Continued Fraction of $ frac7 + 2 sqrt29 + ;,sqrt2$ with coefficients in $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We can read from various sources that $mathbbQ(sqrt2)$ has class number one, and that $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ is a Euclidean domain. However, it also has a group of units: $mathbbZ[sqrt2]^times =(1 + sqrt2)^mathbbZ$. Let's try an example:
$79 = (9 times 9) - 2 times (1 times 1) = (9 + sqrt2)times(9 - sqrt2)$
$41 = (7 times 7) - 2 times (2 times 2) = (7 + 2 sqrt2)times(7 - 2 sqrt2) $
This is just a quick way to get two relatively prime numbers in the ring of integers $mathcalO_K$. Can we get a continued fraction for the ratio of the two of them?
$$ frac7 + 2 sqrt29 + ;,sqrt2 = frac5979+
frac2579sqrt2in mathbbQ(sqrt2)$$
So now I have to qualify a bit what I mean by Eucliean algorithm. The norm $Nbig(a + b sqrt2big) = a^2 - 2b^2$. Then I guess we have
$$ y = m x + b $$
with $m in mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ and $N(b) < N(x)$. And then we iterate the Euclidean algorithm until we obtain the GCD. Hopefully that is right?
I guess we'd have to flip them:
$$ frac9 + 1 times sqrt27 + 2 times sqrt2 = frac5941 + frac941 sqrt2 approx 1 in mathbbQ(sqrt2)$$
This is a really crummy approimation. Let's try a "subtractive" Euclidean algorithm...
- $(9 + sqrt2) - (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 2 - sqrt2 < 1 $ looks good.
- $(9 + sqrt2) + (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 16 + 3 sqrt2$ Looks worse. $16 times 16 - 3 times 2 times 2 > 100 $.
And two other possibilities:
- $(9 + sqrt2) - sqrt2 times(7 + 2 sqrt2) = 5 - 6 sqrt2$
- $(9 + sqrt2) + sqrt2 times (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 13 + 8 sqrt2$
and I've started to conclude the quotient should be $m=1$. The first step could read:
$$ 9 + sqrt2 = 1 times big(7 + 2 times sqrt2big) + big( 2 - sqrt2big)$$
I have my doubts. We could have chosen another basis $mathbbZ[sqrt2] = 1 mathbbZoplus (sqrt2-1)mathbbZ$ as a $mathbbZ$-module.
number-theory continued-fractions euclidean-algorithm
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We can read from various sources that $mathbbQ(sqrt2)$ has class number one, and that $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ is a Euclidean domain. However, it also has a group of units: $mathbbZ[sqrt2]^times =(1 + sqrt2)^mathbbZ$. Let's try an example:
$79 = (9 times 9) - 2 times (1 times 1) = (9 + sqrt2)times(9 - sqrt2)$
$41 = (7 times 7) - 2 times (2 times 2) = (7 + 2 sqrt2)times(7 - 2 sqrt2) $
This is just a quick way to get two relatively prime numbers in the ring of integers $mathcalO_K$. Can we get a continued fraction for the ratio of the two of them?
$$ frac7 + 2 sqrt29 + ;,sqrt2 = frac5979+
frac2579sqrt2in mathbbQ(sqrt2)$$
So now I have to qualify a bit what I mean by Eucliean algorithm. The norm $Nbig(a + b sqrt2big) = a^2 - 2b^2$. Then I guess we have
$$ y = m x + b $$
with $m in mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ and $N(b) < N(x)$. And then we iterate the Euclidean algorithm until we obtain the GCD. Hopefully that is right?
I guess we'd have to flip them:
$$ frac9 + 1 times sqrt27 + 2 times sqrt2 = frac5941 + frac941 sqrt2 approx 1 in mathbbQ(sqrt2)$$
This is a really crummy approimation. Let's try a "subtractive" Euclidean algorithm...
- $(9 + sqrt2) - (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 2 - sqrt2 < 1 $ looks good.
- $(9 + sqrt2) + (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 16 + 3 sqrt2$ Looks worse. $16 times 16 - 3 times 2 times 2 > 100 $.
And two other possibilities:
- $(9 + sqrt2) - sqrt2 times(7 + 2 sqrt2) = 5 - 6 sqrt2$
- $(9 + sqrt2) + sqrt2 times (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 13 + 8 sqrt2$
and I've started to conclude the quotient should be $m=1$. The first step could read:
$$ 9 + sqrt2 = 1 times big(7 + 2 times sqrt2big) + big( 2 - sqrt2big)$$
I have my doubts. We could have chosen another basis $mathbbZ[sqrt2] = 1 mathbbZoplus (sqrt2-1)mathbbZ$ as a $mathbbZ$-module.
number-theory continued-fractions euclidean-algorithm
For a start, why not rationalize the denominator of $(7+2sqrt 2)/(9+sqrt 2)$ by multiplying its numerator and denominator by $9-sqrt 2;$?
â DanielWainfleet
Aug 28 at 15:54
Your concept looks correct - you should be able to just run the Euclidean algorithm to do it. (It's not immediately clear to me how you find your $m$, mind you, but I think that's only a sign that I need coffee...)
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 28 at 23:28
@StevenStadnicki Right. what is the Euclidean algorithm here? one certainly exists. i don't think it's straightforward. just my opinion.
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 1:30
1
Did you look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/2524792/⦠(which is over in the 'related' column)? It suggests looking at an 'approximate' division of the two items, which in your case is $(9+sqrt2)/(7+2sqrt2)=59/41-(11/41)sqrt2$ as a sort of guiding principle. More generally, the set of multiples of any number in $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ forms a lattice and it shouldn't be too hard to find the 'closest' of those multiples to your target number (though the distance in question isn't exactly 'Euclidean' in the other sense).
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 29 at 5:19
math.SE suggests this one is related math.stackexchange.com/q/1856408/4997
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 13:28
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We can read from various sources that $mathbbQ(sqrt2)$ has class number one, and that $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ is a Euclidean domain. However, it also has a group of units: $mathbbZ[sqrt2]^times =(1 + sqrt2)^mathbbZ$. Let's try an example:
$79 = (9 times 9) - 2 times (1 times 1) = (9 + sqrt2)times(9 - sqrt2)$
$41 = (7 times 7) - 2 times (2 times 2) = (7 + 2 sqrt2)times(7 - 2 sqrt2) $
This is just a quick way to get two relatively prime numbers in the ring of integers $mathcalO_K$. Can we get a continued fraction for the ratio of the two of them?
$$ frac7 + 2 sqrt29 + ;,sqrt2 = frac5979+
frac2579sqrt2in mathbbQ(sqrt2)$$
So now I have to qualify a bit what I mean by Eucliean algorithm. The norm $Nbig(a + b sqrt2big) = a^2 - 2b^2$. Then I guess we have
$$ y = m x + b $$
with $m in mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ and $N(b) < N(x)$. And then we iterate the Euclidean algorithm until we obtain the GCD. Hopefully that is right?
I guess we'd have to flip them:
$$ frac9 + 1 times sqrt27 + 2 times sqrt2 = frac5941 + frac941 sqrt2 approx 1 in mathbbQ(sqrt2)$$
This is a really crummy approimation. Let's try a "subtractive" Euclidean algorithm...
- $(9 + sqrt2) - (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 2 - sqrt2 < 1 $ looks good.
- $(9 + sqrt2) + (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 16 + 3 sqrt2$ Looks worse. $16 times 16 - 3 times 2 times 2 > 100 $.
And two other possibilities:
- $(9 + sqrt2) - sqrt2 times(7 + 2 sqrt2) = 5 - 6 sqrt2$
- $(9 + sqrt2) + sqrt2 times (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 13 + 8 sqrt2$
and I've started to conclude the quotient should be $m=1$. The first step could read:
$$ 9 + sqrt2 = 1 times big(7 + 2 times sqrt2big) + big( 2 - sqrt2big)$$
I have my doubts. We could have chosen another basis $mathbbZ[sqrt2] = 1 mathbbZoplus (sqrt2-1)mathbbZ$ as a $mathbbZ$-module.
number-theory continued-fractions euclidean-algorithm
We can read from various sources that $mathbbQ(sqrt2)$ has class number one, and that $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ is a Euclidean domain. However, it also has a group of units: $mathbbZ[sqrt2]^times =(1 + sqrt2)^mathbbZ$. Let's try an example:
$79 = (9 times 9) - 2 times (1 times 1) = (9 + sqrt2)times(9 - sqrt2)$
$41 = (7 times 7) - 2 times (2 times 2) = (7 + 2 sqrt2)times(7 - 2 sqrt2) $
This is just a quick way to get two relatively prime numbers in the ring of integers $mathcalO_K$. Can we get a continued fraction for the ratio of the two of them?
$$ frac7 + 2 sqrt29 + ;,sqrt2 = frac5979+
frac2579sqrt2in mathbbQ(sqrt2)$$
So now I have to qualify a bit what I mean by Eucliean algorithm. The norm $Nbig(a + b sqrt2big) = a^2 - 2b^2$. Then I guess we have
$$ y = m x + b $$
with $m in mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ and $N(b) < N(x)$. And then we iterate the Euclidean algorithm until we obtain the GCD. Hopefully that is right?
I guess we'd have to flip them:
$$ frac9 + 1 times sqrt27 + 2 times sqrt2 = frac5941 + frac941 sqrt2 approx 1 in mathbbQ(sqrt2)$$
This is a really crummy approimation. Let's try a "subtractive" Euclidean algorithm...
- $(9 + sqrt2) - (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 2 - sqrt2 < 1 $ looks good.
- $(9 + sqrt2) + (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 16 + 3 sqrt2$ Looks worse. $16 times 16 - 3 times 2 times 2 > 100 $.
And two other possibilities:
- $(9 + sqrt2) - sqrt2 times(7 + 2 sqrt2) = 5 - 6 sqrt2$
- $(9 + sqrt2) + sqrt2 times (7 + 2 sqrt2) = 13 + 8 sqrt2$
and I've started to conclude the quotient should be $m=1$. The first step could read:
$$ 9 + sqrt2 = 1 times big(7 + 2 times sqrt2big) + big( 2 - sqrt2big)$$
I have my doubts. We could have chosen another basis $mathbbZ[sqrt2] = 1 mathbbZoplus (sqrt2-1)mathbbZ$ as a $mathbbZ$-module.
number-theory continued-fractions euclidean-algorithm
edited Aug 29 at 13:26
asked Aug 27 at 18:19
cactus314
15.1k41862
15.1k41862
For a start, why not rationalize the denominator of $(7+2sqrt 2)/(9+sqrt 2)$ by multiplying its numerator and denominator by $9-sqrt 2;$?
â DanielWainfleet
Aug 28 at 15:54
Your concept looks correct - you should be able to just run the Euclidean algorithm to do it. (It's not immediately clear to me how you find your $m$, mind you, but I think that's only a sign that I need coffee...)
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 28 at 23:28
@StevenStadnicki Right. what is the Euclidean algorithm here? one certainly exists. i don't think it's straightforward. just my opinion.
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 1:30
1
Did you look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/2524792/⦠(which is over in the 'related' column)? It suggests looking at an 'approximate' division of the two items, which in your case is $(9+sqrt2)/(7+2sqrt2)=59/41-(11/41)sqrt2$ as a sort of guiding principle. More generally, the set of multiples of any number in $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ forms a lattice and it shouldn't be too hard to find the 'closest' of those multiples to your target number (though the distance in question isn't exactly 'Euclidean' in the other sense).
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 29 at 5:19
math.SE suggests this one is related math.stackexchange.com/q/1856408/4997
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 13:28
add a comment |Â
For a start, why not rationalize the denominator of $(7+2sqrt 2)/(9+sqrt 2)$ by multiplying its numerator and denominator by $9-sqrt 2;$?
â DanielWainfleet
Aug 28 at 15:54
Your concept looks correct - you should be able to just run the Euclidean algorithm to do it. (It's not immediately clear to me how you find your $m$, mind you, but I think that's only a sign that I need coffee...)
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 28 at 23:28
@StevenStadnicki Right. what is the Euclidean algorithm here? one certainly exists. i don't think it's straightforward. just my opinion.
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 1:30
1
Did you look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/2524792/⦠(which is over in the 'related' column)? It suggests looking at an 'approximate' division of the two items, which in your case is $(9+sqrt2)/(7+2sqrt2)=59/41-(11/41)sqrt2$ as a sort of guiding principle. More generally, the set of multiples of any number in $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ forms a lattice and it shouldn't be too hard to find the 'closest' of those multiples to your target number (though the distance in question isn't exactly 'Euclidean' in the other sense).
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 29 at 5:19
math.SE suggests this one is related math.stackexchange.com/q/1856408/4997
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 13:28
For a start, why not rationalize the denominator of $(7+2sqrt 2)/(9+sqrt 2)$ by multiplying its numerator and denominator by $9-sqrt 2;$?
â DanielWainfleet
Aug 28 at 15:54
For a start, why not rationalize the denominator of $(7+2sqrt 2)/(9+sqrt 2)$ by multiplying its numerator and denominator by $9-sqrt 2;$?
â DanielWainfleet
Aug 28 at 15:54
Your concept looks correct - you should be able to just run the Euclidean algorithm to do it. (It's not immediately clear to me how you find your $m$, mind you, but I think that's only a sign that I need coffee...)
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 28 at 23:28
Your concept looks correct - you should be able to just run the Euclidean algorithm to do it. (It's not immediately clear to me how you find your $m$, mind you, but I think that's only a sign that I need coffee...)
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 28 at 23:28
@StevenStadnicki Right. what is the Euclidean algorithm here? one certainly exists. i don't think it's straightforward. just my opinion.
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 1:30
@StevenStadnicki Right. what is the Euclidean algorithm here? one certainly exists. i don't think it's straightforward. just my opinion.
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 1:30
1
1
Did you look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/2524792/⦠(which is over in the 'related' column)? It suggests looking at an 'approximate' division of the two items, which in your case is $(9+sqrt2)/(7+2sqrt2)=59/41-(11/41)sqrt2$ as a sort of guiding principle. More generally, the set of multiples of any number in $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ forms a lattice and it shouldn't be too hard to find the 'closest' of those multiples to your target number (though the distance in question isn't exactly 'Euclidean' in the other sense).
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 29 at 5:19
Did you look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/2524792/⦠(which is over in the 'related' column)? It suggests looking at an 'approximate' division of the two items, which in your case is $(9+sqrt2)/(7+2sqrt2)=59/41-(11/41)sqrt2$ as a sort of guiding principle. More generally, the set of multiples of any number in $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ forms a lattice and it shouldn't be too hard to find the 'closest' of those multiples to your target number (though the distance in question isn't exactly 'Euclidean' in the other sense).
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 29 at 5:19
math.SE suggests this one is related math.stackexchange.com/q/1856408/4997
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 13:28
math.SE suggests this one is related math.stackexchange.com/q/1856408/4997
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 13:28
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2896499%2fcontinued-fraction-of-frac7-2-sqrt29-sqrt2-with-coefficien%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
For a start, why not rationalize the denominator of $(7+2sqrt 2)/(9+sqrt 2)$ by multiplying its numerator and denominator by $9-sqrt 2;$?
â DanielWainfleet
Aug 28 at 15:54
Your concept looks correct - you should be able to just run the Euclidean algorithm to do it. (It's not immediately clear to me how you find your $m$, mind you, but I think that's only a sign that I need coffee...)
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 28 at 23:28
@StevenStadnicki Right. what is the Euclidean algorithm here? one certainly exists. i don't think it's straightforward. just my opinion.
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 1:30
1
Did you look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/2524792/⦠(which is over in the 'related' column)? It suggests looking at an 'approximate' division of the two items, which in your case is $(9+sqrt2)/(7+2sqrt2)=59/41-(11/41)sqrt2$ as a sort of guiding principle. More generally, the set of multiples of any number in $mathbbZ[sqrt2]$ forms a lattice and it shouldn't be too hard to find the 'closest' of those multiples to your target number (though the distance in question isn't exactly 'Euclidean' in the other sense).
â Steven Stadnicki
Aug 29 at 5:19
math.SE suggests this one is related math.stackexchange.com/q/1856408/4997
â cactus314
Aug 29 at 13:28