Prove that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a connected graph G results in a disconnected graph with exactly two components.

Multi tool use
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Prove that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a connected
graph $G$ results in a disconnected graph with exactly two components.
(Note that a similar result is not true for a minimum vertex cut.)
Suppose that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a
connected graph $G$ results in a disconnected graph with more than two components. Let $G_1, G_2, G_3,...G_k$ be the connected components obtained by removing minimum-edge cut of a connected graph. so, there exists $k$ edges required to make the graph connected. which contadict our assumption. Am I correct?
proof-verification graph-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Prove that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a connected
graph $G$ results in a disconnected graph with exactly two components.
(Note that a similar result is not true for a minimum vertex cut.)
Suppose that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a
connected graph $G$ results in a disconnected graph with more than two components. Let $G_1, G_2, G_3,...G_k$ be the connected components obtained by removing minimum-edge cut of a connected graph. so, there exists $k$ edges required to make the graph connected. which contadict our assumption. Am I correct?
proof-verification graph-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Prove that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a connected
graph $G$ results in a disconnected graph with exactly two components.
(Note that a similar result is not true for a minimum vertex cut.)
Suppose that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a
connected graph $G$ results in a disconnected graph with more than two components. Let $G_1, G_2, G_3,...G_k$ be the connected components obtained by removing minimum-edge cut of a connected graph. so, there exists $k$ edges required to make the graph connected. which contadict our assumption. Am I correct?
proof-verification graph-theory
Prove that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a connected
graph $G$ results in a disconnected graph with exactly two components.
(Note that a similar result is not true for a minimum vertex cut.)
Suppose that the deletion of edges of a minimum-edge cut of a
connected graph $G$ results in a disconnected graph with more than two components. Let $G_1, G_2, G_3,...G_k$ be the connected components obtained by removing minimum-edge cut of a connected graph. so, there exists $k$ edges required to make the graph connected. which contadict our assumption. Am I correct?
proof-verification graph-theory
proof-verification graph-theory
edited Sep 10 at 9:06
asked Sep 10 at 8:25
Math geek
1346
1346
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I think there is an important thing to add.
There exist $k-1$ (not $k$) edges from the original graph required to make it connected (if we take edges from the outside of original graph, the set being smaller doesn't make any contradiction), but each edge can have its endings in at most two of the connected components, and that's why adding one edge can change disconnectivity of at most two connected component only. So after adding one of these $k-1$ edges the disconnectivity of the graph cannot break, because we assumed that we have more than two connected components. Thus we obtained smaller (with quantity $k-2$) minimum-edge cut.
You can also go with graph with a vertex set $(G_1, G_2, dots , G_k)$ with empty edge set and a set of earlier deleted edges $A=(e_1,e_2,dots,e_k-1)$. For any connected graph it is true that $|E(G)|-1geq |V(G)|$. Therefore for any set of edges smaller than $A$, the graph is disconnected.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I think there is an important thing to add.
There exist $k-1$ (not $k$) edges from the original graph required to make it connected (if we take edges from the outside of original graph, the set being smaller doesn't make any contradiction), but each edge can have its endings in at most two of the connected components, and that's why adding one edge can change disconnectivity of at most two connected component only. So after adding one of these $k-1$ edges the disconnectivity of the graph cannot break, because we assumed that we have more than two connected components. Thus we obtained smaller (with quantity $k-2$) minimum-edge cut.
You can also go with graph with a vertex set $(G_1, G_2, dots , G_k)$ with empty edge set and a set of earlier deleted edges $A=(e_1,e_2,dots,e_k-1)$. For any connected graph it is true that $|E(G)|-1geq |V(G)|$. Therefore for any set of edges smaller than $A$, the graph is disconnected.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I think there is an important thing to add.
There exist $k-1$ (not $k$) edges from the original graph required to make it connected (if we take edges from the outside of original graph, the set being smaller doesn't make any contradiction), but each edge can have its endings in at most two of the connected components, and that's why adding one edge can change disconnectivity of at most two connected component only. So after adding one of these $k-1$ edges the disconnectivity of the graph cannot break, because we assumed that we have more than two connected components. Thus we obtained smaller (with quantity $k-2$) minimum-edge cut.
You can also go with graph with a vertex set $(G_1, G_2, dots , G_k)$ with empty edge set and a set of earlier deleted edges $A=(e_1,e_2,dots,e_k-1)$. For any connected graph it is true that $|E(G)|-1geq |V(G)|$. Therefore for any set of edges smaller than $A$, the graph is disconnected.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I think there is an important thing to add.
There exist $k-1$ (not $k$) edges from the original graph required to make it connected (if we take edges from the outside of original graph, the set being smaller doesn't make any contradiction), but each edge can have its endings in at most two of the connected components, and that's why adding one edge can change disconnectivity of at most two connected component only. So after adding one of these $k-1$ edges the disconnectivity of the graph cannot break, because we assumed that we have more than two connected components. Thus we obtained smaller (with quantity $k-2$) minimum-edge cut.
You can also go with graph with a vertex set $(G_1, G_2, dots , G_k)$ with empty edge set and a set of earlier deleted edges $A=(e_1,e_2,dots,e_k-1)$. For any connected graph it is true that $|E(G)|-1geq |V(G)|$. Therefore for any set of edges smaller than $A$, the graph is disconnected.
I think there is an important thing to add.
There exist $k-1$ (not $k$) edges from the original graph required to make it connected (if we take edges from the outside of original graph, the set being smaller doesn't make any contradiction), but each edge can have its endings in at most two of the connected components, and that's why adding one edge can change disconnectivity of at most two connected component only. So after adding one of these $k-1$ edges the disconnectivity of the graph cannot break, because we assumed that we have more than two connected components. Thus we obtained smaller (with quantity $k-2$) minimum-edge cut.
You can also go with graph with a vertex set $(G_1, G_2, dots , G_k)$ with empty edge set and a set of earlier deleted edges $A=(e_1,e_2,dots,e_k-1)$. For any connected graph it is true that $|E(G)|-1geq |V(G)|$. Therefore for any set of edges smaller than $A$, the graph is disconnected.
answered Sep 11 at 6:21


Gaha
657
657
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911668%2fprove-that-the-deletion-of-edges-of-a-minimum-edge-cut-of-a-connected-graph-g-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password