Prove $forall x,y in mathbbR :lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor∨lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor+1$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Prove
$∀x,y (x,yin mathbbR: lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor∨lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor+1)$




So, I let



$lfloorxrfloor=m ≡ m≤x<m+1$



$lflooryrfloor=n ≡ n≤y<n+1$



Now, I have that $m+n≤x+y<m+n+2$



... And I get stuck in here.



I found this proof over the the internet:




Let $[x] = m$ and $[y] = n$, then we have $$ m leq x < m + 1 quad
> textand quad n leq y < n + 1.$$ So, adding, we obtain, $$ m+n
> leq x+y < m+n+2.$$ Thus, $$ [x+y] = m+n = [x] + [y] quad textor
quad [x+y] = m+n+1 = [x] + [y] + 1.$$




Which seems to state that where I am is sufficient to conclude the theorem, however I don't see how,because it escalates too quickly.



How do you think i should follow?



Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • I suggest to use Latex, if you can.
    – peterh
    Aug 18 at 7:40











  • Is the following clear to you? If $nle z <n+2$ then either $nle z<n+1$ or $n+1le z<n+2$. If not, think about it. Draw the number line, and place the numbers $n,n+1,n+2$ on it. Then check out where $z$ may land?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Aug 19 at 5:47















up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Prove
$∀x,y (x,yin mathbbR: lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor∨lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor+1)$




So, I let



$lfloorxrfloor=m ≡ m≤x<m+1$



$lflooryrfloor=n ≡ n≤y<n+1$



Now, I have that $m+n≤x+y<m+n+2$



... And I get stuck in here.



I found this proof over the the internet:




Let $[x] = m$ and $[y] = n$, then we have $$ m leq x < m + 1 quad
> textand quad n leq y < n + 1.$$ So, adding, we obtain, $$ m+n
> leq x+y < m+n+2.$$ Thus, $$ [x+y] = m+n = [x] + [y] quad textor
quad [x+y] = m+n+1 = [x] + [y] + 1.$$




Which seems to state that where I am is sufficient to conclude the theorem, however I don't see how,because it escalates too quickly.



How do you think i should follow?



Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • I suggest to use Latex, if you can.
    – peterh
    Aug 18 at 7:40











  • Is the following clear to you? If $nle z <n+2$ then either $nle z<n+1$ or $n+1le z<n+2$. If not, think about it. Draw the number line, and place the numbers $n,n+1,n+2$ on it. Then check out where $z$ may land?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Aug 19 at 5:47













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Prove
$∀x,y (x,yin mathbbR: lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor∨lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor+1)$




So, I let



$lfloorxrfloor=m ≡ m≤x<m+1$



$lflooryrfloor=n ≡ n≤y<n+1$



Now, I have that $m+n≤x+y<m+n+2$



... And I get stuck in here.



I found this proof over the the internet:




Let $[x] = m$ and $[y] = n$, then we have $$ m leq x < m + 1 quad
> textand quad n leq y < n + 1.$$ So, adding, we obtain, $$ m+n
> leq x+y < m+n+2.$$ Thus, $$ [x+y] = m+n = [x] + [y] quad textor
quad [x+y] = m+n+1 = [x] + [y] + 1.$$




Which seems to state that where I am is sufficient to conclude the theorem, however I don't see how,because it escalates too quickly.



How do you think i should follow?



Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question















Prove
$∀x,y (x,yin mathbbR: lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor∨lfloorx+yrfloor=lfloorxrfloor+lflooryrfloor+1)$




So, I let



$lfloorxrfloor=m ≡ m≤x<m+1$



$lflooryrfloor=n ≡ n≤y<n+1$



Now, I have that $m+n≤x+y<m+n+2$



... And I get stuck in here.



I found this proof over the the internet:




Let $[x] = m$ and $[y] = n$, then we have $$ m leq x < m + 1 quad
> textand quad n leq y < n + 1.$$ So, adding, we obtain, $$ m+n
> leq x+y < m+n+2.$$ Thus, $$ [x+y] = m+n = [x] + [y] quad textor
quad [x+y] = m+n+1 = [x] + [y] + 1.$$




Which seems to state that where I am is sufficient to conclude the theorem, however I don't see how,because it escalates too quickly.



How do you think i should follow?



Thanks in advance.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 18 at 8:29









Andrew

2,38221223




2,38221223










asked Aug 18 at 2:58









Daniel Bonilla Jaramillo

40329




40329











  • I suggest to use Latex, if you can.
    – peterh
    Aug 18 at 7:40











  • Is the following clear to you? If $nle z <n+2$ then either $nle z<n+1$ or $n+1le z<n+2$. If not, think about it. Draw the number line, and place the numbers $n,n+1,n+2$ on it. Then check out where $z$ may land?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Aug 19 at 5:47

















  • I suggest to use Latex, if you can.
    – peterh
    Aug 18 at 7:40











  • Is the following clear to you? If $nle z <n+2$ then either $nle z<n+1$ or $n+1le z<n+2$. If not, think about it. Draw the number line, and place the numbers $n,n+1,n+2$ on it. Then check out where $z$ may land?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Aug 19 at 5:47
















I suggest to use Latex, if you can.
– peterh
Aug 18 at 7:40





I suggest to use Latex, if you can.
– peterh
Aug 18 at 7:40













Is the following clear to you? If $nle z <n+2$ then either $nle z<n+1$ or $n+1le z<n+2$. If not, think about it. Draw the number line, and place the numbers $n,n+1,n+2$ on it. Then check out where $z$ may land?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Aug 19 at 5:47





Is the following clear to you? If $nle z <n+2$ then either $nle z<n+1$ or $n+1le z<n+2$. If not, think about it. Draw the number line, and place the numbers $n,n+1,n+2$ on it. Then check out where $z$ may land?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Aug 19 at 5:47











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Hint:
How many $k in mathbbZ$ are there such that



$m + n leq k < m + n + 2$



and what are they? Now, what does this, along with the fact that



$m + n leq x + y < m + n + 2$



tell you about $lfloor x + y rfloor $?






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Remark that if $a = lfloor x+y rfloor$, then the inequalities $$a leq x+y < a+1$$ can be rearranged as $$x+y-1 < a leq x+y$$ Do you see how combining this with $$m+n leq x+y < m+n+2$$ gives you the possible values of $a$?






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Perhaps one may add that either $x+y<m+n+1$ or $m+n+1 leq x+y$, from which the result readily follows.






      share|cite|improve this answer




















      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
        – Adrian Keister
        Aug 18 at 19:59










      • It is a simple fact that the OP may have overlooked that directs him straight to the desired conclusion, right from where he is/was stuck.
        – SEBASTIAN VARGAS LOAIZA
        Aug 18 at 22:20










      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2886380%2fprove-forall-x-y-in-mathbbr-lfloorxy-rfloor-lfloorx-rfloor-lfloor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Hint:
      How many $k in mathbbZ$ are there such that



      $m + n leq k < m + n + 2$



      and what are they? Now, what does this, along with the fact that



      $m + n leq x + y < m + n + 2$



      tell you about $lfloor x + y rfloor $?






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        Hint:
        How many $k in mathbbZ$ are there such that



        $m + n leq k < m + n + 2$



        and what are they? Now, what does this, along with the fact that



        $m + n leq x + y < m + n + 2$



        tell you about $lfloor x + y rfloor $?






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          Hint:
          How many $k in mathbbZ$ are there such that



          $m + n leq k < m + n + 2$



          and what are they? Now, what does this, along with the fact that



          $m + n leq x + y < m + n + 2$



          tell you about $lfloor x + y rfloor $?






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Hint:
          How many $k in mathbbZ$ are there such that



          $m + n leq k < m + n + 2$



          and what are they? Now, what does this, along with the fact that



          $m + n leq x + y < m + n + 2$



          tell you about $lfloor x + y rfloor $?







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 18 at 4:18

























          answered Aug 18 at 3:58









          matt stokes

          43519




          43519




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Remark that if $a = lfloor x+y rfloor$, then the inequalities $$a leq x+y < a+1$$ can be rearranged as $$x+y-1 < a leq x+y$$ Do you see how combining this with $$m+n leq x+y < m+n+2$$ gives you the possible values of $a$?






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Remark that if $a = lfloor x+y rfloor$, then the inequalities $$a leq x+y < a+1$$ can be rearranged as $$x+y-1 < a leq x+y$$ Do you see how combining this with $$m+n leq x+y < m+n+2$$ gives you the possible values of $a$?






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Remark that if $a = lfloor x+y rfloor$, then the inequalities $$a leq x+y < a+1$$ can be rearranged as $$x+y-1 < a leq x+y$$ Do you see how combining this with $$m+n leq x+y < m+n+2$$ gives you the possible values of $a$?






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Remark that if $a = lfloor x+y rfloor$, then the inequalities $$a leq x+y < a+1$$ can be rearranged as $$x+y-1 < a leq x+y$$ Do you see how combining this with $$m+n leq x+y < m+n+2$$ gives you the possible values of $a$?







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 18 at 3:20









                  Sambo

                  1,3621427




                  1,3621427




















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Perhaps one may add that either $x+y<m+n+1$ or $m+n+1 leq x+y$, from which the result readily follows.






                      share|cite|improve this answer




















                      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                        – Adrian Keister
                        Aug 18 at 19:59










                      • It is a simple fact that the OP may have overlooked that directs him straight to the desired conclusion, right from where he is/was stuck.
                        – SEBASTIAN VARGAS LOAIZA
                        Aug 18 at 22:20














                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Perhaps one may add that either $x+y<m+n+1$ or $m+n+1 leq x+y$, from which the result readily follows.






                      share|cite|improve this answer




















                      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                        – Adrian Keister
                        Aug 18 at 19:59










                      • It is a simple fact that the OP may have overlooked that directs him straight to the desired conclusion, right from where he is/was stuck.
                        – SEBASTIAN VARGAS LOAIZA
                        Aug 18 at 22:20












                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote









                      Perhaps one may add that either $x+y<m+n+1$ or $m+n+1 leq x+y$, from which the result readily follows.






                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      Perhaps one may add that either $x+y<m+n+1$ or $m+n+1 leq x+y$, from which the result readily follows.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Aug 18 at 18:20









                      SEBASTIAN VARGAS LOAIZA

                      1664




                      1664











                      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                        – Adrian Keister
                        Aug 18 at 19:59










                      • It is a simple fact that the OP may have overlooked that directs him straight to the desired conclusion, right from where he is/was stuck.
                        – SEBASTIAN VARGAS LOAIZA
                        Aug 18 at 22:20
















                      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                        – Adrian Keister
                        Aug 18 at 19:59










                      • It is a simple fact that the OP may have overlooked that directs him straight to the desired conclusion, right from where he is/was stuck.
                        – SEBASTIAN VARGAS LOAIZA
                        Aug 18 at 22:20















                      This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                      – Adrian Keister
                      Aug 18 at 19:59




                      This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                      – Adrian Keister
                      Aug 18 at 19:59












                      It is a simple fact that the OP may have overlooked that directs him straight to the desired conclusion, right from where he is/was stuck.
                      – SEBASTIAN VARGAS LOAIZA
                      Aug 18 at 22:20




                      It is a simple fact that the OP may have overlooked that directs him straight to the desired conclusion, right from where he is/was stuck.
                      – SEBASTIAN VARGAS LOAIZA
                      Aug 18 at 22:20












                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2886380%2fprove-forall-x-y-in-mathbbr-lfloorxy-rfloor-lfloorx-rfloor-lfloor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                      Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                      Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?