Prove that $intlimits_0^infty,dfracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx=dfracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big)$ for all $kinmathbbR_ge0$.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
13
down vote

favorite
5












I found the following result (I apologize if this has been posted before, but I could not find anything here). I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Prove that $$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi2,Big(1-exp(-k)Big)=pi,expleft(-frack2right),sinhleft(frack2right),.$$




I am especially interested in a solution not using complex analysis. However, a complex-analytic solution that is different from mine is very welcome as well. I have three approaches, but all of them end up using complex analysis as a major part.



We also have this very nice consequence. This result can be proven on its own without knowing the integral $displaystyle int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx$.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Then,
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x^2,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi2,big(k-1+exp(-k)big),.$$
Equivalently,
$$int_0^infty,fracsin^2(kx)x^2,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi4,big(2k-1+exp(-2k)big),.$$




Interestingly, during my quest to obtain this integral, I discovered two more integral relations, although I do not know how to obtain the exact values of any of them. The exact values of these integrals involve the exponential integral $textEi$, where $textEi(x)=displaystyletextPVint_-infty^x,fracexp(t)t,textdt$ for all $xinmathbbR$. Both of the results below also came from contour integrations.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Then,
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=-frac2pi,int_0^infty,fracln(x),sin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx,.$$
and
$$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x^2+1,textdx=-frac2pi,int_0^infty,fracln(x),cos(kx)x^2+1,textdx,.$$




Mathematica says that
$$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x^2+1,textdx=fracexp(-k),textEi(+k)-exp(+k),textEi(-k)2$$
and that
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=gamma+ln(k)-fracexp(-k),textEi(+k)+exp(+k),textEi(-k)2,.$$
Here, $gammaapprox 0.57722$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.




Approach I.




Consider the meromorphic function $f(z):=dfracexp(textikz)z(z^2+1)$ for all $zin mathbbCsetminus 0,-texti,+texti$. For $epsilonin(0,1)$, let $C_epsilon$ be the positively oriented contour $$left[+epsilon,+frac1epsilonright]cup Biggl,thetain[0,pi]Biggrcupleft[-frac1epsilon,-epsilonright]cup Big,thetain[pi,0]Big,.$$ Write $Gamma_r$ for the positively-oriented (with respect to $0$) semicircle $Bigr,exp(textitheta),Big$ for every $r>0$. We have $$I(k):=limlimits_epsilonto 0^+,oint_C_epsilon,f(z),textdz=2pitexti,textRes_z=textibig(f(z)big)=-pitexti,exp(-k),.$$ Now, note that $$lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_epsilon,f(z),textdz=pitextitext and lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_frac1epsilon,f(z),textdz=0,.$$ Because $$I(k)=int_0^infty,fracexp(+textikx)-exp(-textikx)x(x^2+1),textdx-lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_epsilon,f(z),textdz+lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_frac1epsilon,f(z),textdz,,$$ we see that $$I(k)=2texti,int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx-pitexti,.$$ The result follows immediately.







Approach II.




We apply Richard Feynman's integral trick. First, define $J(k)$ to be the required integral: $$J(k):=int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx,.$$ Thus, by the Leibniz Integral Rule, we have $J'(k)=displaystyle int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx$. Let $g(z):=dfracexp(textikz)z^2+1$ for all $zinmathbbCsetminus-texti,+texti$. It follows that $$lim_epsilonto0^+,oint_C_epsilon,g(z),textdz=2,int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx,,$$ where $C_epsilon$ is the positively oriented contour $$left[+epsilon,+frac1epsilonright]cup Biggl,thetain[0,pi]Biggrcupleft[-frac1epsilon,-epsilonright]cup Big,thetain[pi,0]Bigtext for epsilonin(0,1),.$$ Furthermore, we have $$oint_C_epsilon,g(z),textdz=2pitexti,textRes_z=textibig(g(z)big)=pi,exp(-k)text for all epsilonin(0,1)$$ Ergo, $J'(k)=displaystyleint_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx=dfracpi2,exp(-k)$. Since $J(0)=0$, $$J(k)=int_0^k,J'(t),textdt=fracpi2,int_0^k,exp(-t),textdt=fracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big),.$$







Approach III.




It is easy to see that $dfracsin(t)t=displaystylefrac12,int_-1^+1,exp(textittau),textdtau$ for all $tneq 0$. That is, the required integral is given by $$beginalignJ(k):=int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx&=frac12,int_0^infty,frackx^2+1,int_-1^+1,exp(textikxt),textdt,textdx\&=frac12,int_-infty^+infty,frackx^2+1,int_0^1,exp(textikxt),textdt,textdx,.endalign$$ Using Fubini's Theorem, we obtain $$J(k)=frac12,int_0^1,k,int_-infty^+infty,fracexp(textikxt)x^2+1,textdx,textdt,.$$
For a real number $R>1$, let $gamma_R$ be the positively oriented contour $$[-R,+R]cupbig,thetain[0,2pi]big,.$$ Then, for $omega geq 0$, we have $$lim_Rtoinfty,oint_gamma_R,fracexp(textiomega z)z^2+1,textdz=int_-infty^+infty,fracexp(textiomega x)x^2+1,textdx=:K(omega),.$$ Ergo, $$K(omega)=2pitexti,textRes_z=textileft(fracexp(textiomega z)z^2+1right)=2pitexti,left(fracexp(-omega)2textiright)=pi,exp(-omega),.$$ As $displaystyle J(k)=frac12,int_0^1,k,K(kt),textdt$, we conclude that $$J(k)=fracpi2,int_0^1,k,exp(-kt),textdt=fracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big),.$$ From this proof, we also obtain $$int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx=frac12,K(k)=fracpi2,exp(-k),.$$





P.S. I put my solutions in spoilers for people who want to try to solve the problem without being led on by my attempts. If you do not want to waste your time doing what I have already done, then please look at the spoilers. All of the solutions in the spoilers are complex-analytic proofs anyhow, so if you are giving me a real-analytic proof, then there is no way you are going to replicate my work.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 3




    "I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration." > tags contour-integration
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 2 at 19:20







  • 2




    @KennyLau Because my solutions involve contour integration.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:20






  • 2




    Spoilers aren't helpful at all in a question. After all, you are looking for solutions other than the approaches you've taken, right? So why play games and hide them behind spoilers?
    – amWhy
    Aug 2 at 19:21







  • 2




    @amWhy Because some people might not want to see a solution. In cases like this, seeing a solution can corrupt one's imagination.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:22







  • 3




    @amWhy The spoilers are for someone who wants to work on this problem without knowing a solution beforehand. I like attacking problems on my own, and believe many people like that too. If you don't want to waste your time, you are welcome to look at the spoilers.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:25















up vote
13
down vote

favorite
5












I found the following result (I apologize if this has been posted before, but I could not find anything here). I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Prove that $$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi2,Big(1-exp(-k)Big)=pi,expleft(-frack2right),sinhleft(frack2right),.$$




I am especially interested in a solution not using complex analysis. However, a complex-analytic solution that is different from mine is very welcome as well. I have three approaches, but all of them end up using complex analysis as a major part.



We also have this very nice consequence. This result can be proven on its own without knowing the integral $displaystyle int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx$.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Then,
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x^2,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi2,big(k-1+exp(-k)big),.$$
Equivalently,
$$int_0^infty,fracsin^2(kx)x^2,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi4,big(2k-1+exp(-2k)big),.$$




Interestingly, during my quest to obtain this integral, I discovered two more integral relations, although I do not know how to obtain the exact values of any of them. The exact values of these integrals involve the exponential integral $textEi$, where $textEi(x)=displaystyletextPVint_-infty^x,fracexp(t)t,textdt$ for all $xinmathbbR$. Both of the results below also came from contour integrations.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Then,
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=-frac2pi,int_0^infty,fracln(x),sin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx,.$$
and
$$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x^2+1,textdx=-frac2pi,int_0^infty,fracln(x),cos(kx)x^2+1,textdx,.$$




Mathematica says that
$$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x^2+1,textdx=fracexp(-k),textEi(+k)-exp(+k),textEi(-k)2$$
and that
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=gamma+ln(k)-fracexp(-k),textEi(+k)+exp(+k),textEi(-k)2,.$$
Here, $gammaapprox 0.57722$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.




Approach I.




Consider the meromorphic function $f(z):=dfracexp(textikz)z(z^2+1)$ for all $zin mathbbCsetminus 0,-texti,+texti$. For $epsilonin(0,1)$, let $C_epsilon$ be the positively oriented contour $$left[+epsilon,+frac1epsilonright]cup Biggl,thetain[0,pi]Biggrcupleft[-frac1epsilon,-epsilonright]cup Big,thetain[pi,0]Big,.$$ Write $Gamma_r$ for the positively-oriented (with respect to $0$) semicircle $Bigr,exp(textitheta),Big$ for every $r>0$. We have $$I(k):=limlimits_epsilonto 0^+,oint_C_epsilon,f(z),textdz=2pitexti,textRes_z=textibig(f(z)big)=-pitexti,exp(-k),.$$ Now, note that $$lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_epsilon,f(z),textdz=pitextitext and lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_frac1epsilon,f(z),textdz=0,.$$ Because $$I(k)=int_0^infty,fracexp(+textikx)-exp(-textikx)x(x^2+1),textdx-lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_epsilon,f(z),textdz+lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_frac1epsilon,f(z),textdz,,$$ we see that $$I(k)=2texti,int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx-pitexti,.$$ The result follows immediately.







Approach II.




We apply Richard Feynman's integral trick. First, define $J(k)$ to be the required integral: $$J(k):=int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx,.$$ Thus, by the Leibniz Integral Rule, we have $J'(k)=displaystyle int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx$. Let $g(z):=dfracexp(textikz)z^2+1$ for all $zinmathbbCsetminus-texti,+texti$. It follows that $$lim_epsilonto0^+,oint_C_epsilon,g(z),textdz=2,int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx,,$$ where $C_epsilon$ is the positively oriented contour $$left[+epsilon,+frac1epsilonright]cup Biggl,thetain[0,pi]Biggrcupleft[-frac1epsilon,-epsilonright]cup Big,thetain[pi,0]Bigtext for epsilonin(0,1),.$$ Furthermore, we have $$oint_C_epsilon,g(z),textdz=2pitexti,textRes_z=textibig(g(z)big)=pi,exp(-k)text for all epsilonin(0,1)$$ Ergo, $J'(k)=displaystyleint_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx=dfracpi2,exp(-k)$. Since $J(0)=0$, $$J(k)=int_0^k,J'(t),textdt=fracpi2,int_0^k,exp(-t),textdt=fracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big),.$$







Approach III.




It is easy to see that $dfracsin(t)t=displaystylefrac12,int_-1^+1,exp(textittau),textdtau$ for all $tneq 0$. That is, the required integral is given by $$beginalignJ(k):=int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx&=frac12,int_0^infty,frackx^2+1,int_-1^+1,exp(textikxt),textdt,textdx\&=frac12,int_-infty^+infty,frackx^2+1,int_0^1,exp(textikxt),textdt,textdx,.endalign$$ Using Fubini's Theorem, we obtain $$J(k)=frac12,int_0^1,k,int_-infty^+infty,fracexp(textikxt)x^2+1,textdx,textdt,.$$
For a real number $R>1$, let $gamma_R$ be the positively oriented contour $$[-R,+R]cupbig,thetain[0,2pi]big,.$$ Then, for $omega geq 0$, we have $$lim_Rtoinfty,oint_gamma_R,fracexp(textiomega z)z^2+1,textdz=int_-infty^+infty,fracexp(textiomega x)x^2+1,textdx=:K(omega),.$$ Ergo, $$K(omega)=2pitexti,textRes_z=textileft(fracexp(textiomega z)z^2+1right)=2pitexti,left(fracexp(-omega)2textiright)=pi,exp(-omega),.$$ As $displaystyle J(k)=frac12,int_0^1,k,K(kt),textdt$, we conclude that $$J(k)=fracpi2,int_0^1,k,exp(-kt),textdt=fracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big),.$$ From this proof, we also obtain $$int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx=frac12,K(k)=fracpi2,exp(-k),.$$





P.S. I put my solutions in spoilers for people who want to try to solve the problem without being led on by my attempts. If you do not want to waste your time doing what I have already done, then please look at the spoilers. All of the solutions in the spoilers are complex-analytic proofs anyhow, so if you are giving me a real-analytic proof, then there is no way you are going to replicate my work.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 3




    "I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration." > tags contour-integration
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 2 at 19:20







  • 2




    @KennyLau Because my solutions involve contour integration.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:20






  • 2




    Spoilers aren't helpful at all in a question. After all, you are looking for solutions other than the approaches you've taken, right? So why play games and hide them behind spoilers?
    – amWhy
    Aug 2 at 19:21







  • 2




    @amWhy Because some people might not want to see a solution. In cases like this, seeing a solution can corrupt one's imagination.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:22







  • 3




    @amWhy The spoilers are for someone who wants to work on this problem without knowing a solution beforehand. I like attacking problems on my own, and believe many people like that too. If you don't want to waste your time, you are welcome to look at the spoilers.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:25













up vote
13
down vote

favorite
5









up vote
13
down vote

favorite
5






5





I found the following result (I apologize if this has been posted before, but I could not find anything here). I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Prove that $$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi2,Big(1-exp(-k)Big)=pi,expleft(-frack2right),sinhleft(frack2right),.$$




I am especially interested in a solution not using complex analysis. However, a complex-analytic solution that is different from mine is very welcome as well. I have three approaches, but all of them end up using complex analysis as a major part.



We also have this very nice consequence. This result can be proven on its own without knowing the integral $displaystyle int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx$.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Then,
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x^2,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi2,big(k-1+exp(-k)big),.$$
Equivalently,
$$int_0^infty,fracsin^2(kx)x^2,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi4,big(2k-1+exp(-2k)big),.$$




Interestingly, during my quest to obtain this integral, I discovered two more integral relations, although I do not know how to obtain the exact values of any of them. The exact values of these integrals involve the exponential integral $textEi$, where $textEi(x)=displaystyletextPVint_-infty^x,fracexp(t)t,textdt$ for all $xinmathbbR$. Both of the results below also came from contour integrations.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Then,
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=-frac2pi,int_0^infty,fracln(x),sin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx,.$$
and
$$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x^2+1,textdx=-frac2pi,int_0^infty,fracln(x),cos(kx)x^2+1,textdx,.$$




Mathematica says that
$$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x^2+1,textdx=fracexp(-k),textEi(+k)-exp(+k),textEi(-k)2$$
and that
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=gamma+ln(k)-fracexp(-k),textEi(+k)+exp(+k),textEi(-k)2,.$$
Here, $gammaapprox 0.57722$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.




Approach I.




Consider the meromorphic function $f(z):=dfracexp(textikz)z(z^2+1)$ for all $zin mathbbCsetminus 0,-texti,+texti$. For $epsilonin(0,1)$, let $C_epsilon$ be the positively oriented contour $$left[+epsilon,+frac1epsilonright]cup Biggl,thetain[0,pi]Biggrcupleft[-frac1epsilon,-epsilonright]cup Big,thetain[pi,0]Big,.$$ Write $Gamma_r$ for the positively-oriented (with respect to $0$) semicircle $Bigr,exp(textitheta),Big$ for every $r>0$. We have $$I(k):=limlimits_epsilonto 0^+,oint_C_epsilon,f(z),textdz=2pitexti,textRes_z=textibig(f(z)big)=-pitexti,exp(-k),.$$ Now, note that $$lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_epsilon,f(z),textdz=pitextitext and lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_frac1epsilon,f(z),textdz=0,.$$ Because $$I(k)=int_0^infty,fracexp(+textikx)-exp(-textikx)x(x^2+1),textdx-lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_epsilon,f(z),textdz+lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_frac1epsilon,f(z),textdz,,$$ we see that $$I(k)=2texti,int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx-pitexti,.$$ The result follows immediately.







Approach II.




We apply Richard Feynman's integral trick. First, define $J(k)$ to be the required integral: $$J(k):=int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx,.$$ Thus, by the Leibniz Integral Rule, we have $J'(k)=displaystyle int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx$. Let $g(z):=dfracexp(textikz)z^2+1$ for all $zinmathbbCsetminus-texti,+texti$. It follows that $$lim_epsilonto0^+,oint_C_epsilon,g(z),textdz=2,int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx,,$$ where $C_epsilon$ is the positively oriented contour $$left[+epsilon,+frac1epsilonright]cup Biggl,thetain[0,pi]Biggrcupleft[-frac1epsilon,-epsilonright]cup Big,thetain[pi,0]Bigtext for epsilonin(0,1),.$$ Furthermore, we have $$oint_C_epsilon,g(z),textdz=2pitexti,textRes_z=textibig(g(z)big)=pi,exp(-k)text for all epsilonin(0,1)$$ Ergo, $J'(k)=displaystyleint_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx=dfracpi2,exp(-k)$. Since $J(0)=0$, $$J(k)=int_0^k,J'(t),textdt=fracpi2,int_0^k,exp(-t),textdt=fracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big),.$$







Approach III.




It is easy to see that $dfracsin(t)t=displaystylefrac12,int_-1^+1,exp(textittau),textdtau$ for all $tneq 0$. That is, the required integral is given by $$beginalignJ(k):=int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx&=frac12,int_0^infty,frackx^2+1,int_-1^+1,exp(textikxt),textdt,textdx\&=frac12,int_-infty^+infty,frackx^2+1,int_0^1,exp(textikxt),textdt,textdx,.endalign$$ Using Fubini's Theorem, we obtain $$J(k)=frac12,int_0^1,k,int_-infty^+infty,fracexp(textikxt)x^2+1,textdx,textdt,.$$
For a real number $R>1$, let $gamma_R$ be the positively oriented contour $$[-R,+R]cupbig,thetain[0,2pi]big,.$$ Then, for $omega geq 0$, we have $$lim_Rtoinfty,oint_gamma_R,fracexp(textiomega z)z^2+1,textdz=int_-infty^+infty,fracexp(textiomega x)x^2+1,textdx=:K(omega),.$$ Ergo, $$K(omega)=2pitexti,textRes_z=textileft(fracexp(textiomega z)z^2+1right)=2pitexti,left(fracexp(-omega)2textiright)=pi,exp(-omega),.$$ As $displaystyle J(k)=frac12,int_0^1,k,K(kt),textdt$, we conclude that $$J(k)=fracpi2,int_0^1,k,exp(-kt),textdt=fracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big),.$$ From this proof, we also obtain $$int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx=frac12,K(k)=fracpi2,exp(-k),.$$





P.S. I put my solutions in spoilers for people who want to try to solve the problem without being led on by my attempts. If you do not want to waste your time doing what I have already done, then please look at the spoilers. All of the solutions in the spoilers are complex-analytic proofs anyhow, so if you are giving me a real-analytic proof, then there is no way you are going to replicate my work.










share|cite|improve this question















I found the following result (I apologize if this has been posted before, but I could not find anything here). I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Prove that $$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi2,Big(1-exp(-k)Big)=pi,expleft(-frack2right),sinhleft(frack2right),.$$




I am especially interested in a solution not using complex analysis. However, a complex-analytic solution that is different from mine is very welcome as well. I have three approaches, but all of them end up using complex analysis as a major part.



We also have this very nice consequence. This result can be proven on its own without knowing the integral $displaystyle int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx$.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Then,
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x^2,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi2,big(k-1+exp(-k)big),.$$
Equivalently,
$$int_0^infty,fracsin^2(kx)x^2,left(x^2+1right),textdx=fracpi4,big(2k-1+exp(-2k)big),.$$




Interestingly, during my quest to obtain this integral, I discovered two more integral relations, although I do not know how to obtain the exact values of any of them. The exact values of these integrals involve the exponential integral $textEi$, where $textEi(x)=displaystyletextPVint_-infty^x,fracexp(t)t,textdt$ for all $xinmathbbR$. Both of the results below also came from contour integrations.




Let $k$ be a nonnegative real number. Then,
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=-frac2pi,int_0^infty,fracln(x),sin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx,.$$
and
$$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x^2+1,textdx=-frac2pi,int_0^infty,fracln(x),cos(kx)x^2+1,textdx,.$$




Mathematica says that
$$int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x^2+1,textdx=fracexp(-k),textEi(+k)-exp(+k),textEi(-k)2$$
and that
$$int_0^infty,frac1-cos(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx=gamma+ln(k)-fracexp(-k),textEi(+k)+exp(+k),textEi(-k)2,.$$
Here, $gammaapprox 0.57722$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.




Approach I.




Consider the meromorphic function $f(z):=dfracexp(textikz)z(z^2+1)$ for all $zin mathbbCsetminus 0,-texti,+texti$. For $epsilonin(0,1)$, let $C_epsilon$ be the positively oriented contour $$left[+epsilon,+frac1epsilonright]cup Biggl,thetain[0,pi]Biggrcupleft[-frac1epsilon,-epsilonright]cup Big,thetain[pi,0]Big,.$$ Write $Gamma_r$ for the positively-oriented (with respect to $0$) semicircle $Bigr,exp(textitheta),Big$ for every $r>0$. We have $$I(k):=limlimits_epsilonto 0^+,oint_C_epsilon,f(z),textdz=2pitexti,textRes_z=textibig(f(z)big)=-pitexti,exp(-k),.$$ Now, note that $$lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_epsilon,f(z),textdz=pitextitext and lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_frac1epsilon,f(z),textdz=0,.$$ Because $$I(k)=int_0^infty,fracexp(+textikx)-exp(-textikx)x(x^2+1),textdx-lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_epsilon,f(z),textdz+lim_epsilonto0^+,int_Gamma_frac1epsilon,f(z),textdz,,$$ we see that $$I(k)=2texti,int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx-pitexti,.$$ The result follows immediately.







Approach II.




We apply Richard Feynman's integral trick. First, define $J(k)$ to be the required integral: $$J(k):=int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),textdx,.$$ Thus, by the Leibniz Integral Rule, we have $J'(k)=displaystyle int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx$. Let $g(z):=dfracexp(textikz)z^2+1$ for all $zinmathbbCsetminus-texti,+texti$. It follows that $$lim_epsilonto0^+,oint_C_epsilon,g(z),textdz=2,int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx,,$$ where $C_epsilon$ is the positively oriented contour $$left[+epsilon,+frac1epsilonright]cup Biggl,thetain[0,pi]Biggrcupleft[-frac1epsilon,-epsilonright]cup Big,thetain[pi,0]Bigtext for epsilonin(0,1),.$$ Furthermore, we have $$oint_C_epsilon,g(z),textdz=2pitexti,textRes_z=textibig(g(z)big)=pi,exp(-k)text for all epsilonin(0,1)$$ Ergo, $J'(k)=displaystyleint_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx=dfracpi2,exp(-k)$. Since $J(0)=0$, $$J(k)=int_0^k,J'(t),textdt=fracpi2,int_0^k,exp(-t),textdt=fracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big),.$$







Approach III.




It is easy to see that $dfracsin(t)t=displaystylefrac12,int_-1^+1,exp(textittau),textdtau$ for all $tneq 0$. That is, the required integral is given by $$beginalignJ(k):=int_0^infty,fracsin(kx)x,left(x^2+1right),textdx&=frac12,int_0^infty,frackx^2+1,int_-1^+1,exp(textikxt),textdt,textdx\&=frac12,int_-infty^+infty,frackx^2+1,int_0^1,exp(textikxt),textdt,textdx,.endalign$$ Using Fubini's Theorem, we obtain $$J(k)=frac12,int_0^1,k,int_-infty^+infty,fracexp(textikxt)x^2+1,textdx,textdt,.$$
For a real number $R>1$, let $gamma_R$ be the positively oriented contour $$[-R,+R]cupbig,thetain[0,2pi]big,.$$ Then, for $omega geq 0$, we have $$lim_Rtoinfty,oint_gamma_R,fracexp(textiomega z)z^2+1,textdz=int_-infty^+infty,fracexp(textiomega x)x^2+1,textdx=:K(omega),.$$ Ergo, $$K(omega)=2pitexti,textRes_z=textileft(fracexp(textiomega z)z^2+1right)=2pitexti,left(fracexp(-omega)2textiright)=pi,exp(-omega),.$$ As $displaystyle J(k)=frac12,int_0^1,k,K(kt),textdt$, we conclude that $$J(k)=fracpi2,int_0^1,k,exp(-kt),textdt=fracpi2,big(1-exp(-k)big),.$$ From this proof, we also obtain $$int_0^infty,fraccos(kx)x^2+1,textdx=frac12,K(k)=fracpi2,exp(-k),.$$





P.S. I put my solutions in spoilers for people who want to try to solve the problem without being led on by my attempts. If you do not want to waste your time doing what I have already done, then please look at the spoilers. All of the solutions in the spoilers are complex-analytic proofs anyhow, so if you are giving me a real-analytic proof, then there is no way you are going to replicate my work.







real-analysis integration definite-integrals improper-integrals contour-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 3 at 9:37

























asked Aug 2 at 19:19









Batominovski

25.7k22881




25.7k22881







  • 3




    "I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration." > tags contour-integration
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 2 at 19:20







  • 2




    @KennyLau Because my solutions involve contour integration.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:20






  • 2




    Spoilers aren't helpful at all in a question. After all, you are looking for solutions other than the approaches you've taken, right? So why play games and hide them behind spoilers?
    – amWhy
    Aug 2 at 19:21







  • 2




    @amWhy Because some people might not want to see a solution. In cases like this, seeing a solution can corrupt one's imagination.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:22







  • 3




    @amWhy The spoilers are for someone who wants to work on this problem without knowing a solution beforehand. I like attacking problems on my own, and believe many people like that too. If you don't want to waste your time, you are welcome to look at the spoilers.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:25













  • 3




    "I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration." > tags contour-integration
    – Kenny Lau
    Aug 2 at 19:20







  • 2




    @KennyLau Because my solutions involve contour integration.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:20






  • 2




    Spoilers aren't helpful at all in a question. After all, you are looking for solutions other than the approaches you've taken, right? So why play games and hide them behind spoilers?
    – amWhy
    Aug 2 at 19:21







  • 2




    @amWhy Because some people might not want to see a solution. In cases like this, seeing a solution can corrupt one's imagination.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:22







  • 3




    @amWhy The spoilers are for someone who wants to work on this problem without knowing a solution beforehand. I like attacking problems on my own, and believe many people like that too. If you don't want to waste your time, you are welcome to look at the spoilers.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 2 at 19:25








3




3




"I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration." > tags contour-integration
– Kenny Lau
Aug 2 at 19:20





"I am wondering whether there is an approach without using contour integration." > tags contour-integration
– Kenny Lau
Aug 2 at 19:20





2




2




@KennyLau Because my solutions involve contour integration.
– Batominovski
Aug 2 at 19:20




@KennyLau Because my solutions involve contour integration.
– Batominovski
Aug 2 at 19:20




2




2




Spoilers aren't helpful at all in a question. After all, you are looking for solutions other than the approaches you've taken, right? So why play games and hide them behind spoilers?
– amWhy
Aug 2 at 19:21





Spoilers aren't helpful at all in a question. After all, you are looking for solutions other than the approaches you've taken, right? So why play games and hide them behind spoilers?
– amWhy
Aug 2 at 19:21





2




2




@amWhy Because some people might not want to see a solution. In cases like this, seeing a solution can corrupt one's imagination.
– Batominovski
Aug 2 at 19:22





@amWhy Because some people might not want to see a solution. In cases like this, seeing a solution can corrupt one's imagination.
– Batominovski
Aug 2 at 19:22





3




3




@amWhy The spoilers are for someone who wants to work on this problem without knowing a solution beforehand. I like attacking problems on my own, and believe many people like that too. If you don't want to waste your time, you are welcome to look at the spoilers.
– Batominovski
Aug 2 at 19:25





@amWhy The spoilers are for someone who wants to work on this problem without knowing a solution beforehand. I like attacking problems on my own, and believe many people like that too. If you don't want to waste your time, you are welcome to look at the spoilers.
– Batominovski
Aug 2 at 19:25











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
11
down vote



accepted










HINT:



Let $f(k)$ be given by the integral



$$f(k) =int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx tag1$$



Inasmuch as the improper integral $int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx$ converges uniformly for $|k|ge delta>0$, we can differentiate twice under the integral in $(1)$ to reveal



$$f''(k)-f(k)=-fracpi2 textsgn(k)tag2$$



Solve $(2)$ subject to the initial conditions $f(0)=0$ and $f'(0)=fracpi2$.



NOTE:



$$int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx=int_0^infty frac(x^2+1-1)sin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x,dx-int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I will accept your answer eventually. I just want to wait a bit more. I want to see how many more solutions I can get. By the end of this week, I will accept the answer.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:10











  • @Batominovski Much appreciative.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:15










  • Many thanks for this great answer by the way. :D
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:16










  • You're welcome. It was a pleasure.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:17

















up vote
7
down vote













You can use a nice property of the Laplace transform to computer your integral:
$$int_0^infty f(x) g(x),dx=int_0^infty mathcalLf(x)(s),mathcalL^-1g(x)(s) ,ds$$
In your case, letting $f(x)=sin (kx)$ and $g(x)=frac1x(x^2+1)$, we can show that
beginalign
int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx &= kint_0^infty frac1-cos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-kint_0^infty fraccos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-frack2int_-infty^infty frace^isk^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2 - frack2 sqrt2pi ,mathcalFleftfrac1k^2+s^2right(omega)Biggr|_omega=1 \
&= fracpi2 - frack2sqrt2pi sqrtfracpi2 frace^-kk \
&=fracpi2-fracpi2e^-k \
&= fracpi2left(1-e^-kright)
endalign
Where we used the Fourier Transform.
Thus,
$$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=fracpi2left(1-e^-kright) quad textfor kinmathbbR^+$$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • If one is going to appeal to a FT table to arrive at a result, then why bother to begin with applying the LT integration by parts? Simply write $$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^k int_0^infty fraccos(k'x)x^2+1,dx,dk'$$
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 6 at 14:37











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870410%2fprove-that-int-limits-0-infty-dfrac-sinkxxx21-textdx-dfrac%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
11
down vote



accepted










HINT:



Let $f(k)$ be given by the integral



$$f(k) =int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx tag1$$



Inasmuch as the improper integral $int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx$ converges uniformly for $|k|ge delta>0$, we can differentiate twice under the integral in $(1)$ to reveal



$$f''(k)-f(k)=-fracpi2 textsgn(k)tag2$$



Solve $(2)$ subject to the initial conditions $f(0)=0$ and $f'(0)=fracpi2$.



NOTE:



$$int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx=int_0^infty frac(x^2+1-1)sin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x,dx-int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I will accept your answer eventually. I just want to wait a bit more. I want to see how many more solutions I can get. By the end of this week, I will accept the answer.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:10











  • @Batominovski Much appreciative.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:15










  • Many thanks for this great answer by the way. :D
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:16










  • You're welcome. It was a pleasure.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:17














up vote
11
down vote



accepted










HINT:



Let $f(k)$ be given by the integral



$$f(k) =int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx tag1$$



Inasmuch as the improper integral $int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx$ converges uniformly for $|k|ge delta>0$, we can differentiate twice under the integral in $(1)$ to reveal



$$f''(k)-f(k)=-fracpi2 textsgn(k)tag2$$



Solve $(2)$ subject to the initial conditions $f(0)=0$ and $f'(0)=fracpi2$.



NOTE:



$$int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx=int_0^infty frac(x^2+1-1)sin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x,dx-int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I will accept your answer eventually. I just want to wait a bit more. I want to see how many more solutions I can get. By the end of this week, I will accept the answer.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:10











  • @Batominovski Much appreciative.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:15










  • Many thanks for this great answer by the way. :D
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:16










  • You're welcome. It was a pleasure.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:17












up vote
11
down vote



accepted







up vote
11
down vote



accepted






HINT:



Let $f(k)$ be given by the integral



$$f(k) =int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx tag1$$



Inasmuch as the improper integral $int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx$ converges uniformly for $|k|ge delta>0$, we can differentiate twice under the integral in $(1)$ to reveal



$$f''(k)-f(k)=-fracpi2 textsgn(k)tag2$$



Solve $(2)$ subject to the initial conditions $f(0)=0$ and $f'(0)=fracpi2$.



NOTE:



$$int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx=int_0^infty frac(x^2+1-1)sin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x,dx-int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer














HINT:



Let $f(k)$ be given by the integral



$$f(k) =int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx tag1$$



Inasmuch as the improper integral $int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx$ converges uniformly for $|k|ge delta>0$, we can differentiate twice under the integral in $(1)$ to reveal



$$f''(k)-f(k)=-fracpi2 textsgn(k)tag2$$



Solve $(2)$ subject to the initial conditions $f(0)=0$ and $f'(0)=fracpi2$.



NOTE:



$$int_0^infty fracxsin(kx)x^2+1,dx=int_0^infty frac(x^2+1-1)sin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x,dx-int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Aug 2 at 22:03

























answered Aug 2 at 19:55









Mark Viola

126k1172167




126k1172167











  • I will accept your answer eventually. I just want to wait a bit more. I want to see how many more solutions I can get. By the end of this week, I will accept the answer.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:10











  • @Batominovski Much appreciative.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:15










  • Many thanks for this great answer by the way. :D
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:16










  • You're welcome. It was a pleasure.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:17
















  • I will accept your answer eventually. I just want to wait a bit more. I want to see how many more solutions I can get. By the end of this week, I will accept the answer.
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:10











  • @Batominovski Much appreciative.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:15










  • Many thanks for this great answer by the way. :D
    – Batominovski
    Aug 7 at 16:16










  • You're welcome. It was a pleasure.
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 7 at 16:17















I will accept your answer eventually. I just want to wait a bit more. I want to see how many more solutions I can get. By the end of this week, I will accept the answer.
– Batominovski
Aug 7 at 16:10





I will accept your answer eventually. I just want to wait a bit more. I want to see how many more solutions I can get. By the end of this week, I will accept the answer.
– Batominovski
Aug 7 at 16:10













@Batominovski Much appreciative.
– Mark Viola
Aug 7 at 16:15




@Batominovski Much appreciative.
– Mark Viola
Aug 7 at 16:15












Many thanks for this great answer by the way. :D
– Batominovski
Aug 7 at 16:16




Many thanks for this great answer by the way. :D
– Batominovski
Aug 7 at 16:16












You're welcome. It was a pleasure.
– Mark Viola
Aug 7 at 16:17




You're welcome. It was a pleasure.
– Mark Viola
Aug 7 at 16:17










up vote
7
down vote













You can use a nice property of the Laplace transform to computer your integral:
$$int_0^infty f(x) g(x),dx=int_0^infty mathcalLf(x)(s),mathcalL^-1g(x)(s) ,ds$$
In your case, letting $f(x)=sin (kx)$ and $g(x)=frac1x(x^2+1)$, we can show that
beginalign
int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx &= kint_0^infty frac1-cos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-kint_0^infty fraccos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-frack2int_-infty^infty frace^isk^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2 - frack2 sqrt2pi ,mathcalFleftfrac1k^2+s^2right(omega)Biggr|_omega=1 \
&= fracpi2 - frack2sqrt2pi sqrtfracpi2 frace^-kk \
&=fracpi2-fracpi2e^-k \
&= fracpi2left(1-e^-kright)
endalign
Where we used the Fourier Transform.
Thus,
$$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=fracpi2left(1-e^-kright) quad textfor kinmathbbR^+$$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • If one is going to appeal to a FT table to arrive at a result, then why bother to begin with applying the LT integration by parts? Simply write $$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^k int_0^infty fraccos(k'x)x^2+1,dx,dk'$$
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 6 at 14:37















up vote
7
down vote













You can use a nice property of the Laplace transform to computer your integral:
$$int_0^infty f(x) g(x),dx=int_0^infty mathcalLf(x)(s),mathcalL^-1g(x)(s) ,ds$$
In your case, letting $f(x)=sin (kx)$ and $g(x)=frac1x(x^2+1)$, we can show that
beginalign
int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx &= kint_0^infty frac1-cos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-kint_0^infty fraccos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-frack2int_-infty^infty frace^isk^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2 - frack2 sqrt2pi ,mathcalFleftfrac1k^2+s^2right(omega)Biggr|_omega=1 \
&= fracpi2 - frack2sqrt2pi sqrtfracpi2 frace^-kk \
&=fracpi2-fracpi2e^-k \
&= fracpi2left(1-e^-kright)
endalign
Where we used the Fourier Transform.
Thus,
$$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=fracpi2left(1-e^-kright) quad textfor kinmathbbR^+$$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • If one is going to appeal to a FT table to arrive at a result, then why bother to begin with applying the LT integration by parts? Simply write $$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^k int_0^infty fraccos(k'x)x^2+1,dx,dk'$$
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 6 at 14:37













up vote
7
down vote










up vote
7
down vote









You can use a nice property of the Laplace transform to computer your integral:
$$int_0^infty f(x) g(x),dx=int_0^infty mathcalLf(x)(s),mathcalL^-1g(x)(s) ,ds$$
In your case, letting $f(x)=sin (kx)$ and $g(x)=frac1x(x^2+1)$, we can show that
beginalign
int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx &= kint_0^infty frac1-cos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-kint_0^infty fraccos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-frack2int_-infty^infty frace^isk^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2 - frack2 sqrt2pi ,mathcalFleftfrac1k^2+s^2right(omega)Biggr|_omega=1 \
&= fracpi2 - frack2sqrt2pi sqrtfracpi2 frace^-kk \
&=fracpi2-fracpi2e^-k \
&= fracpi2left(1-e^-kright)
endalign
Where we used the Fourier Transform.
Thus,
$$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=fracpi2left(1-e^-kright) quad textfor kinmathbbR^+$$






share|cite|improve this answer












You can use a nice property of the Laplace transform to computer your integral:
$$int_0^infty f(x) g(x),dx=int_0^infty mathcalLf(x)(s),mathcalL^-1g(x)(s) ,ds$$
In your case, letting $f(x)=sin (kx)$ and $g(x)=frac1x(x^2+1)$, we can show that
beginalign
int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx &= kint_0^infty frac1-cos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-kint_0^infty fraccos(s)k^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2-frack2int_-infty^infty frace^isk^2+s^2,ds \
&=fracpi2 - frack2 sqrt2pi ,mathcalFleftfrac1k^2+s^2right(omega)Biggr|_omega=1 \
&= fracpi2 - frack2sqrt2pi sqrtfracpi2 frace^-kk \
&=fracpi2-fracpi2e^-k \
&= fracpi2left(1-e^-kright)
endalign
Where we used the Fourier Transform.
Thus,
$$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=fracpi2left(1-e^-kright) quad textfor kinmathbbR^+$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 3 at 2:56









Zachary

1,9211211




1,9211211











  • If one is going to appeal to a FT table to arrive at a result, then why bother to begin with applying the LT integration by parts? Simply write $$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^k int_0^infty fraccos(k'x)x^2+1,dx,dk'$$
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 6 at 14:37

















  • If one is going to appeal to a FT table to arrive at a result, then why bother to begin with applying the LT integration by parts? Simply write $$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^k int_0^infty fraccos(k'x)x^2+1,dx,dk'$$
    – Mark Viola
    Aug 6 at 14:37
















If one is going to appeal to a FT table to arrive at a result, then why bother to begin with applying the LT integration by parts? Simply write $$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^k int_0^infty fraccos(k'x)x^2+1,dx,dk'$$
– Mark Viola
Aug 6 at 14:37





If one is going to appeal to a FT table to arrive at a result, then why bother to begin with applying the LT integration by parts? Simply write $$int_0^infty fracsin(kx)x(x^2+1),dx=int_0^k int_0^infty fraccos(k'x)x^2+1,dx,dk'$$
– Mark Viola
Aug 6 at 14:37


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870410%2fprove-that-int-limits-0-infty-dfrac-sinkxxx21-textdx-dfrac%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?