Question regarding Rudin's proof that for $Y subset X$, $E subset Y$ is open relative to $Y$ iff $E = Y cap G$ for some open $G subset X$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am reading Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis and I have some questions regarding Theorem 2.30 (p.36) about open relative sets.




2.30 Theorem. Suppose $Y subset X$. A subset $E$ of $Y$ is open relative to $Y$ if and only if $E = Y cap G$ for some open subset $G$ of $X$.



Proof. Suppose $E$ is open relative to $Y$. To each $p in E$ there is a positive number $r_p$ such that the conditions $d ( p,q ) < r_p$, $q in Y$ imply that $q in E$. Let $V_p$ be the set of all $q in X$ such that $d ( p,q ) < r_p$, and define $$G = bigcup_p in E V_p.$$ Then $G$ is an open subset of $X$, by Theorems 2.19 and 2.24.



Since $p in V_p$ for all $p in E$, it is clear that $E subset G cap Y$.



By our choice of $V_p$, we have $V_p cap Y subset E$ for every $p in E$, so that $G cap Y subset E$. Thus $E = G cap Y$, and one half of the theorem is proved.



Conversely, if $G$ is open in $X$ and $E = G cap Y$, every $p in E$ has a neighborhood $V_p subset G$. Then $V_p cap Y subset E$, so that $E$ is open relative to $Y$.




The question is: after Rudin defines $G$, he immediately states that $G$ is open in $X$, by Theorems 2.19 (every neighborhood is an open set) and 2.24 (every union of open sets is an open set). By Theorem 2.24 I know that the union of open sets is still an open set. However, I don't know how Theorem 2.19 applies in this situation and thus implies $V_p$ is open. Because $V_p$ is a set of all $q$, not $p$, if it is the set of all $p$, I know it must be open.



Can somebody please help me explain why $G$ is open? And please be very specific.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am reading Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis and I have some questions regarding Theorem 2.30 (p.36) about open relative sets.




    2.30 Theorem. Suppose $Y subset X$. A subset $E$ of $Y$ is open relative to $Y$ if and only if $E = Y cap G$ for some open subset $G$ of $X$.



    Proof. Suppose $E$ is open relative to $Y$. To each $p in E$ there is a positive number $r_p$ such that the conditions $d ( p,q ) < r_p$, $q in Y$ imply that $q in E$. Let $V_p$ be the set of all $q in X$ such that $d ( p,q ) < r_p$, and define $$G = bigcup_p in E V_p.$$ Then $G$ is an open subset of $X$, by Theorems 2.19 and 2.24.



    Since $p in V_p$ for all $p in E$, it is clear that $E subset G cap Y$.



    By our choice of $V_p$, we have $V_p cap Y subset E$ for every $p in E$, so that $G cap Y subset E$. Thus $E = G cap Y$, and one half of the theorem is proved.



    Conversely, if $G$ is open in $X$ and $E = G cap Y$, every $p in E$ has a neighborhood $V_p subset G$. Then $V_p cap Y subset E$, so that $E$ is open relative to $Y$.




    The question is: after Rudin defines $G$, he immediately states that $G$ is open in $X$, by Theorems 2.19 (every neighborhood is an open set) and 2.24 (every union of open sets is an open set). By Theorem 2.24 I know that the union of open sets is still an open set. However, I don't know how Theorem 2.19 applies in this situation and thus implies $V_p$ is open. Because $V_p$ is a set of all $q$, not $p$, if it is the set of all $p$, I know it must be open.



    Can somebody please help me explain why $G$ is open? And please be very specific.







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am reading Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis and I have some questions regarding Theorem 2.30 (p.36) about open relative sets.




      2.30 Theorem. Suppose $Y subset X$. A subset $E$ of $Y$ is open relative to $Y$ if and only if $E = Y cap G$ for some open subset $G$ of $X$.



      Proof. Suppose $E$ is open relative to $Y$. To each $p in E$ there is a positive number $r_p$ such that the conditions $d ( p,q ) < r_p$, $q in Y$ imply that $q in E$. Let $V_p$ be the set of all $q in X$ such that $d ( p,q ) < r_p$, and define $$G = bigcup_p in E V_p.$$ Then $G$ is an open subset of $X$, by Theorems 2.19 and 2.24.



      Since $p in V_p$ for all $p in E$, it is clear that $E subset G cap Y$.



      By our choice of $V_p$, we have $V_p cap Y subset E$ for every $p in E$, so that $G cap Y subset E$. Thus $E = G cap Y$, and one half of the theorem is proved.



      Conversely, if $G$ is open in $X$ and $E = G cap Y$, every $p in E$ has a neighborhood $V_p subset G$. Then $V_p cap Y subset E$, so that $E$ is open relative to $Y$.




      The question is: after Rudin defines $G$, he immediately states that $G$ is open in $X$, by Theorems 2.19 (every neighborhood is an open set) and 2.24 (every union of open sets is an open set). By Theorem 2.24 I know that the union of open sets is still an open set. However, I don't know how Theorem 2.19 applies in this situation and thus implies $V_p$ is open. Because $V_p$ is a set of all $q$, not $p$, if it is the set of all $p$, I know it must be open.



      Can somebody please help me explain why $G$ is open? And please be very specific.







      share|cite|improve this question














      I am reading Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis and I have some questions regarding Theorem 2.30 (p.36) about open relative sets.




      2.30 Theorem. Suppose $Y subset X$. A subset $E$ of $Y$ is open relative to $Y$ if and only if $E = Y cap G$ for some open subset $G$ of $X$.



      Proof. Suppose $E$ is open relative to $Y$. To each $p in E$ there is a positive number $r_p$ such that the conditions $d ( p,q ) < r_p$, $q in Y$ imply that $q in E$. Let $V_p$ be the set of all $q in X$ such that $d ( p,q ) < r_p$, and define $$G = bigcup_p in E V_p.$$ Then $G$ is an open subset of $X$, by Theorems 2.19 and 2.24.



      Since $p in V_p$ for all $p in E$, it is clear that $E subset G cap Y$.



      By our choice of $V_p$, we have $V_p cap Y subset E$ for every $p in E$, so that $G cap Y subset E$. Thus $E = G cap Y$, and one half of the theorem is proved.



      Conversely, if $G$ is open in $X$ and $E = G cap Y$, every $p in E$ has a neighborhood $V_p subset G$. Then $V_p cap Y subset E$, so that $E$ is open relative to $Y$.




      The question is: after Rudin defines $G$, he immediately states that $G$ is open in $X$, by Theorems 2.19 (every neighborhood is an open set) and 2.24 (every union of open sets is an open set). By Theorem 2.24 I know that the union of open sets is still an open set. However, I don't know how Theorem 2.19 applies in this situation and thus implies $V_p$ is open. Because $V_p$ is a set of all $q$, not $p$, if it is the set of all $p$, I know it must be open.



      Can somebody please help me explain why $G$ is open? And please be very specific.









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 18 at 9:24









      castor occupatus

      4,365927




      4,365927










      asked Aug 18 at 8:45









      Yunhan

      31




      31




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          $V_p$ is a ball-neighbourhood (he states the definition for it: all $q in X$ such that $d(p,q) < r_p$, so it's just the open ball with centre $p$ and radius $r_p$), so it's open by 2.19.



          And $G$ is just a union of these open sets, hence open too.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Understood. Thanks!
            – Yunhan
            Aug 18 at 10:53










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2886537%2fquestion-regarding-rudins-proof-that-for-y-subset-x-e-subset-y-is-open-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          $V_p$ is a ball-neighbourhood (he states the definition for it: all $q in X$ such that $d(p,q) < r_p$, so it's just the open ball with centre $p$ and radius $r_p$), so it's open by 2.19.



          And $G$ is just a union of these open sets, hence open too.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Understood. Thanks!
            – Yunhan
            Aug 18 at 10:53














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          $V_p$ is a ball-neighbourhood (he states the definition for it: all $q in X$ such that $d(p,q) < r_p$, so it's just the open ball with centre $p$ and radius $r_p$), so it's open by 2.19.



          And $G$ is just a union of these open sets, hence open too.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Understood. Thanks!
            – Yunhan
            Aug 18 at 10:53












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          $V_p$ is a ball-neighbourhood (he states the definition for it: all $q in X$ such that $d(p,q) < r_p$, so it's just the open ball with centre $p$ and radius $r_p$), so it's open by 2.19.



          And $G$ is just a union of these open sets, hence open too.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          $V_p$ is a ball-neighbourhood (he states the definition for it: all $q in X$ such that $d(p,q) < r_p$, so it's just the open ball with centre $p$ and radius $r_p$), so it's open by 2.19.



          And $G$ is just a union of these open sets, hence open too.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 18 at 9:22









          Henno Brandsma

          92k342100




          92k342100











          • Understood. Thanks!
            – Yunhan
            Aug 18 at 10:53
















          • Understood. Thanks!
            – Yunhan
            Aug 18 at 10:53















          Understood. Thanks!
          – Yunhan
          Aug 18 at 10:53




          Understood. Thanks!
          – Yunhan
          Aug 18 at 10:53












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2886537%2fquestion-regarding-rudins-proof-that-for-y-subset-x-e-subset-y-is-open-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Mutual Information Always Non-negative

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?