Prove that a sum of degrees in a path between two vertices is smaller than $3n$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a simple graph with $n$ vertices. Let $P$ be the shortest path between any two vertices. Prove that: $$sum_vin Pdeg(v)leq 3n$$
Let the sum of degrees be bigger than $3n$. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than $frac3np$, where $p$ is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than $2$ neighbors on a path, so its degree is smaller or equal $n-p+2$. Unfortunately those two don't make contradiction.
I think at least two non adjacent vertices (with $dist(x,y)>2$) on a path should have a common neighbor outside the path. This would make a contradiction with the path being the shortest. But I don't know how to show that.
graph-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a simple graph with $n$ vertices. Let $P$ be the shortest path between any two vertices. Prove that: $$sum_vin Pdeg(v)leq 3n$$
Let the sum of degrees be bigger than $3n$. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than $frac3np$, where $p$ is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than $2$ neighbors on a path, so its degree is smaller or equal $n-p+2$. Unfortunately those two don't make contradiction.
I think at least two non adjacent vertices (with $dist(x,y)>2$) on a path should have a common neighbor outside the path. This would make a contradiction with the path being the shortest. But I don't know how to show that.
graph-theory
2
What have you done to think about this problem? Have you tried anything? Worked out any examples? Etc.?
â 4-ier
Aug 30 at 8:00
I tried to make a proof by contradiction. So... let the sum of degrees be bigger than 3n. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than 3n/p, where p is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than 2 neighboors on a path, so its degree is smaller than n-p+2. Unfortunately those two didn't make contradiction.
â Gaha
Aug 30 at 8:09
@Gaha: include your attempt in the original post
â Berci
Aug 30 at 8:18
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a simple graph with $n$ vertices. Let $P$ be the shortest path between any two vertices. Prove that: $$sum_vin Pdeg(v)leq 3n$$
Let the sum of degrees be bigger than $3n$. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than $frac3np$, where $p$ is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than $2$ neighbors on a path, so its degree is smaller or equal $n-p+2$. Unfortunately those two don't make contradiction.
I think at least two non adjacent vertices (with $dist(x,y)>2$) on a path should have a common neighbor outside the path. This would make a contradiction with the path being the shortest. But I don't know how to show that.
graph-theory
Let $G$ be a simple graph with $n$ vertices. Let $P$ be the shortest path between any two vertices. Prove that: $$sum_vin Pdeg(v)leq 3n$$
Let the sum of degrees be bigger than $3n$. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than $frac3np$, where $p$ is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than $2$ neighbors on a path, so its degree is smaller or equal $n-p+2$. Unfortunately those two don't make contradiction.
I think at least two non adjacent vertices (with $dist(x,y)>2$) on a path should have a common neighbor outside the path. This would make a contradiction with the path being the shortest. But I don't know how to show that.
graph-theory
graph-theory
edited Aug 30 at 9:03
greedoid
28k93776
28k93776
asked Aug 30 at 7:59
Gaha
487
487
2
What have you done to think about this problem? Have you tried anything? Worked out any examples? Etc.?
â 4-ier
Aug 30 at 8:00
I tried to make a proof by contradiction. So... let the sum of degrees be bigger than 3n. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than 3n/p, where p is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than 2 neighboors on a path, so its degree is smaller than n-p+2. Unfortunately those two didn't make contradiction.
â Gaha
Aug 30 at 8:09
@Gaha: include your attempt in the original post
â Berci
Aug 30 at 8:18
add a comment |Â
2
What have you done to think about this problem? Have you tried anything? Worked out any examples? Etc.?
â 4-ier
Aug 30 at 8:00
I tried to make a proof by contradiction. So... let the sum of degrees be bigger than 3n. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than 3n/p, where p is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than 2 neighboors on a path, so its degree is smaller than n-p+2. Unfortunately those two didn't make contradiction.
â Gaha
Aug 30 at 8:09
@Gaha: include your attempt in the original post
â Berci
Aug 30 at 8:18
2
2
What have you done to think about this problem? Have you tried anything? Worked out any examples? Etc.?
â 4-ier
Aug 30 at 8:00
What have you done to think about this problem? Have you tried anything? Worked out any examples? Etc.?
â 4-ier
Aug 30 at 8:00
I tried to make a proof by contradiction. So... let the sum of degrees be bigger than 3n. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than 3n/p, where p is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than 2 neighboors on a path, so its degree is smaller than n-p+2. Unfortunately those two didn't make contradiction.
â Gaha
Aug 30 at 8:09
I tried to make a proof by contradiction. So... let the sum of degrees be bigger than 3n. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than 3n/p, where p is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than 2 neighboors on a path, so its degree is smaller than n-p+2. Unfortunately those two didn't make contradiction.
â Gaha
Aug 30 at 8:09
@Gaha: include your attempt in the original post
â Berci
Aug 30 at 8:18
@Gaha: include your attempt in the original post
â Berci
Aug 30 at 8:18
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Hint: Consider a vertex $v notin P$, at most how many vertices in $P$ that are adjacent to $v$? From that, in $sum_u in Pdeg u$, at most how many times a vertex $v notin P$ (or $v in P$) is counted?
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Hint. Let $v_0,v_1,v_2,dots,v_n$ be a path of minimum length from $v_0$ to $v_n.$ Can you show that $deg v_0+deg v_3+deg v_6+cdots+deg v_lfloor n/3rfloorle n?$
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Hint: Consider a vertex $v notin P$, at most how many vertices in $P$ that are adjacent to $v$? From that, in $sum_u in Pdeg u$, at most how many times a vertex $v notin P$ (or $v in P$) is counted?
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Hint: Consider a vertex $v notin P$, at most how many vertices in $P$ that are adjacent to $v$? From that, in $sum_u in Pdeg u$, at most how many times a vertex $v notin P$ (or $v in P$) is counted?
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Hint: Consider a vertex $v notin P$, at most how many vertices in $P$ that are adjacent to $v$? From that, in $sum_u in Pdeg u$, at most how many times a vertex $v notin P$ (or $v in P$) is counted?
Hint: Consider a vertex $v notin P$, at most how many vertices in $P$ that are adjacent to $v$? From that, in $sum_u in Pdeg u$, at most how many times a vertex $v notin P$ (or $v in P$) is counted?
answered Aug 30 at 9:03
Tengu
2,4791920
2,4791920
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Hint. Let $v_0,v_1,v_2,dots,v_n$ be a path of minimum length from $v_0$ to $v_n.$ Can you show that $deg v_0+deg v_3+deg v_6+cdots+deg v_lfloor n/3rfloorle n?$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Hint. Let $v_0,v_1,v_2,dots,v_n$ be a path of minimum length from $v_0$ to $v_n.$ Can you show that $deg v_0+deg v_3+deg v_6+cdots+deg v_lfloor n/3rfloorle n?$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Hint. Let $v_0,v_1,v_2,dots,v_n$ be a path of minimum length from $v_0$ to $v_n.$ Can you show that $deg v_0+deg v_3+deg v_6+cdots+deg v_lfloor n/3rfloorle n?$
Hint. Let $v_0,v_1,v_2,dots,v_n$ be a path of minimum length from $v_0$ to $v_n.$ Can you show that $deg v_0+deg v_3+deg v_6+cdots+deg v_lfloor n/3rfloorle n?$
answered Aug 30 at 9:11
bof
46.7k349113
46.7k349113
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2899253%2fprove-that-a-sum-of-degrees-in-a-path-between-two-vertices-is-smaller-than-3n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
What have you done to think about this problem? Have you tried anything? Worked out any examples? Etc.?
â 4-ier
Aug 30 at 8:00
I tried to make a proof by contradiction. So... let the sum of degrees be bigger than 3n. If so, there is a vertex on a path that has degree bigger than 3n/p, where p is the size of a path. And we know that a vertex in a path can't have more than 2 neighboors on a path, so its degree is smaller than n-p+2. Unfortunately those two didn't make contradiction.
â Gaha
Aug 30 at 8:09
@Gaha: include your attempt in the original post
â Berci
Aug 30 at 8:18