Why are two stages used for an instrumentation amplifier?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
10
down vote

favorite
2












When we have a two-stage instrumentation amplifier, such as the following.
enter image description here



Why do we need the first stage of the two Operational Amplifiers? Couldn't we just input V1 and V2 into the differential amplifier?










share|improve this question

















  • 2




    Look at the input impedances
    – PlasmaHH
    Sep 9 at 20:19










  • Infinite for the first stage, and R2 for second stage, right?
    – Bee
    Sep 9 at 20:20










  • Input resistance is one point which is sometimes important but increasing CMRR electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/343096/… is another key benefit
    – carloc
    Sep 9 at 20:34










  • No, different input impedences for the two inputs of stage 2
    – Scott Seidman
    Sep 9 at 20:42










  • If you have any imbalance in capacitance on Vin+ versus on Vin-, the common-mode rejection is in peril.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Sep 9 at 22:23














up vote
10
down vote

favorite
2












When we have a two-stage instrumentation amplifier, such as the following.
enter image description here



Why do we need the first stage of the two Operational Amplifiers? Couldn't we just input V1 and V2 into the differential amplifier?










share|improve this question

















  • 2




    Look at the input impedances
    – PlasmaHH
    Sep 9 at 20:19










  • Infinite for the first stage, and R2 for second stage, right?
    – Bee
    Sep 9 at 20:20










  • Input resistance is one point which is sometimes important but increasing CMRR electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/343096/… is another key benefit
    – carloc
    Sep 9 at 20:34










  • No, different input impedences for the two inputs of stage 2
    – Scott Seidman
    Sep 9 at 20:42










  • If you have any imbalance in capacitance on Vin+ versus on Vin-, the common-mode rejection is in peril.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Sep 9 at 22:23












up vote
10
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
10
down vote

favorite
2






2





When we have a two-stage instrumentation amplifier, such as the following.
enter image description here



Why do we need the first stage of the two Operational Amplifiers? Couldn't we just input V1 and V2 into the differential amplifier?










share|improve this question













When we have a two-stage instrumentation amplifier, such as the following.
enter image description here



Why do we need the first stage of the two Operational Amplifiers? Couldn't we just input V1 and V2 into the differential amplifier?







amplifier instrumentation-amplifier diff-amp






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Sep 9 at 20:17









Bee

1208




1208







  • 2




    Look at the input impedances
    – PlasmaHH
    Sep 9 at 20:19










  • Infinite for the first stage, and R2 for second stage, right?
    – Bee
    Sep 9 at 20:20










  • Input resistance is one point which is sometimes important but increasing CMRR electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/343096/… is another key benefit
    – carloc
    Sep 9 at 20:34










  • No, different input impedences for the two inputs of stage 2
    – Scott Seidman
    Sep 9 at 20:42










  • If you have any imbalance in capacitance on Vin+ versus on Vin-, the common-mode rejection is in peril.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Sep 9 at 22:23












  • 2




    Look at the input impedances
    – PlasmaHH
    Sep 9 at 20:19










  • Infinite for the first stage, and R2 for second stage, right?
    – Bee
    Sep 9 at 20:20










  • Input resistance is one point which is sometimes important but increasing CMRR electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/343096/… is another key benefit
    – carloc
    Sep 9 at 20:34










  • No, different input impedences for the two inputs of stage 2
    – Scott Seidman
    Sep 9 at 20:42










  • If you have any imbalance in capacitance on Vin+ versus on Vin-, the common-mode rejection is in peril.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Sep 9 at 22:23







2




2




Look at the input impedances
– PlasmaHH
Sep 9 at 20:19




Look at the input impedances
– PlasmaHH
Sep 9 at 20:19












Infinite for the first stage, and R2 for second stage, right?
– Bee
Sep 9 at 20:20




Infinite for the first stage, and R2 for second stage, right?
– Bee
Sep 9 at 20:20












Input resistance is one point which is sometimes important but increasing CMRR electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/343096/… is another key benefit
– carloc
Sep 9 at 20:34




Input resistance is one point which is sometimes important but increasing CMRR electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/343096/… is another key benefit
– carloc
Sep 9 at 20:34












No, different input impedences for the two inputs of stage 2
– Scott Seidman
Sep 9 at 20:42




No, different input impedences for the two inputs of stage 2
– Scott Seidman
Sep 9 at 20:42












If you have any imbalance in capacitance on Vin+ versus on Vin-, the common-mode rejection is in peril.
– analogsystemsrf
Sep 9 at 22:23




If you have any imbalance in capacitance on Vin+ versus on Vin-, the common-mode rejection is in peril.
– analogsystemsrf
Sep 9 at 22:23










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
12
down vote



accepted










The 3 op-amp design has three main advantages over a single op-amp differential amplifier.



  1. The input impedance is much higher, since the inputs drive directly into an op-amp input rather than into a resistive divider.

  2. The gain can be set by changing a single resistor, so the critical parts can be easily integrated on to one chip (maximizing symmetry) with a single external resistor for setting the gain.

  3. In high gain configurations the common mode rejection is much better because the gain of the first stage effectively multiplies the common mode rejection of the second stage.

Note that in general it is better to use a specific instrumentation amplifier chip than to try to build it yourself out of separate parts. Having everything on one chip improves symmetry and hence common mode rejection.






share|improve this answer




















  • Excellent point about using a single IC; even using 1% discrete resistors lowers the theoretical CMRR to no more than 34dB
    – Peter Smith
    Sep 10 at 13:00

















up vote
14
down vote













One of the biggest benefits of the 3 op amp INA is the equal and high input impedance. The op amp's non-inverting pins' input impedance can be up in the $TOmega$ range. I'll leave it as an exercise for you, but if you look at the difference amplifier circuit, the input impedance of the negative input varies with the positive input.






share|improve this answer






















  • Why do we want a high input impedance?
    – Bee
    Sep 9 at 20:29






  • 6




    @Bee so that we can measure from sources that have a high output impedance
    – BeB00
    Sep 9 at 20:33

















up vote
3
down vote













In addition to input impedance concerns, gain in two stages offers better frequency response.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    While this is true in principle. most instrumentation amplifiers have all the gain in the first stage with the second stage having unity gain.
    – Peter Green
    Sep 10 at 22:59

















up vote
1
down vote













There is a single stage, high input impedance, differential amplifier.





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



Without Rg, this has a gain of (f+1). Rg can be used to increase the gain.



However it has performance compromises over the 3 amplifier version.



a) It has less open loop gain, so very high gains are not as stable

b) The two signal paths have different phase shift, so common mode rejection only works to low frequencies. You can improve this a bit with a strategically placed capacitor though

c) At low gains, common mode range is limited by the power supply headroom

d) It's more complicated to draw correctly than the 3 amplifier version. It's only recently that I've created a mnemonic to get the resistors in the right places from memory.



But, if you have only 2 amplifiers left, then it does work. It does allow you control of the gain with a single variable resistor, just like the 3 amplifier version, but unfortunately, just the 3 amp version, this resistor is floating.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    -2
    down vote













    The above answers are reliable, but i want to add something. Consider the differential amplifier: enter image description here



    When a person wants to vary the amplifier gain (for instance to exploit the maximum resolution of ADC) the 2 resistors with value K⋅R must be adjusted perfectly synchronously, via electromechanical adjustable resistors so an slight runout or wearing of these resistors results in imbalance between the value of this two resistors then it results in not to be neglected common mode factor. Usually the common mode in the previous stage (Wheatstone bridge for example) is way bigger than differential mode then it results in false measurements.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 5




      I wouldn't call this an instrumentation amplifier, I would call it a differential amplifier. You need to provide a citation for the image you included. Also, please don't assume that all of the people using this site are male.
      – Elliot Alderson
      Sep 9 at 21:30






    • 2




      @ElliotAlderson maybe the implication is that women are too smart to use this circuit design anyway ;)
      – alephzero
      Sep 9 at 23:53










    • @ElliotAlderson Yes this is a differential amplifier, the OP asked what if we use only differential amplifier and i tried what happen when we use only differential amplifier. And by men i meant 'man' , so all the human races regardless of their gender. It is perfectly possible to make such a mistakes, that's why there is 'EDIT' button.
      – Sam Farjamirad
      Sep 10 at 6:17











    • If you know it is a differential amplifier, you shouldn't say "consider the instrumentation amplifier:". It's true that others can correct your answers, but in the meantime some new users may get more confused.
      – Elliot Alderson
      Sep 10 at 12:35










    • You need to add a citation for the graphic in your answer so the original creator may receive proper credit.
      – Elliot Alderson
      Sep 10 at 12:35










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f395195%2fwhy-are-two-stages-used-for-an-instrumentation-amplifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    12
    down vote



    accepted










    The 3 op-amp design has three main advantages over a single op-amp differential amplifier.



    1. The input impedance is much higher, since the inputs drive directly into an op-amp input rather than into a resistive divider.

    2. The gain can be set by changing a single resistor, so the critical parts can be easily integrated on to one chip (maximizing symmetry) with a single external resistor for setting the gain.

    3. In high gain configurations the common mode rejection is much better because the gain of the first stage effectively multiplies the common mode rejection of the second stage.

    Note that in general it is better to use a specific instrumentation amplifier chip than to try to build it yourself out of separate parts. Having everything on one chip improves symmetry and hence common mode rejection.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Excellent point about using a single IC; even using 1% discrete resistors lowers the theoretical CMRR to no more than 34dB
      – Peter Smith
      Sep 10 at 13:00














    up vote
    12
    down vote



    accepted










    The 3 op-amp design has three main advantages over a single op-amp differential amplifier.



    1. The input impedance is much higher, since the inputs drive directly into an op-amp input rather than into a resistive divider.

    2. The gain can be set by changing a single resistor, so the critical parts can be easily integrated on to one chip (maximizing symmetry) with a single external resistor for setting the gain.

    3. In high gain configurations the common mode rejection is much better because the gain of the first stage effectively multiplies the common mode rejection of the second stage.

    Note that in general it is better to use a specific instrumentation amplifier chip than to try to build it yourself out of separate parts. Having everything on one chip improves symmetry and hence common mode rejection.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Excellent point about using a single IC; even using 1% discrete resistors lowers the theoretical CMRR to no more than 34dB
      – Peter Smith
      Sep 10 at 13:00












    up vote
    12
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    12
    down vote



    accepted






    The 3 op-amp design has three main advantages over a single op-amp differential amplifier.



    1. The input impedance is much higher, since the inputs drive directly into an op-amp input rather than into a resistive divider.

    2. The gain can be set by changing a single resistor, so the critical parts can be easily integrated on to one chip (maximizing symmetry) with a single external resistor for setting the gain.

    3. In high gain configurations the common mode rejection is much better because the gain of the first stage effectively multiplies the common mode rejection of the second stage.

    Note that in general it is better to use a specific instrumentation amplifier chip than to try to build it yourself out of separate parts. Having everything on one chip improves symmetry and hence common mode rejection.






    share|improve this answer












    The 3 op-amp design has three main advantages over a single op-amp differential amplifier.



    1. The input impedance is much higher, since the inputs drive directly into an op-amp input rather than into a resistive divider.

    2. The gain can be set by changing a single resistor, so the critical parts can be easily integrated on to one chip (maximizing symmetry) with a single external resistor for setting the gain.

    3. In high gain configurations the common mode rejection is much better because the gain of the first stage effectively multiplies the common mode rejection of the second stage.

    Note that in general it is better to use a specific instrumentation amplifier chip than to try to build it yourself out of separate parts. Having everything on one chip improves symmetry and hence common mode rejection.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 10 at 1:29









    Peter Green

    10.8k11837




    10.8k11837











    • Excellent point about using a single IC; even using 1% discrete resistors lowers the theoretical CMRR to no more than 34dB
      – Peter Smith
      Sep 10 at 13:00
















    • Excellent point about using a single IC; even using 1% discrete resistors lowers the theoretical CMRR to no more than 34dB
      – Peter Smith
      Sep 10 at 13:00















    Excellent point about using a single IC; even using 1% discrete resistors lowers the theoretical CMRR to no more than 34dB
    – Peter Smith
    Sep 10 at 13:00




    Excellent point about using a single IC; even using 1% discrete resistors lowers the theoretical CMRR to no more than 34dB
    – Peter Smith
    Sep 10 at 13:00












    up vote
    14
    down vote













    One of the biggest benefits of the 3 op amp INA is the equal and high input impedance. The op amp's non-inverting pins' input impedance can be up in the $TOmega$ range. I'll leave it as an exercise for you, but if you look at the difference amplifier circuit, the input impedance of the negative input varies with the positive input.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Why do we want a high input impedance?
      – Bee
      Sep 9 at 20:29






    • 6




      @Bee so that we can measure from sources that have a high output impedance
      – BeB00
      Sep 9 at 20:33














    up vote
    14
    down vote













    One of the biggest benefits of the 3 op amp INA is the equal and high input impedance. The op amp's non-inverting pins' input impedance can be up in the $TOmega$ range. I'll leave it as an exercise for you, but if you look at the difference amplifier circuit, the input impedance of the negative input varies with the positive input.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Why do we want a high input impedance?
      – Bee
      Sep 9 at 20:29






    • 6




      @Bee so that we can measure from sources that have a high output impedance
      – BeB00
      Sep 9 at 20:33












    up vote
    14
    down vote










    up vote
    14
    down vote









    One of the biggest benefits of the 3 op amp INA is the equal and high input impedance. The op amp's non-inverting pins' input impedance can be up in the $TOmega$ range. I'll leave it as an exercise for you, but if you look at the difference amplifier circuit, the input impedance of the negative input varies with the positive input.






    share|improve this answer














    One of the biggest benefits of the 3 op amp INA is the equal and high input impedance. The op amp's non-inverting pins' input impedance can be up in the $TOmega$ range. I'll leave it as an exercise for you, but if you look at the difference amplifier circuit, the input impedance of the negative input varies with the positive input.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 9 at 20:32

























    answered Sep 9 at 20:21









    Matt Young

    12.2k42459




    12.2k42459











    • Why do we want a high input impedance?
      – Bee
      Sep 9 at 20:29






    • 6




      @Bee so that we can measure from sources that have a high output impedance
      – BeB00
      Sep 9 at 20:33
















    • Why do we want a high input impedance?
      – Bee
      Sep 9 at 20:29






    • 6




      @Bee so that we can measure from sources that have a high output impedance
      – BeB00
      Sep 9 at 20:33















    Why do we want a high input impedance?
    – Bee
    Sep 9 at 20:29




    Why do we want a high input impedance?
    – Bee
    Sep 9 at 20:29




    6




    6




    @Bee so that we can measure from sources that have a high output impedance
    – BeB00
    Sep 9 at 20:33




    @Bee so that we can measure from sources that have a high output impedance
    – BeB00
    Sep 9 at 20:33










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    In addition to input impedance concerns, gain in two stages offers better frequency response.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      While this is true in principle. most instrumentation amplifiers have all the gain in the first stage with the second stage having unity gain.
      – Peter Green
      Sep 10 at 22:59














    up vote
    3
    down vote













    In addition to input impedance concerns, gain in two stages offers better frequency response.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      While this is true in principle. most instrumentation amplifiers have all the gain in the first stage with the second stage having unity gain.
      – Peter Green
      Sep 10 at 22:59












    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    In addition to input impedance concerns, gain in two stages offers better frequency response.






    share|improve this answer














    In addition to input impedance concerns, gain in two stages offers better frequency response.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 9 at 21:37









    Michel Keijzers

    4,76662149




    4,76662149










    answered Sep 9 at 20:43









    Scott Seidman

    21.6k43181




    21.6k43181







    • 1




      While this is true in principle. most instrumentation amplifiers have all the gain in the first stage with the second stage having unity gain.
      – Peter Green
      Sep 10 at 22:59












    • 1




      While this is true in principle. most instrumentation amplifiers have all the gain in the first stage with the second stage having unity gain.
      – Peter Green
      Sep 10 at 22:59







    1




    1




    While this is true in principle. most instrumentation amplifiers have all the gain in the first stage with the second stage having unity gain.
    – Peter Green
    Sep 10 at 22:59




    While this is true in principle. most instrumentation amplifiers have all the gain in the first stage with the second stage having unity gain.
    – Peter Green
    Sep 10 at 22:59










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    There is a single stage, high input impedance, differential amplifier.





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    Without Rg, this has a gain of (f+1). Rg can be used to increase the gain.



    However it has performance compromises over the 3 amplifier version.



    a) It has less open loop gain, so very high gains are not as stable

    b) The two signal paths have different phase shift, so common mode rejection only works to low frequencies. You can improve this a bit with a strategically placed capacitor though

    c) At low gains, common mode range is limited by the power supply headroom

    d) It's more complicated to draw correctly than the 3 amplifier version. It's only recently that I've created a mnemonic to get the resistors in the right places from memory.



    But, if you have only 2 amplifiers left, then it does work. It does allow you control of the gain with a single variable resistor, just like the 3 amplifier version, but unfortunately, just the 3 amp version, this resistor is floating.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      There is a single stage, high input impedance, differential amplifier.





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



      Without Rg, this has a gain of (f+1). Rg can be used to increase the gain.



      However it has performance compromises over the 3 amplifier version.



      a) It has less open loop gain, so very high gains are not as stable

      b) The two signal paths have different phase shift, so common mode rejection only works to low frequencies. You can improve this a bit with a strategically placed capacitor though

      c) At low gains, common mode range is limited by the power supply headroom

      d) It's more complicated to draw correctly than the 3 amplifier version. It's only recently that I've created a mnemonic to get the resistors in the right places from memory.



      But, if you have only 2 amplifiers left, then it does work. It does allow you control of the gain with a single variable resistor, just like the 3 amplifier version, but unfortunately, just the 3 amp version, this resistor is floating.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        There is a single stage, high input impedance, differential amplifier.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



        Without Rg, this has a gain of (f+1). Rg can be used to increase the gain.



        However it has performance compromises over the 3 amplifier version.



        a) It has less open loop gain, so very high gains are not as stable

        b) The two signal paths have different phase shift, so common mode rejection only works to low frequencies. You can improve this a bit with a strategically placed capacitor though

        c) At low gains, common mode range is limited by the power supply headroom

        d) It's more complicated to draw correctly than the 3 amplifier version. It's only recently that I've created a mnemonic to get the resistors in the right places from memory.



        But, if you have only 2 amplifiers left, then it does work. It does allow you control of the gain with a single variable resistor, just like the 3 amplifier version, but unfortunately, just the 3 amp version, this resistor is floating.






        share|improve this answer












        There is a single stage, high input impedance, differential amplifier.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



        Without Rg, this has a gain of (f+1). Rg can be used to increase the gain.



        However it has performance compromises over the 3 amplifier version.



        a) It has less open loop gain, so very high gains are not as stable

        b) The two signal paths have different phase shift, so common mode rejection only works to low frequencies. You can improve this a bit with a strategically placed capacitor though

        c) At low gains, common mode range is limited by the power supply headroom

        d) It's more complicated to draw correctly than the 3 amplifier version. It's only recently that I've created a mnemonic to get the resistors in the right places from memory.



        But, if you have only 2 amplifiers left, then it does work. It does allow you control of the gain with a single variable resistor, just like the 3 amplifier version, but unfortunately, just the 3 amp version, this resistor is floating.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Sep 10 at 6:07









        Neil_UK

        70.2k273155




        70.2k273155




















            up vote
            -2
            down vote













            The above answers are reliable, but i want to add something. Consider the differential amplifier: enter image description here



            When a person wants to vary the amplifier gain (for instance to exploit the maximum resolution of ADC) the 2 resistors with value K⋅R must be adjusted perfectly synchronously, via electromechanical adjustable resistors so an slight runout or wearing of these resistors results in imbalance between the value of this two resistors then it results in not to be neglected common mode factor. Usually the common mode in the previous stage (Wheatstone bridge for example) is way bigger than differential mode then it results in false measurements.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 5




              I wouldn't call this an instrumentation amplifier, I would call it a differential amplifier. You need to provide a citation for the image you included. Also, please don't assume that all of the people using this site are male.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 9 at 21:30






            • 2




              @ElliotAlderson maybe the implication is that women are too smart to use this circuit design anyway ;)
              – alephzero
              Sep 9 at 23:53










            • @ElliotAlderson Yes this is a differential amplifier, the OP asked what if we use only differential amplifier and i tried what happen when we use only differential amplifier. And by men i meant 'man' , so all the human races regardless of their gender. It is perfectly possible to make such a mistakes, that's why there is 'EDIT' button.
              – Sam Farjamirad
              Sep 10 at 6:17











            • If you know it is a differential amplifier, you shouldn't say "consider the instrumentation amplifier:". It's true that others can correct your answers, but in the meantime some new users may get more confused.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 10 at 12:35










            • You need to add a citation for the graphic in your answer so the original creator may receive proper credit.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 10 at 12:35














            up vote
            -2
            down vote













            The above answers are reliable, but i want to add something. Consider the differential amplifier: enter image description here



            When a person wants to vary the amplifier gain (for instance to exploit the maximum resolution of ADC) the 2 resistors with value K⋅R must be adjusted perfectly synchronously, via electromechanical adjustable resistors so an slight runout or wearing of these resistors results in imbalance between the value of this two resistors then it results in not to be neglected common mode factor. Usually the common mode in the previous stage (Wheatstone bridge for example) is way bigger than differential mode then it results in false measurements.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 5




              I wouldn't call this an instrumentation amplifier, I would call it a differential amplifier. You need to provide a citation for the image you included. Also, please don't assume that all of the people using this site are male.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 9 at 21:30






            • 2




              @ElliotAlderson maybe the implication is that women are too smart to use this circuit design anyway ;)
              – alephzero
              Sep 9 at 23:53










            • @ElliotAlderson Yes this is a differential amplifier, the OP asked what if we use only differential amplifier and i tried what happen when we use only differential amplifier. And by men i meant 'man' , so all the human races regardless of their gender. It is perfectly possible to make such a mistakes, that's why there is 'EDIT' button.
              – Sam Farjamirad
              Sep 10 at 6:17











            • If you know it is a differential amplifier, you shouldn't say "consider the instrumentation amplifier:". It's true that others can correct your answers, but in the meantime some new users may get more confused.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 10 at 12:35










            • You need to add a citation for the graphic in your answer so the original creator may receive proper credit.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 10 at 12:35












            up vote
            -2
            down vote










            up vote
            -2
            down vote









            The above answers are reliable, but i want to add something. Consider the differential amplifier: enter image description here



            When a person wants to vary the amplifier gain (for instance to exploit the maximum resolution of ADC) the 2 resistors with value K⋅R must be adjusted perfectly synchronously, via electromechanical adjustable resistors so an slight runout or wearing of these resistors results in imbalance between the value of this two resistors then it results in not to be neglected common mode factor. Usually the common mode in the previous stage (Wheatstone bridge for example) is way bigger than differential mode then it results in false measurements.






            share|improve this answer














            The above answers are reliable, but i want to add something. Consider the differential amplifier: enter image description here



            When a person wants to vary the amplifier gain (for instance to exploit the maximum resolution of ADC) the 2 resistors with value K⋅R must be adjusted perfectly synchronously, via electromechanical adjustable resistors so an slight runout or wearing of these resistors results in imbalance between the value of this two resistors then it results in not to be neglected common mode factor. Usually the common mode in the previous stage (Wheatstone bridge for example) is way bigger than differential mode then it results in false measurements.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 10 at 12:37









            Elliot Alderson

            3,5651716




            3,5651716










            answered Sep 9 at 20:58









            Sam Farjamirad

            16919




            16919







            • 5




              I wouldn't call this an instrumentation amplifier, I would call it a differential amplifier. You need to provide a citation for the image you included. Also, please don't assume that all of the people using this site are male.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 9 at 21:30






            • 2




              @ElliotAlderson maybe the implication is that women are too smart to use this circuit design anyway ;)
              – alephzero
              Sep 9 at 23:53










            • @ElliotAlderson Yes this is a differential amplifier, the OP asked what if we use only differential amplifier and i tried what happen when we use only differential amplifier. And by men i meant 'man' , so all the human races regardless of their gender. It is perfectly possible to make such a mistakes, that's why there is 'EDIT' button.
              – Sam Farjamirad
              Sep 10 at 6:17











            • If you know it is a differential amplifier, you shouldn't say "consider the instrumentation amplifier:". It's true that others can correct your answers, but in the meantime some new users may get more confused.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 10 at 12:35










            • You need to add a citation for the graphic in your answer so the original creator may receive proper credit.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 10 at 12:35












            • 5




              I wouldn't call this an instrumentation amplifier, I would call it a differential amplifier. You need to provide a citation for the image you included. Also, please don't assume that all of the people using this site are male.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 9 at 21:30






            • 2




              @ElliotAlderson maybe the implication is that women are too smart to use this circuit design anyway ;)
              – alephzero
              Sep 9 at 23:53










            • @ElliotAlderson Yes this is a differential amplifier, the OP asked what if we use only differential amplifier and i tried what happen when we use only differential amplifier. And by men i meant 'man' , so all the human races regardless of their gender. It is perfectly possible to make such a mistakes, that's why there is 'EDIT' button.
              – Sam Farjamirad
              Sep 10 at 6:17











            • If you know it is a differential amplifier, you shouldn't say "consider the instrumentation amplifier:". It's true that others can correct your answers, but in the meantime some new users may get more confused.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 10 at 12:35










            • You need to add a citation for the graphic in your answer so the original creator may receive proper credit.
              – Elliot Alderson
              Sep 10 at 12:35







            5




            5




            I wouldn't call this an instrumentation amplifier, I would call it a differential amplifier. You need to provide a citation for the image you included. Also, please don't assume that all of the people using this site are male.
            – Elliot Alderson
            Sep 9 at 21:30




            I wouldn't call this an instrumentation amplifier, I would call it a differential amplifier. You need to provide a citation for the image you included. Also, please don't assume that all of the people using this site are male.
            – Elliot Alderson
            Sep 9 at 21:30




            2




            2




            @ElliotAlderson maybe the implication is that women are too smart to use this circuit design anyway ;)
            – alephzero
            Sep 9 at 23:53




            @ElliotAlderson maybe the implication is that women are too smart to use this circuit design anyway ;)
            – alephzero
            Sep 9 at 23:53












            @ElliotAlderson Yes this is a differential amplifier, the OP asked what if we use only differential amplifier and i tried what happen when we use only differential amplifier. And by men i meant 'man' , so all the human races regardless of their gender. It is perfectly possible to make such a mistakes, that's why there is 'EDIT' button.
            – Sam Farjamirad
            Sep 10 at 6:17





            @ElliotAlderson Yes this is a differential amplifier, the OP asked what if we use only differential amplifier and i tried what happen when we use only differential amplifier. And by men i meant 'man' , so all the human races regardless of their gender. It is perfectly possible to make such a mistakes, that's why there is 'EDIT' button.
            – Sam Farjamirad
            Sep 10 at 6:17













            If you know it is a differential amplifier, you shouldn't say "consider the instrumentation amplifier:". It's true that others can correct your answers, but in the meantime some new users may get more confused.
            – Elliot Alderson
            Sep 10 at 12:35




            If you know it is a differential amplifier, you shouldn't say "consider the instrumentation amplifier:". It's true that others can correct your answers, but in the meantime some new users may get more confused.
            – Elliot Alderson
            Sep 10 at 12:35












            You need to add a citation for the graphic in your answer so the original creator may receive proper credit.
            – Elliot Alderson
            Sep 10 at 12:35




            You need to add a citation for the graphic in your answer so the original creator may receive proper credit.
            – Elliot Alderson
            Sep 10 at 12:35

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f395195%2fwhy-are-two-stages-used-for-an-instrumentation-amplifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Strongly p-embedded subgroups and p-Sylow subgroups.