Error when applying for ESTA: “Invalid Street Name”

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
65
down vote

favorite
1












When I input my address in the 'Your Contact Information' section of the ESTA application form (for a visa waiver for entry into the United States), I repeatedly get a "Address Validation: Invalid Street Name". It doesn't matter what I put in the field, it doesn't accept it. My street number and name are not particularly odd-looking (no non-ASCII characters etc.).










share|improve this question

















  • 3




    We would really like to know the street name you put in, so we can give an answer that is a bit more than just "brute force"
    – Sebastian
    Sep 3 at 9:46






  • 3




    I don't think that it's a problem of invalid characters. It looks like they perform geolocation: that is, they look up your address on Google Maps or something like that to check if it's a real one. So I would guess that they could not place your home address on a map and hence it's possible that a human will have to give a second look at your application.
    – Federico Poloni
    Sep 3 at 10:25






  • 12




    @MartinBurch I’d doubt it: if OP is applying to get into the US, his contact information isn’t going to be in the US.
    – Robin Whittleton
    Sep 3 at 11:52






  • 1




    I didn't add the actual address I used, because I tried with a few different variations (even looking up how USPS would format it etc.), and even with an address from the next street over (just to see if it worked; I would've gone back and changed it if it had of course). But nothing worked. I suspect it's just that whatever address validator they're using doesn't have my suburb? Or maybe was just failing on everything at that moment in time (e.g. upstream service offline or something). Anyway, brute force works!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:20






  • 1




    Whoever coded that site ought to read falsehoods programmers believe about addresses A large portion of the world does not even have street names (including 1st world countries, like Japan)
    – Mawg
    Sep 4 at 14:36

















up vote
65
down vote

favorite
1












When I input my address in the 'Your Contact Information' section of the ESTA application form (for a visa waiver for entry into the United States), I repeatedly get a "Address Validation: Invalid Street Name". It doesn't matter what I put in the field, it doesn't accept it. My street number and name are not particularly odd-looking (no non-ASCII characters etc.).










share|improve this question

















  • 3




    We would really like to know the street name you put in, so we can give an answer that is a bit more than just "brute force"
    – Sebastian
    Sep 3 at 9:46






  • 3




    I don't think that it's a problem of invalid characters. It looks like they perform geolocation: that is, they look up your address on Google Maps or something like that to check if it's a real one. So I would guess that they could not place your home address on a map and hence it's possible that a human will have to give a second look at your application.
    – Federico Poloni
    Sep 3 at 10:25






  • 12




    @MartinBurch I’d doubt it: if OP is applying to get into the US, his contact information isn’t going to be in the US.
    – Robin Whittleton
    Sep 3 at 11:52






  • 1




    I didn't add the actual address I used, because I tried with a few different variations (even looking up how USPS would format it etc.), and even with an address from the next street over (just to see if it worked; I would've gone back and changed it if it had of course). But nothing worked. I suspect it's just that whatever address validator they're using doesn't have my suburb? Or maybe was just failing on everything at that moment in time (e.g. upstream service offline or something). Anyway, brute force works!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:20






  • 1




    Whoever coded that site ought to read falsehoods programmers believe about addresses A large portion of the world does not even have street names (including 1st world countries, like Japan)
    – Mawg
    Sep 4 at 14:36













up vote
65
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
65
down vote

favorite
1






1





When I input my address in the 'Your Contact Information' section of the ESTA application form (for a visa waiver for entry into the United States), I repeatedly get a "Address Validation: Invalid Street Name". It doesn't matter what I put in the field, it doesn't accept it. My street number and name are not particularly odd-looking (no non-ASCII characters etc.).










share|improve this question













When I input my address in the 'Your Contact Information' section of the ESTA application form (for a visa waiver for entry into the United States), I repeatedly get a "Address Validation: Invalid Street Name". It doesn't matter what I put in the field, it doesn't accept it. My street number and name are not particularly odd-looking (no non-ASCII characters etc.).







esta






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Sep 3 at 0:38









Sam Wilson

556137




556137







  • 3




    We would really like to know the street name you put in, so we can give an answer that is a bit more than just "brute force"
    – Sebastian
    Sep 3 at 9:46






  • 3




    I don't think that it's a problem of invalid characters. It looks like they perform geolocation: that is, they look up your address on Google Maps or something like that to check if it's a real one. So I would guess that they could not place your home address on a map and hence it's possible that a human will have to give a second look at your application.
    – Federico Poloni
    Sep 3 at 10:25






  • 12




    @MartinBurch I’d doubt it: if OP is applying to get into the US, his contact information isn’t going to be in the US.
    – Robin Whittleton
    Sep 3 at 11:52






  • 1




    I didn't add the actual address I used, because I tried with a few different variations (even looking up how USPS would format it etc.), and even with an address from the next street over (just to see if it worked; I would've gone back and changed it if it had of course). But nothing worked. I suspect it's just that whatever address validator they're using doesn't have my suburb? Or maybe was just failing on everything at that moment in time (e.g. upstream service offline or something). Anyway, brute force works!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:20






  • 1




    Whoever coded that site ought to read falsehoods programmers believe about addresses A large portion of the world does not even have street names (including 1st world countries, like Japan)
    – Mawg
    Sep 4 at 14:36













  • 3




    We would really like to know the street name you put in, so we can give an answer that is a bit more than just "brute force"
    – Sebastian
    Sep 3 at 9:46






  • 3




    I don't think that it's a problem of invalid characters. It looks like they perform geolocation: that is, they look up your address on Google Maps or something like that to check if it's a real one. So I would guess that they could not place your home address on a map and hence it's possible that a human will have to give a second look at your application.
    – Federico Poloni
    Sep 3 at 10:25






  • 12




    @MartinBurch I’d doubt it: if OP is applying to get into the US, his contact information isn’t going to be in the US.
    – Robin Whittleton
    Sep 3 at 11:52






  • 1




    I didn't add the actual address I used, because I tried with a few different variations (even looking up how USPS would format it etc.), and even with an address from the next street over (just to see if it worked; I would've gone back and changed it if it had of course). But nothing worked. I suspect it's just that whatever address validator they're using doesn't have my suburb? Or maybe was just failing on everything at that moment in time (e.g. upstream service offline or something). Anyway, brute force works!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:20






  • 1




    Whoever coded that site ought to read falsehoods programmers believe about addresses A large portion of the world does not even have street names (including 1st world countries, like Japan)
    – Mawg
    Sep 4 at 14:36








3




3




We would really like to know the street name you put in, so we can give an answer that is a bit more than just "brute force"
– Sebastian
Sep 3 at 9:46




We would really like to know the street name you put in, so we can give an answer that is a bit more than just "brute force"
– Sebastian
Sep 3 at 9:46




3




3




I don't think that it's a problem of invalid characters. It looks like they perform geolocation: that is, they look up your address on Google Maps or something like that to check if it's a real one. So I would guess that they could not place your home address on a map and hence it's possible that a human will have to give a second look at your application.
– Federico Poloni
Sep 3 at 10:25




I don't think that it's a problem of invalid characters. It looks like they perform geolocation: that is, they look up your address on Google Maps or something like that to check if it's a real one. So I would guess that they could not place your home address on a map and hence it's possible that a human will have to give a second look at your application.
– Federico Poloni
Sep 3 at 10:25




12




12




@MartinBurch I’d doubt it: if OP is applying to get into the US, his contact information isn’t going to be in the US.
– Robin Whittleton
Sep 3 at 11:52




@MartinBurch I’d doubt it: if OP is applying to get into the US, his contact information isn’t going to be in the US.
– Robin Whittleton
Sep 3 at 11:52




1




1




I didn't add the actual address I used, because I tried with a few different variations (even looking up how USPS would format it etc.), and even with an address from the next street over (just to see if it worked; I would've gone back and changed it if it had of course). But nothing worked. I suspect it's just that whatever address validator they're using doesn't have my suburb? Or maybe was just failing on everything at that moment in time (e.g. upstream service offline or something). Anyway, brute force works!
– Sam Wilson
Sep 4 at 0:20




I didn't add the actual address I used, because I tried with a few different variations (even looking up how USPS would format it etc.), and even with an address from the next street over (just to see if it worked; I would've gone back and changed it if it had of course). But nothing worked. I suspect it's just that whatever address validator they're using doesn't have my suburb? Or maybe was just failing on everything at that moment in time (e.g. upstream service offline or something). Anyway, brute force works!
– Sam Wilson
Sep 4 at 0:20




1




1




Whoever coded that site ought to read falsehoods programmers believe about addresses A large portion of the world does not even have street names (including 1st world countries, like Japan)
– Mawg
Sep 4 at 14:36





Whoever coded that site ought to read falsehoods programmers believe about addresses A large portion of the world does not even have street names (including 1st world countries, like Japan)
– Mawg
Sep 4 at 14:36











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
113
down vote













Just keep clicking retry, and eventually, after a dozen tries, it will give you the option of accepting the address anyway and continuing:



Verification checkbox






share|improve this answer
















  • 8




    @ROIMaison He didn't come back. He already knew the answer and posted it at exactly the same time as the question. It was never unanswered.
    – pipe
    Sep 3 at 14:58






  • 16




    @pipe, he still took the time to come back to Travel.SE from the ESTA application form to inform the rest of the world about this issue and how to resolve it by posting it as a Q&A.
    – RyanfaeScotland
    Sep 3 at 16:02







  • 15




    It's true, I posted the answer at the same time as the question. It was just because I'd spent 20 minutes worrying that I wouldn't be able to submit the ESTA application, and wanted to post the info somewhere useful! :-)
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:17






  • 14




    I don't think they'd have an override checkbox if it wasn't anticipated. But it's a good point. Still, this seems to have gotten lots of upvotes so maybe people think it's useful!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 3:02






  • 4




    @user13267 That seems unlikely. It is a common and inevitable problem with sites that rely on address verification that eventually a user will come along with a valid entry that is not "on the list" (e.g. a new street). The option to manually override it was clearly deliberately designed in this case.
    – JBentley
    Sep 4 at 16:09











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121689%2ferror-when-applying-for-esta-invalid-street-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
113
down vote













Just keep clicking retry, and eventually, after a dozen tries, it will give you the option of accepting the address anyway and continuing:



Verification checkbox






share|improve this answer
















  • 8




    @ROIMaison He didn't come back. He already knew the answer and posted it at exactly the same time as the question. It was never unanswered.
    – pipe
    Sep 3 at 14:58






  • 16




    @pipe, he still took the time to come back to Travel.SE from the ESTA application form to inform the rest of the world about this issue and how to resolve it by posting it as a Q&A.
    – RyanfaeScotland
    Sep 3 at 16:02







  • 15




    It's true, I posted the answer at the same time as the question. It was just because I'd spent 20 minutes worrying that I wouldn't be able to submit the ESTA application, and wanted to post the info somewhere useful! :-)
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:17






  • 14




    I don't think they'd have an override checkbox if it wasn't anticipated. But it's a good point. Still, this seems to have gotten lots of upvotes so maybe people think it's useful!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 3:02






  • 4




    @user13267 That seems unlikely. It is a common and inevitable problem with sites that rely on address verification that eventually a user will come along with a valid entry that is not "on the list" (e.g. a new street). The option to manually override it was clearly deliberately designed in this case.
    – JBentley
    Sep 4 at 16:09















up vote
113
down vote













Just keep clicking retry, and eventually, after a dozen tries, it will give you the option of accepting the address anyway and continuing:



Verification checkbox






share|improve this answer
















  • 8




    @ROIMaison He didn't come back. He already knew the answer and posted it at exactly the same time as the question. It was never unanswered.
    – pipe
    Sep 3 at 14:58






  • 16




    @pipe, he still took the time to come back to Travel.SE from the ESTA application form to inform the rest of the world about this issue and how to resolve it by posting it as a Q&A.
    – RyanfaeScotland
    Sep 3 at 16:02







  • 15




    It's true, I posted the answer at the same time as the question. It was just because I'd spent 20 minutes worrying that I wouldn't be able to submit the ESTA application, and wanted to post the info somewhere useful! :-)
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:17






  • 14




    I don't think they'd have an override checkbox if it wasn't anticipated. But it's a good point. Still, this seems to have gotten lots of upvotes so maybe people think it's useful!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 3:02






  • 4




    @user13267 That seems unlikely. It is a common and inevitable problem with sites that rely on address verification that eventually a user will come along with a valid entry that is not "on the list" (e.g. a new street). The option to manually override it was clearly deliberately designed in this case.
    – JBentley
    Sep 4 at 16:09













up vote
113
down vote










up vote
113
down vote









Just keep clicking retry, and eventually, after a dozen tries, it will give you the option of accepting the address anyway and continuing:



Verification checkbox






share|improve this answer












Just keep clicking retry, and eventually, after a dozen tries, it will give you the option of accepting the address anyway and continuing:



Verification checkbox







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Sep 3 at 0:38









Sam Wilson

556137




556137







  • 8




    @ROIMaison He didn't come back. He already knew the answer and posted it at exactly the same time as the question. It was never unanswered.
    – pipe
    Sep 3 at 14:58






  • 16




    @pipe, he still took the time to come back to Travel.SE from the ESTA application form to inform the rest of the world about this issue and how to resolve it by posting it as a Q&A.
    – RyanfaeScotland
    Sep 3 at 16:02







  • 15




    It's true, I posted the answer at the same time as the question. It was just because I'd spent 20 minutes worrying that I wouldn't be able to submit the ESTA application, and wanted to post the info somewhere useful! :-)
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:17






  • 14




    I don't think they'd have an override checkbox if it wasn't anticipated. But it's a good point. Still, this seems to have gotten lots of upvotes so maybe people think it's useful!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 3:02






  • 4




    @user13267 That seems unlikely. It is a common and inevitable problem with sites that rely on address verification that eventually a user will come along with a valid entry that is not "on the list" (e.g. a new street). The option to manually override it was clearly deliberately designed in this case.
    – JBentley
    Sep 4 at 16:09













  • 8




    @ROIMaison He didn't come back. He already knew the answer and posted it at exactly the same time as the question. It was never unanswered.
    – pipe
    Sep 3 at 14:58






  • 16




    @pipe, he still took the time to come back to Travel.SE from the ESTA application form to inform the rest of the world about this issue and how to resolve it by posting it as a Q&A.
    – RyanfaeScotland
    Sep 3 at 16:02







  • 15




    It's true, I posted the answer at the same time as the question. It was just because I'd spent 20 minutes worrying that I wouldn't be able to submit the ESTA application, and wanted to post the info somewhere useful! :-)
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 0:17






  • 14




    I don't think they'd have an override checkbox if it wasn't anticipated. But it's a good point. Still, this seems to have gotten lots of upvotes so maybe people think it's useful!
    – Sam Wilson
    Sep 4 at 3:02






  • 4




    @user13267 That seems unlikely. It is a common and inevitable problem with sites that rely on address verification that eventually a user will come along with a valid entry that is not "on the list" (e.g. a new street). The option to manually override it was clearly deliberately designed in this case.
    – JBentley
    Sep 4 at 16:09








8




8




@ROIMaison He didn't come back. He already knew the answer and posted it at exactly the same time as the question. It was never unanswered.
– pipe
Sep 3 at 14:58




@ROIMaison He didn't come back. He already knew the answer and posted it at exactly the same time as the question. It was never unanswered.
– pipe
Sep 3 at 14:58




16




16




@pipe, he still took the time to come back to Travel.SE from the ESTA application form to inform the rest of the world about this issue and how to resolve it by posting it as a Q&A.
– RyanfaeScotland
Sep 3 at 16:02





@pipe, he still took the time to come back to Travel.SE from the ESTA application form to inform the rest of the world about this issue and how to resolve it by posting it as a Q&A.
– RyanfaeScotland
Sep 3 at 16:02





15




15




It's true, I posted the answer at the same time as the question. It was just because I'd spent 20 minutes worrying that I wouldn't be able to submit the ESTA application, and wanted to post the info somewhere useful! :-)
– Sam Wilson
Sep 4 at 0:17




It's true, I posted the answer at the same time as the question. It was just because I'd spent 20 minutes worrying that I wouldn't be able to submit the ESTA application, and wanted to post the info somewhere useful! :-)
– Sam Wilson
Sep 4 at 0:17




14




14




I don't think they'd have an override checkbox if it wasn't anticipated. But it's a good point. Still, this seems to have gotten lots of upvotes so maybe people think it's useful!
– Sam Wilson
Sep 4 at 3:02




I don't think they'd have an override checkbox if it wasn't anticipated. But it's a good point. Still, this seems to have gotten lots of upvotes so maybe people think it's useful!
– Sam Wilson
Sep 4 at 3:02




4




4




@user13267 That seems unlikely. It is a common and inevitable problem with sites that rely on address verification that eventually a user will come along with a valid entry that is not "on the list" (e.g. a new street). The option to manually override it was clearly deliberately designed in this case.
– JBentley
Sep 4 at 16:09





@user13267 That seems unlikely. It is a common and inevitable problem with sites that rely on address verification that eventually a user will come along with a valid entry that is not "on the list" (e.g. a new street). The option to manually override it was clearly deliberately designed in this case.
– JBentley
Sep 4 at 16:09


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121689%2ferror-when-applying-for-esta-invalid-street-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards