How to prove this inequality involving the minimum of two chosen numbers

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
11
down vote

favorite
5












Let $a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, dots , a_n, b_n$ be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that



$$sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ia_j, b_ib_j le sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ib_j, a_jb_i.$$



How do I prove this inequality. I have studied only basic inequalities, namely AM-GM, CS inequality and Tchebycheff's inequality. How do I incorporate that condition of minimum of the two chosen numbers and prove the inequality using the above ones
?










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    11
    down vote

    favorite
    5












    Let $a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, dots , a_n, b_n$ be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that



    $$sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ia_j, b_ib_j le sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ib_j, a_jb_i.$$



    How do I prove this inequality. I have studied only basic inequalities, namely AM-GM, CS inequality and Tchebycheff's inequality. How do I incorporate that condition of minimum of the two chosen numbers and prove the inequality using the above ones
    ?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      11
      down vote

      favorite
      5









      up vote
      11
      down vote

      favorite
      5






      5





      Let $a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, dots , a_n, b_n$ be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that



      $$sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ia_j, b_ib_j le sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ib_j, a_jb_i.$$



      How do I prove this inequality. I have studied only basic inequalities, namely AM-GM, CS inequality and Tchebycheff's inequality. How do I incorporate that condition of minimum of the two chosen numbers and prove the inequality using the above ones
      ?










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, dots , a_n, b_n$ be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that



      $$sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ia_j, b_ib_j le sum_i, j = 1^n mina_ib_j, a_jb_i.$$



      How do I prove this inequality. I have studied only basic inequalities, namely AM-GM, CS inequality and Tchebycheff's inequality. How do I incorporate that condition of minimum of the two chosen numbers and prove the inequality using the above ones
      ?







      inequality summation contest-math maxima-minima substitution






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 10 at 20:51









      Michael Rozenberg

      89.3k1583179




      89.3k1583179










      asked Sep 10 at 13:32









      saisanjeev

      555212




      555212




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.



          Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$



          we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.



          Lemma 1.



          Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
          Proof.



          Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
          Lemma 2.



          Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
          $$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
          Proof.



          Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.



          Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
          $$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
          Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
          $$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!



          For $n=4$ we obtain:
          $$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
          $$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
          $$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
          $$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:56










          • @MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 20:58











          • I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:59










          • @MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 21:07











          • @MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
            – saisanjeev
            Sep 11 at 14:08










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911918%2fhow-to-prove-this-inequality-involving-the-minimum-of-two-chosen-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote













          It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.



          Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$



          we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.



          Lemma 1.



          Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
          Proof.



          Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
          Lemma 2.



          Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
          $$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
          Proof.



          Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.



          Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
          $$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
          Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
          $$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!



          For $n=4$ we obtain:
          $$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
          $$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
          $$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
          $$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:56










          • @MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 20:58











          • I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:59










          • @MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 21:07











          • @MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
            – saisanjeev
            Sep 11 at 14:08














          up vote
          5
          down vote













          It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.



          Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$



          we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.



          Lemma 1.



          Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
          Proof.



          Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
          Lemma 2.



          Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
          $$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
          Proof.



          Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.



          Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
          $$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
          Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
          $$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!



          For $n=4$ we obtain:
          $$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
          $$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
          $$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
          $$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:56










          • @MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 20:58











          • I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:59










          • @MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 21:07











          • @MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
            – saisanjeev
            Sep 11 at 14:08












          up vote
          5
          down vote










          up vote
          5
          down vote









          It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.



          Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$



          we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.



          Lemma 1.



          Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
          Proof.



          Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
          Lemma 2.



          Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
          $$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
          Proof.



          Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.



          Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
          $$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
          Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
          $$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!



          For $n=4$ we obtain:
          $$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
          $$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
          $$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
          $$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          It's USA 2000. The following solution is not mine.



          Since if $mina_i,b_i=0$ then $mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i=0,$



          we can assume that $a_i>0$ and $b_i>0$.



          Lemma 1.



          Let $r_igeq0$ and $x_i$ be real numbers. Prove that:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0.$$
          Proof.



          Since $minr_i,r_j=minr_j,r_i,$ we can assume that $0=r_0leq r_1leq r_2leq...leq r_n$ and we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_j=sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2geq0.$$
          Lemma 2.



          Let $a_i>0$, $b_i>0$, $r_i=fracmaxa_i,b_imina_i,b_i-1$ and $x_i=sign(a_i-b_i)mina_i,b_i.$ Prove that:
          $$mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j=minr_i,r_jx_ix_j.$$
          Proof.



          Since replacing $a_i$ with $b_i$ gives replacing signs of the both sides, we can assume that $a_igeq b_i$.



          Similarly, we can assume that $a_jgeq b_j$ and we obtain:
          $$minr_i,r_jx_ix_j=minleftfraca_ib_i-1,fraca_jb_j-1rightb_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j-b_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-b_ib_j=$$
          $$=mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_j.$$
          Now, by applying of these lemmas we obtain:
          $$sum_i,j=1^nmina_ib_j,a_jb_i-sum_i,j=1^nmina_ia_j,b_ib_j=$$
          $$=sum_i,j=1^nleft(mina_ib_j,a_jb_i-mina_ia_j,b_ib_jright)=sum_i,j=1^nminr_i,r_jx_ix_jgeq0$$ and we are done!



          For $n=4$ we obtain:
          $$(r_4-r_3)x_4^2+(r_3-r_2)(x_3+x_4)^2+(r_2-r_1)(x_2+x_3+x_4)^2+(r_1-r_0)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)^2=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2^2+(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3^2+(r_4-r_3+r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_4^2+$$
          $$+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_3+$$
          $$+2(r_2-r_1+r_1)x_2x_4+2(r_3-r_2+r_2-r_1+r_1)x_3x_4=$$
          $$=r_1x_1^2+r_2x_2^2+x_3r_3^2+r_4x_4^2+2r_1x_1x_2+2r_1x_1x_3+2r_1x_1x_4+$$
          $$+2r_2x_2x_3+2r_2x_2x_4+2r_3x_3x_4.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 11 at 14:28

























          answered Sep 10 at 20:41









          Michael Rozenberg

          89.3k1583179




          89.3k1583179











          • Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:56










          • @MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 20:58











          • I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:59










          • @MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 21:07











          • @MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
            – saisanjeev
            Sep 11 at 14:08
















          • Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:56










          • @MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 20:58











          • I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
            – MathOverview
            Sep 10 at 20:59










          • @MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
            – Michael Rozenberg
            Sep 10 at 21:07











          • @MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
            – saisanjeev
            Sep 11 at 14:08















          Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
          – MathOverview
          Sep 10 at 20:56




          Have you used any telescopic property of series to achieve equality $sum_i=1^nr_ix_i^2+2sum_1leq i<jleq nr_ix_ix_j=sum_i=1^nleft(r_i-r_i-1right)left(sum_j=i^nx_jright)^2$?
          – MathOverview
          Sep 10 at 20:56












          @MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
          – Michael Rozenberg
          Sep 10 at 20:58





          @MathOverview It's just telescoping summation and $left(sumlimits_i=1^kx_iright)^2=sumlimits_i=1^kx_i^2+2sumlimits_1leq i<jleq kx_ix_j.$
          – Michael Rozenberg
          Sep 10 at 20:58













          I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
          – MathOverview
          Sep 10 at 20:59




          I know that telescopic property for series was somehow used. But I can not understand the equality between these two quantities. Could you explain better?
          – MathOverview
          Sep 10 at 20:59












          @MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
          – Michael Rozenberg
          Sep 10 at 21:07





          @MathOverview For example, the coefficient before $x_k^2$ it's $sumlimits_i=1^k(r_i-r_i-1)=r_k-r_0=r_k.$ Similarly, the coefficient before $x_ix_j$, where $i<j$ it's $2r_i$.
          – Michael Rozenberg
          Sep 10 at 21:07













          @MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
          – saisanjeev
          Sep 11 at 14:08




          @MichaelRozenberg can you please elaborate on the step pointed out earlier by MathOverview
          – saisanjeev
          Sep 11 at 14:08

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911918%2fhow-to-prove-this-inequality-involving-the-minimum-of-two-chosen-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          8eGpHpCUVlB5QhQzp9Plhj,uffmwjyC4uXgyCczwx GdLLahT,vJGJazWRQmRCQMackEEcSFIt
          O,XO18,luVStfEUS,kqUW2

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          Propositional logic and tautologies

          Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility