Prove that every open set is lebesgue-measurable

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $mathbbR^nsupsetI=(a,b)=(a_1,b_1)times...times(a_n,b_n)$ with $a,binmathbbR^n$ such that $a_ilt b_i
$$forall i$.
So that the outer measure is defined as:



$$
mu^*(A)=infsum_iinJV(I_i)mid Asubsetbigcup_iinJ(I_i)
$$



Where:
$I_i_iinJ$ is a cover of A.



I have already proven that every $I$ is a Lebesgue-measurable set. Now I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable.



I have done this, is it correct?



Let A be an open set. For every $xin A$ with $x=(x_1,..,x_n)$ there exist an $r>0 $ such that $B(x;r)subset A$. If we take $r$ small enough, there exists $alpha > 0$ such that:



$$
B(x;r)subset I_x=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)times...times(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha)subset A
$$

Then define $A$ with:
$$
A=bigcup_xin A I_x
$$
A is union of Lebesgue-measurable sets so A is Lebesgue-measurable.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Hi and welcome. What is your question?
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    @MatthewLeingang I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable using what I described
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:27










  • @MatthewLeingang is it something not clear? Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:32










  • Ah, now I see if you have inserted “Is it correct?“ and you're asking for your proof to be verified. Thank you.
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 27 at 18:41














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $mathbbR^nsupsetI=(a,b)=(a_1,b_1)times...times(a_n,b_n)$ with $a,binmathbbR^n$ such that $a_ilt b_i
$$forall i$.
So that the outer measure is defined as:



$$
mu^*(A)=infsum_iinJV(I_i)mid Asubsetbigcup_iinJ(I_i)
$$



Where:
$I_i_iinJ$ is a cover of A.



I have already proven that every $I$ is a Lebesgue-measurable set. Now I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable.



I have done this, is it correct?



Let A be an open set. For every $xin A$ with $x=(x_1,..,x_n)$ there exist an $r>0 $ such that $B(x;r)subset A$. If we take $r$ small enough, there exists $alpha > 0$ such that:



$$
B(x;r)subset I_x=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)times...times(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha)subset A
$$

Then define $A$ with:
$$
A=bigcup_xin A I_x
$$
A is union of Lebesgue-measurable sets so A is Lebesgue-measurable.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Hi and welcome. What is your question?
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    @MatthewLeingang I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable using what I described
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:27










  • @MatthewLeingang is it something not clear? Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:32










  • Ah, now I see if you have inserted “Is it correct?“ and you're asking for your proof to be verified. Thank you.
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 27 at 18:41












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $mathbbR^nsupsetI=(a,b)=(a_1,b_1)times...times(a_n,b_n)$ with $a,binmathbbR^n$ such that $a_ilt b_i
$$forall i$.
So that the outer measure is defined as:



$$
mu^*(A)=infsum_iinJV(I_i)mid Asubsetbigcup_iinJ(I_i)
$$



Where:
$I_i_iinJ$ is a cover of A.



I have already proven that every $I$ is a Lebesgue-measurable set. Now I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable.



I have done this, is it correct?



Let A be an open set. For every $xin A$ with $x=(x_1,..,x_n)$ there exist an $r>0 $ such that $B(x;r)subset A$. If we take $r$ small enough, there exists $alpha > 0$ such that:



$$
B(x;r)subset I_x=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)times...times(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha)subset A
$$

Then define $A$ with:
$$
A=bigcup_xin A I_x
$$
A is union of Lebesgue-measurable sets so A is Lebesgue-measurable.







share|cite|improve this question














Let $mathbbR^nsupsetI=(a,b)=(a_1,b_1)times...times(a_n,b_n)$ with $a,binmathbbR^n$ such that $a_ilt b_i
$$forall i$.
So that the outer measure is defined as:



$$
mu^*(A)=infsum_iinJV(I_i)mid Asubsetbigcup_iinJ(I_i)
$$



Where:
$I_i_iinJ$ is a cover of A.



I have already proven that every $I$ is a Lebesgue-measurable set. Now I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable.



I have done this, is it correct?



Let A be an open set. For every $xin A$ with $x=(x_1,..,x_n)$ there exist an $r>0 $ such that $B(x;r)subset A$. If we take $r$ small enough, there exists $alpha > 0$ such that:



$$
B(x;r)subset I_x=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)times...times(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha)subset A
$$

Then define $A$ with:
$$
A=bigcup_xin A I_x
$$
A is union of Lebesgue-measurable sets so A is Lebesgue-measurable.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 27 at 20:39









Mefitico

65514




65514










asked Aug 27 at 18:21







user586534


















  • Hi and welcome. What is your question?
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    @MatthewLeingang I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable using what I described
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:27










  • @MatthewLeingang is it something not clear? Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:32










  • Ah, now I see if you have inserted “Is it correct?“ and you're asking for your proof to be verified. Thank you.
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 27 at 18:41
















  • Hi and welcome. What is your question?
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    @MatthewLeingang I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable using what I described
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:27










  • @MatthewLeingang is it something not clear? Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:32










  • Ah, now I see if you have inserted “Is it correct?“ and you're asking for your proof to be verified. Thank you.
    – Matthew Leingang
    Aug 27 at 18:41















Hi and welcome. What is your question?
– Matthew Leingang
Aug 27 at 18:26




Hi and welcome. What is your question?
– Matthew Leingang
Aug 27 at 18:26




1




1




@MatthewLeingang I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable using what I described
– user586534
Aug 27 at 18:27




@MatthewLeingang I want to prove that every open set is Lebesgue-measurable using what I described
– user586534
Aug 27 at 18:27












@MatthewLeingang is it something not clear? Thanks
– user586534
Aug 27 at 18:32




@MatthewLeingang is it something not clear? Thanks
– user586534
Aug 27 at 18:32












Ah, now I see if you have inserted “Is it correct?“ and you're asking for your proof to be verified. Thank you.
– Matthew Leingang
Aug 27 at 18:41




Ah, now I see if you have inserted “Is it correct?“ and you're asking for your proof to be verified. Thank you.
– Matthew Leingang
Aug 27 at 18:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










No, your argument does not work as is, because it is not true that an arbitrary union of measurable sets is measurable (if it were, every set would be measurable since points are measurable).



What you need to do is to write $A$ as a countable union of certain $I_n$. You can achieve this for instance by considering the set
$$
A_r=xin A: x_kinmathbb Q, k=1,ldots,n.
$$
For each $xin A_r$ there exists $I_x,alpha=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)timesldotstimes(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha) $ such that $I_x,alphasubset A$. Then, if we let $I_x,alpha=emptyset$ when $I_x,alphanotsubset A$,
$$
A=bigcup_xin A_rbigcup_alphainmathbb Q_+ I_x,alpha
$$
is a countable union of intervals, so measurable.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • It is right. I forgot that the union can only be countable. Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:59










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2896500%2fprove-that-every-open-set-is-lebesgue-measurable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest





























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










No, your argument does not work as is, because it is not true that an arbitrary union of measurable sets is measurable (if it were, every set would be measurable since points are measurable).



What you need to do is to write $A$ as a countable union of certain $I_n$. You can achieve this for instance by considering the set
$$
A_r=xin A: x_kinmathbb Q, k=1,ldots,n.
$$
For each $xin A_r$ there exists $I_x,alpha=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)timesldotstimes(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha) $ such that $I_x,alphasubset A$. Then, if we let $I_x,alpha=emptyset$ when $I_x,alphanotsubset A$,
$$
A=bigcup_xin A_rbigcup_alphainmathbb Q_+ I_x,alpha
$$
is a countable union of intervals, so measurable.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • It is right. I forgot that the union can only be countable. Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:59














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










No, your argument does not work as is, because it is not true that an arbitrary union of measurable sets is measurable (if it were, every set would be measurable since points are measurable).



What you need to do is to write $A$ as a countable union of certain $I_n$. You can achieve this for instance by considering the set
$$
A_r=xin A: x_kinmathbb Q, k=1,ldots,n.
$$
For each $xin A_r$ there exists $I_x,alpha=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)timesldotstimes(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha) $ such that $I_x,alphasubset A$. Then, if we let $I_x,alpha=emptyset$ when $I_x,alphanotsubset A$,
$$
A=bigcup_xin A_rbigcup_alphainmathbb Q_+ I_x,alpha
$$
is a countable union of intervals, so measurable.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • It is right. I forgot that the union can only be countable. Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:59












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






No, your argument does not work as is, because it is not true that an arbitrary union of measurable sets is measurable (if it were, every set would be measurable since points are measurable).



What you need to do is to write $A$ as a countable union of certain $I_n$. You can achieve this for instance by considering the set
$$
A_r=xin A: x_kinmathbb Q, k=1,ldots,n.
$$
For each $xin A_r$ there exists $I_x,alpha=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)timesldotstimes(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha) $ such that $I_x,alphasubset A$. Then, if we let $I_x,alpha=emptyset$ when $I_x,alphanotsubset A$,
$$
A=bigcup_xin A_rbigcup_alphainmathbb Q_+ I_x,alpha
$$
is a countable union of intervals, so measurable.






share|cite|improve this answer














No, your argument does not work as is, because it is not true that an arbitrary union of measurable sets is measurable (if it were, every set would be measurable since points are measurable).



What you need to do is to write $A$ as a countable union of certain $I_n$. You can achieve this for instance by considering the set
$$
A_r=xin A: x_kinmathbb Q, k=1,ldots,n.
$$
For each $xin A_r$ there exists $I_x,alpha=(x_1-alpha,x_1+alpha)timesldotstimes(x_n-alpha,x_n+alpha) $ such that $I_x,alphasubset A$. Then, if we let $I_x,alpha=emptyset$ when $I_x,alphanotsubset A$,
$$
A=bigcup_xin A_rbigcup_alphainmathbb Q_+ I_x,alpha
$$
is a countable union of intervals, so measurable.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Aug 27 at 20:15

























answered Aug 27 at 18:38









Martin Argerami

117k1071165




117k1071165











  • It is right. I forgot that the union can only be countable. Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:59
















  • It is right. I forgot that the union can only be countable. Thanks
    – user586534
    Aug 27 at 18:59















It is right. I forgot that the union can only be countable. Thanks
– user586534
Aug 27 at 18:59




It is right. I forgot that the union can only be countable. Thanks
– user586534
Aug 27 at 18:59

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2896500%2fprove-that-every-open-set-is-lebesgue-measurable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?