Vtyjkyuk

Does anyone have any thoughts on this? I have been struggling with it and I'm not sure if it's a hard problem, or easy and I'm just not getting it?

For $n=2$ sets (say $A$ and $B$), it's obviously 4:

1. The one where $A cap B = emptyset$


2. The one in which $A cap B neq emptyset$, but neither set is a subset of the other


3. The one where $A subset B$


4. The one where $B subset A$

(I'm assuming $A neq B$ in all cases.)

For $n ge2 $, though it seems rather difficult. I can't think of a systematic way to count them. Originally I thought I could look at all distinct pairs and allow each pair to take on one of three values (representing disjoint, intersecting, and subset). But I've already found a case where two different diagrams can have the same representation this way.

Any ideas? Thanks.

In the past month and an half I have spent more hours that I care to admit on this problem.

The original answer is still valid: 2^(2^n - 1) - 1 is an upper boundary on the number of possible Euler diagram. This is sequence A077585 in the OEIS.

A better upper limit is the the number of "covers" of an N set, sequence A003464. This eliminate the cases that reduce to a lower number of "characteristics". For example, the case with two separate regions B and C and no A will be eliminated from the count n=3;

An ever better upper limit is calculated with an iterative "procedure" that tracks how many regions are added when a new characteristic is added. I will upload this sequence to the OEIS, but it is related to A007018.

A lower limit is given by this same procedure, but removing repetitions.
This catches most of the "equivalent" arrangements, but has a number of false positives, as the example below

A different lower limit is given by the number of possible arrangements of circles in a projective plane, sequence A250001 on OEIS.
This however misses the possibilities of non-well formed Euler diagrams (e.g. with partially overlapping boundaries) like this

Moreover the sequence is not defined after n=4, while the iterative-no repetition could be easily extended to n=6.

In summary, this is the table that i came up with

I stumbled on the same problem while trying to have an automatic Euler diagram generator and I think the answer of deinst is correct.

Given $n$ “characteristics” there are
$$V(n) = 2^n-1$$ different subsets (i.e. the Venn diagram sets, excluding the "rest of universe").

$$V(2)=3$$ $A setminus B \ B setminus A,\ Acap B$

$$V(3)=7$$ $A setminus (Bcup C)\ B setminus (Acup C)\ Csetminus (Acup B)\ (Acap B) setminus C\ (Acap C) setminus B\ (Bcap C) setminus A\ Acap B cap C$

Then we can assign each of these regions to exist / not exist in our Euler diagram. The number of combinations excluding the empty Universe is
$$E(V) = 2^V - 1 \E(n) = 2^(2^n -1)-1$$

I use a short notation, in which a letter indicates that the zone has only that characteristic. So for 3 characteristics $A triangleq A setminus (B cup C) qquad AB triangleq (Acap B)setminus C$

For n = 2, E= 7
1) A, B=∅
2) B, A=∅
3) AB, A = B ≠ ∅
4) A+B, A∩B=∅
5) A+AB, B⊂A
6) B+AB, A⊂B
7) A+B+AB A∩B≠∅, but neither set is a subset of the other

Of these, the first 3 reduce to cases with only "1" characteristic 
and the last 4 are the cases you listed in the question.

Note that for three characteristics the number is 127, so sketching all of them would take quite some time.

Much more difficult is to define when two diagrams are “functionally equivalent” as cases 5 and 6 above.