How to prove this inequality involving the minimum of two chosen numbers

Multi tool use
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
Let $a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, dots , a_n, b_n$ be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that
$$sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ia_j, b_ib_j le sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ib_j, a_jb_i.$$
How do I prove this inequality. I have studied only basic inequalities, namely AM-GM, CS inequality and Tchebycheff's inequality. How do I incorporate that condition of minimum of the two chosen numbers and prove the inequality using the above ones
?
inequality summation contest-math maxima-minima substitution
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
Let $a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, dots , a_n, b_n$ be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that
$$sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ia_j, b_ib_j le sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ib_j, a_jb_i.$$
How do I prove this inequality. I have studied only basic inequalities, namely AM-GM, CS inequality and Tchebycheff's inequality. How do I incorporate that condition of minimum of the two chosen numbers and prove the inequality using the above ones
?
inequality summation contest-math maxima-minima substitution
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
Let $a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, dots , a_n, b_n$ be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that
$$sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ia_j, b_ib_j le sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ib_j, a_jb_i.$$
How do I prove this inequality. I have studied only basic inequalities, namely AM-GM, CS inequality and Tchebycheff's inequality. How do I incorporate that condition of minimum of the two chosen numbers and prove the inequality using the above ones
?
inequality summation contest-math maxima-minima substitution
Let $a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, dots , a_n, b_n$ be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that
$$sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ia_j, b_ib_j le sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ib_j, a_jb_i.$$
How do I prove this inequality. I have studied only basic inequalities, namely AM-GM, CS inequality and Tchebycheff's inequality. How do I incorporate that condition of minimum of the two chosen numbers and prove the inequality using the above ones
?
inequality summation contest-math maxima-minima substitution
inequality summation contest-math maxima-minima substitution
edited Sep 10 at 20:51
Michael Rozenberg
89.3k1583179
89.3k1583179
asked Sep 10 at 13:32
saisanjeev
555212
555212
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.
Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$
we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.
Lemma 1.
Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
Proof.
Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
Lemma 2.
Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
$$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
Proof.
Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.
Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
$$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
$$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!
For $n=4$ we obtain:
$$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
$$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
$$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
$$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$
Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:56
@MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 20:58
I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:59
@MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 21:07
@MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
– saisanjeev
Sep 11 at 14:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.
Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$
we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.
Lemma 1.
Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
Proof.
Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
Lemma 2.
Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
$$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
Proof.
Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.
Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
$$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
$$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!
For $n=4$ we obtain:
$$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
$$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
$$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
$$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$
Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:56
@MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 20:58
I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:59
@MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 21:07
@MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
– saisanjeev
Sep 11 at 14:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
5
down vote
It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.
Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$
we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.
Lemma 1.
Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
Proof.
Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
Lemma 2.
Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
$$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
Proof.
Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.
Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
$$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
$$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!
For $n=4$ we obtain:
$$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
$$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
$$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
$$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$
Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:56
@MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 20:58
I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:59
@MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 21:07
@MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
– saisanjeev
Sep 11 at 14:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.
Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$
we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.
Lemma 1.
Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
Proof.
Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
Lemma 2.
Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
$$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
Proof.
Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.
Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
$$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
$$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!
For $n=4$ we obtain:
$$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
$$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
$$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
$$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$
It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.
Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$
we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.
Lemma 1.
Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
Proof.
Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
Lemma 2.
Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
$$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
Proof.
Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.
Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
$$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
$$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
$$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
$$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!
For $n=4$ we obtain:
$$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
$$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
$$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
$$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
$$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$
edited Sep 11 at 14:28
answered Sep 10 at 20:41
Michael Rozenberg
89.3k1583179
89.3k1583179
Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:56
@MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 20:58
I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:59
@MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 21:07
@MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
– saisanjeev
Sep 11 at 14:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:56
@MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 20:58
I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:59
@MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 21:07
@MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
– saisanjeev
Sep 11 at 14:08
Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:56
Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:56
@MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 20:58
@MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 20:58
I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:59
I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
– MathOverview
Sep 10 at 20:59
@MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 21:07
@MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Sep 10 at 21:07
@MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
– saisanjeev
Sep 11 at 14:08
@MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
– saisanjeev
Sep 11 at 14:08
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911918%2fhow-to-prove-this-inequality-involving-the-minimum-of-two-chosen-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password