Path connected subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is locally connected at none of its points.

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Let $X$ denote the rational points of the interval $[0,1]times0$ of $mathbb R^2$. Let $T$ denote the union of all line segments joining the point $p=(0,1)$ to points of $X$.



  1. Find a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is path connected but is locally connected at none of its points.



My attempts : I got the answer here



I was visualizing the diagram:



enter image description here



im not getting how it is Nowhere locally connected ?



Any hints/solution will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 2




    I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
    – Clayton
    Sep 3 at 13:15














up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Let $X$ denote the rational points of the interval $[0,1]times0$ of $mathbb R^2$. Let $T$ denote the union of all line segments joining the point $p=(0,1)$ to points of $X$.



  1. Find a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is path connected but is locally connected at none of its points.



My attempts : I got the answer here



I was visualizing the diagram:



enter image description here



im not getting how it is Nowhere locally connected ?



Any hints/solution will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 2




    I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
    – Clayton
    Sep 3 at 13:15












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $X$ denote the rational points of the interval $[0,1]times0$ of $mathbb R^2$. Let $T$ denote the union of all line segments joining the point $p=(0,1)$ to points of $X$.



  1. Find a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is path connected but is locally connected at none of its points.



My attempts : I got the answer here



I was visualizing the diagram:



enter image description here



im not getting how it is Nowhere locally connected ?



Any hints/solution will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question
















Let $X$ denote the rational points of the interval $[0,1]times0$ of $mathbb R^2$. Let $T$ denote the union of all line segments joining the point $p=(0,1)$ to points of $X$.



  1. Find a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is path connected but is locally connected at none of its points.



My attempts : I got the answer here



I was visualizing the diagram:



enter image description here



im not getting how it is Nowhere locally connected ?



Any hints/solution will be appreciated







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 3 at 15:47









zhw.

67.4k42872




67.4k42872










asked Sep 3 at 13:11









stupid

705112




705112







  • 2




    I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
    – Clayton
    Sep 3 at 13:15












  • 2




    I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
    – Clayton
    Sep 3 at 13:15







2




2




I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
– Clayton
Sep 3 at 13:15




I don’t think the diagram is right. You should have lines starting at $(0,0)$ (the origin) and going to $(1,q)$, which means the end points of said lines will all lie on a vertical line with $x$ coordinate equal to $1$.
– Clayton
Sep 3 at 13:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
$$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
$$V(x) =
begincases
X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
endcases
$$
This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.






share|cite|improve this answer






















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2903849%2fpath-connected-subset-of-mathbb-r2-that-is-locally-connected-at-none-of-its%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



    Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
    $$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
    Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



    All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



    Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
    $$V(x) =
    begincases
    X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
    X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
    X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
    endcases
    $$
    This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



    Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



    Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



    a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



    b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



    c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



      Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
      $$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
      Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



      All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



      Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
      $$V(x) =
      begincases
      X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
      X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
      X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
      endcases
      $$
      This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



      Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



      Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



      a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



      b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



      c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



        Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
        $$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
        Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



        All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



        Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
        $$V(x) =
        begincases
        X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
        X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
        X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
        endcases
        $$
        This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



        Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



        Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



        a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



        b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



        c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        As Clayton observed, the space pictured in your question is not the space $X$ defined in William Elliot's original answer.



        Let us redefine $X$ in a slightly modified form. For $r in mathbbR$ let $L_r$ denote the line segment from $(0,0)$ to $(1,r)$ if $r ge 0$ and the line segment from $(1,0)$ to $(0,r)$ if $r le 0$. Now define
        $$X = bigcup_q in mathbbQ L_q subset [0,1] times mathbbR .$$
        Note that the original definition was $X = bigcup_q in [-1,1] cap mathbbQ L_q$.



        All $L_q$ are path connected subspaces of $X$. Hence those with $q ge 0$ resp. $q le 0$ belong to the path component of $(0,0)$ resp. $(0,1)$. But $(0,0), (0,1) in L_0$ which shows that $X$ is path connected.



        Let us check that $X$ is not locally connected at any point $x = (x_1,x_2)in X$. Define
        $$V(x) =
        begincases
        X backslash (0,1) & x_1 = 0 \
        X backslash (0,0) & x_1 = 1 \
        X backslash (0,0), (0,1) & 0 < x_1 < 1
        endcases
        $$
        This is an open neighborhood of $x$ in $X$. For each $r in mathbbR$ the set $([0,1] times mathbbR) backslash L_r$ splits into two disjoint nonempty open sets $O_r^pm$ above and below $L_r$. Hence the sets $V_r^pm(x) = V(x) cap O_r^pm$ are disjoint nonempty open subsets of $V(x)$. Call $r$ admissible for $x$ if $r$ is irrational and $r < 0$ for $x_1 = 0$ resp. $r > 0$ for $x_1 = 1$. For an admissible $r$ we have $L_r cap V(x) = emptyset$ and therefore $V(x) = V_r^+(x) cup V_r^-(x)$.



        Now consider any open $U subset X$ such that $x in U subset V(x)$. We shall show that there exists a regular $r$ such that both $U_r^pm = U cap V_r^pm(x)$ are nonempty. This proves that $U$ is not connected.



        Since $U$ is open, the set $S(U) = q in mathbbQ mid L_q cap U ne emptyset $ is easily seen to be open in $mathbbQ$.



        a) $x_1 = 0$. Then $x = (0,q)$ with $q le 0$. Obviously $qin S(U)$. Choose $p in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.



        b) $x_1 = 1$. Can be treated similarly.



        c) $0 < x_1 <1$. Choose $p, q in S(U)$ such that $p < q$ and an irrational $r$ such that $p < r < q$. Then $r$ is admissible for $x$ and both $U_r^pm$ are nonempty.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Sep 4 at 14:45

























        answered Sep 3 at 15:40









        Paul Frost

        4,853424




        4,853424



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2903849%2fpath-connected-subset-of-mathbb-r2-that-is-locally-connected-at-none-of-its%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            uKEvpL,r0mmGUsYV4gJ,XLSZFnH4zoFqiz 4U
            a2Cl,vx EEOso,6oTPhnI Dxd1pWIYEW 24 hyMqRr1C4EdgYY,L,kzHSRNT25,D jrL1mMcchDQUcs0bcY968Ci4Q8L54ysVbUSn1j3tF

            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Propositional logic and tautologies

            Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility