Simpler way of solving $int z(ln z)^2, dz $
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The following answer to the question $$int z(ln z)^2, dz $$ is given by
$$frac12(z^2(ln z)^2-z^2(ln z)+ fracz^22)+ C. $$
I first used a substitution of $u=z ln z$ as $ln z$ cannot be integrated cleanly (and so Integration by parts is inapplicable), reducing the integral to $$int z ln z (ln z+1) , dz - int z ln z , dz.$$
Still, $ln z$ cannot be integrated cleanly so did a 2nd substitution of $y= ln z$ which will reduce the integral(after applying both substitutions) into $$int u,du - int y e^2y , dy$$ Then I proceeded with Integration by parts.
If the power of $ln z$ was any larger, it would be tedious to use n substitutions and then proceed with integration by parts. Does anyone have an alternative solution to this problem?
calculus indefinite-integrals
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The following answer to the question $$int z(ln z)^2, dz $$ is given by
$$frac12(z^2(ln z)^2-z^2(ln z)+ fracz^22)+ C. $$
I first used a substitution of $u=z ln z$ as $ln z$ cannot be integrated cleanly (and so Integration by parts is inapplicable), reducing the integral to $$int z ln z (ln z+1) , dz - int z ln z , dz.$$
Still, $ln z$ cannot be integrated cleanly so did a 2nd substitution of $y= ln z$ which will reduce the integral(after applying both substitutions) into $$int u,du - int y e^2y , dy$$ Then I proceeded with Integration by parts.
If the power of $ln z$ was any larger, it would be tedious to use n substitutions and then proceed with integration by parts. Does anyone have an alternative solution to this problem?
calculus indefinite-integrals
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The following answer to the question $$int z(ln z)^2, dz $$ is given by
$$frac12(z^2(ln z)^2-z^2(ln z)+ fracz^22)+ C. $$
I first used a substitution of $u=z ln z$ as $ln z$ cannot be integrated cleanly (and so Integration by parts is inapplicable), reducing the integral to $$int z ln z (ln z+1) , dz - int z ln z , dz.$$
Still, $ln z$ cannot be integrated cleanly so did a 2nd substitution of $y= ln z$ which will reduce the integral(after applying both substitutions) into $$int u,du - int y e^2y , dy$$ Then I proceeded with Integration by parts.
If the power of $ln z$ was any larger, it would be tedious to use n substitutions and then proceed with integration by parts. Does anyone have an alternative solution to this problem?
calculus indefinite-integrals
The following answer to the question $$int z(ln z)^2, dz $$ is given by
$$frac12(z^2(ln z)^2-z^2(ln z)+ fracz^22)+ C. $$
I first used a substitution of $u=z ln z$ as $ln z$ cannot be integrated cleanly (and so Integration by parts is inapplicable), reducing the integral to $$int z ln z (ln z+1) , dz - int z ln z , dz.$$
Still, $ln z$ cannot be integrated cleanly so did a 2nd substitution of $y= ln z$ which will reduce the integral(after applying both substitutions) into $$int u,du - int y e^2y , dy$$ Then I proceeded with Integration by parts.
If the power of $ln z$ was any larger, it would be tedious to use n substitutions and then proceed with integration by parts. Does anyone have an alternative solution to this problem?
calculus indefinite-integrals
edited Aug 18 at 7:33
Asaf Karagilaâ¦
293k31407735
293k31407735
asked Aug 18 at 2:38
Prashin Jeevaganth
526
526
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
$$I=displaystyleintxln^2left(xright),mathrmdx$$
Integration by parts
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
$$I_1=displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
again apply integration by parts
$$I_1=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-displaystyleintdfracx2,mathrmdx=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-dfracx^24$$
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2+dfracx^24+C$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
With substitution $ln z=u$ or $z=e^u$ then
$$I=int zln^2z dz=int e^2uu^2 du$$
let $2u=w$ and use the formula $displaystyleint e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ where $p$ is a polynomial therefore
$$I=dfrac18int e^ww^2 dw=dfrac18e^wleft(w^2-2w+2right)+C=colorbluedfrac18z^2left(4ln^2z-4ln z+2right)+C$$
Hi, cool answer u have, may I know where u get these results from? I could see why that formula is valid, just want to know where I could find more of these results.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:02
If you mean $int e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ it is proved with integration by parts (I've got it from simmons calculus book). you may find many useful formulas in this site!
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:11
Ok, I will try to keep track of the formulae on this site, by the way do u mean the book titled "Calculus with Analytic Geometry"?
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:41
Yes. It is. I read it 25 years ago, but in new editions (?) I don't know this formula is or not.
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:46
Ok thanks anyway, will look it up.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:48
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
$$I=displaystyleintxln^2left(xright),mathrmdx$$
Integration by parts
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
$$I_1=displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
again apply integration by parts
$$I_1=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-displaystyleintdfracx2,mathrmdx=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-dfracx^24$$
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2+dfracx^24+C$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
$$I=displaystyleintxln^2left(xright),mathrmdx$$
Integration by parts
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
$$I_1=displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
again apply integration by parts
$$I_1=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-displaystyleintdfracx2,mathrmdx=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-dfracx^24$$
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2+dfracx^24+C$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
$$I=displaystyleintxln^2left(xright),mathrmdx$$
Integration by parts
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
$$I_1=displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
again apply integration by parts
$$I_1=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-displaystyleintdfracx2,mathrmdx=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-dfracx^24$$
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2+dfracx^24+C$$
$$I=displaystyleintxln^2left(xright),mathrmdx$$
Integration by parts
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
$$I_1=displaystyleintxlnleft(xright),mathrmdx$$
again apply integration by parts
$$I_1=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-displaystyleintdfracx2,mathrmdx=dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2-dfracx^24$$
$$I=dfracx^2ln^2left(xright)2-dfracx^2lnleft(xright)2+dfracx^24+C$$
edited Aug 18 at 3:00
answered Aug 18 at 2:51
James
2,184619
2,184619
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
With substitution $ln z=u$ or $z=e^u$ then
$$I=int zln^2z dz=int e^2uu^2 du$$
let $2u=w$ and use the formula $displaystyleint e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ where $p$ is a polynomial therefore
$$I=dfrac18int e^ww^2 dw=dfrac18e^wleft(w^2-2w+2right)+C=colorbluedfrac18z^2left(4ln^2z-4ln z+2right)+C$$
Hi, cool answer u have, may I know where u get these results from? I could see why that formula is valid, just want to know where I could find more of these results.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:02
If you mean $int e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ it is proved with integration by parts (I've got it from simmons calculus book). you may find many useful formulas in this site!
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:11
Ok, I will try to keep track of the formulae on this site, by the way do u mean the book titled "Calculus with Analytic Geometry"?
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:41
Yes. It is. I read it 25 years ago, but in new editions (?) I don't know this formula is or not.
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:46
Ok thanks anyway, will look it up.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
With substitution $ln z=u$ or $z=e^u$ then
$$I=int zln^2z dz=int e^2uu^2 du$$
let $2u=w$ and use the formula $displaystyleint e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ where $p$ is a polynomial therefore
$$I=dfrac18int e^ww^2 dw=dfrac18e^wleft(w^2-2w+2right)+C=colorbluedfrac18z^2left(4ln^2z-4ln z+2right)+C$$
Hi, cool answer u have, may I know where u get these results from? I could see why that formula is valid, just want to know where I could find more of these results.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:02
If you mean $int e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ it is proved with integration by parts (I've got it from simmons calculus book). you may find many useful formulas in this site!
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:11
Ok, I will try to keep track of the formulae on this site, by the way do u mean the book titled "Calculus with Analytic Geometry"?
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:41
Yes. It is. I read it 25 years ago, but in new editions (?) I don't know this formula is or not.
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:46
Ok thanks anyway, will look it up.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
With substitution $ln z=u$ or $z=e^u$ then
$$I=int zln^2z dz=int e^2uu^2 du$$
let $2u=w$ and use the formula $displaystyleint e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ where $p$ is a polynomial therefore
$$I=dfrac18int e^ww^2 dw=dfrac18e^wleft(w^2-2w+2right)+C=colorbluedfrac18z^2left(4ln^2z-4ln z+2right)+C$$
With substitution $ln z=u$ or $z=e^u$ then
$$I=int zln^2z dz=int e^2uu^2 du$$
let $2u=w$ and use the formula $displaystyleint e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ where $p$ is a polynomial therefore
$$I=dfrac18int e^ww^2 dw=dfrac18e^wleft(w^2-2w+2right)+C=colorbluedfrac18z^2left(4ln^2z-4ln z+2right)+C$$
answered Aug 18 at 3:19
Nosrati
20.7k41644
20.7k41644
Hi, cool answer u have, may I know where u get these results from? I could see why that formula is valid, just want to know where I could find more of these results.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:02
If you mean $int e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ it is proved with integration by parts (I've got it from simmons calculus book). you may find many useful formulas in this site!
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:11
Ok, I will try to keep track of the formulae on this site, by the way do u mean the book titled "Calculus with Analytic Geometry"?
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:41
Yes. It is. I read it 25 years ago, but in new editions (?) I don't know this formula is or not.
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:46
Ok thanks anyway, will look it up.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:48
add a comment |Â
Hi, cool answer u have, may I know where u get these results from? I could see why that formula is valid, just want to know where I could find more of these results.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:02
If you mean $int e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ it is proved with integration by parts (I've got it from simmons calculus book). you may find many useful formulas in this site!
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:11
Ok, I will try to keep track of the formulae on this site, by the way do u mean the book titled "Calculus with Analytic Geometry"?
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:41
Yes. It is. I read it 25 years ago, but in new editions (?) I don't know this formula is or not.
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:46
Ok thanks anyway, will look it up.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:48
Hi, cool answer u have, may I know where u get these results from? I could see why that formula is valid, just want to know where I could find more of these results.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:02
Hi, cool answer u have, may I know where u get these results from? I could see why that formula is valid, just want to know where I could find more of these results.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:02
If you mean $int e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ it is proved with integration by parts (I've got it from simmons calculus book). you may find many useful formulas in this site!
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:11
If you mean $int e^tp(t)dt=e^t(p-p'+p''-cdots)+C$ it is proved with integration by parts (I've got it from simmons calculus book). you may find many useful formulas in this site!
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:11
Ok, I will try to keep track of the formulae on this site, by the way do u mean the book titled "Calculus with Analytic Geometry"?
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:41
Ok, I will try to keep track of the formulae on this site, by the way do u mean the book titled "Calculus with Analytic Geometry"?
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:41
Yes. It is. I read it 25 years ago, but in new editions (?) I don't know this formula is or not.
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:46
Yes. It is. I read it 25 years ago, but in new editions (?) I don't know this formula is or not.
â Nosrati
Aug 18 at 8:46
Ok thanks anyway, will look it up.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:48
Ok thanks anyway, will look it up.
â Prashin Jeevaganth
Aug 18 at 8:48
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2886363%2fsimpler-way-of-solving-int-z-ln-z2-dz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password