Convergence of Borel measure evaluated at sequence of intervals

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $nu$ be a $1$-dimensional Borel measure i.e. for each $x in mathbbR$ there exists an open set $U$ containing $x$ and $nu (U) < infty$.



Does $lim_delta downarrow 0 nu(a,a+delta) = 0$ hold for all $a in mathbbR$? If so why?







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    It holds for all $a$.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 27 at 18:23










  • Can you please tell me why...
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 27 at 18:25






  • 1




    Continuity of measure from above.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 27 at 18:26















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $nu$ be a $1$-dimensional Borel measure i.e. for each $x in mathbbR$ there exists an open set $U$ containing $x$ and $nu (U) < infty$.



Does $lim_delta downarrow 0 nu(a,a+delta) = 0$ hold for all $a in mathbbR$? If so why?







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    It holds for all $a$.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 27 at 18:23










  • Can you please tell me why...
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 27 at 18:25






  • 1




    Continuity of measure from above.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 27 at 18:26













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $nu$ be a $1$-dimensional Borel measure i.e. for each $x in mathbbR$ there exists an open set $U$ containing $x$ and $nu (U) < infty$.



Does $lim_delta downarrow 0 nu(a,a+delta) = 0$ hold for all $a in mathbbR$? If so why?







share|cite|improve this question














Let $nu$ be a $1$-dimensional Borel measure i.e. for each $x in mathbbR$ there exists an open set $U$ containing $x$ and $nu (U) < infty$.



Does $lim_delta downarrow 0 nu(a,a+delta) = 0$ hold for all $a in mathbbR$? If so why?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 27 at 18:24

























asked Aug 27 at 18:17









An_876_Joke

935




935







  • 1




    It holds for all $a$.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 27 at 18:23










  • Can you please tell me why...
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 27 at 18:25






  • 1




    Continuity of measure from above.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 27 at 18:26













  • 1




    It holds for all $a$.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 27 at 18:23










  • Can you please tell me why...
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 27 at 18:25






  • 1




    Continuity of measure from above.
    – copper.hat
    Aug 27 at 18:26








1




1




It holds for all $a$.
– copper.hat
Aug 27 at 18:23




It holds for all $a$.
– copper.hat
Aug 27 at 18:23












Can you please tell me why...
– An_876_Joke
Aug 27 at 18:25




Can you please tell me why...
– An_876_Joke
Aug 27 at 18:25




1




1




Continuity of measure from above.
– copper.hat
Aug 27 at 18:26





Continuity of measure from above.
– copper.hat
Aug 27 at 18:26











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













As copper.hat points out in the comments, this is true. Let $(delta_n)$ be a sequence of positive real numbers such that $delta_nto 0$ as $ntoinfty$. By assumpution, there is some open neighborhood $U$ of $a$ such that $nu(U)<infty$, hence some $varepsilon>0$ such that $(a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon)subset U$.
There is some $N$ such that $delta_n<varepsilon$ for $ngeq N$. For such $n$, we have
$$nu((a,a+delta_n))leqnu((a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon))leqnu(U)<infty.$$
Continuity from above now implies that $limlimits_ntoinftynu((a,a+delta_n))=0$, and since the sequence $(delta_n)$ was arbitrary, the result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Although I know how to show that the conditions on $nu $ imply continuity from above,) I dk whether the proposer knows why $nu$ must be continuous from above.
    – DanielWainfleet
    Aug 28 at 4:00











  • I read how to proof continuity from above.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:28






  • 1




    Although I must say that we dont have $... subset (a+delta_n+2,a) subset (a+delta_n+1,a) subset (a+delta_n,a)$.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:41







  • 1




    We can show $lim_n rightarrow infty nu((a,a+delta_phi(n))) = 0$ for some rearrangement $phi:mathbbN rightarrow mathbbN$ making the $delta_phi(n)$ monotone. Now any rearrangement of $ nu((a,a+delta_phi(n)))$ will converge to the same limit.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 15:17











  • Yes, you are correct. It is sufficient to assume that $(delta_n)$ converges monotonically to $0$.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 16:03










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2896497%2fconvergence-of-borel-measure-evaluated-at-sequence-of-intervals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













As copper.hat points out in the comments, this is true. Let $(delta_n)$ be a sequence of positive real numbers such that $delta_nto 0$ as $ntoinfty$. By assumpution, there is some open neighborhood $U$ of $a$ such that $nu(U)<infty$, hence some $varepsilon>0$ such that $(a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon)subset U$.
There is some $N$ such that $delta_n<varepsilon$ for $ngeq N$. For such $n$, we have
$$nu((a,a+delta_n))leqnu((a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon))leqnu(U)<infty.$$
Continuity from above now implies that $limlimits_ntoinftynu((a,a+delta_n))=0$, and since the sequence $(delta_n)$ was arbitrary, the result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Although I know how to show that the conditions on $nu $ imply continuity from above,) I dk whether the proposer knows why $nu$ must be continuous from above.
    – DanielWainfleet
    Aug 28 at 4:00











  • I read how to proof continuity from above.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:28






  • 1




    Although I must say that we dont have $... subset (a+delta_n+2,a) subset (a+delta_n+1,a) subset (a+delta_n,a)$.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:41







  • 1




    We can show $lim_n rightarrow infty nu((a,a+delta_phi(n))) = 0$ for some rearrangement $phi:mathbbN rightarrow mathbbN$ making the $delta_phi(n)$ monotone. Now any rearrangement of $ nu((a,a+delta_phi(n)))$ will converge to the same limit.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 15:17











  • Yes, you are correct. It is sufficient to assume that $(delta_n)$ converges monotonically to $0$.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 16:03














up vote
1
down vote













As copper.hat points out in the comments, this is true. Let $(delta_n)$ be a sequence of positive real numbers such that $delta_nto 0$ as $ntoinfty$. By assumpution, there is some open neighborhood $U$ of $a$ such that $nu(U)<infty$, hence some $varepsilon>0$ such that $(a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon)subset U$.
There is some $N$ such that $delta_n<varepsilon$ for $ngeq N$. For such $n$, we have
$$nu((a,a+delta_n))leqnu((a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon))leqnu(U)<infty.$$
Continuity from above now implies that $limlimits_ntoinftynu((a,a+delta_n))=0$, and since the sequence $(delta_n)$ was arbitrary, the result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Although I know how to show that the conditions on $nu $ imply continuity from above,) I dk whether the proposer knows why $nu$ must be continuous from above.
    – DanielWainfleet
    Aug 28 at 4:00











  • I read how to proof continuity from above.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:28






  • 1




    Although I must say that we dont have $... subset (a+delta_n+2,a) subset (a+delta_n+1,a) subset (a+delta_n,a)$.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:41







  • 1




    We can show $lim_n rightarrow infty nu((a,a+delta_phi(n))) = 0$ for some rearrangement $phi:mathbbN rightarrow mathbbN$ making the $delta_phi(n)$ monotone. Now any rearrangement of $ nu((a,a+delta_phi(n)))$ will converge to the same limit.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 15:17











  • Yes, you are correct. It is sufficient to assume that $(delta_n)$ converges monotonically to $0$.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 16:03












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









As copper.hat points out in the comments, this is true. Let $(delta_n)$ be a sequence of positive real numbers such that $delta_nto 0$ as $ntoinfty$. By assumpution, there is some open neighborhood $U$ of $a$ such that $nu(U)<infty$, hence some $varepsilon>0$ such that $(a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon)subset U$.
There is some $N$ such that $delta_n<varepsilon$ for $ngeq N$. For such $n$, we have
$$nu((a,a+delta_n))leqnu((a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon))leqnu(U)<infty.$$
Continuity from above now implies that $limlimits_ntoinftynu((a,a+delta_n))=0$, and since the sequence $(delta_n)$ was arbitrary, the result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer












As copper.hat points out in the comments, this is true. Let $(delta_n)$ be a sequence of positive real numbers such that $delta_nto 0$ as $ntoinfty$. By assumpution, there is some open neighborhood $U$ of $a$ such that $nu(U)<infty$, hence some $varepsilon>0$ such that $(a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon)subset U$.
There is some $N$ such that $delta_n<varepsilon$ for $ngeq N$. For such $n$, we have
$$nu((a,a+delta_n))leqnu((a-varepsilon,a+varepsilon))leqnu(U)<infty.$$
Continuity from above now implies that $limlimits_ntoinftynu((a,a+delta_n))=0$, and since the sequence $(delta_n)$ was arbitrary, the result follows.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 27 at 19:09









Aweygan

12k21438




12k21438











  • Although I know how to show that the conditions on $nu $ imply continuity from above,) I dk whether the proposer knows why $nu$ must be continuous from above.
    – DanielWainfleet
    Aug 28 at 4:00











  • I read how to proof continuity from above.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:28






  • 1




    Although I must say that we dont have $... subset (a+delta_n+2,a) subset (a+delta_n+1,a) subset (a+delta_n,a)$.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:41







  • 1




    We can show $lim_n rightarrow infty nu((a,a+delta_phi(n))) = 0$ for some rearrangement $phi:mathbbN rightarrow mathbbN$ making the $delta_phi(n)$ monotone. Now any rearrangement of $ nu((a,a+delta_phi(n)))$ will converge to the same limit.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 15:17











  • Yes, you are correct. It is sufficient to assume that $(delta_n)$ converges monotonically to $0$.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 16:03
















  • Although I know how to show that the conditions on $nu $ imply continuity from above,) I dk whether the proposer knows why $nu$ must be continuous from above.
    – DanielWainfleet
    Aug 28 at 4:00











  • I read how to proof continuity from above.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:28






  • 1




    Although I must say that we dont have $... subset (a+delta_n+2,a) subset (a+delta_n+1,a) subset (a+delta_n,a)$.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 14:41







  • 1




    We can show $lim_n rightarrow infty nu((a,a+delta_phi(n))) = 0$ for some rearrangement $phi:mathbbN rightarrow mathbbN$ making the $delta_phi(n)$ monotone. Now any rearrangement of $ nu((a,a+delta_phi(n)))$ will converge to the same limit.
    – An_876_Joke
    Aug 28 at 15:17











  • Yes, you are correct. It is sufficient to assume that $(delta_n)$ converges monotonically to $0$.
    – Aweygan
    Aug 28 at 16:03















Although I know how to show that the conditions on $nu $ imply continuity from above,) I dk whether the proposer knows why $nu$ must be continuous from above.
– DanielWainfleet
Aug 28 at 4:00





Although I know how to show that the conditions on $nu $ imply continuity from above,) I dk whether the proposer knows why $nu$ must be continuous from above.
– DanielWainfleet
Aug 28 at 4:00













I read how to proof continuity from above.
– An_876_Joke
Aug 28 at 14:28




I read how to proof continuity from above.
– An_876_Joke
Aug 28 at 14:28




1




1




Although I must say that we dont have $... subset (a+delta_n+2,a) subset (a+delta_n+1,a) subset (a+delta_n,a)$.
– An_876_Joke
Aug 28 at 14:41





Although I must say that we dont have $... subset (a+delta_n+2,a) subset (a+delta_n+1,a) subset (a+delta_n,a)$.
– An_876_Joke
Aug 28 at 14:41





1




1




We can show $lim_n rightarrow infty nu((a,a+delta_phi(n))) = 0$ for some rearrangement $phi:mathbbN rightarrow mathbbN$ making the $delta_phi(n)$ monotone. Now any rearrangement of $ nu((a,a+delta_phi(n)))$ will converge to the same limit.
– An_876_Joke
Aug 28 at 15:17





We can show $lim_n rightarrow infty nu((a,a+delta_phi(n))) = 0$ for some rearrangement $phi:mathbbN rightarrow mathbbN$ making the $delta_phi(n)$ monotone. Now any rearrangement of $ nu((a,a+delta_phi(n)))$ will converge to the same limit.
– An_876_Joke
Aug 28 at 15:17













Yes, you are correct. It is sufficient to assume that $(delta_n)$ converges monotonically to $0$.
– Aweygan
Aug 28 at 16:03




Yes, you are correct. It is sufficient to assume that $(delta_n)$ converges monotonically to $0$.
– Aweygan
Aug 28 at 16:03

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2896497%2fconvergence-of-borel-measure-evaluated-at-sequence-of-intervals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































tTHS3TA3Q,9iCn3coy bKe FwONxQRpe,M,e,V4,HOffB67hQKP QTVV,zvVUC5CnMogHl,m0yRzdshdOJtYLb46g,yEniS,29ZQMJ13
UH,MerQCX Jjo Zzrfvi80IqEG,8wnO l0 Vz5LY6auvHcBc NR3D1lhwQW62QslIvF,m0UUGgrh2lz5pN,C l,DklpVAkfQO

這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Propositional logic and tautologies

Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility