Find factors of this expression: $x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$ [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Find factors of
$$x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4.$$




I could not find the factors of this polynomial. Can you please explain me how to proceed?










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Jyrki Lahtonen, Jendrik Stelzner, A. Pongrácz, amWhy, José Carlos Santos Sep 3 at 23:56


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jyrki Lahtonen, Jendrik Stelzner, A. Pongrácz, amWhy, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    If you rewrite it as $p(x,y)=x^2+(3-6y)x+(y^2-3y+4)$ you can "solve" it in the usual way as a quadratic in $x$. If there are "nice" factors, this will give them.
    – Mark Bennet
    Sep 3 at 9:23










  • Can u solve further plz
    – shadow Fire
    Sep 3 at 9:36






  • 1




    Please study our guide for new askers. Copy/pasting a homework assignment will not be received well. Make the question focused on a key concept, share your thoughts, or give other context (what related pieces of theory have been covered recently). That way the answerers can give an answer that helps you learn (rather than one that zips over your head). If you just want an answer, and don't want to learn, then this site is not for you.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 3 at 9:40














up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Find factors of
$$x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4.$$




I could not find the factors of this polynomial. Can you please explain me how to proceed?










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Jyrki Lahtonen, Jendrik Stelzner, A. Pongrácz, amWhy, José Carlos Santos Sep 3 at 23:56


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jyrki Lahtonen, Jendrik Stelzner, A. Pongrácz, amWhy, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    If you rewrite it as $p(x,y)=x^2+(3-6y)x+(y^2-3y+4)$ you can "solve" it in the usual way as a quadratic in $x$. If there are "nice" factors, this will give them.
    – Mark Bennet
    Sep 3 at 9:23










  • Can u solve further plz
    – shadow Fire
    Sep 3 at 9:36






  • 1




    Please study our guide for new askers. Copy/pasting a homework assignment will not be received well. Make the question focused on a key concept, share your thoughts, or give other context (what related pieces of theory have been covered recently). That way the answerers can give an answer that helps you learn (rather than one that zips over your head). If you just want an answer, and don't want to learn, then this site is not for you.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 3 at 9:40












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Find factors of
$$x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4.$$




I could not find the factors of this polynomial. Can you please explain me how to proceed?










share|cite|improve this question
















Find factors of
$$x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4.$$




I could not find the factors of this polynomial. Can you please explain me how to proceed?







algebra-precalculus polynomials factoring






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 3 at 12:37









greedoid

28.1k93776




28.1k93776










asked Sep 3 at 9:10









shadow Fire

91




91




closed as off-topic by Jyrki Lahtonen, Jendrik Stelzner, A. Pongrácz, amWhy, José Carlos Santos Sep 3 at 23:56


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jyrki Lahtonen, Jendrik Stelzner, A. Pongrácz, amWhy, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Jyrki Lahtonen, Jendrik Stelzner, A. Pongrácz, amWhy, José Carlos Santos Sep 3 at 23:56


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jyrki Lahtonen, Jendrik Stelzner, A. Pongrácz, amWhy, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 1




    If you rewrite it as $p(x,y)=x^2+(3-6y)x+(y^2-3y+4)$ you can "solve" it in the usual way as a quadratic in $x$. If there are "nice" factors, this will give them.
    – Mark Bennet
    Sep 3 at 9:23










  • Can u solve further plz
    – shadow Fire
    Sep 3 at 9:36






  • 1




    Please study our guide for new askers. Copy/pasting a homework assignment will not be received well. Make the question focused on a key concept, share your thoughts, or give other context (what related pieces of theory have been covered recently). That way the answerers can give an answer that helps you learn (rather than one that zips over your head). If you just want an answer, and don't want to learn, then this site is not for you.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 3 at 9:40












  • 1




    If you rewrite it as $p(x,y)=x^2+(3-6y)x+(y^2-3y+4)$ you can "solve" it in the usual way as a quadratic in $x$. If there are "nice" factors, this will give them.
    – Mark Bennet
    Sep 3 at 9:23










  • Can u solve further plz
    – shadow Fire
    Sep 3 at 9:36






  • 1




    Please study our guide for new askers. Copy/pasting a homework assignment will not be received well. Make the question focused on a key concept, share your thoughts, or give other context (what related pieces of theory have been covered recently). That way the answerers can give an answer that helps you learn (rather than one that zips over your head). If you just want an answer, and don't want to learn, then this site is not for you.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 3 at 9:40







1




1




If you rewrite it as $p(x,y)=x^2+(3-6y)x+(y^2-3y+4)$ you can "solve" it in the usual way as a quadratic in $x$. If there are "nice" factors, this will give them.
– Mark Bennet
Sep 3 at 9:23




If you rewrite it as $p(x,y)=x^2+(3-6y)x+(y^2-3y+4)$ you can "solve" it in the usual way as a quadratic in $x$. If there are "nice" factors, this will give them.
– Mark Bennet
Sep 3 at 9:23












Can u solve further plz
– shadow Fire
Sep 3 at 9:36




Can u solve further plz
– shadow Fire
Sep 3 at 9:36




1




1




Please study our guide for new askers. Copy/pasting a homework assignment will not be received well. Make the question focused on a key concept, share your thoughts, or give other context (what related pieces of theory have been covered recently). That way the answerers can give an answer that helps you learn (rather than one that zips over your head). If you just want an answer, and don't want to learn, then this site is not for you.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 3 at 9:40




Please study our guide for new askers. Copy/pasting a homework assignment will not be received well. Make the question focused on a key concept, share your thoughts, or give other context (what related pieces of theory have been covered recently). That way the answerers can give an answer that helps you learn (rather than one that zips over your head). If you just want an answer, and don't want to learn, then this site is not for you.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 3 at 9:40










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













Hint: try with



$$ (x+ay+b)(x+cy+d)= x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$$



Since this should be true for all $x,y$ you can put different values of $x,y$ into to calculate $a,b,c,d$. You should get a system of 4 equation.



Say for $y=0$ we get $$(x+b)(x+d)= x^2+3x+4$$
which should be true for all (real) $x$, but this is imposible since the discrimanant is $-7$. So you can't factor this expression (in real).






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Compute the determinant
    $$
    detbeginbmatrix
    1 & -3 & 3/2 \
    -3 & 1 & -3/2 \
    3/2 & -3/2 & 4
    endbmatrix=-23
    $$
    Since the determinant is nonzero, the polynomial represents a nondegenerate conic, so it is irreducible.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • is not it the quadratic form in $(x,y)$, so is not the determinant $beginvmatrix1&-3\-3&1endvmatrix=-8ne 0$? Though the result is the same.
      – farruhota
      Sep 3 at 10:28










    • @farruhota No, that determinant is $0$ when the conic is a parabola (degenerate or not).
      – egreg
      Sep 3 at 10:38






    • 1




      @farruhota You can't use just only the coefficients of the quadratic terms in $x$ and $y$. For example, $x^2-y^2$ is reducible, but the determinant of $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix$ is $-1neq 0$.
      – Batominovski
      Sep 3 at 10:44











    • @Batominovski, thank you, indeed, here it states "discriminant of non-homogenous form determines the parabola, ellipse or hyperbola", while "discriminant of homogenized form determines the non-degenerate or degenerate", so the given is non-degenerate hyperbola.
      – farruhota
      Sep 3 at 11:25

















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    You cannot factor $f(x,y):=x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$ over $mathbbQ$, $mathbbR$, or $mathbbC$. If the base field is $mathbbQ$ or $mathbbR$, then the answer by greedoid covers it. We now assume that the base field is $mathbbC$ (or any algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$).



    To show that $f(x,y)$ is an irreducible element of $mathbbC[x,y]$, you can first homogenize the polynomial with a dummy variable $z$ to get
    $$F(x,y,z)=x^2-6xy+y^2+3xz-3yz+4z^2inmathbbC[x,y,z],.$$
    Then,
    $$fracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=2x-6y+3z,,$$
    $$fracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=-6x+2y-3z,,$$
    and
    $$fracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=3x-3y+8z,.$$
    Thus, $dfracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=0$, $dfracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=0$, and $dfracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=0$ simultaneously if and only if $(x,y,z)=(0,0,0)$. From this link, we conclude that $F(x,y,z)$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, and so is $f(x,y)$.




    It can be shown that $f(x,y)$ is reducible over a given base field $K$ if and only if $textchar(K)=2$ or $textchar(K)=23$. When $textchar(K)=2$, we have
    $$f(x,y)=(x+y),(x+y+1),.$$
    When $textchar(K)=23$, we have
    $$f(x,y)=(7x+y+8)(10x+y+12),.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Hint:



      Use the quadratic formula and treat $x$ as a constant. What you will get is a function with asymptotic behaviour, i.e., something like $xy=1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        4
        down vote













        Hint: try with



        $$ (x+ay+b)(x+cy+d)= x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$$



        Since this should be true for all $x,y$ you can put different values of $x,y$ into to calculate $a,b,c,d$. You should get a system of 4 equation.



        Say for $y=0$ we get $$(x+b)(x+d)= x^2+3x+4$$
        which should be true for all (real) $x$, but this is imposible since the discrimanant is $-7$. So you can't factor this expression (in real).






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Hint: try with



          $$ (x+ay+b)(x+cy+d)= x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$$



          Since this should be true for all $x,y$ you can put different values of $x,y$ into to calculate $a,b,c,d$. You should get a system of 4 equation.



          Say for $y=0$ we get $$(x+b)(x+d)= x^2+3x+4$$
          which should be true for all (real) $x$, but this is imposible since the discrimanant is $-7$. So you can't factor this expression (in real).






          share|cite|improve this answer
























            up vote
            4
            down vote










            up vote
            4
            down vote









            Hint: try with



            $$ (x+ay+b)(x+cy+d)= x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$$



            Since this should be true for all $x,y$ you can put different values of $x,y$ into to calculate $a,b,c,d$. You should get a system of 4 equation.



            Say for $y=0$ we get $$(x+b)(x+d)= x^2+3x+4$$
            which should be true for all (real) $x$, but this is imposible since the discrimanant is $-7$. So you can't factor this expression (in real).






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Hint: try with



            $$ (x+ay+b)(x+cy+d)= x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$$



            Since this should be true for all $x,y$ you can put different values of $x,y$ into to calculate $a,b,c,d$. You should get a system of 4 equation.



            Say for $y=0$ we get $$(x+b)(x+d)= x^2+3x+4$$
            which should be true for all (real) $x$, but this is imposible since the discrimanant is $-7$. So you can't factor this expression (in real).







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Sep 3 at 9:26

























            answered Sep 3 at 9:14









            greedoid

            28.1k93776




            28.1k93776




















                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Compute the determinant
                $$
                detbeginbmatrix
                1 & -3 & 3/2 \
                -3 & 1 & -3/2 \
                3/2 & -3/2 & 4
                endbmatrix=-23
                $$
                Since the determinant is nonzero, the polynomial represents a nondegenerate conic, so it is irreducible.






                share|cite|improve this answer




















                • is not it the quadratic form in $(x,y)$, so is not the determinant $beginvmatrix1&-3\-3&1endvmatrix=-8ne 0$? Though the result is the same.
                  – farruhota
                  Sep 3 at 10:28










                • @farruhota No, that determinant is $0$ when the conic is a parabola (degenerate or not).
                  – egreg
                  Sep 3 at 10:38






                • 1




                  @farruhota You can't use just only the coefficients of the quadratic terms in $x$ and $y$. For example, $x^2-y^2$ is reducible, but the determinant of $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix$ is $-1neq 0$.
                  – Batominovski
                  Sep 3 at 10:44











                • @Batominovski, thank you, indeed, here it states "discriminant of non-homogenous form determines the parabola, ellipse or hyperbola", while "discriminant of homogenized form determines the non-degenerate or degenerate", so the given is non-degenerate hyperbola.
                  – farruhota
                  Sep 3 at 11:25














                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Compute the determinant
                $$
                detbeginbmatrix
                1 & -3 & 3/2 \
                -3 & 1 & -3/2 \
                3/2 & -3/2 & 4
                endbmatrix=-23
                $$
                Since the determinant is nonzero, the polynomial represents a nondegenerate conic, so it is irreducible.






                share|cite|improve this answer




















                • is not it the quadratic form in $(x,y)$, so is not the determinant $beginvmatrix1&-3\-3&1endvmatrix=-8ne 0$? Though the result is the same.
                  – farruhota
                  Sep 3 at 10:28










                • @farruhota No, that determinant is $0$ when the conic is a parabola (degenerate or not).
                  – egreg
                  Sep 3 at 10:38






                • 1




                  @farruhota You can't use just only the coefficients of the quadratic terms in $x$ and $y$. For example, $x^2-y^2$ is reducible, but the determinant of $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix$ is $-1neq 0$.
                  – Batominovski
                  Sep 3 at 10:44











                • @Batominovski, thank you, indeed, here it states "discriminant of non-homogenous form determines the parabola, ellipse or hyperbola", while "discriminant of homogenized form determines the non-degenerate or degenerate", so the given is non-degenerate hyperbola.
                  – farruhota
                  Sep 3 at 11:25












                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                Compute the determinant
                $$
                detbeginbmatrix
                1 & -3 & 3/2 \
                -3 & 1 & -3/2 \
                3/2 & -3/2 & 4
                endbmatrix=-23
                $$
                Since the determinant is nonzero, the polynomial represents a nondegenerate conic, so it is irreducible.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Compute the determinant
                $$
                detbeginbmatrix
                1 & -3 & 3/2 \
                -3 & 1 & -3/2 \
                3/2 & -3/2 & 4
                endbmatrix=-23
                $$
                Since the determinant is nonzero, the polynomial represents a nondegenerate conic, so it is irreducible.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Sep 3 at 10:05









                egreg

                167k1180189




                167k1180189











                • is not it the quadratic form in $(x,y)$, so is not the determinant $beginvmatrix1&-3\-3&1endvmatrix=-8ne 0$? Though the result is the same.
                  – farruhota
                  Sep 3 at 10:28










                • @farruhota No, that determinant is $0$ when the conic is a parabola (degenerate or not).
                  – egreg
                  Sep 3 at 10:38






                • 1




                  @farruhota You can't use just only the coefficients of the quadratic terms in $x$ and $y$. For example, $x^2-y^2$ is reducible, but the determinant of $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix$ is $-1neq 0$.
                  – Batominovski
                  Sep 3 at 10:44











                • @Batominovski, thank you, indeed, here it states "discriminant of non-homogenous form determines the parabola, ellipse or hyperbola", while "discriminant of homogenized form determines the non-degenerate or degenerate", so the given is non-degenerate hyperbola.
                  – farruhota
                  Sep 3 at 11:25
















                • is not it the quadratic form in $(x,y)$, so is not the determinant $beginvmatrix1&-3\-3&1endvmatrix=-8ne 0$? Though the result is the same.
                  – farruhota
                  Sep 3 at 10:28










                • @farruhota No, that determinant is $0$ when the conic is a parabola (degenerate or not).
                  – egreg
                  Sep 3 at 10:38






                • 1




                  @farruhota You can't use just only the coefficients of the quadratic terms in $x$ and $y$. For example, $x^2-y^2$ is reducible, but the determinant of $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix$ is $-1neq 0$.
                  – Batominovski
                  Sep 3 at 10:44











                • @Batominovski, thank you, indeed, here it states "discriminant of non-homogenous form determines the parabola, ellipse or hyperbola", while "discriminant of homogenized form determines the non-degenerate or degenerate", so the given is non-degenerate hyperbola.
                  – farruhota
                  Sep 3 at 11:25















                is not it the quadratic form in $(x,y)$, so is not the determinant $beginvmatrix1&-3\-3&1endvmatrix=-8ne 0$? Though the result is the same.
                – farruhota
                Sep 3 at 10:28




                is not it the quadratic form in $(x,y)$, so is not the determinant $beginvmatrix1&-3\-3&1endvmatrix=-8ne 0$? Though the result is the same.
                – farruhota
                Sep 3 at 10:28












                @farruhota No, that determinant is $0$ when the conic is a parabola (degenerate or not).
                – egreg
                Sep 3 at 10:38




                @farruhota No, that determinant is $0$ when the conic is a parabola (degenerate or not).
                – egreg
                Sep 3 at 10:38




                1




                1




                @farruhota You can't use just only the coefficients of the quadratic terms in $x$ and $y$. For example, $x^2-y^2$ is reducible, but the determinant of $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix$ is $-1neq 0$.
                – Batominovski
                Sep 3 at 10:44





                @farruhota You can't use just only the coefficients of the quadratic terms in $x$ and $y$. For example, $x^2-y^2$ is reducible, but the determinant of $beginbmatrix1&0\0&-1endbmatrix$ is $-1neq 0$.
                – Batominovski
                Sep 3 at 10:44













                @Batominovski, thank you, indeed, here it states "discriminant of non-homogenous form determines the parabola, ellipse or hyperbola", while "discriminant of homogenized form determines the non-degenerate or degenerate", so the given is non-degenerate hyperbola.
                – farruhota
                Sep 3 at 11:25




                @Batominovski, thank you, indeed, here it states "discriminant of non-homogenous form determines the parabola, ellipse or hyperbola", while "discriminant of homogenized form determines the non-degenerate or degenerate", so the given is non-degenerate hyperbola.
                – farruhota
                Sep 3 at 11:25










                up vote
                2
                down vote













                You cannot factor $f(x,y):=x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$ over $mathbbQ$, $mathbbR$, or $mathbbC$. If the base field is $mathbbQ$ or $mathbbR$, then the answer by greedoid covers it. We now assume that the base field is $mathbbC$ (or any algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$).



                To show that $f(x,y)$ is an irreducible element of $mathbbC[x,y]$, you can first homogenize the polynomial with a dummy variable $z$ to get
                $$F(x,y,z)=x^2-6xy+y^2+3xz-3yz+4z^2inmathbbC[x,y,z],.$$
                Then,
                $$fracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=2x-6y+3z,,$$
                $$fracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=-6x+2y-3z,,$$
                and
                $$fracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=3x-3y+8z,.$$
                Thus, $dfracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=0$, $dfracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=0$, and $dfracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=0$ simultaneously if and only if $(x,y,z)=(0,0,0)$. From this link, we conclude that $F(x,y,z)$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, and so is $f(x,y)$.




                It can be shown that $f(x,y)$ is reducible over a given base field $K$ if and only if $textchar(K)=2$ or $textchar(K)=23$. When $textchar(K)=2$, we have
                $$f(x,y)=(x+y),(x+y+1),.$$
                When $textchar(K)=23$, we have
                $$f(x,y)=(7x+y+8)(10x+y+12),.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  You cannot factor $f(x,y):=x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$ over $mathbbQ$, $mathbbR$, or $mathbbC$. If the base field is $mathbbQ$ or $mathbbR$, then the answer by greedoid covers it. We now assume that the base field is $mathbbC$ (or any algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$).



                  To show that $f(x,y)$ is an irreducible element of $mathbbC[x,y]$, you can first homogenize the polynomial with a dummy variable $z$ to get
                  $$F(x,y,z)=x^2-6xy+y^2+3xz-3yz+4z^2inmathbbC[x,y,z],.$$
                  Then,
                  $$fracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=2x-6y+3z,,$$
                  $$fracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=-6x+2y-3z,,$$
                  and
                  $$fracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=3x-3y+8z,.$$
                  Thus, $dfracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=0$, $dfracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=0$, and $dfracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=0$ simultaneously if and only if $(x,y,z)=(0,0,0)$. From this link, we conclude that $F(x,y,z)$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, and so is $f(x,y)$.




                  It can be shown that $f(x,y)$ is reducible over a given base field $K$ if and only if $textchar(K)=2$ or $textchar(K)=23$. When $textchar(K)=2$, we have
                  $$f(x,y)=(x+y),(x+y+1),.$$
                  When $textchar(K)=23$, we have
                  $$f(x,y)=(7x+y+8)(10x+y+12),.$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote









                    You cannot factor $f(x,y):=x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$ over $mathbbQ$, $mathbbR$, or $mathbbC$. If the base field is $mathbbQ$ or $mathbbR$, then the answer by greedoid covers it. We now assume that the base field is $mathbbC$ (or any algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$).



                    To show that $f(x,y)$ is an irreducible element of $mathbbC[x,y]$, you can first homogenize the polynomial with a dummy variable $z$ to get
                    $$F(x,y,z)=x^2-6xy+y^2+3xz-3yz+4z^2inmathbbC[x,y,z],.$$
                    Then,
                    $$fracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=2x-6y+3z,,$$
                    $$fracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=-6x+2y-3z,,$$
                    and
                    $$fracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=3x-3y+8z,.$$
                    Thus, $dfracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=0$, $dfracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=0$, and $dfracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=0$ simultaneously if and only if $(x,y,z)=(0,0,0)$. From this link, we conclude that $F(x,y,z)$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, and so is $f(x,y)$.




                    It can be shown that $f(x,y)$ is reducible over a given base field $K$ if and only if $textchar(K)=2$ or $textchar(K)=23$. When $textchar(K)=2$, we have
                    $$f(x,y)=(x+y),(x+y+1),.$$
                    When $textchar(K)=23$, we have
                    $$f(x,y)=(7x+y+8)(10x+y+12),.$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    You cannot factor $f(x,y):=x^2-6xy+y^2+3x-3y+4$ over $mathbbQ$, $mathbbR$, or $mathbbC$. If the base field is $mathbbQ$ or $mathbbR$, then the answer by greedoid covers it. We now assume that the base field is $mathbbC$ (or any algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$).



                    To show that $f(x,y)$ is an irreducible element of $mathbbC[x,y]$, you can first homogenize the polynomial with a dummy variable $z$ to get
                    $$F(x,y,z)=x^2-6xy+y^2+3xz-3yz+4z^2inmathbbC[x,y,z],.$$
                    Then,
                    $$fracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=2x-6y+3z,,$$
                    $$fracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=-6x+2y-3z,,$$
                    and
                    $$fracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=3x-3y+8z,.$$
                    Thus, $dfracpartial Fpartial x(x,y,z)=0$, $dfracpartial Fpartial y(x,y,z)=0$, and $dfracpartial Fpartial z(x,y,z)=0$ simultaneously if and only if $(x,y,z)=(0,0,0)$. From this link, we conclude that $F(x,y,z)$ is irreducible over $mathbbC$, and so is $f(x,y)$.




                    It can be shown that $f(x,y)$ is reducible over a given base field $K$ if and only if $textchar(K)=2$ or $textchar(K)=23$. When $textchar(K)=2$, we have
                    $$f(x,y)=(x+y),(x+y+1),.$$
                    When $textchar(K)=23$, we have
                    $$f(x,y)=(7x+y+8)(10x+y+12),.$$







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Sep 3 at 10:18

























                    answered Sep 3 at 9:57









                    Batominovski

                    25.7k22881




                    25.7k22881




















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Hint:



                        Use the quadratic formula and treat $x$ as a constant. What you will get is a function with asymptotic behaviour, i.e., something like $xy=1$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Hint:



                          Use the quadratic formula and treat $x$ as a constant. What you will get is a function with asymptotic behaviour, i.e., something like $xy=1$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            Hint:



                            Use the quadratic formula and treat $x$ as a constant. What you will get is a function with asymptotic behaviour, i.e., something like $xy=1$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            Hint:



                            Use the quadratic formula and treat $x$ as a constant. What you will get is a function with asymptotic behaviour, i.e., something like $xy=1$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Sep 3 at 9:24









                            cansomeonehelpmeout

                            5,5383830




                            5,5383830












                                這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                                Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                                Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?