Proving a topological space is Tychonoff (completely regular) iff it has a base of cozero sets.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












There is a particular characterization of Tychonoff spaces (also known as completely regular spaces) which uses cozero sets which I'm trying to prove. As a quick reminder,




For a space $X$, a set $A subseteq X$ is said to be a zero set of $X$ if there exists a continuous function $f: X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $A = f^-1(0)$. We say that a set $B subseteq X$ is a cozero set of $X$ if it is the complement of a zero set; i.e., there exists a continuous function $g: X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $B = g^-1((0,1])$.




With this in mind, I'm trying to prove that a $T_1$ topological space $X$ is Tychonoff if and only if it has a base of cozero sets. This seems to be a pretty well known result, but I'm struggling to prove it (or for that matter find a proof). I've shown that if a space is Tychonoff then it has a base of cozero sets, but after a couple of weeks of failing, I can't prove the fact that if a space has a base of cozero sets, then it must be Tychonoff.



Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    There is a particular characterization of Tychonoff spaces (also known as completely regular spaces) which uses cozero sets which I'm trying to prove. As a quick reminder,




    For a space $X$, a set $A subseteq X$ is said to be a zero set of $X$ if there exists a continuous function $f: X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $A = f^-1(0)$. We say that a set $B subseteq X$ is a cozero set of $X$ if it is the complement of a zero set; i.e., there exists a continuous function $g: X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $B = g^-1((0,1])$.




    With this in mind, I'm trying to prove that a $T_1$ topological space $X$ is Tychonoff if and only if it has a base of cozero sets. This seems to be a pretty well known result, but I'm struggling to prove it (or for that matter find a proof). I've shown that if a space is Tychonoff then it has a base of cozero sets, but after a couple of weeks of failing, I can't prove the fact that if a space has a base of cozero sets, then it must be Tychonoff.



    Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      There is a particular characterization of Tychonoff spaces (also known as completely regular spaces) which uses cozero sets which I'm trying to prove. As a quick reminder,




      For a space $X$, a set $A subseteq X$ is said to be a zero set of $X$ if there exists a continuous function $f: X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $A = f^-1(0)$. We say that a set $B subseteq X$ is a cozero set of $X$ if it is the complement of a zero set; i.e., there exists a continuous function $g: X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $B = g^-1((0,1])$.




      With this in mind, I'm trying to prove that a $T_1$ topological space $X$ is Tychonoff if and only if it has a base of cozero sets. This seems to be a pretty well known result, but I'm struggling to prove it (or for that matter find a proof). I've shown that if a space is Tychonoff then it has a base of cozero sets, but after a couple of weeks of failing, I can't prove the fact that if a space has a base of cozero sets, then it must be Tychonoff.



      Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?










      share|cite|improve this question













      There is a particular characterization of Tychonoff spaces (also known as completely regular spaces) which uses cozero sets which I'm trying to prove. As a quick reminder,




      For a space $X$, a set $A subseteq X$ is said to be a zero set of $X$ if there exists a continuous function $f: X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $A = f^-1(0)$. We say that a set $B subseteq X$ is a cozero set of $X$ if it is the complement of a zero set; i.e., there exists a continuous function $g: X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $B = g^-1((0,1])$.




      With this in mind, I'm trying to prove that a $T_1$ topological space $X$ is Tychonoff if and only if it has a base of cozero sets. This seems to be a pretty well known result, but I'm struggling to prove it (or for that matter find a proof). I've shown that if a space is Tychonoff then it has a base of cozero sets, but after a couple of weeks of failing, I can't prove the fact that if a space has a base of cozero sets, then it must be Tychonoff.



      Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?







      general-topology separation-axioms






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 30 at 0:27









      Ando Escalando

      102




      102




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Suppose $X$ has a base of cozero sets.



          Let $p in O$ where $O$ is open in $X$.



          As the cozero sets form a base, there is a cozero set $U$ such that



          $$p in U subseteq O$$ This $U$ is of the form $g^-1[[(0,1]]$ for some $g: X to [0,1]$ that is continuous. (This is your own definition of a cozero set).



          Note that this means $g(p) in (0,1]$ and $g(x) = 0$ whenever $x notin O$ (or else $x in g^-1[[(0,1]] = U subseteq O$, contradiction).
          Now take any continuous function $h: [0,1] to [0,1]$ such that $h(g(p)) = 0$ and $h(0) = 1$ (a simple linear descending function from $(0,1)$ to $(f(p),0))$ continuing with $0$ (as the graph) will do). Then $f:= h circ g$ is also continuous, maps $X$ to $[0,1]$ also and obeys $f(p) = 0$ and $f[Xsetminus O] = 1$



          As we have such $f$ for every such $x in O$, $X$ is completely regular.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • This was it! Thanks a bunch! I'm assuming you meant $h(f(p))$ on the choice of $h$, correct? Thanks again man!
            – Ando Escalando
            Sep 1 at 0:16










          • @AndoEscalando Yes, I edited the post to correct the $g$ to $h$. Glad I could help.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Sep 1 at 5:00

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          If we prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ (the zero sets of $X$) are a basis for the closed sets we are done (only take complements).



          Let $X$ be a Tychonoff space. We want to prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for closed sets, .i.e., for all $F$ closed there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. Let $Fsubseteq X$ be a closed set. If $F=X$ then $mathscrF=X$. If $Fsubseteq X$ and $Fneq X$ then for all $pin Xsetminus F$ there exist $f_p:Xto[0,1]$ (because $X$ is Tychonoff) a continuous function such that $f_p(p)=1$ and $f_p[F]=0$. Let $mathscrF=Z(f_p):pin Xsetminus F$ (here, $Z(f_p)$ is the zero set of $f_p$). Clearly, because for all $pin Xsetminus F$ we have that $Fsubseteq Z(f_p)$ then $Fsubseteqdisplaystylebigcap mathscrF$. If we take $pindisplaystylebigcapmathscrF$ then, if we suposse that $pnotin F$ we conclude that $f_p(p)=1$ but $pin Z(f_p)$, i.e., $f_p(p)=0$. This is a contradiction. Therefore $pin F$ and thus $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. In this way, $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for a closed sets, therefore, $textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$.



          Now, if $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for the closed sets ($textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$), take $Fsubseteq X$ a closed set and $pin Xsetminus F$. By hypothesis there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $F=displaystylebigcapmathscrF$. Because $pnotin F$ then there exist $ZinmathscrF$ such that $pnotin Z$. Let $f$ be the function that gives the zero set $Z$. Then, $f(p)neq 0$. If we define $$g(x)=dfracf(x)f(p)$$then $Z(g)=Z(f)$, i.e., $f$ and $g$ vanishes in the same points. Therefore $Fsubseteq Z(g)$ and $g(p)=1$.



          Note that your general hypothesis should be $X$ a $T_1$ space.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • I thought about something similar when defining $g$, but couldn't figure out how to guarantee that $Im(g) subseteq [0,1]$, since $f(p) in (0,1]$. How do you work around this?
            – Ando Escalando
            Aug 31 at 19:05


















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          This is Theorem 3.12 in Chapter 7 of Freiwald's book An Introduction to Set Theory and Topology, which also gives two other characterizations.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Would the downvoter dare to explain the dowvote? The question was "Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?". I think I answered the question and I actually spent quite a long time to find a reachable link on the web.
            – J.-E. Pin
            Aug 30 at 8:12










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2898967%2fproving-a-topological-space-is-tychonoff-completely-regular-iff-it-has-a-base%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Suppose $X$ has a base of cozero sets.



          Let $p in O$ where $O$ is open in $X$.



          As the cozero sets form a base, there is a cozero set $U$ such that



          $$p in U subseteq O$$ This $U$ is of the form $g^-1[[(0,1]]$ for some $g: X to [0,1]$ that is continuous. (This is your own definition of a cozero set).



          Note that this means $g(p) in (0,1]$ and $g(x) = 0$ whenever $x notin O$ (or else $x in g^-1[[(0,1]] = U subseteq O$, contradiction).
          Now take any continuous function $h: [0,1] to [0,1]$ such that $h(g(p)) = 0$ and $h(0) = 1$ (a simple linear descending function from $(0,1)$ to $(f(p),0))$ continuing with $0$ (as the graph) will do). Then $f:= h circ g$ is also continuous, maps $X$ to $[0,1]$ also and obeys $f(p) = 0$ and $f[Xsetminus O] = 1$



          As we have such $f$ for every such $x in O$, $X$ is completely regular.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • This was it! Thanks a bunch! I'm assuming you meant $h(f(p))$ on the choice of $h$, correct? Thanks again man!
            – Ando Escalando
            Sep 1 at 0:16










          • @AndoEscalando Yes, I edited the post to correct the $g$ to $h$. Glad I could help.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Sep 1 at 5:00














          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Suppose $X$ has a base of cozero sets.



          Let $p in O$ where $O$ is open in $X$.



          As the cozero sets form a base, there is a cozero set $U$ such that



          $$p in U subseteq O$$ This $U$ is of the form $g^-1[[(0,1]]$ for some $g: X to [0,1]$ that is continuous. (This is your own definition of a cozero set).



          Note that this means $g(p) in (0,1]$ and $g(x) = 0$ whenever $x notin O$ (or else $x in g^-1[[(0,1]] = U subseteq O$, contradiction).
          Now take any continuous function $h: [0,1] to [0,1]$ such that $h(g(p)) = 0$ and $h(0) = 1$ (a simple linear descending function from $(0,1)$ to $(f(p),0))$ continuing with $0$ (as the graph) will do). Then $f:= h circ g$ is also continuous, maps $X$ to $[0,1]$ also and obeys $f(p) = 0$ and $f[Xsetminus O] = 1$



          As we have such $f$ for every such $x in O$, $X$ is completely regular.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • This was it! Thanks a bunch! I'm assuming you meant $h(f(p))$ on the choice of $h$, correct? Thanks again man!
            – Ando Escalando
            Sep 1 at 0:16










          • @AndoEscalando Yes, I edited the post to correct the $g$ to $h$. Glad I could help.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Sep 1 at 5:00












          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          Suppose $X$ has a base of cozero sets.



          Let $p in O$ where $O$ is open in $X$.



          As the cozero sets form a base, there is a cozero set $U$ such that



          $$p in U subseteq O$$ This $U$ is of the form $g^-1[[(0,1]]$ for some $g: X to [0,1]$ that is continuous. (This is your own definition of a cozero set).



          Note that this means $g(p) in (0,1]$ and $g(x) = 0$ whenever $x notin O$ (or else $x in g^-1[[(0,1]] = U subseteq O$, contradiction).
          Now take any continuous function $h: [0,1] to [0,1]$ such that $h(g(p)) = 0$ and $h(0) = 1$ (a simple linear descending function from $(0,1)$ to $(f(p),0))$ continuing with $0$ (as the graph) will do). Then $f:= h circ g$ is also continuous, maps $X$ to $[0,1]$ also and obeys $f(p) = 0$ and $f[Xsetminus O] = 1$



          As we have such $f$ for every such $x in O$, $X$ is completely regular.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Suppose $X$ has a base of cozero sets.



          Let $p in O$ where $O$ is open in $X$.



          As the cozero sets form a base, there is a cozero set $U$ such that



          $$p in U subseteq O$$ This $U$ is of the form $g^-1[[(0,1]]$ for some $g: X to [0,1]$ that is continuous. (This is your own definition of a cozero set).



          Note that this means $g(p) in (0,1]$ and $g(x) = 0$ whenever $x notin O$ (or else $x in g^-1[[(0,1]] = U subseteq O$, contradiction).
          Now take any continuous function $h: [0,1] to [0,1]$ such that $h(g(p)) = 0$ and $h(0) = 1$ (a simple linear descending function from $(0,1)$ to $(f(p),0))$ continuing with $0$ (as the graph) will do). Then $f:= h circ g$ is also continuous, maps $X$ to $[0,1]$ also and obeys $f(p) = 0$ and $f[Xsetminus O] = 1$



          As we have such $f$ for every such $x in O$, $X$ is completely regular.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 1 at 4:57

























          answered Aug 31 at 22:11









          Henno Brandsma

          93.1k342101




          93.1k342101











          • This was it! Thanks a bunch! I'm assuming you meant $h(f(p))$ on the choice of $h$, correct? Thanks again man!
            – Ando Escalando
            Sep 1 at 0:16










          • @AndoEscalando Yes, I edited the post to correct the $g$ to $h$. Glad I could help.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Sep 1 at 5:00
















          • This was it! Thanks a bunch! I'm assuming you meant $h(f(p))$ on the choice of $h$, correct? Thanks again man!
            – Ando Escalando
            Sep 1 at 0:16










          • @AndoEscalando Yes, I edited the post to correct the $g$ to $h$. Glad I could help.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Sep 1 at 5:00















          This was it! Thanks a bunch! I'm assuming you meant $h(f(p))$ on the choice of $h$, correct? Thanks again man!
          – Ando Escalando
          Sep 1 at 0:16




          This was it! Thanks a bunch! I'm assuming you meant $h(f(p))$ on the choice of $h$, correct? Thanks again man!
          – Ando Escalando
          Sep 1 at 0:16












          @AndoEscalando Yes, I edited the post to correct the $g$ to $h$. Glad I could help.
          – Henno Brandsma
          Sep 1 at 5:00




          @AndoEscalando Yes, I edited the post to correct the $g$ to $h$. Glad I could help.
          – Henno Brandsma
          Sep 1 at 5:00










          up vote
          1
          down vote













          If we prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ (the zero sets of $X$) are a basis for the closed sets we are done (only take complements).



          Let $X$ be a Tychonoff space. We want to prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for closed sets, .i.e., for all $F$ closed there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. Let $Fsubseteq X$ be a closed set. If $F=X$ then $mathscrF=X$. If $Fsubseteq X$ and $Fneq X$ then for all $pin Xsetminus F$ there exist $f_p:Xto[0,1]$ (because $X$ is Tychonoff) a continuous function such that $f_p(p)=1$ and $f_p[F]=0$. Let $mathscrF=Z(f_p):pin Xsetminus F$ (here, $Z(f_p)$ is the zero set of $f_p$). Clearly, because for all $pin Xsetminus F$ we have that $Fsubseteq Z(f_p)$ then $Fsubseteqdisplaystylebigcap mathscrF$. If we take $pindisplaystylebigcapmathscrF$ then, if we suposse that $pnotin F$ we conclude that $f_p(p)=1$ but $pin Z(f_p)$, i.e., $f_p(p)=0$. This is a contradiction. Therefore $pin F$ and thus $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. In this way, $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for a closed sets, therefore, $textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$.



          Now, if $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for the closed sets ($textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$), take $Fsubseteq X$ a closed set and $pin Xsetminus F$. By hypothesis there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $F=displaystylebigcapmathscrF$. Because $pnotin F$ then there exist $ZinmathscrF$ such that $pnotin Z$. Let $f$ be the function that gives the zero set $Z$. Then, $f(p)neq 0$. If we define $$g(x)=dfracf(x)f(p)$$then $Z(g)=Z(f)$, i.e., $f$ and $g$ vanishes in the same points. Therefore $Fsubseteq Z(g)$ and $g(p)=1$.



          Note that your general hypothesis should be $X$ a $T_1$ space.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • I thought about something similar when defining $g$, but couldn't figure out how to guarantee that $Im(g) subseteq [0,1]$, since $f(p) in (0,1]$. How do you work around this?
            – Ando Escalando
            Aug 31 at 19:05















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          If we prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ (the zero sets of $X$) are a basis for the closed sets we are done (only take complements).



          Let $X$ be a Tychonoff space. We want to prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for closed sets, .i.e., for all $F$ closed there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. Let $Fsubseteq X$ be a closed set. If $F=X$ then $mathscrF=X$. If $Fsubseteq X$ and $Fneq X$ then for all $pin Xsetminus F$ there exist $f_p:Xto[0,1]$ (because $X$ is Tychonoff) a continuous function such that $f_p(p)=1$ and $f_p[F]=0$. Let $mathscrF=Z(f_p):pin Xsetminus F$ (here, $Z(f_p)$ is the zero set of $f_p$). Clearly, because for all $pin Xsetminus F$ we have that $Fsubseteq Z(f_p)$ then $Fsubseteqdisplaystylebigcap mathscrF$. If we take $pindisplaystylebigcapmathscrF$ then, if we suposse that $pnotin F$ we conclude that $f_p(p)=1$ but $pin Z(f_p)$, i.e., $f_p(p)=0$. This is a contradiction. Therefore $pin F$ and thus $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. In this way, $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for a closed sets, therefore, $textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$.



          Now, if $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for the closed sets ($textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$), take $Fsubseteq X$ a closed set and $pin Xsetminus F$. By hypothesis there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $F=displaystylebigcapmathscrF$. Because $pnotin F$ then there exist $ZinmathscrF$ such that $pnotin Z$. Let $f$ be the function that gives the zero set $Z$. Then, $f(p)neq 0$. If we define $$g(x)=dfracf(x)f(p)$$then $Z(g)=Z(f)$, i.e., $f$ and $g$ vanishes in the same points. Therefore $Fsubseteq Z(g)$ and $g(p)=1$.



          Note that your general hypothesis should be $X$ a $T_1$ space.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • I thought about something similar when defining $g$, but couldn't figure out how to guarantee that $Im(g) subseteq [0,1]$, since $f(p) in (0,1]$. How do you work around this?
            – Ando Escalando
            Aug 31 at 19:05













          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          If we prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ (the zero sets of $X$) are a basis for the closed sets we are done (only take complements).



          Let $X$ be a Tychonoff space. We want to prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for closed sets, .i.e., for all $F$ closed there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. Let $Fsubseteq X$ be a closed set. If $F=X$ then $mathscrF=X$. If $Fsubseteq X$ and $Fneq X$ then for all $pin Xsetminus F$ there exist $f_p:Xto[0,1]$ (because $X$ is Tychonoff) a continuous function such that $f_p(p)=1$ and $f_p[F]=0$. Let $mathscrF=Z(f_p):pin Xsetminus F$ (here, $Z(f_p)$ is the zero set of $f_p$). Clearly, because for all $pin Xsetminus F$ we have that $Fsubseteq Z(f_p)$ then $Fsubseteqdisplaystylebigcap mathscrF$. If we take $pindisplaystylebigcapmathscrF$ then, if we suposse that $pnotin F$ we conclude that $f_p(p)=1$ but $pin Z(f_p)$, i.e., $f_p(p)=0$. This is a contradiction. Therefore $pin F$ and thus $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. In this way, $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for a closed sets, therefore, $textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$.



          Now, if $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for the closed sets ($textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$), take $Fsubseteq X$ a closed set and $pin Xsetminus F$. By hypothesis there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $F=displaystylebigcapmathscrF$. Because $pnotin F$ then there exist $ZinmathscrF$ such that $pnotin Z$. Let $f$ be the function that gives the zero set $Z$. Then, $f(p)neq 0$. If we define $$g(x)=dfracf(x)f(p)$$then $Z(g)=Z(f)$, i.e., $f$ and $g$ vanishes in the same points. Therefore $Fsubseteq Z(g)$ and $g(p)=1$.



          Note that your general hypothesis should be $X$ a $T_1$ space.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          If we prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ (the zero sets of $X$) are a basis for the closed sets we are done (only take complements).



          Let $X$ be a Tychonoff space. We want to prove that $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for closed sets, .i.e., for all $F$ closed there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. Let $Fsubseteq X$ be a closed set. If $F=X$ then $mathscrF=X$. If $Fsubseteq X$ and $Fneq X$ then for all $pin Xsetminus F$ there exist $f_p:Xto[0,1]$ (because $X$ is Tychonoff) a continuous function such that $f_p(p)=1$ and $f_p[F]=0$. Let $mathscrF=Z(f_p):pin Xsetminus F$ (here, $Z(f_p)$ is the zero set of $f_p$). Clearly, because for all $pin Xsetminus F$ we have that $Fsubseteq Z(f_p)$ then $Fsubseteqdisplaystylebigcap mathscrF$. If we take $pindisplaystylebigcapmathscrF$ then, if we suposse that $pnotin F$ we conclude that $f_p(p)=1$ but $pin Z(f_p)$, i.e., $f_p(p)=0$. This is a contradiction. Therefore $pin F$ and thus $displaystylebigcapmathscrF=F$. In this way, $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for a closed sets, therefore, $textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$.



          Now, if $mathcalZ[X]$ is a basis for the closed sets ($textcomathcalZ[X]$ (the cozero sets) is a basis for $X$), take $Fsubseteq X$ a closed set and $pin Xsetminus F$. By hypothesis there exist $mathscrFsubseteqmathcalZ[X]$ such that $F=displaystylebigcapmathscrF$. Because $pnotin F$ then there exist $ZinmathscrF$ such that $pnotin Z$. Let $f$ be the function that gives the zero set $Z$. Then, $f(p)neq 0$. If we define $$g(x)=dfracf(x)f(p)$$then $Z(g)=Z(f)$, i.e., $f$ and $g$ vanishes in the same points. Therefore $Fsubseteq Z(g)$ and $g(p)=1$.



          Note that your general hypothesis should be $X$ a $T_1$ space.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 30 at 2:32









          Carlos Jiménez

          2,1721519




          2,1721519











          • I thought about something similar when defining $g$, but couldn't figure out how to guarantee that $Im(g) subseteq [0,1]$, since $f(p) in (0,1]$. How do you work around this?
            – Ando Escalando
            Aug 31 at 19:05

















          • I thought about something similar when defining $g$, but couldn't figure out how to guarantee that $Im(g) subseteq [0,1]$, since $f(p) in (0,1]$. How do you work around this?
            – Ando Escalando
            Aug 31 at 19:05
















          I thought about something similar when defining $g$, but couldn't figure out how to guarantee that $Im(g) subseteq [0,1]$, since $f(p) in (0,1]$. How do you work around this?
          – Ando Escalando
          Aug 31 at 19:05





          I thought about something similar when defining $g$, but couldn't figure out how to guarantee that $Im(g) subseteq [0,1]$, since $f(p) in (0,1]$. How do you work around this?
          – Ando Escalando
          Aug 31 at 19:05











          up vote
          0
          down vote













          This is Theorem 3.12 in Chapter 7 of Freiwald's book An Introduction to Set Theory and Topology, which also gives two other characterizations.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Would the downvoter dare to explain the dowvote? The question was "Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?". I think I answered the question and I actually spent quite a long time to find a reachable link on the web.
            – J.-E. Pin
            Aug 30 at 8:12














          up vote
          0
          down vote













          This is Theorem 3.12 in Chapter 7 of Freiwald's book An Introduction to Set Theory and Topology, which also gives two other characterizations.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Would the downvoter dare to explain the dowvote? The question was "Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?". I think I answered the question and I actually spent quite a long time to find a reachable link on the web.
            – J.-E. Pin
            Aug 30 at 8:12












          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          This is Theorem 3.12 in Chapter 7 of Freiwald's book An Introduction to Set Theory and Topology, which also gives two other characterizations.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          This is Theorem 3.12 in Chapter 7 of Freiwald's book An Introduction to Set Theory and Topology, which also gives two other characterizations.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 30 at 2:38

























          answered Aug 30 at 2:31









          J.-E. Pin

          17.4k21754




          17.4k21754











          • Would the downvoter dare to explain the dowvote? The question was "Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?". I think I answered the question and I actually spent quite a long time to find a reachable link on the web.
            – J.-E. Pin
            Aug 30 at 8:12
















          • Would the downvoter dare to explain the dowvote? The question was "Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?". I think I answered the question and I actually spent quite a long time to find a reachable link on the web.
            – J.-E. Pin
            Aug 30 at 8:12















          Would the downvoter dare to explain the dowvote? The question was "Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?". I think I answered the question and I actually spent quite a long time to find a reachable link on the web.
          – J.-E. Pin
          Aug 30 at 8:12




          Would the downvoter dare to explain the dowvote? The question was "Any pointers / proofs / articles which have this proof on them?". I think I answered the question and I actually spent quite a long time to find a reachable link on the web.
          – J.-E. Pin
          Aug 30 at 8:12

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2898967%2fproving-a-topological-space-is-tychonoff-completely-regular-iff-it-has-a-base%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          1st Magritte Awards