How to show a morphism $f^•: A^•to B^•$ of complexes induce the morphism of cohomology objects $H^i(A^•)to H^i(B^•)$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $mathscr C$ be a Abelian category, how to show a morphism $varphi^•: A^•to B^•$ of complexes induce the morphism of cohomology objects $H^i(A^•)to H^i(B^•)$?



$A^•:qquad cdotsto A^i-1stackrelf^i-1toA^istackrelf^itoA^i+1stackrelf^i+1tocdots$



$B^•:qquad cdotsto B^i-1stackrelg^i-1toB^istackrelg^itoB^i+1stackrelg^i+1tocdots$



However, I can only give the morphism $operatornamekerf^ito operatornamekerg^i$.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 3




    Have you tried diagram chasing?
    – Ashar Tafhim
    Sep 3 at 7:24






  • 1




    $DeclareMathOperatorimim$Show that your map $ker f^i to ker g^i$ sends $im f^i-1$ into $im g^i-1$ so you get a well defined map in homology.
    – Christoph
    Sep 3 at 9:38















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $mathscr C$ be a Abelian category, how to show a morphism $varphi^•: A^•to B^•$ of complexes induce the morphism of cohomology objects $H^i(A^•)to H^i(B^•)$?



$A^•:qquad cdotsto A^i-1stackrelf^i-1toA^istackrelf^itoA^i+1stackrelf^i+1tocdots$



$B^•:qquad cdotsto B^i-1stackrelg^i-1toB^istackrelg^itoB^i+1stackrelg^i+1tocdots$



However, I can only give the morphism $operatornamekerf^ito operatornamekerg^i$.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 3




    Have you tried diagram chasing?
    – Ashar Tafhim
    Sep 3 at 7:24






  • 1




    $DeclareMathOperatorimim$Show that your map $ker f^i to ker g^i$ sends $im f^i-1$ into $im g^i-1$ so you get a well defined map in homology.
    – Christoph
    Sep 3 at 9:38













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $mathscr C$ be a Abelian category, how to show a morphism $varphi^•: A^•to B^•$ of complexes induce the morphism of cohomology objects $H^i(A^•)to H^i(B^•)$?



$A^•:qquad cdotsto A^i-1stackrelf^i-1toA^istackrelf^itoA^i+1stackrelf^i+1tocdots$



$B^•:qquad cdotsto B^i-1stackrelg^i-1toB^istackrelg^itoB^i+1stackrelg^i+1tocdots$



However, I can only give the morphism $operatornamekerf^ito operatornamekerg^i$.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $mathscr C$ be a Abelian category, how to show a morphism $varphi^•: A^•to B^•$ of complexes induce the morphism of cohomology objects $H^i(A^•)to H^i(B^•)$?



$A^•:qquad cdotsto A^i-1stackrelf^i-1toA^istackrelf^itoA^i+1stackrelf^i+1tocdots$



$B^•:qquad cdotsto B^i-1stackrelg^i-1toB^istackrelg^itoB^i+1stackrelg^i+1tocdots$



However, I can only give the morphism $operatornamekerf^ito operatornamekerg^i$.







algebraic-geometry category-theory homology-cohomology abelian-categories






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 3 at 9:32

























asked Sep 3 at 7:06









Born to be proud

48849




48849







  • 3




    Have you tried diagram chasing?
    – Ashar Tafhim
    Sep 3 at 7:24






  • 1




    $DeclareMathOperatorimim$Show that your map $ker f^i to ker g^i$ sends $im f^i-1$ into $im g^i-1$ so you get a well defined map in homology.
    – Christoph
    Sep 3 at 9:38













  • 3




    Have you tried diagram chasing?
    – Ashar Tafhim
    Sep 3 at 7:24






  • 1




    $DeclareMathOperatorimim$Show that your map $ker f^i to ker g^i$ sends $im f^i-1$ into $im g^i-1$ so you get a well defined map in homology.
    – Christoph
    Sep 3 at 9:38








3




3




Have you tried diagram chasing?
– Ashar Tafhim
Sep 3 at 7:24




Have you tried diagram chasing?
– Ashar Tafhim
Sep 3 at 7:24




1




1




$DeclareMathOperatorimim$Show that your map $ker f^i to ker g^i$ sends $im f^i-1$ into $im g^i-1$ so you get a well defined map in homology.
– Christoph
Sep 3 at 9:38





$DeclareMathOperatorimim$Show that your map $ker f^i to ker g^i$ sends $im f^i-1$ into $im g^i-1$ so you get a well defined map in homology.
– Christoph
Sep 3 at 9:38











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Let $varphi^bullet : (A^bullet, d_A^bullet)to (B^bullet,d_B^bullet)$ be a morphism of cochain complexes. Concretely, recall that this means that for any $i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i$ as maps $A^ito B^i+1.$



  1. First, observe that $varphi^i$ induces a morphism $varphi^i : ker d_A^itoker d_B^i$ by restriction. Given $alphainker d_A^isubseteq A^i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1(0) = 0.$ This means that $varphi^i(alpha)inker d_B^i,$ which is what we wanted.

  2. In order to show that we obtain a well-defined map at the level of cohomology, we must show that the composition
    $$
    ker d_A^ixrightarrowvarphi^iker d_B^ixrightarrowpiker d_B^i/operatornameimd_B^i-1 = mathrmH^i(B^bullet)
    $$
    factors through $H^i(A^bullet);$ i.e., that any $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1$ is sent to $0$ in the quotient. Precisely, this means that we must check that such an $alpha$ is mapped into $operatornameimd_B^i-1$ under $varphi^i.$ To that end, let $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1,$ and write $alpha = d_A^i-1(beta)$ for some $betain A^i-1.$ Then it follows that
    $$
    varphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i(d_A^i-1(beta)) = d_B^i-1(varphi^i-1(beta))inoperatornameimd_B^i-1.
    $$
    This shows that the map $picircvarphi^i : ker d_A^ito mathrmH^i(B^bullet)$ factors through a unique map $(varphi^i)^ast : mathrmH^i(A^bullet)tomathrmH^i(B^bullet).$ This is the desired map.





share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2903594%2fhow-to-show-a-morphism-f-a-to-b-of-complexes-induce-the-morphism-of-coh%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Let $varphi^bullet : (A^bullet, d_A^bullet)to (B^bullet,d_B^bullet)$ be a morphism of cochain complexes. Concretely, recall that this means that for any $i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i$ as maps $A^ito B^i+1.$



    1. First, observe that $varphi^i$ induces a morphism $varphi^i : ker d_A^itoker d_B^i$ by restriction. Given $alphainker d_A^isubseteq A^i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1(0) = 0.$ This means that $varphi^i(alpha)inker d_B^i,$ which is what we wanted.

    2. In order to show that we obtain a well-defined map at the level of cohomology, we must show that the composition
      $$
      ker d_A^ixrightarrowvarphi^iker d_B^ixrightarrowpiker d_B^i/operatornameimd_B^i-1 = mathrmH^i(B^bullet)
      $$
      factors through $H^i(A^bullet);$ i.e., that any $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1$ is sent to $0$ in the quotient. Precisely, this means that we must check that such an $alpha$ is mapped into $operatornameimd_B^i-1$ under $varphi^i.$ To that end, let $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1,$ and write $alpha = d_A^i-1(beta)$ for some $betain A^i-1.$ Then it follows that
      $$
      varphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i(d_A^i-1(beta)) = d_B^i-1(varphi^i-1(beta))inoperatornameimd_B^i-1.
      $$
      This shows that the map $picircvarphi^i : ker d_A^ito mathrmH^i(B^bullet)$ factors through a unique map $(varphi^i)^ast : mathrmH^i(A^bullet)tomathrmH^i(B^bullet).$ This is the desired map.





    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Let $varphi^bullet : (A^bullet, d_A^bullet)to (B^bullet,d_B^bullet)$ be a morphism of cochain complexes. Concretely, recall that this means that for any $i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i$ as maps $A^ito B^i+1.$



      1. First, observe that $varphi^i$ induces a morphism $varphi^i : ker d_A^itoker d_B^i$ by restriction. Given $alphainker d_A^isubseteq A^i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1(0) = 0.$ This means that $varphi^i(alpha)inker d_B^i,$ which is what we wanted.

      2. In order to show that we obtain a well-defined map at the level of cohomology, we must show that the composition
        $$
        ker d_A^ixrightarrowvarphi^iker d_B^ixrightarrowpiker d_B^i/operatornameimd_B^i-1 = mathrmH^i(B^bullet)
        $$
        factors through $H^i(A^bullet);$ i.e., that any $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1$ is sent to $0$ in the quotient. Precisely, this means that we must check that such an $alpha$ is mapped into $operatornameimd_B^i-1$ under $varphi^i.$ To that end, let $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1,$ and write $alpha = d_A^i-1(beta)$ for some $betain A^i-1.$ Then it follows that
        $$
        varphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i(d_A^i-1(beta)) = d_B^i-1(varphi^i-1(beta))inoperatornameimd_B^i-1.
        $$
        This shows that the map $picircvarphi^i : ker d_A^ito mathrmH^i(B^bullet)$ factors through a unique map $(varphi^i)^ast : mathrmH^i(A^bullet)tomathrmH^i(B^bullet).$ This is the desired map.





      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        Let $varphi^bullet : (A^bullet, d_A^bullet)to (B^bullet,d_B^bullet)$ be a morphism of cochain complexes. Concretely, recall that this means that for any $i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i$ as maps $A^ito B^i+1.$



        1. First, observe that $varphi^i$ induces a morphism $varphi^i : ker d_A^itoker d_B^i$ by restriction. Given $alphainker d_A^isubseteq A^i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1(0) = 0.$ This means that $varphi^i(alpha)inker d_B^i,$ which is what we wanted.

        2. In order to show that we obtain a well-defined map at the level of cohomology, we must show that the composition
          $$
          ker d_A^ixrightarrowvarphi^iker d_B^ixrightarrowpiker d_B^i/operatornameimd_B^i-1 = mathrmH^i(B^bullet)
          $$
          factors through $H^i(A^bullet);$ i.e., that any $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1$ is sent to $0$ in the quotient. Precisely, this means that we must check that such an $alpha$ is mapped into $operatornameimd_B^i-1$ under $varphi^i.$ To that end, let $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1,$ and write $alpha = d_A^i-1(beta)$ for some $betain A^i-1.$ Then it follows that
          $$
          varphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i(d_A^i-1(beta)) = d_B^i-1(varphi^i-1(beta))inoperatornameimd_B^i-1.
          $$
          This shows that the map $picircvarphi^i : ker d_A^ito mathrmH^i(B^bullet)$ factors through a unique map $(varphi^i)^ast : mathrmH^i(A^bullet)tomathrmH^i(B^bullet).$ This is the desired map.





        share|cite|improve this answer












        Let $varphi^bullet : (A^bullet, d_A^bullet)to (B^bullet,d_B^bullet)$ be a morphism of cochain complexes. Concretely, recall that this means that for any $i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i$ as maps $A^ito B^i+1.$



        1. First, observe that $varphi^i$ induces a morphism $varphi^i : ker d_A^itoker d_B^i$ by restriction. Given $alphainker d_A^isubseteq A^i,$ we have $d_B^icircvarphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1circ d_A^i(alpha) = varphi^i+1(0) = 0.$ This means that $varphi^i(alpha)inker d_B^i,$ which is what we wanted.

        2. In order to show that we obtain a well-defined map at the level of cohomology, we must show that the composition
          $$
          ker d_A^ixrightarrowvarphi^iker d_B^ixrightarrowpiker d_B^i/operatornameimd_B^i-1 = mathrmH^i(B^bullet)
          $$
          factors through $H^i(A^bullet);$ i.e., that any $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1$ is sent to $0$ in the quotient. Precisely, this means that we must check that such an $alpha$ is mapped into $operatornameimd_B^i-1$ under $varphi^i.$ To that end, let $alphainoperatornameimd_A^i-1,$ and write $alpha = d_A^i-1(beta)$ for some $betain A^i-1.$ Then it follows that
          $$
          varphi^i(alpha) = varphi^i(d_A^i-1(beta)) = d_B^i-1(varphi^i-1(beta))inoperatornameimd_B^i-1.
          $$
          This shows that the map $picircvarphi^i : ker d_A^ito mathrmH^i(B^bullet)$ factors through a unique map $(varphi^i)^ast : mathrmH^i(A^bullet)tomathrmH^i(B^bullet).$ This is the desired map.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Sep 3 at 17:35









        Stahl

        15.7k43351




        15.7k43351



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2903594%2fhow-to-show-a-morphism-f-a-to-b-of-complexes-induce-the-morphism-of-coh%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            1st Magritte Awards