If $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are 2 elementary families of sets in $X_1$ and $X_2$ respectively then the cross product is an elementary family too.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am trying to show that if $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are 2 elementary families of sets in $X_1$ and $X_2$ respectively then $$epsilon_1 times epsilon_2=E_1 times E_2 $$ is an elementary family of sets on $X_1 times X_2$.




My book, Folland, defines an elementary family to be a collection
$epsilon$ of subsets of $X$ such that:



1) The empty set is in $epsilon$



2) If $E,F in epsilon$, then $E cap F in epsilon$



3) If $E in epsilon$, then $E^c$ is a finite disjoint union of
members of $epsilon$




For this problem I am trying to show the following:



1) The empty set is in $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$ is clear since it is in both $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$.



I am not sure about 2) and 3)...



2) I want to show that if $E,F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$, then $E cap F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$



We know that there exists $E_i,E_m in epsilon_1$ and $E_j,E_n in epsilon_2$ so that $E=E_i times E_j$ and $F=E_m times E_n$. Then, $E cap F=(E_i times E_j) cap (E_m times E_n)$ where both terms in parentheses are in $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$ by definition. So we have that $E cap F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$. I am wondering if this is correct...



3) I want to show that If $E in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$, then $E^c$ is a finite disjoint union of members of $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$.



Again, we know that there exists $E_i in epsilon_1$ and $E_j in epsilon_2$ so that $E=E_i times E_j$. I then said that $E^c=(E_i times E_j)^c = (E_i^c times X_1) cup (E_j^c times X_2)$ but I am stuck because $(E_i^c times X_1)$ and $(E_j^c times X_2)$ are not disjoint as far as I understand...



Thank you for any help you can give me.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    In 2, the point is that $Ecap F=(E_icap E_m)times (E_jcap E_n)$.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 27 at 18:19










  • @LordSharktheUnknown why is that? Shouldn't E be made up of some $E_i in X_1$ and some $E_j in X_2$?
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:24










  • Oh I think I misread what you put. Thank you I see what you mean now. :)
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:26














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am trying to show that if $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are 2 elementary families of sets in $X_1$ and $X_2$ respectively then $$epsilon_1 times epsilon_2=E_1 times E_2 $$ is an elementary family of sets on $X_1 times X_2$.




My book, Folland, defines an elementary family to be a collection
$epsilon$ of subsets of $X$ such that:



1) The empty set is in $epsilon$



2) If $E,F in epsilon$, then $E cap F in epsilon$



3) If $E in epsilon$, then $E^c$ is a finite disjoint union of
members of $epsilon$




For this problem I am trying to show the following:



1) The empty set is in $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$ is clear since it is in both $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$.



I am not sure about 2) and 3)...



2) I want to show that if $E,F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$, then $E cap F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$



We know that there exists $E_i,E_m in epsilon_1$ and $E_j,E_n in epsilon_2$ so that $E=E_i times E_j$ and $F=E_m times E_n$. Then, $E cap F=(E_i times E_j) cap (E_m times E_n)$ where both terms in parentheses are in $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$ by definition. So we have that $E cap F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$. I am wondering if this is correct...



3) I want to show that If $E in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$, then $E^c$ is a finite disjoint union of members of $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$.



Again, we know that there exists $E_i in epsilon_1$ and $E_j in epsilon_2$ so that $E=E_i times E_j$. I then said that $E^c=(E_i times E_j)^c = (E_i^c times X_1) cup (E_j^c times X_2)$ but I am stuck because $(E_i^c times X_1)$ and $(E_j^c times X_2)$ are not disjoint as far as I understand...



Thank you for any help you can give me.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    In 2, the point is that $Ecap F=(E_icap E_m)times (E_jcap E_n)$.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 27 at 18:19










  • @LordSharktheUnknown why is that? Shouldn't E be made up of some $E_i in X_1$ and some $E_j in X_2$?
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:24










  • Oh I think I misread what you put. Thank you I see what you mean now. :)
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:26












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I am trying to show that if $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are 2 elementary families of sets in $X_1$ and $X_2$ respectively then $$epsilon_1 times epsilon_2=E_1 times E_2 $$ is an elementary family of sets on $X_1 times X_2$.




My book, Folland, defines an elementary family to be a collection
$epsilon$ of subsets of $X$ such that:



1) The empty set is in $epsilon$



2) If $E,F in epsilon$, then $E cap F in epsilon$



3) If $E in epsilon$, then $E^c$ is a finite disjoint union of
members of $epsilon$




For this problem I am trying to show the following:



1) The empty set is in $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$ is clear since it is in both $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$.



I am not sure about 2) and 3)...



2) I want to show that if $E,F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$, then $E cap F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$



We know that there exists $E_i,E_m in epsilon_1$ and $E_j,E_n in epsilon_2$ so that $E=E_i times E_j$ and $F=E_m times E_n$. Then, $E cap F=(E_i times E_j) cap (E_m times E_n)$ where both terms in parentheses are in $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$ by definition. So we have that $E cap F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$. I am wondering if this is correct...



3) I want to show that If $E in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$, then $E^c$ is a finite disjoint union of members of $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$.



Again, we know that there exists $E_i in epsilon_1$ and $E_j in epsilon_2$ so that $E=E_i times E_j$. I then said that $E^c=(E_i times E_j)^c = (E_i^c times X_1) cup (E_j^c times X_2)$ but I am stuck because $(E_i^c times X_1)$ and $(E_j^c times X_2)$ are not disjoint as far as I understand...



Thank you for any help you can give me.







share|cite|improve this question












I am trying to show that if $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are 2 elementary families of sets in $X_1$ and $X_2$ respectively then $$epsilon_1 times epsilon_2=E_1 times E_2 $$ is an elementary family of sets on $X_1 times X_2$.




My book, Folland, defines an elementary family to be a collection
$epsilon$ of subsets of $X$ such that:



1) The empty set is in $epsilon$



2) If $E,F in epsilon$, then $E cap F in epsilon$



3) If $E in epsilon$, then $E^c$ is a finite disjoint union of
members of $epsilon$




For this problem I am trying to show the following:



1) The empty set is in $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$ is clear since it is in both $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$.



I am not sure about 2) and 3)...



2) I want to show that if $E,F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$, then $E cap F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$



We know that there exists $E_i,E_m in epsilon_1$ and $E_j,E_n in epsilon_2$ so that $E=E_i times E_j$ and $F=E_m times E_n$. Then, $E cap F=(E_i times E_j) cap (E_m times E_n)$ where both terms in parentheses are in $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$ by definition. So we have that $E cap F in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$. I am wondering if this is correct...



3) I want to show that If $E in epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$, then $E^c$ is a finite disjoint union of members of $epsilon_1 times epsilon_2$.



Again, we know that there exists $E_i in epsilon_1$ and $E_j in epsilon_2$ so that $E=E_i times E_j$. I then said that $E^c=(E_i times E_j)^c = (E_i^c times X_1) cup (E_j^c times X_2)$ but I am stuck because $(E_i^c times X_1)$ and $(E_j^c times X_2)$ are not disjoint as far as I understand...



Thank you for any help you can give me.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 27 at 18:16









MathIsHard

1,163415




1,163415







  • 1




    In 2, the point is that $Ecap F=(E_icap E_m)times (E_jcap E_n)$.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 27 at 18:19










  • @LordSharktheUnknown why is that? Shouldn't E be made up of some $E_i in X_1$ and some $E_j in X_2$?
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:24










  • Oh I think I misread what you put. Thank you I see what you mean now. :)
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:26












  • 1




    In 2, the point is that $Ecap F=(E_icap E_m)times (E_jcap E_n)$.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Aug 27 at 18:19










  • @LordSharktheUnknown why is that? Shouldn't E be made up of some $E_i in X_1$ and some $E_j in X_2$?
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:24










  • Oh I think I misread what you put. Thank you I see what you mean now. :)
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:26







1




1




In 2, the point is that $Ecap F=(E_icap E_m)times (E_jcap E_n)$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 27 at 18:19




In 2, the point is that $Ecap F=(E_icap E_m)times (E_jcap E_n)$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Aug 27 at 18:19












@LordSharktheUnknown why is that? Shouldn't E be made up of some $E_i in X_1$ and some $E_j in X_2$?
– MathIsHard
Aug 27 at 18:24




@LordSharktheUnknown why is that? Shouldn't E be made up of some $E_i in X_1$ and some $E_j in X_2$?
– MathIsHard
Aug 27 at 18:24












Oh I think I misread what you put. Thank you I see what you mean now. :)
– MathIsHard
Aug 27 at 18:26




Oh I think I misread what you put. Thank you I see what you mean now. :)
– MathIsHard
Aug 27 at 18:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










For 3, let $Einvarepsilon_1$ and $E'invarepsilon_2$. Then
$X_1=E_0cup E_1cupcdotscup E_m$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_1$ and $E_0=E$. Likewise
$X_2=E_0'cup E_1'cupcdotscup E_n'$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_2$ and $E_0'=E'$.



Then $(Etimes E')^c$ is the disjoint union of the $E_itimes E_j'$
for $(i,j)ne(0,0)$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Oh thank you very much. I appreciate the help. :) I see now that my approach wasn't quite correct.
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:28










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2896493%2fif-epsilon-1-and-epsilon-2-are-2-elementary-families-of-sets-in-x-1-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










For 3, let $Einvarepsilon_1$ and $E'invarepsilon_2$. Then
$X_1=E_0cup E_1cupcdotscup E_m$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_1$ and $E_0=E$. Likewise
$X_2=E_0'cup E_1'cupcdotscup E_n'$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_2$ and $E_0'=E'$.



Then $(Etimes E')^c$ is the disjoint union of the $E_itimes E_j'$
for $(i,j)ne(0,0)$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Oh thank you very much. I appreciate the help. :) I see now that my approach wasn't quite correct.
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:28














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










For 3, let $Einvarepsilon_1$ and $E'invarepsilon_2$. Then
$X_1=E_0cup E_1cupcdotscup E_m$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_1$ and $E_0=E$. Likewise
$X_2=E_0'cup E_1'cupcdotscup E_n'$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_2$ and $E_0'=E'$.



Then $(Etimes E')^c$ is the disjoint union of the $E_itimes E_j'$
for $(i,j)ne(0,0)$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Oh thank you very much. I appreciate the help. :) I see now that my approach wasn't quite correct.
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:28












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






For 3, let $Einvarepsilon_1$ and $E'invarepsilon_2$. Then
$X_1=E_0cup E_1cupcdotscup E_m$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_1$ and $E_0=E$. Likewise
$X_2=E_0'cup E_1'cupcdotscup E_n'$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_2$ and $E_0'=E'$.



Then $(Etimes E')^c$ is the disjoint union of the $E_itimes E_j'$
for $(i,j)ne(0,0)$.






share|cite|improve this answer












For 3, let $Einvarepsilon_1$ and $E'invarepsilon_2$. Then
$X_1=E_0cup E_1cupcdotscup E_m$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_1$ and $E_0=E$. Likewise
$X_2=E_0'cup E_1'cupcdotscup E_n'$ where this is a disjoint union of
elements of $varepsilon_2$ and $E_0'=E'$.



Then $(Etimes E')^c$ is the disjoint union of the $E_itimes E_j'$
for $(i,j)ne(0,0)$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 27 at 18:24









Lord Shark the Unknown

88.5k955115




88.5k955115











  • Oh thank you very much. I appreciate the help. :) I see now that my approach wasn't quite correct.
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:28
















  • Oh thank you very much. I appreciate the help. :) I see now that my approach wasn't quite correct.
    – MathIsHard
    Aug 27 at 18:28















Oh thank you very much. I appreciate the help. :) I see now that my approach wasn't quite correct.
– MathIsHard
Aug 27 at 18:28




Oh thank you very much. I appreciate the help. :) I see now that my approach wasn't quite correct.
– MathIsHard
Aug 27 at 18:28

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2896493%2fif-epsilon-1-and-epsilon-2-are-2-elementary-families-of-sets-in-x-1-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?