Path connected subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is locally connected at none of its points.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Let $X$ denote the rational points of the interval $[0,1]times0$ of $mathbb R^2$. Let $T$ denote the union of all line segments joining the point $p=(0,1)$ to points of $X$.



  1. Find a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is path connected but is locally connected at none of its points.



My attempts : I got the answer here



I was visualizing the diagram:



enter image description here



im not getting how it is Nowhere locally connected ?



Any hints/solution will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 2




    I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
    – Clayton
    Sep 3 at 13:15














up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Let $X$ denote the rational points of the interval $[0,1]times0$ of $mathbb R^2$. Let $T$ denote the union of all line segments joining the point $p=(0,1)$ to points of $X$.



  1. Find a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is path connected but is locally connected at none of its points.



My attempts : I got the answer here



I was visualizing the diagram:



enter image description here



im not getting how it is Nowhere locally connected ?



Any hints/solution will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 2




    I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
    – Clayton
    Sep 3 at 13:15












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $X$ denote the rational points of the interval $[0,1]times0$ of $mathbb R^2$. Let $T$ denote the union of all line segments joining the point $p=(0,1)$ to points of $X$.



  1. Find a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is path connected but is locally connected at none of its points.



My attempts : I got the answer here



I was visualizing the diagram:



enter image description here



im not getting how it is Nowhere locally connected ?



Any hints/solution will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question
















Let $X$ denote the rational points of the interval $[0,1]times0$ of $mathbb R^2$. Let $T$ denote the union of all line segments joining the point $p=(0,1)$ to points of $X$.



  1. Find a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is path connected but is locally connected at none of its points.



My attempts : I got the answer here



I was visualizing the diagram:



enter image description here



im not getting how it is Nowhere locally connected ?



Any hints/solution will be appreciated







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 3 at 15:47









zhw.

67.4k42872




67.4k42872










asked Sep 3 at 13:11









stupid

705112




705112







  • 2




    I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
    – Clayton
    Sep 3 at 13:15












  • 2




    I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
    – Clayton
    Sep 3 at 13:15







2




2




I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
– Clayton
Sep 3 at 13:15




I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
– Clayton
Sep 3 at 13:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
$$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
$$V(x) =
begincases
X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
endcases
$$
This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.






share|cite|improve this answer






















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2903849%2fpath-connected-subset-of-mathbb-r2-that-is-locally-connected-at-none-of-its%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



    Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
    $$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
    Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



    All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



    Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
    $$V(x) =
    begincases
    X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
    X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
    X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
    endcases
    $$
    This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



    Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



    Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



    a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



    b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



    c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



      Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
      $$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
      Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



      All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



      Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
      $$V(x) =
      begincases
      X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
      X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
      X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
      endcases
      $$
      This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



      Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



      Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



      a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



      b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



      c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



        Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
        $$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
        Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



        All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



        Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
        $$V(x) =
        begincases
        X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
        X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
        X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
        endcases
        $$
        This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



        Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



        Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



        a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



        b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



        c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



        Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
        $$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
        Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



        All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



        Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
        $$V(x) =
        begincases
        X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
        X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
        X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
        endcases
        $$
        This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



        Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



        Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



        a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



        b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



        c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Sep 4 at 14:45

























        answered Sep 3 at 15:40









        Paul Frost

        4,853424




        4,853424



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2903849%2fpath-connected-subset-of-mathbb-r2-that-is-locally-connected-at-none-of-its%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Mutual Information Always Non-negative

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?