munkres analysis integration question

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $[0,1]^2 = [0,1] times [0,1]$. Let $f: [0,1]^2 to mathbbR$ be defined by setting $f(x,y)=0$ if $y neq x$, and $f(x,y) = 1$ if $y=x$. Show that $f$ is integrable over $[0,1]^2$.










share|cite|improve this question























  • what kind of integral are you using? With the Lebesgue integral, the problem is trivial.
    – Stefan Smith
    Jan 11 '14 at 15:22














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $[0,1]^2 = [0,1] times [0,1]$. Let $f: [0,1]^2 to mathbbR$ be defined by setting $f(x,y)=0$ if $y neq x$, and $f(x,y) = 1$ if $y=x$. Show that $f$ is integrable over $[0,1]^2$.










share|cite|improve this question























  • what kind of integral are you using? With the Lebesgue integral, the problem is trivial.
    – Stefan Smith
    Jan 11 '14 at 15:22












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $[0,1]^2 = [0,1] times [0,1]$. Let $f: [0,1]^2 to mathbbR$ be defined by setting $f(x,y)=0$ if $y neq x$, and $f(x,y) = 1$ if $y=x$. Show that $f$ is integrable over $[0,1]^2$.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $[0,1]^2 = [0,1] times [0,1]$. Let $f: [0,1]^2 to mathbbR$ be defined by setting $f(x,y)=0$ if $y neq x$, and $f(x,y) = 1$ if $y=x$. Show that $f$ is integrable over $[0,1]^2$.







integration analysis measure-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 14 '14 at 18:21

























asked Jan 11 '14 at 13:38









user115722

257




257











  • what kind of integral are you using? With the Lebesgue integral, the problem is trivial.
    – Stefan Smith
    Jan 11 '14 at 15:22
















  • what kind of integral are you using? With the Lebesgue integral, the problem is trivial.
    – Stefan Smith
    Jan 11 '14 at 15:22















what kind of integral are you using? With the Lebesgue integral, the problem is trivial.
– Stefan Smith
Jan 11 '14 at 15:22




what kind of integral are you using? With the Lebesgue integral, the problem is trivial.
– Stefan Smith
Jan 11 '14 at 15:22










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Given $ varepsilon> 0 $ is $ k in N $ such that $varepsilon >1/k$ consider a 'homogeneous' partition of $ [0,1] times [0,1] $, i.e., all sub- rectangles of partition has area $1/k^2$, we know that $ m_B = 0$ and $ m_B = 1$ if $B$ intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set, so
$ S (f, P)-s (f, P) = sum_ B in P (m_B-m_B) vol (B) = sum_ B mbox such that intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set = 1 / k <varepsilon $ hence f is integrable .






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    enter image description here



    Consider the partition $P$ like the above picture.



    $U(f, P) - L(f, P) = frac3 n - 2n^2$.



    $frac3 n - 2n^2 to 0 (n to infty)$.



    So, for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a partition $P$ such that $U(f, P) - L(f, P) < epsilon$.



    By Theorem 10.3 (p.86), $f$ is integrable over $[0, 1] times [0, 1]$.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f634680%2fmunkres-analysis-integration-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Given $ varepsilon> 0 $ is $ k in N $ such that $varepsilon >1/k$ consider a 'homogeneous' partition of $ [0,1] times [0,1] $, i.e., all sub- rectangles of partition has area $1/k^2$, we know that $ m_B = 0$ and $ m_B = 1$ if $B$ intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set, so
      $ S (f, P)-s (f, P) = sum_ B in P (m_B-m_B) vol (B) = sum_ B mbox such that intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set = 1 / k <varepsilon $ hence f is integrable .






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        Given $ varepsilon> 0 $ is $ k in N $ such that $varepsilon >1/k$ consider a 'homogeneous' partition of $ [0,1] times [0,1] $, i.e., all sub- rectangles of partition has area $1/k^2$, we know that $ m_B = 0$ and $ m_B = 1$ if $B$ intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set, so
        $ S (f, P)-s (f, P) = sum_ B in P (m_B-m_B) vol (B) = sum_ B mbox such that intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set = 1 / k <varepsilon $ hence f is integrable .






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Given $ varepsilon> 0 $ is $ k in N $ such that $varepsilon >1/k$ consider a 'homogeneous' partition of $ [0,1] times [0,1] $, i.e., all sub- rectangles of partition has area $1/k^2$, we know that $ m_B = 0$ and $ m_B = 1$ if $B$ intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set, so
          $ S (f, P)-s (f, P) = sum_ B in P (m_B-m_B) vol (B) = sum_ B mbox such that intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set = 1 / k <varepsilon $ hence f is integrable .






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Given $ varepsilon> 0 $ is $ k in N $ such that $varepsilon >1/k$ consider a 'homogeneous' partition of $ [0,1] times [0,1] $, i.e., all sub- rectangles of partition has area $1/k^2$, we know that $ m_B = 0$ and $ m_B = 1$ if $B$ intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set, so
          $ S (f, P)-s (f, P) = sum_ B in P (m_B-m_B) vol (B) = sum_ B mbox such that intection the line $ y = x $ is not empty set = 1 / k <varepsilon $ hence f is integrable .







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Apr 19 '14 at 4:30

























          answered Apr 19 '14 at 4:07









          Alcides de carvalho jr

          11311




          11311




















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              enter image description here



              Consider the partition $P$ like the above picture.



              $U(f, P) - L(f, P) = frac3 n - 2n^2$.



              $frac3 n - 2n^2 to 0 (n to infty)$.



              So, for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a partition $P$ such that $U(f, P) - L(f, P) < epsilon$.



              By Theorem 10.3 (p.86), $f$ is integrable over $[0, 1] times [0, 1]$.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                enter image description here



                Consider the partition $P$ like the above picture.



                $U(f, P) - L(f, P) = frac3 n - 2n^2$.



                $frac3 n - 2n^2 to 0 (n to infty)$.



                So, for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a partition $P$ such that $U(f, P) - L(f, P) < epsilon$.



                By Theorem 10.3 (p.86), $f$ is integrable over $[0, 1] times [0, 1]$.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  enter image description here



                  Consider the partition $P$ like the above picture.



                  $U(f, P) - L(f, P) = frac3 n - 2n^2$.



                  $frac3 n - 2n^2 to 0 (n to infty)$.



                  So, for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a partition $P$ such that $U(f, P) - L(f, P) < epsilon$.



                  By Theorem 10.3 (p.86), $f$ is integrable over $[0, 1] times [0, 1]$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  enter image description here



                  Consider the partition $P$ like the above picture.



                  $U(f, P) - L(f, P) = frac3 n - 2n^2$.



                  $frac3 n - 2n^2 to 0 (n to infty)$.



                  So, for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a partition $P$ such that $U(f, P) - L(f, P) < epsilon$.



                  By Theorem 10.3 (p.86), $f$ is integrable over $[0, 1] times [0, 1]$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 3 at 9:25









                  tchappy ha

                  1938




                  1938



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f634680%2fmunkres-analysis-integration-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                      Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                      Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?