Prove that a simple graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $n ge 2$; is complete if and only if $kappa(G)[vertex connctivity]=n - 1$:

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Prove that a simple graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $n ge 2$; is complete if and only if $kappa(G)[textvertex connctivity]=n - 1$:



proof. n=1. It is trivially true. Suppose we assume result hols for $n=k$, We need to prove this result hold for $n=k+1$. Consider $K_k+1$ complete graph, removal of one vertex resuts $K_k$. We know that the $k-1$ vertex required to remove the graph disconnected. So, $kappa(K_k-1)=k-1+1=k$. Hence, by induction, result holds for every $nin mathbb N$. Am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question























  • It is hard to be sure, but I think you only proved it one way, that is "if the graph is complete than it has vertex connectivity such and such".
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Sep 10 at 9:16










  • How can I `write the converse argument?
    – Math geek
    Sep 10 at 9:21






  • 1




    You have to prove that if $G$ is not complete then it has v.c. at most $n-2$. I would start by looking at some missing edge.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Sep 10 at 9:51














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Prove that a simple graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $n ge 2$; is complete if and only if $kappa(G)[textvertex connctivity]=n - 1$:



proof. n=1. It is trivially true. Suppose we assume result hols for $n=k$, We need to prove this result hold for $n=k+1$. Consider $K_k+1$ complete graph, removal of one vertex resuts $K_k$. We know that the $k-1$ vertex required to remove the graph disconnected. So, $kappa(K_k-1)=k-1+1=k$. Hence, by induction, result holds for every $nin mathbb N$. Am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question























  • It is hard to be sure, but I think you only proved it one way, that is "if the graph is complete than it has vertex connectivity such and such".
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Sep 10 at 9:16










  • How can I `write the converse argument?
    – Math geek
    Sep 10 at 9:21






  • 1




    You have to prove that if $G$ is not complete then it has v.c. at most $n-2$. I would start by looking at some missing edge.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Sep 10 at 9:51












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Prove that a simple graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $n ge 2$; is complete if and only if $kappa(G)[textvertex connctivity]=n - 1$:



proof. n=1. It is trivially true. Suppose we assume result hols for $n=k$, We need to prove this result hold for $n=k+1$. Consider $K_k+1$ complete graph, removal of one vertex resuts $K_k$. We know that the $k-1$ vertex required to remove the graph disconnected. So, $kappa(K_k-1)=k-1+1=k$. Hence, by induction, result holds for every $nin mathbb N$. Am I correct?










share|cite|improve this question















Prove that a simple graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $n ge 2$; is complete if and only if $kappa(G)[textvertex connctivity]=n - 1$:



proof. n=1. It is trivially true. Suppose we assume result hols for $n=k$, We need to prove this result hold for $n=k+1$. Consider $K_k+1$ complete graph, removal of one vertex resuts $K_k$. We know that the $k-1$ vertex required to remove the graph disconnected. So, $kappa(K_k-1)=k-1+1=k$. Hence, by induction, result holds for every $nin mathbb N$. Am I correct?







proof-verification graph-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 10 at 9:04

























asked Sep 10 at 8:49









Math geek

1346




1346











  • It is hard to be sure, but I think you only proved it one way, that is "if the graph is complete than it has vertex connectivity such and such".
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Sep 10 at 9:16










  • How can I `write the converse argument?
    – Math geek
    Sep 10 at 9:21






  • 1




    You have to prove that if $G$ is not complete then it has v.c. at most $n-2$. I would start by looking at some missing edge.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Sep 10 at 9:51
















  • It is hard to be sure, but I think you only proved it one way, that is "if the graph is complete than it has vertex connectivity such and such".
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Sep 10 at 9:16










  • How can I `write the converse argument?
    – Math geek
    Sep 10 at 9:21






  • 1




    You have to prove that if $G$ is not complete then it has v.c. at most $n-2$. I would start by looking at some missing edge.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Sep 10 at 9:51















It is hard to be sure, but I think you only proved it one way, that is "if the graph is complete than it has vertex connectivity such and such".
– Michal Adamaszek
Sep 10 at 9:16




It is hard to be sure, but I think you only proved it one way, that is "if the graph is complete than it has vertex connectivity such and such".
– Michal Adamaszek
Sep 10 at 9:16












How can I `write the converse argument?
– Math geek
Sep 10 at 9:21




How can I `write the converse argument?
– Math geek
Sep 10 at 9:21




1




1




You have to prove that if $G$ is not complete then it has v.c. at most $n-2$. I would start by looking at some missing edge.
– Michal Adamaszek
Sep 10 at 9:51




You have to prove that if $G$ is not complete then it has v.c. at most $n-2$. I would start by looking at some missing edge.
– Michal Adamaszek
Sep 10 at 9:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













For the statement $kappa(G) = n-1$ implies $G=K_n$, again use induction.



The base case is simple.



The induction hypothesis is then that if $G$ has $k-1$ vertices and $kappa(G) = k -2$, then $G = K_k-1$.



Now, take a graph $G$ with vertex connectivity $kappa(G) = k-1$. Pick an arbitrary vertex $v$, now $kappa(G-v) = k-2$ and has $k-1$ vertices, so that $G-v$ is the complete graph on $k-1$ vertices by the induction hypothesis. We can see that $operatornamedeg(v) = k-1$, because otherwise, the deletion of less that $k-1$ vertices from $G$ would disconnect $v$ from $G$, contradicting the fact that $kappa(G) = k-1$. Therefore, $G-v$ is $K_k-1$ and $v$ is connected to every vertex in it. Thus $G = K_k$.






share|cite|improve this answer






















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911697%2fprove-that-a-simple-graph-g-with-n-vertices-n-ge-2-is-complete-if-and-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    For the statement $kappa(G) = n-1$ implies $G=K_n$, again use induction.



    The base case is simple.



    The induction hypothesis is then that if $G$ has $k-1$ vertices and $kappa(G) = k -2$, then $G = K_k-1$.



    Now, take a graph $G$ with vertex connectivity $kappa(G) = k-1$. Pick an arbitrary vertex $v$, now $kappa(G-v) = k-2$ and has $k-1$ vertices, so that $G-v$ is the complete graph on $k-1$ vertices by the induction hypothesis. We can see that $operatornamedeg(v) = k-1$, because otherwise, the deletion of less that $k-1$ vertices from $G$ would disconnect $v$ from $G$, contradicting the fact that $kappa(G) = k-1$. Therefore, $G-v$ is $K_k-1$ and $v$ is connected to every vertex in it. Thus $G = K_k$.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      For the statement $kappa(G) = n-1$ implies $G=K_n$, again use induction.



      The base case is simple.



      The induction hypothesis is then that if $G$ has $k-1$ vertices and $kappa(G) = k -2$, then $G = K_k-1$.



      Now, take a graph $G$ with vertex connectivity $kappa(G) = k-1$. Pick an arbitrary vertex $v$, now $kappa(G-v) = k-2$ and has $k-1$ vertices, so that $G-v$ is the complete graph on $k-1$ vertices by the induction hypothesis. We can see that $operatornamedeg(v) = k-1$, because otherwise, the deletion of less that $k-1$ vertices from $G$ would disconnect $v$ from $G$, contradicting the fact that $kappa(G) = k-1$. Therefore, $G-v$ is $K_k-1$ and $v$ is connected to every vertex in it. Thus $G = K_k$.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        For the statement $kappa(G) = n-1$ implies $G=K_n$, again use induction.



        The base case is simple.



        The induction hypothesis is then that if $G$ has $k-1$ vertices and $kappa(G) = k -2$, then $G = K_k-1$.



        Now, take a graph $G$ with vertex connectivity $kappa(G) = k-1$. Pick an arbitrary vertex $v$, now $kappa(G-v) = k-2$ and has $k-1$ vertices, so that $G-v$ is the complete graph on $k-1$ vertices by the induction hypothesis. We can see that $operatornamedeg(v) = k-1$, because otherwise, the deletion of less that $k-1$ vertices from $G$ would disconnect $v$ from $G$, contradicting the fact that $kappa(G) = k-1$. Therefore, $G-v$ is $K_k-1$ and $v$ is connected to every vertex in it. Thus $G = K_k$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        For the statement $kappa(G) = n-1$ implies $G=K_n$, again use induction.



        The base case is simple.



        The induction hypothesis is then that if $G$ has $k-1$ vertices and $kappa(G) = k -2$, then $G = K_k-1$.



        Now, take a graph $G$ with vertex connectivity $kappa(G) = k-1$. Pick an arbitrary vertex $v$, now $kappa(G-v) = k-2$ and has $k-1$ vertices, so that $G-v$ is the complete graph on $k-1$ vertices by the induction hypothesis. We can see that $operatornamedeg(v) = k-1$, because otherwise, the deletion of less that $k-1$ vertices from $G$ would disconnect $v$ from $G$, contradicting the fact that $kappa(G) = k-1$. Therefore, $G-v$ is $K_k-1$ and $v$ is connected to every vertex in it. Thus $G = K_k$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Sep 10 at 9:58

























        answered Sep 10 at 9:53









        Slugger

        2,64111024




        2,64111024



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911697%2fprove-that-a-simple-graph-g-with-n-vertices-n-ge-2-is-complete-if-and-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Strongly p-embedded subgroups and p-Sylow subgroups.