Partition of Set: Proof

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1













Let $f : Ato B$. If $B_1,B_2,dots,B_n$ is a partition of $B$, prove that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is partition of $A$.




I approached it like following:
Since $f^-1$ exists $f$ must be one one and onto. So for each $x$ in $A$ there is one distinct image in $B$ under $A$. Converse, "for each $y$ in $B$ there is distinct pre-image under $f$". This implies that we can define a set $A_i subseteq A$ which is the set of all elements in A whose image lies in $B_i$ under the $f$ i.e., $A_i=_f^-1(B_i)$. Since $f$ is onto $f$ covers all of $B$ and hence union of $A_i$s is equal to $A$.

Since $B_i$ is non-empty set, there exist a $y$ in $B_i$ such that $f(x)=y$. This means that $x$ is pre-image of $y$ under $f$. Hence $x$ belongs to $A_i$. So $A_i$ is non empty set.

Now since $B_i cap B_j$ is empty if $ine j$, them there is no $y$ such that it belongs to both $B_i$ and $B_j$. Now $f$ is one one so there is no pre-image $x$ such that it belongs to both $A_i$ and $A_j$. So $A_i cap A_j$ is empty. Hence set of all $A_i$s form a partition of $A$.



I think my logic is correct but can someone help me writing it in formal way. Also since there is one one correspondence between equivalence relations and partitions, how to approach this using relations.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Maybe it's just a nit in how the question is worded, but nothing here implies that $f^-1$ does exist.
    – chepner
    Aug 31 at 15:38














up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1













Let $f : Ato B$. If $B_1,B_2,dots,B_n$ is a partition of $B$, prove that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is partition of $A$.




I approached it like following:
Since $f^-1$ exists $f$ must be one one and onto. So for each $x$ in $A$ there is one distinct image in $B$ under $A$. Converse, "for each $y$ in $B$ there is distinct pre-image under $f$". This implies that we can define a set $A_i subseteq A$ which is the set of all elements in A whose image lies in $B_i$ under the $f$ i.e., $A_i=_f^-1(B_i)$. Since $f$ is onto $f$ covers all of $B$ and hence union of $A_i$s is equal to $A$.

Since $B_i$ is non-empty set, there exist a $y$ in $B_i$ such that $f(x)=y$. This means that $x$ is pre-image of $y$ under $f$. Hence $x$ belongs to $A_i$. So $A_i$ is non empty set.

Now since $B_i cap B_j$ is empty if $ine j$, them there is no $y$ such that it belongs to both $B_i$ and $B_j$. Now $f$ is one one so there is no pre-image $x$ such that it belongs to both $A_i$ and $A_j$. So $A_i cap A_j$ is empty. Hence set of all $A_i$s form a partition of $A$.



I think my logic is correct but can someone help me writing it in formal way. Also since there is one one correspondence between equivalence relations and partitions, how to approach this using relations.










share|cite|improve this question























  • Maybe it's just a nit in how the question is worded, but nothing here implies that $f^-1$ does exist.
    – chepner
    Aug 31 at 15:38












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1






Let $f : Ato B$. If $B_1,B_2,dots,B_n$ is a partition of $B$, prove that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is partition of $A$.




I approached it like following:
Since $f^-1$ exists $f$ must be one one and onto. So for each $x$ in $A$ there is one distinct image in $B$ under $A$. Converse, "for each $y$ in $B$ there is distinct pre-image under $f$". This implies that we can define a set $A_i subseteq A$ which is the set of all elements in A whose image lies in $B_i$ under the $f$ i.e., $A_i=_f^-1(B_i)$. Since $f$ is onto $f$ covers all of $B$ and hence union of $A_i$s is equal to $A$.

Since $B_i$ is non-empty set, there exist a $y$ in $B_i$ such that $f(x)=y$. This means that $x$ is pre-image of $y$ under $f$. Hence $x$ belongs to $A_i$. So $A_i$ is non empty set.

Now since $B_i cap B_j$ is empty if $ine j$, them there is no $y$ such that it belongs to both $B_i$ and $B_j$. Now $f$ is one one so there is no pre-image $x$ such that it belongs to both $A_i$ and $A_j$. So $A_i cap A_j$ is empty. Hence set of all $A_i$s form a partition of $A$.



I think my logic is correct but can someone help me writing it in formal way. Also since there is one one correspondence between equivalence relations and partitions, how to approach this using relations.










share|cite|improve this question
















Let $f : Ato B$. If $B_1,B_2,dots,B_n$ is a partition of $B$, prove that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is partition of $A$.




I approached it like following:
Since $f^-1$ exists $f$ must be one one and onto. So for each $x$ in $A$ there is one distinct image in $B$ under $A$. Converse, "for each $y$ in $B$ there is distinct pre-image under $f$". This implies that we can define a set $A_i subseteq A$ which is the set of all elements in A whose image lies in $B_i$ under the $f$ i.e., $A_i=_f^-1(B_i)$. Since $f$ is onto $f$ covers all of $B$ and hence union of $A_i$s is equal to $A$.

Since $B_i$ is non-empty set, there exist a $y$ in $B_i$ such that $f(x)=y$. This means that $x$ is pre-image of $y$ under $f$. Hence $x$ belongs to $A_i$. So $A_i$ is non empty set.

Now since $B_i cap B_j$ is empty if $ine j$, them there is no $y$ such that it belongs to both $B_i$ and $B_j$. Now $f$ is one one so there is no pre-image $x$ such that it belongs to both $A_i$ and $A_j$. So $A_i cap A_j$ is empty. Hence set of all $A_i$s form a partition of $A$.



I think my logic is correct but can someone help me writing it in formal way. Also since there is one one correspondence between equivalence relations and partitions, how to approach this using relations.







functions discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory equivalence-relations set-partition






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 31 at 12:34









Andrés E. Caicedo

63.4k7154238




63.4k7154238










asked Aug 31 at 8:18









Jimmy

446




446











  • Maybe it's just a nit in how the question is worded, but nothing here implies that $f^-1$ does exist.
    – chepner
    Aug 31 at 15:38
















  • Maybe it's just a nit in how the question is worded, but nothing here implies that $f^-1$ does exist.
    – chepner
    Aug 31 at 15:38















Maybe it's just a nit in how the question is worded, but nothing here implies that $f^-1$ does exist.
– chepner
Aug 31 at 15:38




Maybe it's just a nit in how the question is worded, but nothing here implies that $f^-1$ does exist.
– chepner
Aug 31 at 15:38










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










No, here $f$ is not necessarily a bijection. This is my hint: show that if $X, Ysubset B$ then
$$f^-1(X cap Y) = f^-1(X) cap f^-1(Y)quadtextandquad f^-1(X cup Y) = f^-1(X) cup f^-1(Y)$$
where the preimage $f^-1(X):=ain A: f(a)in X$.
Can you take it from here?



Edit. As regards the intersection-property, see how to prove $f^-1(B_1 cap B_2) = f^-1(B_1) cap f^-1(B_2)$ . The union-property can be shown in a similar way.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Beat me by just a second!
    – Niki Di Giano
    Aug 31 at 8:37










  • @NikiDiGiano Sorry! ;-)
    – Robert Z
    Aug 31 at 8:39










  • @RobertZ Thanks for the correction
    – Jimmy
    Aug 31 at 8:55










  • @RobertZ Can you also help me in defining the equivalence relation for this?
    – Jimmy
    Aug 31 at 8:55







  • 1




    @Jimmy Let $aRa'$ iff there is $1leq ileq n$ such that $f(a)in B_i$ and $f(a')in B_i$. Show that $R$ is an equivalence relation in $A$.
    – Robert Z
    Aug 31 at 9:09


















up vote
2
down vote













I think $f^-1$ in your exercise doesn't mean the inverse function, but $f^-1(B_i)$ is just the preimage of $B_i$ under $f$.



To show that these preimages build a partition of $A$, let $a in A$. Then $f(a)in B$ lies in one of the $B_i$, say $f(a)in B_j$, then $a in f^-1(B_j)$. Since $a$ was arbitrary, the preimages cover $A$.



Try to show the other properties of a partition in a similar fashion.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Ok. For starters, you cannot say that $f$ is bijective.
    $$f^-1(B_i)=xin A:f(x)in B_i.$$
    Next, in order to show that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is a partition of $A$ you want to show two things. First,
    $$A=bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)$$ and second that
    $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=emptyset.$$
    For the first point use the fact that
    $$bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)=f^-1left(bigcup_i=1^nB_iright)=f^-1(B)=A.$$
    For the second point note that
    $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=f^-1left(B_icap B_jright)=f^-1(emptyset)=emptyset.$$
    So you indeed have a partition.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      No, you are not given that f is a bijection.

      If x in A, then f(a) in B.

      If K subset A, then f(K) = f(x) : x in A .

      If L subset B, then $f^-1$(L) =
      x : f(x) in L .



      This is the set extension of f and how the
      problem is to be understood.






      share|cite|improve this answer




















        Your Answer




        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: false,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2900452%2fpartition-of-set-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest






























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        No, here $f$ is not necessarily a bijection. This is my hint: show that if $X, Ysubset B$ then
        $$f^-1(X cap Y) = f^-1(X) cap f^-1(Y)quadtextandquad f^-1(X cup Y) = f^-1(X) cup f^-1(Y)$$
        where the preimage $f^-1(X):=ain A: f(a)in X$.
        Can you take it from here?



        Edit. As regards the intersection-property, see how to prove $f^-1(B_1 cap B_2) = f^-1(B_1) cap f^-1(B_2)$ . The union-property can be shown in a similar way.






        share|cite|improve this answer






















        • Beat me by just a second!
          – Niki Di Giano
          Aug 31 at 8:37










        • @NikiDiGiano Sorry! ;-)
          – Robert Z
          Aug 31 at 8:39










        • @RobertZ Thanks for the correction
          – Jimmy
          Aug 31 at 8:55










        • @RobertZ Can you also help me in defining the equivalence relation for this?
          – Jimmy
          Aug 31 at 8:55







        • 1




          @Jimmy Let $aRa'$ iff there is $1leq ileq n$ such that $f(a)in B_i$ and $f(a')in B_i$. Show that $R$ is an equivalence relation in $A$.
          – Robert Z
          Aug 31 at 9:09















        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        No, here $f$ is not necessarily a bijection. This is my hint: show that if $X, Ysubset B$ then
        $$f^-1(X cap Y) = f^-1(X) cap f^-1(Y)quadtextandquad f^-1(X cup Y) = f^-1(X) cup f^-1(Y)$$
        where the preimage $f^-1(X):=ain A: f(a)in X$.
        Can you take it from here?



        Edit. As regards the intersection-property, see how to prove $f^-1(B_1 cap B_2) = f^-1(B_1) cap f^-1(B_2)$ . The union-property can be shown in a similar way.






        share|cite|improve this answer






















        • Beat me by just a second!
          – Niki Di Giano
          Aug 31 at 8:37










        • @NikiDiGiano Sorry! ;-)
          – Robert Z
          Aug 31 at 8:39










        • @RobertZ Thanks for the correction
          – Jimmy
          Aug 31 at 8:55










        • @RobertZ Can you also help me in defining the equivalence relation for this?
          – Jimmy
          Aug 31 at 8:55







        • 1




          @Jimmy Let $aRa'$ iff there is $1leq ileq n$ such that $f(a)in B_i$ and $f(a')in B_i$. Show that $R$ is an equivalence relation in $A$.
          – Robert Z
          Aug 31 at 9:09













        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        No, here $f$ is not necessarily a bijection. This is my hint: show that if $X, Ysubset B$ then
        $$f^-1(X cap Y) = f^-1(X) cap f^-1(Y)quadtextandquad f^-1(X cup Y) = f^-1(X) cup f^-1(Y)$$
        where the preimage $f^-1(X):=ain A: f(a)in X$.
        Can you take it from here?



        Edit. As regards the intersection-property, see how to prove $f^-1(B_1 cap B_2) = f^-1(B_1) cap f^-1(B_2)$ . The union-property can be shown in a similar way.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        No, here $f$ is not necessarily a bijection. This is my hint: show that if $X, Ysubset B$ then
        $$f^-1(X cap Y) = f^-1(X) cap f^-1(Y)quadtextandquad f^-1(X cup Y) = f^-1(X) cup f^-1(Y)$$
        where the preimage $f^-1(X):=ain A: f(a)in X$.
        Can you take it from here?



        Edit. As regards the intersection-property, see how to prove $f^-1(B_1 cap B_2) = f^-1(B_1) cap f^-1(B_2)$ . The union-property can be shown in a similar way.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 31 at 8:44

























        answered Aug 31 at 8:36









        Robert Z

        85.6k1055123




        85.6k1055123











        • Beat me by just a second!
          – Niki Di Giano
          Aug 31 at 8:37










        • @NikiDiGiano Sorry! ;-)
          – Robert Z
          Aug 31 at 8:39










        • @RobertZ Thanks for the correction
          – Jimmy
          Aug 31 at 8:55










        • @RobertZ Can you also help me in defining the equivalence relation for this?
          – Jimmy
          Aug 31 at 8:55







        • 1




          @Jimmy Let $aRa'$ iff there is $1leq ileq n$ such that $f(a)in B_i$ and $f(a')in B_i$. Show that $R$ is an equivalence relation in $A$.
          – Robert Z
          Aug 31 at 9:09

















        • Beat me by just a second!
          – Niki Di Giano
          Aug 31 at 8:37










        • @NikiDiGiano Sorry! ;-)
          – Robert Z
          Aug 31 at 8:39










        • @RobertZ Thanks for the correction
          – Jimmy
          Aug 31 at 8:55










        • @RobertZ Can you also help me in defining the equivalence relation for this?
          – Jimmy
          Aug 31 at 8:55







        • 1




          @Jimmy Let $aRa'$ iff there is $1leq ileq n$ such that $f(a)in B_i$ and $f(a')in B_i$. Show that $R$ is an equivalence relation in $A$.
          – Robert Z
          Aug 31 at 9:09
















        Beat me by just a second!
        – Niki Di Giano
        Aug 31 at 8:37




        Beat me by just a second!
        – Niki Di Giano
        Aug 31 at 8:37












        @NikiDiGiano Sorry! ;-)
        – Robert Z
        Aug 31 at 8:39




        @NikiDiGiano Sorry! ;-)
        – Robert Z
        Aug 31 at 8:39












        @RobertZ Thanks for the correction
        – Jimmy
        Aug 31 at 8:55




        @RobertZ Thanks for the correction
        – Jimmy
        Aug 31 at 8:55












        @RobertZ Can you also help me in defining the equivalence relation for this?
        – Jimmy
        Aug 31 at 8:55





        @RobertZ Can you also help me in defining the equivalence relation for this?
        – Jimmy
        Aug 31 at 8:55





        1




        1




        @Jimmy Let $aRa'$ iff there is $1leq ileq n$ such that $f(a)in B_i$ and $f(a')in B_i$. Show that $R$ is an equivalence relation in $A$.
        – Robert Z
        Aug 31 at 9:09





        @Jimmy Let $aRa'$ iff there is $1leq ileq n$ such that $f(a)in B_i$ and $f(a')in B_i$. Show that $R$ is an equivalence relation in $A$.
        – Robert Z
        Aug 31 at 9:09











        up vote
        2
        down vote













        I think $f^-1$ in your exercise doesn't mean the inverse function, but $f^-1(B_i)$ is just the preimage of $B_i$ under $f$.



        To show that these preimages build a partition of $A$, let $a in A$. Then $f(a)in B$ lies in one of the $B_i$, say $f(a)in B_j$, then $a in f^-1(B_j)$. Since $a$ was arbitrary, the preimages cover $A$.



        Try to show the other properties of a partition in a similar fashion.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          up vote
          2
          down vote













          I think $f^-1$ in your exercise doesn't mean the inverse function, but $f^-1(B_i)$ is just the preimage of $B_i$ under $f$.



          To show that these preimages build a partition of $A$, let $a in A$. Then $f(a)in B$ lies in one of the $B_i$, say $f(a)in B_j$, then $a in f^-1(B_j)$. Since $a$ was arbitrary, the preimages cover $A$.



          Try to show the other properties of a partition in a similar fashion.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            I think $f^-1$ in your exercise doesn't mean the inverse function, but $f^-1(B_i)$ is just the preimage of $B_i$ under $f$.



            To show that these preimages build a partition of $A$, let $a in A$. Then $f(a)in B$ lies in one of the $B_i$, say $f(a)in B_j$, then $a in f^-1(B_j)$. Since $a$ was arbitrary, the preimages cover $A$.



            Try to show the other properties of a partition in a similar fashion.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            I think $f^-1$ in your exercise doesn't mean the inverse function, but $f^-1(B_i)$ is just the preimage of $B_i$ under $f$.



            To show that these preimages build a partition of $A$, let $a in A$. Then $f(a)in B$ lies in one of the $B_i$, say $f(a)in B_j$, then $a in f^-1(B_j)$. Since $a$ was arbitrary, the preimages cover $A$.



            Try to show the other properties of a partition in a similar fashion.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Aug 31 at 8:43









            schneeewittchen

            465




            465




















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Ok. For starters, you cannot say that $f$ is bijective.
                $$f^-1(B_i)=xin A:f(x)in B_i.$$
                Next, in order to show that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is a partition of $A$ you want to show two things. First,
                $$A=bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)$$ and second that
                $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=emptyset.$$
                For the first point use the fact that
                $$bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)=f^-1left(bigcup_i=1^nB_iright)=f^-1(B)=A.$$
                For the second point note that
                $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=f^-1left(B_icap B_jright)=f^-1(emptyset)=emptyset.$$
                So you indeed have a partition.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  Ok. For starters, you cannot say that $f$ is bijective.
                  $$f^-1(B_i)=xin A:f(x)in B_i.$$
                  Next, in order to show that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is a partition of $A$ you want to show two things. First,
                  $$A=bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)$$ and second that
                  $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=emptyset.$$
                  For the first point use the fact that
                  $$bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)=f^-1left(bigcup_i=1^nB_iright)=f^-1(B)=A.$$
                  For the second point note that
                  $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=f^-1left(B_icap B_jright)=f^-1(emptyset)=emptyset.$$
                  So you indeed have a partition.






                  share|cite|improve this answer






















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    Ok. For starters, you cannot say that $f$ is bijective.
                    $$f^-1(B_i)=xin A:f(x)in B_i.$$
                    Next, in order to show that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is a partition of $A$ you want to show two things. First,
                    $$A=bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)$$ and second that
                    $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=emptyset.$$
                    For the first point use the fact that
                    $$bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)=f^-1left(bigcup_i=1^nB_iright)=f^-1(B)=A.$$
                    For the second point note that
                    $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=f^-1left(B_icap B_jright)=f^-1(emptyset)=emptyset.$$
                    So you indeed have a partition.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Ok. For starters, you cannot say that $f$ is bijective.
                    $$f^-1(B_i)=xin A:f(x)in B_i.$$
                    Next, in order to show that $f^-1(B_1),f^-1(B_2),dots,f^-1(B_n)$ is a partition of $A$ you want to show two things. First,
                    $$A=bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)$$ and second that
                    $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=emptyset.$$
                    For the first point use the fact that
                    $$bigcup_i=1^nf^-1(B_i)=f^-1left(bigcup_i=1^nB_iright)=f^-1(B)=A.$$
                    For the second point note that
                    $$f^-1(B_i)cap f^-1(B_j)=f^-1left(B_icap B_jright)=f^-1(emptyset)=emptyset.$$
                    So you indeed have a partition.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Aug 31 at 8:40









                    Hello_World

                    3,20321429




                    3,20321429




















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        No, you are not given that f is a bijection.

                        If x in A, then f(a) in B.

                        If K subset A, then f(K) = f(x) : x in A .

                        If L subset B, then $f^-1$(L) =
                        x : f(x) in L .



                        This is the set extension of f and how the
                        problem is to be understood.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          No, you are not given that f is a bijection.

                          If x in A, then f(a) in B.

                          If K subset A, then f(K) = f(x) : x in A .

                          If L subset B, then $f^-1$(L) =
                          x : f(x) in L .



                          This is the set extension of f and how the
                          problem is to be understood.






                          share|cite|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            No, you are not given that f is a bijection.

                            If x in A, then f(a) in B.

                            If K subset A, then f(K) = f(x) : x in A .

                            If L subset B, then $f^-1$(L) =
                            x : f(x) in L .



                            This is the set extension of f and how the
                            problem is to be understood.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            No, you are not given that f is a bijection.

                            If x in A, then f(a) in B.

                            If K subset A, then f(K) = f(x) : x in A .

                            If L subset B, then $f^-1$(L) =
                            x : f(x) in L .



                            This is the set extension of f and how the
                            problem is to be understood.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Aug 31 at 8:44









                            William Elliot

                            5,2762517




                            5,2762517



























                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded















































                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2900452%2fpartition-of-set-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest













































































                                這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                                Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                                Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?