Equation of line

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose that you don't already know the equation of a line. You take two points A and B. You join those two points and extend that line indefinitely. Now consider any point on that line and mark it as (0,0). Draw your coordinate system accordingly and consider two quantites: rA and rB.



$A_y = r_AA_x$

$B_y = r_BB_x$

rA is always equal to rB!



Consider any other point on the line. The way Y is related to X is the same again!



How is this possible? Is there any proof? Can we surely say that all points that lie on the line have their Ys related to Xs in the same way? Is there no such point which does not have the same relation of its X and Y as the other points on the same line?










share|cite|improve this question





















  • Use similar triangles. (BTW: You've rediscovered that the equation for any (non-vertical) line through the origin is $y=mx$ for some $m$. Congratulations! :) )
    – Blue
    Aug 31 at 2:56











  • Wow, didn't notice the triangles formed. Searching for such stuff didn't yield any good results. Got my answer in a matter of minutes. Thanks!
    – jp_newbie
    Aug 31 at 4:00














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose that you don't already know the equation of a line. You take two points A and B. You join those two points and extend that line indefinitely. Now consider any point on that line and mark it as (0,0). Draw your coordinate system accordingly and consider two quantites: rA and rB.



$A_y = r_AA_x$

$B_y = r_BB_x$

rA is always equal to rB!



Consider any other point on the line. The way Y is related to X is the same again!



How is this possible? Is there any proof? Can we surely say that all points that lie on the line have their Ys related to Xs in the same way? Is there no such point which does not have the same relation of its X and Y as the other points on the same line?










share|cite|improve this question





















  • Use similar triangles. (BTW: You've rediscovered that the equation for any (non-vertical) line through the origin is $y=mx$ for some $m$. Congratulations! :) )
    – Blue
    Aug 31 at 2:56











  • Wow, didn't notice the triangles formed. Searching for such stuff didn't yield any good results. Got my answer in a matter of minutes. Thanks!
    – jp_newbie
    Aug 31 at 4:00












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Suppose that you don't already know the equation of a line. You take two points A and B. You join those two points and extend that line indefinitely. Now consider any point on that line and mark it as (0,0). Draw your coordinate system accordingly and consider two quantites: rA and rB.



$A_y = r_AA_x$

$B_y = r_BB_x$

rA is always equal to rB!



Consider any other point on the line. The way Y is related to X is the same again!



How is this possible? Is there any proof? Can we surely say that all points that lie on the line have their Ys related to Xs in the same way? Is there no such point which does not have the same relation of its X and Y as the other points on the same line?










share|cite|improve this question













Suppose that you don't already know the equation of a line. You take two points A and B. You join those two points and extend that line indefinitely. Now consider any point on that line and mark it as (0,0). Draw your coordinate system accordingly and consider two quantites: rA and rB.



$A_y = r_AA_x$

$B_y = r_BB_x$

rA is always equal to rB!



Consider any other point on the line. The way Y is related to X is the same again!



How is this possible? Is there any proof? Can we surely say that all points that lie on the line have their Ys related to Xs in the same way? Is there no such point which does not have the same relation of its X and Y as the other points on the same line?







geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 31 at 2:46









jp_newbie

185




185











  • Use similar triangles. (BTW: You've rediscovered that the equation for any (non-vertical) line through the origin is $y=mx$ for some $m$. Congratulations! :) )
    – Blue
    Aug 31 at 2:56











  • Wow, didn't notice the triangles formed. Searching for such stuff didn't yield any good results. Got my answer in a matter of minutes. Thanks!
    – jp_newbie
    Aug 31 at 4:00
















  • Use similar triangles. (BTW: You've rediscovered that the equation for any (non-vertical) line through the origin is $y=mx$ for some $m$. Congratulations! :) )
    – Blue
    Aug 31 at 2:56











  • Wow, didn't notice the triangles formed. Searching for such stuff didn't yield any good results. Got my answer in a matter of minutes. Thanks!
    – jp_newbie
    Aug 31 at 4:00















Use similar triangles. (BTW: You've rediscovered that the equation for any (non-vertical) line through the origin is $y=mx$ for some $m$. Congratulations! :) )
– Blue
Aug 31 at 2:56





Use similar triangles. (BTW: You've rediscovered that the equation for any (non-vertical) line through the origin is $y=mx$ for some $m$. Congratulations! :) )
– Blue
Aug 31 at 2:56













Wow, didn't notice the triangles formed. Searching for such stuff didn't yield any good results. Got my answer in a matter of minutes. Thanks!
– jp_newbie
Aug 31 at 4:00




Wow, didn't notice the triangles formed. Searching for such stuff didn't yield any good results. Got my answer in a matter of minutes. Thanks!
– jp_newbie
Aug 31 at 4:00










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










enter image description here



Note that $triangle OCA$ is similar to $triangle ODB$



It follows that $dfracA_yA_x = dfracB_yB_x$






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2900252%2fequation-of-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    enter image description here



    Note that $triangle OCA$ is similar to $triangle ODB$



    It follows that $dfracA_yA_x = dfracB_yB_x$






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      enter image description here



      Note that $triangle OCA$ is similar to $triangle ODB$



      It follows that $dfracA_yA_x = dfracB_yB_x$






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        enter image description here



        Note that $triangle OCA$ is similar to $triangle ODB$



        It follows that $dfracA_yA_x = dfracB_yB_x$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        enter image description here



        Note that $triangle OCA$ is similar to $triangle ODB$



        It follows that $dfracA_yA_x = dfracB_yB_x$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 31 at 3:03









        steven gregory

        16.7k22155




        16.7k22155



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2900252%2fequation-of-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Mutual Information Always Non-negative

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?