Solution verification post : Problem $12.1$, Mathematical Analysis, Apostol

Multi tool use
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
As a continuation of this post, I'm starting to post my solutions (or attempts) to the exercise problems of Chapter 12 (Multivariable Differential Calculus), Mathematical Analysis by Apostol (suggested by Masacroso). Since I'm essentially self-studying, I'd really appreciate if anyone checks the solutions and let me know if there is any gap in my arguments or if there exists any cleverer solutions. Thank you.
Problem $12.1.$ Let $S$ be an open subset of $mathbbR^n$, and let $f:S to mathbbR$ be a real-valued function with finite partial derivative $D_1f,dots,D_nf$ on $S$. If $f$ has a local maximum or a local minimum at a point $c$ in $S$, prove that $D_kfleft(cright)=0 ,,forall ,k$.
Solution. Suppose that $f$ has a local maximum at $c in S$. This implies that $exists delta>0$ such that
$$f(c) geq f(x) text for all x in B_delta(c)=lefty in S : leftVert y-c rightVert < delta right tag1$$
Let $k in 1,dots,n$. Now,
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0 fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h tag2$$
It is given that $(2)$ exists finitely, then
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0;,h in (0,delta) fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h leq 0 tag3$$
On the other hand,
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0;,h in (-delta,0) fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h geq 0 tag4$$
$(3)$ and $(4)$ $Rightarrow$ $D_kf(c)=0$. This holds for every $k in 1,dots,n$ and hence we are done.
real-analysis analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives proof-verification
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
As a continuation of this post, I'm starting to post my solutions (or attempts) to the exercise problems of Chapter 12 (Multivariable Differential Calculus), Mathematical Analysis by Apostol (suggested by Masacroso). Since I'm essentially self-studying, I'd really appreciate if anyone checks the solutions and let me know if there is any gap in my arguments or if there exists any cleverer solutions. Thank you.
Problem $12.1.$ Let $S$ be an open subset of $mathbbR^n$, and let $f:S to mathbbR$ be a real-valued function with finite partial derivative $D_1f,dots,D_nf$ on $S$. If $f$ has a local maximum or a local minimum at a point $c$ in $S$, prove that $D_kfleft(cright)=0 ,,forall ,k$.
Solution. Suppose that $f$ has a local maximum at $c in S$. This implies that $exists delta>0$ such that
$$f(c) geq f(x) text for all x in B_delta(c)=lefty in S : leftVert y-c rightVert < delta right tag1$$
Let $k in 1,dots,n$. Now,
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0 fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h tag2$$
It is given that $(2)$ exists finitely, then
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0;,h in (0,delta) fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h leq 0 tag3$$
On the other hand,
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0;,h in (-delta,0) fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h geq 0 tag4$$
$(3)$ and $(4)$ $Rightarrow$ $D_kf(c)=0$. This holds for every $k in 1,dots,n$ and hence we are done.
real-analysis analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives proof-verification
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
As a continuation of this post, I'm starting to post my solutions (or attempts) to the exercise problems of Chapter 12 (Multivariable Differential Calculus), Mathematical Analysis by Apostol (suggested by Masacroso). Since I'm essentially self-studying, I'd really appreciate if anyone checks the solutions and let me know if there is any gap in my arguments or if there exists any cleverer solutions. Thank you.
Problem $12.1.$ Let $S$ be an open subset of $mathbbR^n$, and let $f:S to mathbbR$ be a real-valued function with finite partial derivative $D_1f,dots,D_nf$ on $S$. If $f$ has a local maximum or a local minimum at a point $c$ in $S$, prove that $D_kfleft(cright)=0 ,,forall ,k$.
Solution. Suppose that $f$ has a local maximum at $c in S$. This implies that $exists delta>0$ such that
$$f(c) geq f(x) text for all x in B_delta(c)=lefty in S : leftVert y-c rightVert < delta right tag1$$
Let $k in 1,dots,n$. Now,
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0 fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h tag2$$
It is given that $(2)$ exists finitely, then
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0;,h in (0,delta) fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h leq 0 tag3$$
On the other hand,
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0;,h in (-delta,0) fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h geq 0 tag4$$
$(3)$ and $(4)$ $Rightarrow$ $D_kf(c)=0$. This holds for every $k in 1,dots,n$ and hence we are done.
real-analysis analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives proof-verification
As a continuation of this post, I'm starting to post my solutions (or attempts) to the exercise problems of Chapter 12 (Multivariable Differential Calculus), Mathematical Analysis by Apostol (suggested by Masacroso). Since I'm essentially self-studying, I'd really appreciate if anyone checks the solutions and let me know if there is any gap in my arguments or if there exists any cleverer solutions. Thank you.
Problem $12.1.$ Let $S$ be an open subset of $mathbbR^n$, and let $f:S to mathbbR$ be a real-valued function with finite partial derivative $D_1f,dots,D_nf$ on $S$. If $f$ has a local maximum or a local minimum at a point $c$ in $S$, prove that $D_kfleft(cright)=0 ,,forall ,k$.
Solution. Suppose that $f$ has a local maximum at $c in S$. This implies that $exists delta>0$ such that
$$f(c) geq f(x) text for all x in B_delta(c)=lefty in S : leftVert y-c rightVert < delta right tag1$$
Let $k in 1,dots,n$. Now,
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0 fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h tag2$$
It is given that $(2)$ exists finitely, then
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0;,h in (0,delta) fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h leq 0 tag3$$
On the other hand,
$$D_kf(c)=lim_h to 0;,h in (-delta,0) fracf(c+he_k)-f(c)h geq 0 tag4$$
$(3)$ and $(4)$ $Rightarrow$ $D_kf(c)=0$. This holds for every $k in 1,dots,n$ and hence we are done.
real-analysis analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives proof-verification
real-analysis analysis multivariable-calculus derivatives proof-verification
asked Sep 10 at 13:03


Eugenia
864
864
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Yes, your solution is correct. The same argument is used in the one-dimensional case. In fact, you could reduce your problem to the one-dimensional case by considering
$$g_k(t):= f(a+t e_k)$$
in a neighboorhoud of $0$ (exists because $S$ is open) and fixed $a in S$. Here $e_1,ldots,e_n$ denote the 'standard basis' of $mathbbR^n$. Assuming that $f$ has a local maximum in $a in S$ implies that $g_1,ldots,g_n$ have a local maximum in $t=0$. Thus we have
$$0=g'_k(0) = left. fracmathrmdmathrmd x_k f(x) right|_x=a.$$
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Yes, your solution is correct. The same argument is used in the one-dimensional case. In fact, you could reduce your problem to the one-dimensional case by considering
$$g_k(t):= f(a+t e_k)$$
in a neighboorhoud of $0$ (exists because $S$ is open) and fixed $a in S$. Here $e_1,ldots,e_n$ denote the 'standard basis' of $mathbbR^n$. Assuming that $f$ has a local maximum in $a in S$ implies that $g_1,ldots,g_n$ have a local maximum in $t=0$. Thus we have
$$0=g'_k(0) = left. fracmathrmdmathrmd x_k f(x) right|_x=a.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Yes, your solution is correct. The same argument is used in the one-dimensional case. In fact, you could reduce your problem to the one-dimensional case by considering
$$g_k(t):= f(a+t e_k)$$
in a neighboorhoud of $0$ (exists because $S$ is open) and fixed $a in S$. Here $e_1,ldots,e_n$ denote the 'standard basis' of $mathbbR^n$. Assuming that $f$ has a local maximum in $a in S$ implies that $g_1,ldots,g_n$ have a local maximum in $t=0$. Thus we have
$$0=g'_k(0) = left. fracmathrmdmathrmd x_k f(x) right|_x=a.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Yes, your solution is correct. The same argument is used in the one-dimensional case. In fact, you could reduce your problem to the one-dimensional case by considering
$$g_k(t):= f(a+t e_k)$$
in a neighboorhoud of $0$ (exists because $S$ is open) and fixed $a in S$. Here $e_1,ldots,e_n$ denote the 'standard basis' of $mathbbR^n$. Assuming that $f$ has a local maximum in $a in S$ implies that $g_1,ldots,g_n$ have a local maximum in $t=0$. Thus we have
$$0=g'_k(0) = left. fracmathrmdmathrmd x_k f(x) right|_x=a.$$
Yes, your solution is correct. The same argument is used in the one-dimensional case. In fact, you could reduce your problem to the one-dimensional case by considering
$$g_k(t):= f(a+t e_k)$$
in a neighboorhoud of $0$ (exists because $S$ is open) and fixed $a in S$. Here $e_1,ldots,e_n$ denote the 'standard basis' of $mathbbR^n$. Assuming that $f$ has a local maximum in $a in S$ implies that $g_1,ldots,g_n$ have a local maximum in $t=0$. Thus we have
$$0=g'_k(0) = left. fracmathrmdmathrmd x_k f(x) right|_x=a.$$
answered Sep 10 at 13:13
p4sch
2,860214
2,860214
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911903%2fsolution-verification-post-problem-12-1-mathematical-analysis-apostol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password