Convergence of jump function with respect to the Skorokhod metric

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider the space $D := D([0, 1], mathbbN)$ of cadlag functions $f : [0, 1] to mathbbN$ equipped with the Skorokhod $J_1$-metric $d(f,g) := inf_lambda in Lambda max lVert lambda - id rVert, lVert f circ lambda - g rVert $ where $Lambda$ is the set of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda : [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda(0) = 0$ and $lambda(1) = 1$ and $lVert cdot rVert$ the supremum norm.
Let $x_n, x in D$ with $x_n to x$ in this metric. Denote by $tau_n$ and $tau$ the timepoint of the first jump of $x_n$ and $x$ respectively. Is it true that $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$?










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Consider the space $D := D([0, 1], mathbbN)$ of cadlag functions $f : [0, 1] to mathbbN$ equipped with the Skorokhod $J_1$-metric $d(f,g) := inf_lambda in Lambda max lVert lambda - id rVert, lVert f circ lambda - g rVert $ where $Lambda$ is the set of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda : [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda(0) = 0$ and $lambda(1) = 1$ and $lVert cdot rVert$ the supremum norm.
    Let $x_n, x in D$ with $x_n to x$ in this metric. Denote by $tau_n$ and $tau$ the timepoint of the first jump of $x_n$ and $x$ respectively. Is it true that $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Consider the space $D := D([0, 1], mathbbN)$ of cadlag functions $f : [0, 1] to mathbbN$ equipped with the Skorokhod $J_1$-metric $d(f,g) := inf_lambda in Lambda max lVert lambda - id rVert, lVert f circ lambda - g rVert $ where $Lambda$ is the set of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda : [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda(0) = 0$ and $lambda(1) = 1$ and $lVert cdot rVert$ the supremum norm.
      Let $x_n, x in D$ with $x_n to x$ in this metric. Denote by $tau_n$ and $tau$ the timepoint of the first jump of $x_n$ and $x$ respectively. Is it true that $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$?










      share|cite|improve this question















      Consider the space $D := D([0, 1], mathbbN)$ of cadlag functions $f : [0, 1] to mathbbN$ equipped with the Skorokhod $J_1$-metric $d(f,g) := inf_lambda in Lambda max lVert lambda - id rVert, lVert f circ lambda - g rVert $ where $Lambda$ is the set of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda : [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda(0) = 0$ and $lambda(1) = 1$ and $lVert cdot rVert$ the supremum norm.
      Let $x_n, x in D$ with $x_n to x$ in this metric. Denote by $tau_n$ and $tau$ the timepoint of the first jump of $x_n$ and $x$ respectively. Is it true that $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$?







      general-topology skorohod-space






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 4 at 15:11









      saz

      73.9k553113




      73.9k553113










      asked Sep 3 at 13:48









      yadaddy

      1,231816




      1,231816




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted











          Lemma: If $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ topology and $x$ is not constant, then $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$.




          Proof: Since $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ we can find a sequence $(lambda_n)_n in mathbbN$ of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda_n: [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda_n(0)=0$, $lambda_n(1)=1$ such that $$|lambda_n-textid|_infty to 0 qquad |x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty to 0.$$ In particular, there exists $N in mathbbN$ such that $$|x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty < 1 quad textfor all $n geq N$,$$ and since the functions are taking values in $mathbbN$, this already implies $$ forall n geq N , forall t in [0,1]: quad x_n(lambda_n(t))= x(t). tag1$$ As $x$ is right-continuous, non-constant and takes values in $mathbbN$, we know that the first jump time $tau$ of $x$ satisfies $$tau = inft in (0,1]: x(0) neq x(t) in (0,1].$$ It follows from $(1)$ that $$tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$$ and $$x_n(tau_n) = x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$$ for all $n geq N$. In particular, $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) to x(tau)$ and $$tau_n =lambda_n(tau) xrightarrown to infty tau.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Please observe that the range space of the cadlag functions is discrete and countable.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 4 at 6:11










          • @yadaddy Sorry, I missed that; see my edited answer.
            – saz
            Sep 4 at 15:10










          • Thank you. I see that $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$ for all $n geq N$, but I don't see why $tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$. The time shifts $lambda_n$ that are given to us by $J_1$-convergence need not be those that map the jump time point $tau$ of $x$ to the jump timepoints $tau_n$ of $x_n$.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 7:41







          • 1




            @yadaddy For $s in [0,tau)$, we have $x(s)=x(0)$, and it follows from $(1)$ that $x_n(s)=x(0)$ for any $s in [0,lambda_n(tau))$. At $s=lambda_n(tau)$, it follows again from (1) that $x_n$ jumps and the new position is exactly $x(tau)$. If this makes things easier for you, you may note that $lambda_n$ is strictly increasing (hence invertible), and then $(1)$ becomes $x_n(s) = x(lambda_n^-1(s))$. By looking at the "trajectory" of $x$ you can recover all the information about $x_n$.
            – saz
            Sep 5 at 7:52











          • Yes, that helped.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 8:13










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2903872%2fconvergence-of-jump-function-with-respect-to-the-skorokhod-metric%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted











          Lemma: If $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ topology and $x$ is not constant, then $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$.




          Proof: Since $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ we can find a sequence $(lambda_n)_n in mathbbN$ of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda_n: [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda_n(0)=0$, $lambda_n(1)=1$ such that $$|lambda_n-textid|_infty to 0 qquad |x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty to 0.$$ In particular, there exists $N in mathbbN$ such that $$|x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty < 1 quad textfor all $n geq N$,$$ and since the functions are taking values in $mathbbN$, this already implies $$ forall n geq N , forall t in [0,1]: quad x_n(lambda_n(t))= x(t). tag1$$ As $x$ is right-continuous, non-constant and takes values in $mathbbN$, we know that the first jump time $tau$ of $x$ satisfies $$tau = inft in (0,1]: x(0) neq x(t) in (0,1].$$ It follows from $(1)$ that $$tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$$ and $$x_n(tau_n) = x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$$ for all $n geq N$. In particular, $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) to x(tau)$ and $$tau_n =lambda_n(tau) xrightarrown to infty tau.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Please observe that the range space of the cadlag functions is discrete and countable.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 4 at 6:11










          • @yadaddy Sorry, I missed that; see my edited answer.
            – saz
            Sep 4 at 15:10










          • Thank you. I see that $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$ for all $n geq N$, but I don't see why $tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$. The time shifts $lambda_n$ that are given to us by $J_1$-convergence need not be those that map the jump time point $tau$ of $x$ to the jump timepoints $tau_n$ of $x_n$.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 7:41







          • 1




            @yadaddy For $s in [0,tau)$, we have $x(s)=x(0)$, and it follows from $(1)$ that $x_n(s)=x(0)$ for any $s in [0,lambda_n(tau))$. At $s=lambda_n(tau)$, it follows again from (1) that $x_n$ jumps and the new position is exactly $x(tau)$. If this makes things easier for you, you may note that $lambda_n$ is strictly increasing (hence invertible), and then $(1)$ becomes $x_n(s) = x(lambda_n^-1(s))$. By looking at the "trajectory" of $x$ you can recover all the information about $x_n$.
            – saz
            Sep 5 at 7:52











          • Yes, that helped.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 8:13














          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted











          Lemma: If $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ topology and $x$ is not constant, then $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$.




          Proof: Since $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ we can find a sequence $(lambda_n)_n in mathbbN$ of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda_n: [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda_n(0)=0$, $lambda_n(1)=1$ such that $$|lambda_n-textid|_infty to 0 qquad |x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty to 0.$$ In particular, there exists $N in mathbbN$ such that $$|x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty < 1 quad textfor all $n geq N$,$$ and since the functions are taking values in $mathbbN$, this already implies $$ forall n geq N , forall t in [0,1]: quad x_n(lambda_n(t))= x(t). tag1$$ As $x$ is right-continuous, non-constant and takes values in $mathbbN$, we know that the first jump time $tau$ of $x$ satisfies $$tau = inft in (0,1]: x(0) neq x(t) in (0,1].$$ It follows from $(1)$ that $$tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$$ and $$x_n(tau_n) = x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$$ for all $n geq N$. In particular, $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) to x(tau)$ and $$tau_n =lambda_n(tau) xrightarrown to infty tau.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Please observe that the range space of the cadlag functions is discrete and countable.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 4 at 6:11










          • @yadaddy Sorry, I missed that; see my edited answer.
            – saz
            Sep 4 at 15:10










          • Thank you. I see that $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$ for all $n geq N$, but I don't see why $tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$. The time shifts $lambda_n$ that are given to us by $J_1$-convergence need not be those that map the jump time point $tau$ of $x$ to the jump timepoints $tau_n$ of $x_n$.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 7:41







          • 1




            @yadaddy For $s in [0,tau)$, we have $x(s)=x(0)$, and it follows from $(1)$ that $x_n(s)=x(0)$ for any $s in [0,lambda_n(tau))$. At $s=lambda_n(tau)$, it follows again from (1) that $x_n$ jumps and the new position is exactly $x(tau)$. If this makes things easier for you, you may note that $lambda_n$ is strictly increasing (hence invertible), and then $(1)$ becomes $x_n(s) = x(lambda_n^-1(s))$. By looking at the "trajectory" of $x$ you can recover all the information about $x_n$.
            – saz
            Sep 5 at 7:52











          • Yes, that helped.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 8:13












          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          Lemma: If $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ topology and $x$ is not constant, then $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$.




          Proof: Since $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ we can find a sequence $(lambda_n)_n in mathbbN$ of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda_n: [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda_n(0)=0$, $lambda_n(1)=1$ such that $$|lambda_n-textid|_infty to 0 qquad |x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty to 0.$$ In particular, there exists $N in mathbbN$ such that $$|x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty < 1 quad textfor all $n geq N$,$$ and since the functions are taking values in $mathbbN$, this already implies $$ forall n geq N , forall t in [0,1]: quad x_n(lambda_n(t))= x(t). tag1$$ As $x$ is right-continuous, non-constant and takes values in $mathbbN$, we know that the first jump time $tau$ of $x$ satisfies $$tau = inft in (0,1]: x(0) neq x(t) in (0,1].$$ It follows from $(1)$ that $$tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$$ and $$x_n(tau_n) = x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$$ for all $n geq N$. In particular, $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) to x(tau)$ and $$tau_n =lambda_n(tau) xrightarrown to infty tau.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer















          Lemma: If $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ topology and $x$ is not constant, then $tau_n to tau$ and $x_n(tau_n) to x(tau)$.




          Proof: Since $x_n to x$ in $J_1$ we can find a sequence $(lambda_n)_n in mathbbN$ of continuous strictly increasing functions $lambda_n: [0,1] to [0,1]$ with $lambda_n(0)=0$, $lambda_n(1)=1$ such that $$|lambda_n-textid|_infty to 0 qquad |x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty to 0.$$ In particular, there exists $N in mathbbN$ such that $$|x_n circ lambda_n-x|_infty < 1 quad textfor all $n geq N$,$$ and since the functions are taking values in $mathbbN$, this already implies $$ forall n geq N , forall t in [0,1]: quad x_n(lambda_n(t))= x(t). tag1$$ As $x$ is right-continuous, non-constant and takes values in $mathbbN$, we know that the first jump time $tau$ of $x$ satisfies $$tau = inft in (0,1]: x(0) neq x(t) in (0,1].$$ It follows from $(1)$ that $$tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$$ and $$x_n(tau_n) = x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$$ for all $n geq N$. In particular, $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) to x(tau)$ and $$tau_n =lambda_n(tau) xrightarrown to infty tau.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 4 at 15:10

























          answered Sep 4 at 6:08









          saz

          73.9k553113




          73.9k553113











          • Please observe that the range space of the cadlag functions is discrete and countable.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 4 at 6:11










          • @yadaddy Sorry, I missed that; see my edited answer.
            – saz
            Sep 4 at 15:10










          • Thank you. I see that $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$ for all $n geq N$, but I don't see why $tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$. The time shifts $lambda_n$ that are given to us by $J_1$-convergence need not be those that map the jump time point $tau$ of $x$ to the jump timepoints $tau_n$ of $x_n$.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 7:41







          • 1




            @yadaddy For $s in [0,tau)$, we have $x(s)=x(0)$, and it follows from $(1)$ that $x_n(s)=x(0)$ for any $s in [0,lambda_n(tau))$. At $s=lambda_n(tau)$, it follows again from (1) that $x_n$ jumps and the new position is exactly $x(tau)$. If this makes things easier for you, you may note that $lambda_n$ is strictly increasing (hence invertible), and then $(1)$ becomes $x_n(s) = x(lambda_n^-1(s))$. By looking at the "trajectory" of $x$ you can recover all the information about $x_n$.
            – saz
            Sep 5 at 7:52











          • Yes, that helped.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 8:13
















          • Please observe that the range space of the cadlag functions is discrete and countable.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 4 at 6:11










          • @yadaddy Sorry, I missed that; see my edited answer.
            – saz
            Sep 4 at 15:10










          • Thank you. I see that $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$ for all $n geq N$, but I don't see why $tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$. The time shifts $lambda_n$ that are given to us by $J_1$-convergence need not be those that map the jump time point $tau$ of $x$ to the jump timepoints $tau_n$ of $x_n$.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 7:41







          • 1




            @yadaddy For $s in [0,tau)$, we have $x(s)=x(0)$, and it follows from $(1)$ that $x_n(s)=x(0)$ for any $s in [0,lambda_n(tau))$. At $s=lambda_n(tau)$, it follows again from (1) that $x_n$ jumps and the new position is exactly $x(tau)$. If this makes things easier for you, you may note that $lambda_n$ is strictly increasing (hence invertible), and then $(1)$ becomes $x_n(s) = x(lambda_n^-1(s))$. By looking at the "trajectory" of $x$ you can recover all the information about $x_n$.
            – saz
            Sep 5 at 7:52











          • Yes, that helped.
            – yadaddy
            Sep 5 at 8:13















          Please observe that the range space of the cadlag functions is discrete and countable.
          – yadaddy
          Sep 4 at 6:11




          Please observe that the range space of the cadlag functions is discrete and countable.
          – yadaddy
          Sep 4 at 6:11












          @yadaddy Sorry, I missed that; see my edited answer.
          – saz
          Sep 4 at 15:10




          @yadaddy Sorry, I missed that; see my edited answer.
          – saz
          Sep 4 at 15:10












          Thank you. I see that $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$ for all $n geq N$, but I don't see why $tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$. The time shifts $lambda_n$ that are given to us by $J_1$-convergence need not be those that map the jump time point $tau$ of $x$ to the jump timepoints $tau_n$ of $x_n$.
          – yadaddy
          Sep 5 at 7:41





          Thank you. I see that $x_n(lambda_n(tau)) = x(tau)$ for all $n geq N$, but I don't see why $tau_n = lambda_n(tau)$. The time shifts $lambda_n$ that are given to us by $J_1$-convergence need not be those that map the jump time point $tau$ of $x$ to the jump timepoints $tau_n$ of $x_n$.
          – yadaddy
          Sep 5 at 7:41





          1




          1




          @yadaddy For $s in [0,tau)$, we have $x(s)=x(0)$, and it follows from $(1)$ that $x_n(s)=x(0)$ for any $s in [0,lambda_n(tau))$. At $s=lambda_n(tau)$, it follows again from (1) that $x_n$ jumps and the new position is exactly $x(tau)$. If this makes things easier for you, you may note that $lambda_n$ is strictly increasing (hence invertible), and then $(1)$ becomes $x_n(s) = x(lambda_n^-1(s))$. By looking at the "trajectory" of $x$ you can recover all the information about $x_n$.
          – saz
          Sep 5 at 7:52





          @yadaddy For $s in [0,tau)$, we have $x(s)=x(0)$, and it follows from $(1)$ that $x_n(s)=x(0)$ for any $s in [0,lambda_n(tau))$. At $s=lambda_n(tau)$, it follows again from (1) that $x_n$ jumps and the new position is exactly $x(tau)$. If this makes things easier for you, you may note that $lambda_n$ is strictly increasing (hence invertible), and then $(1)$ becomes $x_n(s) = x(lambda_n^-1(s))$. By looking at the "trajectory" of $x$ you can recover all the information about $x_n$.
          – saz
          Sep 5 at 7:52













          Yes, that helped.
          – yadaddy
          Sep 5 at 8:13




          Yes, that helped.
          – yadaddy
          Sep 5 at 8:13

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2903872%2fconvergence-of-jump-function-with-respect-to-the-skorokhod-metric%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          ra1 OlDReP,f u 4eCEqaEo19g5kE L1cjL6TA62rc8OaCYfG,QzMNrt9DnW 5uIa595OEIkk2ql1lfnuq Nev9cE,F,Q0yly77,LdFMT56W
          s4t83OL8u5nD6AQ5JXkK05 nR nPSjZw,UypC

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Propositional logic and tautologies

          Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility