Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ given by Mathematica

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Mathematica gives $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ as the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ (i.e., the result of the command FourierTransform[1/x^2, x, k]). And the Fourier transform of $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ is $1/x^2$ (FourierTransform[-k Sqrt[Pi/2] Sign[k], k, x]). I found this by chance while playing with Mathematica, but I cannot understand the result. The definition of Fourier transform $int_-infty^infty f(x) e^-ikx dx$ does not converge for the functions, and even Mathematica reports that the integrals does not converge. I read the documentation of FourierTransform but could not find any relevant information. In what sense are they Fourier transform of each other?



I found an almost same question (What does the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ mean?), but the answers looks not so complete. The answers mention "tempered distribution" and so I read some basic materials about it, but $1/x^2$ is not a tempered distribution as some comments on the answers already pointed. Is the notion of the Fourier transform of tempered distributions really relevant to my question?










share|cite|improve this question





















  • According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 7:36











  • @Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
    – rimusolem
    Aug 31 at 7:54










  • They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 8:02










  • @Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
    – rimusolem
    Aug 31 at 8:05










  • I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 8:10














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Mathematica gives $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ as the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ (i.e., the result of the command FourierTransform[1/x^2, x, k]). And the Fourier transform of $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ is $1/x^2$ (FourierTransform[-k Sqrt[Pi/2] Sign[k], k, x]). I found this by chance while playing with Mathematica, but I cannot understand the result. The definition of Fourier transform $int_-infty^infty f(x) e^-ikx dx$ does not converge for the functions, and even Mathematica reports that the integrals does not converge. I read the documentation of FourierTransform but could not find any relevant information. In what sense are they Fourier transform of each other?



I found an almost same question (What does the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ mean?), but the answers looks not so complete. The answers mention "tempered distribution" and so I read some basic materials about it, but $1/x^2$ is not a tempered distribution as some comments on the answers already pointed. Is the notion of the Fourier transform of tempered distributions really relevant to my question?










share|cite|improve this question





















  • According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 7:36











  • @Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
    – rimusolem
    Aug 31 at 7:54










  • They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 8:02










  • @Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
    – rimusolem
    Aug 31 at 8:05










  • I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 8:10












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Mathematica gives $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ as the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ (i.e., the result of the command FourierTransform[1/x^2, x, k]). And the Fourier transform of $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ is $1/x^2$ (FourierTransform[-k Sqrt[Pi/2] Sign[k], k, x]). I found this by chance while playing with Mathematica, but I cannot understand the result. The definition of Fourier transform $int_-infty^infty f(x) e^-ikx dx$ does not converge for the functions, and even Mathematica reports that the integrals does not converge. I read the documentation of FourierTransform but could not find any relevant information. In what sense are they Fourier transform of each other?



I found an almost same question (What does the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ mean?), but the answers looks not so complete. The answers mention "tempered distribution" and so I read some basic materials about it, but $1/x^2$ is not a tempered distribution as some comments on the answers already pointed. Is the notion of the Fourier transform of tempered distributions really relevant to my question?










share|cite|improve this question













Mathematica gives $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ as the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ (i.e., the result of the command FourierTransform[1/x^2, x, k]). And the Fourier transform of $-k sqrtfracpi2 textsgn(k)$ is $1/x^2$ (FourierTransform[-k Sqrt[Pi/2] Sign[k], k, x]). I found this by chance while playing with Mathematica, but I cannot understand the result. The definition of Fourier transform $int_-infty^infty f(x) e^-ikx dx$ does not converge for the functions, and even Mathematica reports that the integrals does not converge. I read the documentation of FourierTransform but could not find any relevant information. In what sense are they Fourier transform of each other?



I found an almost same question (What does the Fourier transform of $1/x^2$ mean?), but the answers looks not so complete. The answers mention "tempered distribution" and so I read some basic materials about it, but $1/x^2$ is not a tempered distribution as some comments on the answers already pointed. Is the notion of the Fourier transform of tempered distributions really relevant to my question?







distribution-theory fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 31 at 7:22









rimusolem

133




133











  • According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 7:36











  • @Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
    – rimusolem
    Aug 31 at 7:54










  • They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 8:02










  • @Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
    – rimusolem
    Aug 31 at 8:05










  • I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 8:10
















  • According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 7:36











  • @Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
    – rimusolem
    Aug 31 at 7:54










  • They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 8:02










  • @Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
    – rimusolem
    Aug 31 at 8:05










  • I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
    – Sobi
    Aug 31 at 8:10















According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
– Sobi
Aug 31 at 7:36





According to Wiki, $1/x^2$ is defined in this context as the distributional derivative $$ -fracd^2dx^2log|x|. $$ It also refers to two books that should contain the derivation of this transform, namely Erdélyi (1954), and Kammler (2000).
– Sobi
Aug 31 at 7:36













@Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
– rimusolem
Aug 31 at 7:54




@Sobi Thank you. Then the notation $1/x^2$ should not be interpreted as a usual function $mathbbR setminus 0 to mathbbR : x mapsto 1/x^2$. The distribution you gave is different from the usual fuction $1/x^2$ in the sense of equality between distributions. Am I right?
– rimusolem
Aug 31 at 7:54












They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
– Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:02




They should coincide in the distributional sense, I think.
– Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:02












@Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
– rimusolem
Aug 31 at 8:05




@Sobi Do you mean $int_-infty^infty frac1x^2 phi(x) dx = left< -fracd^2dx^2 log|x|, phi right>$ with test function $phi$?
– rimusolem
Aug 31 at 8:05












I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
– Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:10




I don't feel confident enough to answer, but I would guess that $$ -leftlangle fracd^2dx^2log|x|, phi rightrangle = lim_epsilon to 0^+ int_>epsilon frac1x^2 phi(x) , dx.$$
– Sobi
Aug 31 at 8:10










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.



Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.



That is we define a linear map
beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
endalign*
The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
$$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
so that
beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
&=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
endalign*
and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
$$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
$$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$



Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
$$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$



and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
    $$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$



    By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
    $$
    mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
    = mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
    = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
    $$



    Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
    $$
    2pi , delta(nu)
    = mathcalFleft 1 right
    = mathcalFleft x frac1x right
    = ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
    $$
    so
    $$
    mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
    $$
    for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.



    Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
    $$
    mathcalF left frac1x right
    = -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
    = -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
    $$
    where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.



    Thus,
    $$
    mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
    = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
    = -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
    = -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
    = -pi , |nu|.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2900409%2ffourier-transform-of-1-x2-given-by-mathematica%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.



      Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.



      That is we define a linear map
      beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
      varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
      endalign*
      The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
      $$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
      so that
      beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
      &=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
      endalign*
      and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
      $$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
      Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
      $$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$



      Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
      $$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$



      and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.



        Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.



        That is we define a linear map
        beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
        varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
        endalign*
        The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
        $$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
        so that
        beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
        &=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
        endalign*
        and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
        $$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
        Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
        $$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$



        Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
        $$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$



        and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.



          Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.



          That is we define a linear map
          beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
          varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
          endalign*
          The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
          $$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
          so that
          beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
          &=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
          endalign*
          and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
          $$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
          Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
          $$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$



          Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
          $$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$



          and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          As you noticed, the function $frac1x^2$ cannot be identified as a tempered distribution in the usual way as it is not locally integrable.



          Here the symbol "$frac1x^2$" has another meaning in the context of tempered distributions, which is formalized by the concept of Hadamard finite-part integral.



          That is we define a linear map
          beginalign*frac1x^2:mathcalS(mathbbR)&to mathbbR\
          varphi&mapsto lim_varepsilon to 0left[int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilonright]
          endalign*
          The function is well defined: since $varphi$ is smooth by the mean value theorem we may write
          $$varphi(x)=varphi(0)+xvarphi'(xi(x)),qquad xi(x)in [0,x] $$
          so that
          beginalign*int_fracvarphi(x)x^2dx-2fracvarphi(0)varepsilon&=varphi(0)left(int_frac1x^2dx-frac2varepsilonright)+int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=\
          &=int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx
          endalign*
          and applying mean value again, with $varphi'(xi(x))=varphi'(0)+xi(x)varphi''(eta(x))$,
          $$int_fracvarphi'(xi(x))xdx=varphi'(0)int_frac1xdx+int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx=int_varphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$
          Since $xi(x)in [0,x]$ for all $x$, we have $fracxi(x)xin [0,1]$ and so the last integral converges as $varepsilon to 0$, so that
          $$frac1x^2(varphi)=int_-infty^+inftyvarphi''(eta(x))fracxi(x)xdx $$



          Now to prove that the map $frac1x^2$ is a tempered distribution, suppose $varphi_nto 0$ in $mathcalS(mathbbR)$. Then in particular $varphi_n''(eta(x))to 0$ in $L^1(mathbbR)$, and so
          $$left|frac1x^2(varphi_n)right|leq int_-infty^+infty|varphi_n''(eta(x))|dxto 0$$



          and therefore its Fourier transform is well-defined as the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 31 at 9:37

























          answered Aug 31 at 9:31









          Lorenzo Quarisa

          2,734315




          2,734315




















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
              $$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$



              By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
              $$
              mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
              = mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
              = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
              $$



              Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
              $$
              2pi , delta(nu)
              = mathcalFleft 1 right
              = mathcalFleft x frac1x right
              = ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
              $$
              so
              $$
              mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
              $$
              for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.



              Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
              $$
              mathcalF left frac1x right
              = -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
              = -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
              $$
              where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.



              Thus,
              $$
              mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
              = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
              = -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
              = -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
              = -pi , |nu|.
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
                $$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$



                By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
                $$
                mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
                = mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
                = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
                $$



                Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
                $$
                2pi , delta(nu)
                = mathcalFleft 1 right
                = mathcalFleft x frac1x right
                = ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
                $$
                so
                $$
                mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
                $$
                for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.



                Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
                $$
                mathcalF left frac1x right
                = -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
                = -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
                $$
                where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.



                Thus,
                $$
                mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
                = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
                = -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
                = -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
                = -pi , |nu|.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
                  $$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$



                  By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
                  $$
                  mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
                  = mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
                  = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
                  $$



                  Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
                  $$
                  2pi , delta(nu)
                  = mathcalFleft 1 right
                  = mathcalFleft x frac1x right
                  = ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
                  $$
                  so
                  $$
                  mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
                  $$
                  for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.



                  Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
                  $$
                  mathcalF left frac1x right
                  = -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
                  = -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
                  $$
                  where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.



                  Thus,
                  $$
                  mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
                  = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
                  = -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
                  = -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
                  = -pi , |nu|.
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  I will here use the non-unitary, angular frequency Fourier transform defined as
                  $$hatu(nu) = mathcalF u(x) = int_-infty^infty u(x) , e^-i nu x , dx.$$



                  By first definition of the distribution $frac1x^2$ and then rule 106
                  $$
                  mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
                  = mathcalFleft left( -frac1x right)' right
                  = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right.
                  $$



                  Here $frac1x$ is defined as the unique odd distribution satisfying $x frac1x = 1.$ Therefore, by rule 107, we have
                  $$
                  2pi , delta(nu)
                  = mathcalFleft 1 right
                  = mathcalFleft x frac1x right
                  = ifracddnu mathcalF left frac1x right
                  $$
                  so
                  $$
                  mathcalF left frac1x right = -i , 2pi H(nu) + C
                  $$
                  for some constant $C.$ Here $H$ is the Heaviside step function.



                  Since $frac1x$ is odd so must be $mathcalFleftfrac1xright.$ Therefore $C = i , pi$ and
                  $$
                  mathcalF left frac1x right
                  = -i , 2pi H(nu) + i pi
                  = -i pi operatornamesign(nu),
                  $$
                  where $operatornamesign$ is the signature function.



                  Thus,
                  $$
                  mathcalFleft frac1x^2 right
                  = -inu , mathcalFleft frac1x right
                  = -inu , left( -ipi operatornamesign(nu) right)
                  = -pi , nu , operatornamesign(nu)
                  = -pi , |nu|.
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 31 at 12:21









                  md2perpe

                  6,66311023




                  6,66311023



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2900409%2ffourier-transform-of-1-x2-given-by-mathematica%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                      Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                      Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?