Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ given by Mathematica
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Mathematica gives $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ as the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ (i.e., the result of the command FourierTransform[1/x^2, x, k]
). And the Fourier transform of $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ is $1/x^2$ (FourierTransform[-k Sqrt[Pi/2] Sign[k], k, x]
). I found this by chance while playing with Mathematica, but I cannot understand the result. The definition of Fourier transform $int_-infty^infty f(x) e^-ikx dx$ does not converge for the functions, and even Mathematica reports that the integrals does not converge. I read the documentation of FourierTransform
but could not find any relevant information. In what sense are they Fourier transform of each other?
I found an almost same question (What does the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ mean?), but the answers looks not so complete. The answers mention "tempered distribution" and so I read some basic materials about it, but $1/x^2$ is not a tempered distribution as some comments on the answers already pointed. Is the notion of the Fourier transform of tempered distributions really relevant to my question?
distribution-theory fourier-transform
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Mathematica gives $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ as the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ (i.e., the result of the command FourierTransform[1/x^2, x, k]
). And the Fourier transform of $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ is $1/x^2$ (FourierTransform[-k Sqrt[Pi/2] Sign[k], k, x]
). I found this by chance while playing with Mathematica, but I cannot understand the result. The definition of Fourier transform $int_-infty^infty f(x) e^-ikx dx$ does not converge for the functions, and even Mathematica reports that the integrals does not converge. I read the documentation of FourierTransform
but could not find any relevant information. In what sense are they Fourier transform of each other?
I found an almost same question (What does the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ mean?), but the answers looks not so complete. The answers mention "tempered distribution" and so I read some basic materials about it, but $1/x^2$ is not a tempered distribution as some comments on the answers already pointed. Is the notion of the Fourier transform of tempered distributions really relevant to my question?
distribution-theory fourier-transform
According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 7:36
@Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 7:54
They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:02
@Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 8:05
I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:10
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Mathematica gives $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ as the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ (i.e., the result of the command FourierTransform[1/x^2, x, k]
). And the Fourier transform of $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ is $1/x^2$ (FourierTransform[-k Sqrt[Pi/2] Sign[k], k, x]
). I found this by chance while playing with Mathematica, but I cannot understand the result. The definition of Fourier transform $int_-infty^infty f(x) e^-ikx dx$ does not converge for the functions, and even Mathematica reports that the integrals does not converge. I read the documentation of FourierTransform
but could not find any relevant information. In what sense are they Fourier transform of each other?
I found an almost same question (What does the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ mean?), but the answers looks not so complete. The answers mention "tempered distribution" and so I read some basic materials about it, but $1/x^2$ is not a tempered distribution as some comments on the answers already pointed. Is the notion of the Fourier transform of tempered distributions really relevant to my question?
distribution-theory fourier-transform
Mathematica gives $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ as the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ (i.e., the result of the command FourierTransform[1/x^2, x, k]
). And the Fourier transform of $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ is $1/x^2$ (FourierTransform[-k Sqrt[Pi/2] Sign[k], k, x]
). I found this by chance while playing with Mathematica, but I cannot understand the result. The definition of Fourier transform $int_-infty^infty f(x) e^-ikx dx$ does not converge for the functions, and even Mathematica reports that the integrals does not converge. I read the documentation of FourierTransform
but could not find any relevant information. In what sense are they Fourier transform of each other?
I found an almost same question (What does the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ mean?), but the answers looks not so complete. The answers mention "tempered distribution" and so I read some basic materials about it, but $1/x^2$ is not a tempered distribution as some comments on the answers already pointed. Is the notion of the Fourier transform of tempered distributions really relevant to my question?
distribution-theory fourier-transform
distribution-theory fourier-transform
asked Aug 31 at 7:22
rimusolem
133
133
According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 7:36
@Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 7:54
They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:02
@Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 8:05
I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:10
 |Â
show 2 more comments
According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 7:36
@Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 7:54
They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:02
@Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 8:05
I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:10
According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 7:36
According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 7:36
@Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 7:54
@Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 7:54
They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:02
They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:02
@Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 8:05
@Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 8:05
I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:10
I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:10
 |Â
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.
Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.
That is we define a linear map
beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
endalign*
The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
$$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
so that
beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
&=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
endalign*
and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
$$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
$$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
$$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$
and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
$$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$
By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
$$
Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
$$
2pi , delta(nu)
= mathcalFleft 1 right
= mathcalFleft x frac1x right
= ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
$$
so
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
$$
for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.
Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right
= -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
= -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
$$
where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.
Thus,
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
= -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
= -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
= -pi , |nu|.
$$
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.
Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.
That is we define a linear map
beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
endalign*
The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
$$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
so that
beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
&=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
endalign*
and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
$$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
$$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
$$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$
and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.
Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.
That is we define a linear map
beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
endalign*
The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
$$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
so that
beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
&=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
endalign*
and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
$$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
$$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
$$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$
and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.
Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.
That is we define a linear map
beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
endalign*
The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
$$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
so that
beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
&=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
endalign*
and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
$$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
$$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
$$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$
and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.
As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.
Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.
That is we define a linear map
beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
endalign*
The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
$$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
so that
beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
&=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
endalign*
and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
$$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
$$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
$$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$
and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.
edited Aug 31 at 9:37
answered Aug 31 at 9:31
Lorenzo Quarisa
2,734315
2,734315
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
$$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$
By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
$$
Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
$$
2pi , delta(nu)
= mathcalFleft 1 right
= mathcalFleft x frac1x right
= ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
$$
so
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
$$
for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.
Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right
= -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
= -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
$$
where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.
Thus,
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
= -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
= -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
= -pi , |nu|.
$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
$$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$
By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
$$
Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
$$
2pi , delta(nu)
= mathcalFleft 1 right
= mathcalFleft x frac1x right
= ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
$$
so
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
$$
for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.
Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right
= -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
= -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
$$
where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.
Thus,
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
= -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
= -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
= -pi , |nu|.
$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
$$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$
By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
$$
Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
$$
2pi , delta(nu)
= mathcalFleft 1 right
= mathcalFleft x frac1x right
= ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
$$
so
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
$$
for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.
Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right
= -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
= -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
$$
where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.
Thus,
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
= -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
= -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
= -pi , |nu|.
$$
I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
$$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$
By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
$$
Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
$$
2pi , delta(nu)
= mathcalFleft 1 right
= mathcalFleft x frac1x right
= ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
$$
so
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
$$
for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.
Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
$$
mathcalF left frac1x right
= -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
= -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
$$
where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.
Thus,
$$
mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
= -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
= -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
= -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
= -pi , |nu|.
$$
answered Aug 31 at 12:21
md2perpe
6,66311023
6,66311023
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2900409%2ffourier-transform-of-1-x2-given-by-mathematica%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 7:36
@Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 7:54
They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:02
@Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
â rimusolem
Aug 31 at 8:05
I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
â Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:10