aug 13 at 8:32

























                              answered Aug 13 at 8:19









                              dani

                              1958




                              1958




















                                  up vote
                                  1
                                  down vote













                                  I don't have much to add to the accepted answer, but I wanted to suggest that this problem is relatively easy if you start by thinking about what a matrix means as a linear transform. Draw both column vectors and look at them as transforms to $hati$ and $hatj$, and it should be clear which transforms will result in no change when applied 4 times.



                                  The first leaves $hati$ unchanged and negates $hatj$. Applying it a second time flips it back to the original. Flipping it 2 more times again leaves us at the original.



                                  The second is a clockwise rotation by 45°. Doing this 4x only takes us halfway around the circle.



                                  The third maps both basis vectors to the same point. So we lose a dimension, determinant is 0, matrix is not invertible, yadda yadda yadda, the point is: applying it 4x certainly isn't going to get us back to the original.



                                  The fourth is another rotation, again by an angle that doesn't get us back to the original.



                                  The fifth is the classic counterclockwise rotation by 90°. Applying it 4x takes us all the way around the circle.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote













                                    I don't have much to add to the accepted answer, but I wanted to suggest that this problem is relatively easy if you start by thinking about what a matrix means as a linear transform. Draw both column vectors and look at them as transforms to $hati$ and $hatj$, and it should be clear which transforms will result in no change when applied 4 times.



                                    The first leaves $hati$ unchanged and negates $hatj$. Applying it a second time flips it back to the original. Flipping it 2 more times again leaves us at the original.



                                    The second is a clockwise rotation by 45°. Doing this 4x only takes us halfway around the circle.



                                    The third maps both basis vectors to the same point. So we lose a dimension, determinant is 0, matrix is not invertible, yadda yadda yadda, the point is: applying it 4x certainly isn't going to get us back to the original.



                                    The fourth is another rotation, again by an angle that doesn't get us back to the original.



                                    The fifth is the classic counterclockwise rotation by 90°. Applying it 4x takes us all the way around the circle.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer






















                                      up vote
                                      1
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      1
                                      down vote









                                      I don't have much to add to the accepted answer, but I wanted to suggest that this problem is relatively easy if you start by thinking about what a matrix means as a linear transform. Draw both column vectors and look at them as transforms to $hati$ and $hatj$, and it should be clear which transforms will result in no change when applied 4 times.



                                      The first leaves $hati$ unchanged and negates $hatj$. Applying it a second time flips it back to the original. Flipping it 2 more times again leaves us at the original.



                                      The second is a clockwise rotation by 45°. Doing this 4x only takes us halfway around the circle.



                                      The third maps both basis vectors to the same point. So we lose a dimension, determinant is 0, matrix is not invertible, yadda yadda yadda, the point is: applying it 4x certainly isn't going to get us back to the original.



                                      The fourth is another rotation, again by an angle that doesn't get us back to the original.



                                      The fifth is the classic counterclockwise rotation by 90°. Applying it 4x takes us all the way around the circle.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      I don't have much to add to the accepted answer, but I wanted to suggest that this problem is relatively easy if you start by thinking about what a matrix means as a linear transform. Draw both column vectors and look at them as transforms to $hati$ and $hatj$, and it should be clear which transforms will result in no change when applied 4 times.



                                      The first leaves $hati$ unchanged and negates $hatj$. Applying it a second time flips it back to the original. Flipping it 2 more times again leaves us at the original.



                                      The second is a clockwise rotation by 45°. Doing this 4x only takes us halfway around the circle.



                                      The third maps both basis vectors to the same point. So we lose a dimension, determinant is 0, matrix is not invertible, yadda yadda yadda, the point is: applying it 4x certainly isn't going to get us back to the original.



                                      The fourth is another rotation, again by an angle that doesn't get us back to the original.



                                      The fifth is the classic counterclockwise rotation by 90°. Applying it 4x takes us all the way around the circle.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Aug 13 at 15:15









                                      MattPutnam

                                      46933




                                      46933






















                                           

                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded


























                                           


                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2881107%2fhow-to-find-out-whether-a-matrix-to-the-4th-power-is-the-identity-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest













































































                                          這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                                          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                                          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?