How do I get the square root of a complex number?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
79
down vote
favorite
If I'm given a complex number (say $9 + 4i$), how do I calculate its square root?
complex-numbers radicals
add a comment |Â
up vote
79
down vote
favorite
If I'm given a complex number (say $9 + 4i$), how do I calculate its square root?
complex-numbers radicals
14
The answers of using de Moivre's formula are correct but it may also be instructive to try and find the square roots directly using $(a+bi)^2 = 9 + 4i$ (say) and solve for $a$ and $b$ or even just use the quadratic formula directly, which will give you an appreciation for why we use de Moivre's formula.
â Jason Polak
Jun 9 '11 at 19:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
79
down vote
favorite
up vote
79
down vote
favorite
If I'm given a complex number (say $9 + 4i$), how do I calculate its square root?
complex-numbers radicals
If I'm given a complex number (say $9 + 4i$), how do I calculate its square root?
complex-numbers radicals
complex-numbers radicals
edited Dec 11 '16 at 13:41
Martin Sleziak
43.6k6113260
43.6k6113260
asked Jun 9 '11 at 19:18
Macha
516267
516267
14
The answers of using de Moivre's formula are correct but it may also be instructive to try and find the square roots directly using $(a+bi)^2 = 9 + 4i$ (say) and solve for $a$ and $b$ or even just use the quadratic formula directly, which will give you an appreciation for why we use de Moivre's formula.
â Jason Polak
Jun 9 '11 at 19:38
add a comment |Â
14
The answers of using de Moivre's formula are correct but it may also be instructive to try and find the square roots directly using $(a+bi)^2 = 9 + 4i$ (say) and solve for $a$ and $b$ or even just use the quadratic formula directly, which will give you an appreciation for why we use de Moivre's formula.
â Jason Polak
Jun 9 '11 at 19:38
14
14
The answers of using de Moivre's formula are correct but it may also be instructive to try and find the square roots directly using $(a+bi)^2 = 9 + 4i$ (say) and solve for $a$ and $b$ or even just use the quadratic formula directly, which will give you an appreciation for why we use de Moivre's formula.
â Jason Polak
Jun 9 '11 at 19:38
The answers of using de Moivre's formula are correct but it may also be instructive to try and find the square roots directly using $(a+bi)^2 = 9 + 4i$ (say) and solve for $a$ and $b$ or even just use the quadratic formula directly, which will give you an appreciation for why we use de Moivre's formula.
â Jason Polak
Jun 9 '11 at 19:38
add a comment |Â
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
The square root is not a well defined function on complex numbers. Because of the fundamental theorem of algebra, you will always have two different square roots for a given number. If you want to find out the possible values, the easiest way is probably to go with De Moivre's formula, that is, converting your number into the form $r(cos(theta) + i sin(theta))$, and then you will get $(r(cos(theta)+ i sin(theta)))^1/2 = ±sqrtr(cos(theta/2) + i sin(theta/2))$.
28
The "two different square roots" issue applies to real numbers as well; it's just that in that case there's a consensus on which one is the "principal" square root.
â Dan
Jun 9 '11 at 23:49
3
@user1374 There is also a consensus about which square root of a complex number is the principal square root--at least for almost every complex number... See my answer.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 5:55
9
Oh, and I am afraid I must object to the assertion that going with De Moivre's formula would be the easiest way.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:35
1
@Did What's the rational basis for having positive square roots as the principal square roots instead of negative square roots?
â Doug Spoonwood
May 22 '13 at 13:47
1
@DougSpoonwood You might want to explain what you have in mind when you call some complex numbers positive and some others negative.
â Did
May 22 '13 at 15:13
add a comment |Â
up vote
115
down vote
This is a three parts post. The first part was written by user Did, it provides a formula and some brief comments on it. The second part was written by user Hans Lundmark, it provides a geometric way to understand the formula. The third part was written by user t.b., it provides some explanatory pictures and some brief comments on them.
(Did) If one is able to compute the square root of every positive real number and the modulus of every complex number, a nice formula for the principal square root $sqrtz$ of $z$ is
$$
sqrtz=sqrtrfracz+rz+r,quad r=|z|.
$$
Try to prove it and you will see, it works...
The principal square root is the one with a positive real part. The only case when the formula fails is when there is no principal square root, that is, when $z$ is a negative real number.
No sine or cosine is involved, one does not even need to solve second degree polynomials, one just uses squares and square roots. For example, for $z=9+4mathrmi$,
$$
sqrtz=frac9+sqrt97+4mathrmisqrt2(9+sqrt97).
$$
(HL) There's a geometric way of understanding the formula in Did's answer. To find a square root of a given complex number $z$, you first want to find a complex number $w$ which has half the argument of $z$ (since squaring doubles the argument). Compute $r=|z|$ and let $w = z+r$; thus $w$ lies $r$ steps to the right of $z$ in the complex plane. Draw a picture of this, and it should be clear that the points $0$, $z$ and $w$ form an isosceles triangle, from which one sees that the line from $0$ to $w$ bisects the angle between the real axis and the line from $0$ to $z$. In other words, $w$ has half the argument of $z$, as desired. Now it only remains to multiply $w$ by some suitable real constant $c$ so that $|cw|^2 = |z|$; then we will have $(cw)^2=z$ and hence $cw$ is a square root of $z$. Obviously, $c=pmsqrtz/|w|$ will do the trick, so this method only fails when $w$ happens to be zero, i.e., if $z$ is a negative real number.
(t.b.) Following a suggestion of Did, I take the liberty of adding two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer, but it seemed better to have them here:
Here's the picture for $z = 9 + 4i$:
Remark: The construction of the square roots is geometrically exact. That is to say, they were constructed using straightedge and compass only. I decided to hide the construction, as it seems rather obfuscating the intended illustration than adding to it. Nevertheless, I suggest taking a moment and thinking about how you would achieve the geometric construction.
Added (t.b.)
Here's the construction I used: Intersect the circle around $z/2$ through $z$ with the tangent to the unit circle orthogonal to $z$. Then $h^2 = (|z|-1)cdot 1$ and thus the red circle has radius $sqrtz$. It remains to intersect the red circle with the angular bisector of the $x$-axis and $z$ which I constructed using the process Hans described in his part of the post.
The pictures were created using GeoGebra.
@Hans: Yes. This is a question where a picture would be useful (if only I knew how to draw pictures on MSE (and if I had more time on my hands)). Thanks.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:14
1
Hans: Following a suggestion of @Didier I added two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer. It seemed more reasonable to have them in one answer. I hope you don't mind.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:44
Since you can't see it on my deleted post, here's @Didier's original comment: "Theo and @Hans: What do you think about the idea of making one single post from our three complementary answers? (Re reputation, if that matters, either one of you may sign the resulting post, I really do not care.)" I refrain from adding Didier's answer in since it seems a bit too aggressive an edit to me, but I'd be strongly in favor of doing it.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:53
1
@Hans: very true. To reduce confusion, I deleted my comment :)
â t.b.
Jun 11 '11 at 14:49
2
@legends2k Right, the formula gets even simpler... Thanks for noticing this. Since you checked the formula, I cancelled the mention "unless I am mistaken".
â Did
Jan 6 '14 at 14:53
 |Â
show 12 more comments
up vote
26
down vote
Here is a direct algebraic answer:
Suppose that $z=c+di$, and we want to find $sqrtz=a+bi$ lying in the first two quadrants. So what are $a$ and $b$?
Precisely we have:
$$a=sqrtfracc+sqrtc^2+d^22$$ and
$$b=fracddsqrtfrac-c+sqrtc^2+d^22.$$ (The factor of $fracdd$ is used so that $b$ has the same sign as $d$) To find this, we can use brute force and the quadratic formula. Squaring, we would need to solve $$a^2-b^2 +2abi=c+di.$$ This gives two equations and two unknowns (seperate into real and imaginary parts) which can then be solved by substitutions and the quadratic formula.
Hope that helps,
Better add and say that you want d/|d|=1 for d=0, right?
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
You can also do following (technique often advised at school) :
Let's write $zò = 9 + 4i$ with $z = a + bi$. The goal is to find $z$
Thus we have $(a + bi)ò = 9 + 4i$ and if you expend we get $aò+ 2abi - bò = 9 + 4i$
If you identify the real and imaginary parts, you obtain :
$aò-bò = 9$ (1)
and
$2ab= 4$ (2)
Now, as $zò = 9 + 4i$, the modulus of $zò$ and $9 + 4i$ are equal so we can write :
$aò+bò = sqrt9ò+4ò$
$aò+bò = sqrt97$ (3)
Now find $a$ and $b$ with the the equations (1) , (2) and (3) :
(1) + (3) $Leftrightarrow 2aò = 9+sqrt97 $
so $a = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $ or $a = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $
With equation (2) and the previous result you can now find $b$ :
$2ab= 4$
$b= 2/a$
so $b = 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $b = - 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
The answer is : $z = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) + 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $z = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) - 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
Why is the modulus of z = a^2 + b^2 instead of sqr( a^4 + b^4 + 4*a^2*b^2 )?
â Mirte
Feb 14 '17 at 13:55
Shouldn't you get 4 roots for a=+- and b=+-. How did you eliminate two choices??
â Harshit Joshi
Aug 12 at 16:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
One way is to convert the complex number into polar form. For $z = re^itheta$, $z^2 = r^2 e^i(2theta)$. So to take the square root, you'll find $z^1/2 = pm sqrtr e^itheta/2$.
Added: Just as with the nonnegative real numbers, there are two complex numbers whose square will be $z$. So there are two square roots (except when $z = 0$).
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Claim 1. Suppose $bneq 0$. Then the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are: $$pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright).$$
Claim 2. Suppose $b>0$. Then:
(a) The two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are $$x = pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+textrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright). $$
(b) And the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a -bi$ are $$x=pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-textrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right).$$
Proof of Claim 1. beginalignat*1
& left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmifracbbrightleft|bright|=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
Proof of Claim 2. beginalignat*1
textbf(a) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmisqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmisqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmisqrtb^2=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
beginalignat*1
textbf(b) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-mathrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]^2\
= & frac12left[a+sqrta^2-b^2+a-sqrta^2+b^2-2mathrmisqrtleft(a+sqrta^2-b^2right)left(a-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]\
= & frac12left[2a-2mathrmisqrta^2-left(a^2-b^2right)right]=a-mathrmisqrtb^2=a-mathrmib.
endalignat*
1
Except when b < 0 the last line isn't true because sqrt(b^2) isn't equal to b. For b < 0 replace + i... by -i... Also typo in second to last line: r + a - (r + a) should be r + a - (r - a), where r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2).
â Wout
Jun 27 '16 at 15:11
@Wout: Thanks for spotting that error! I've now corrected, hopefully it's now good.
â Kenny LJ
Jun 28 '16 at 8:49
Better say b>=0, so that we have sqrt(-1)=i as a first solution.
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
Here's a useful picture from Wikipedia (ref). This helps visualise some comments above about having two square roots of most complex numbers.
The horizontal plane is the original complex number $z$.
The vertical axis is the real part of the square root(s) of $z$. (Note how there are two solutions for most numbers, i.e. all except zero.)
The colour is the angle of a square root of $z$, where red is 0ð i.e. the real axis, cyan is $pm$180ð and so on.
The principal square root is the top half of the surface.
The see how the imaginary part behaves, rotate the surface 180ð about the vertical axis. (Of course, the colours don't rotate, they stay where they are. More precisely, the magenta part will go to the bottom, and the green to the top, while the yellow and blue will stay as they are.)
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
SQUARE ROOT OF A BINOMIC COMPLEX NUMBER
The number $sqrta+bi$ is a complex (or complex) $x+yi$ such that: $a+bi=(x+yi)^2$
So: $a+bi=(x^2-y^2)+2xyirightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
2xy=b
right}$ Solving this system, and taking into account, to solve the bi-square equation, that $sqrta^2+b^2geq a$:
$$left.
y=dfracb2x atop
4x^4-4ax^2-b^2=0
right}rightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22
right}rightarrow left.
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22 atop
y^2=dfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22
right}$$
Now, the equation $2xy=b$ tells us that the product $xy$ has the same sign as $b$. Therefore, if $b>0$, $x$ and $y$ have the same signs, and if $b<0$, they have different signs.
$$bgeq 0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22+isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
$$b<0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22-isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
In practice, these formulas are not used, but the process is followed.
Also, it is highly recommended to pass it to polar.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$x^2 - y^2 +2ixy$ = write the complex no.
$x^2 - y^2$ = write the real value---------(1)
$2xy$ = write the imaginary value------(2)
from equation (1) and (2)
$x^2 + y^2 = sqrt(x^2 - y^2)^2 + 4x^2y^2$
you will get $x^2 + y^2 = ?$ -------(3)
from equation (1) and (3)
you will get the value of $x$ and $y$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
ok, Would someone please tell me if I'm wrong about this.
We want $pmsqrta+bi.$ $($This kind of square root is not well-defined without the $textâÂÂpmtext''.)$
If $a+bi = r(costheta+isintheta)$ then $displaystyletanfractheta2 = fracsintheta1+costheta = frac b sqrta^2+b^2+a,$ so
$$
sinfractheta2 = frac btextsomething text and cosfractheta 2 = fracsqrtb^2+a^2+atextsomething
$$
where $textâÂÂsomething''$ makes $sin^2+cos^2=1,$ so the efficient way to think about this is the tangent half-angle formula. Or is there a more efficient way?
add a comment |Â
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
The square root is not a well defined function on complex numbers. Because of the fundamental theorem of algebra, you will always have two different square roots for a given number. If you want to find out the possible values, the easiest way is probably to go with De Moivre's formula, that is, converting your number into the form $r(cos(theta) + i sin(theta))$, and then you will get $(r(cos(theta)+ i sin(theta)))^1/2 = ±sqrtr(cos(theta/2) + i sin(theta/2))$.
28
The "two different square roots" issue applies to real numbers as well; it's just that in that case there's a consensus on which one is the "principal" square root.
â Dan
Jun 9 '11 at 23:49
3
@user1374 There is also a consensus about which square root of a complex number is the principal square root--at least for almost every complex number... See my answer.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 5:55
9
Oh, and I am afraid I must object to the assertion that going with De Moivre's formula would be the easiest way.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:35
1
@Did What's the rational basis for having positive square roots as the principal square roots instead of negative square roots?
â Doug Spoonwood
May 22 '13 at 13:47
1
@DougSpoonwood You might want to explain what you have in mind when you call some complex numbers positive and some others negative.
â Did
May 22 '13 at 15:13
add a comment |Â
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
The square root is not a well defined function on complex numbers. Because of the fundamental theorem of algebra, you will always have two different square roots for a given number. If you want to find out the possible values, the easiest way is probably to go with De Moivre's formula, that is, converting your number into the form $r(cos(theta) + i sin(theta))$, and then you will get $(r(cos(theta)+ i sin(theta)))^1/2 = ±sqrtr(cos(theta/2) + i sin(theta/2))$.
28
The "two different square roots" issue applies to real numbers as well; it's just that in that case there's a consensus on which one is the "principal" square root.
â Dan
Jun 9 '11 at 23:49
3
@user1374 There is also a consensus about which square root of a complex number is the principal square root--at least for almost every complex number... See my answer.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 5:55
9
Oh, and I am afraid I must object to the assertion that going with De Moivre's formula would be the easiest way.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:35
1
@Did What's the rational basis for having positive square roots as the principal square roots instead of negative square roots?
â Doug Spoonwood
May 22 '13 at 13:47
1
@DougSpoonwood You might want to explain what you have in mind when you call some complex numbers positive and some others negative.
â Did
May 22 '13 at 15:13
add a comment |Â
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
up vote
51
down vote
accepted
The square root is not a well defined function on complex numbers. Because of the fundamental theorem of algebra, you will always have two different square roots for a given number. If you want to find out the possible values, the easiest way is probably to go with De Moivre's formula, that is, converting your number into the form $r(cos(theta) + i sin(theta))$, and then you will get $(r(cos(theta)+ i sin(theta)))^1/2 = ±sqrtr(cos(theta/2) + i sin(theta/2))$.
The square root is not a well defined function on complex numbers. Because of the fundamental theorem of algebra, you will always have two different square roots for a given number. If you want to find out the possible values, the easiest way is probably to go with De Moivre's formula, that is, converting your number into the form $r(cos(theta) + i sin(theta))$, and then you will get $(r(cos(theta)+ i sin(theta)))^1/2 = ±sqrtr(cos(theta/2) + i sin(theta/2))$.
edited Jun 9 '11 at 19:38
ShreevatsaR
33.9k566102
33.9k566102
answered Jun 9 '11 at 19:24
Vhailor
2,2581315
2,2581315
28
The "two different square roots" issue applies to real numbers as well; it's just that in that case there's a consensus on which one is the "principal" square root.
â Dan
Jun 9 '11 at 23:49
3
@user1374 There is also a consensus about which square root of a complex number is the principal square root--at least for almost every complex number... See my answer.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 5:55
9
Oh, and I am afraid I must object to the assertion that going with De Moivre's formula would be the easiest way.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:35
1
@Did What's the rational basis for having positive square roots as the principal square roots instead of negative square roots?
â Doug Spoonwood
May 22 '13 at 13:47
1
@DougSpoonwood You might want to explain what you have in mind when you call some complex numbers positive and some others negative.
â Did
May 22 '13 at 15:13
add a comment |Â
28
The "two different square roots" issue applies to real numbers as well; it's just that in that case there's a consensus on which one is the "principal" square root.
â Dan
Jun 9 '11 at 23:49
3
@user1374 There is also a consensus about which square root of a complex number is the principal square root--at least for almost every complex number... See my answer.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 5:55
9
Oh, and I am afraid I must object to the assertion that going with De Moivre's formula would be the easiest way.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:35
1
@Did What's the rational basis for having positive square roots as the principal square roots instead of negative square roots?
â Doug Spoonwood
May 22 '13 at 13:47
1
@DougSpoonwood You might want to explain what you have in mind when you call some complex numbers positive and some others negative.
â Did
May 22 '13 at 15:13
28
28
The "two different square roots" issue applies to real numbers as well; it's just that in that case there's a consensus on which one is the "principal" square root.
â Dan
Jun 9 '11 at 23:49
The "two different square roots" issue applies to real numbers as well; it's just that in that case there's a consensus on which one is the "principal" square root.
â Dan
Jun 9 '11 at 23:49
3
3
@user1374 There is also a consensus about which square root of a complex number is the principal square root--at least for almost every complex number... See my answer.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 5:55
@user1374 There is also a consensus about which square root of a complex number is the principal square root--at least for almost every complex number... See my answer.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 5:55
9
9
Oh, and I am afraid I must object to the assertion that going with De Moivre's formula would be the easiest way.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:35
Oh, and I am afraid I must object to the assertion that going with De Moivre's formula would be the easiest way.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:35
1
1
@Did What's the rational basis for having positive square roots as the principal square roots instead of negative square roots?
â Doug Spoonwood
May 22 '13 at 13:47
@Did What's the rational basis for having positive square roots as the principal square roots instead of negative square roots?
â Doug Spoonwood
May 22 '13 at 13:47
1
1
@DougSpoonwood You might want to explain what you have in mind when you call some complex numbers positive and some others negative.
â Did
May 22 '13 at 15:13
@DougSpoonwood You might want to explain what you have in mind when you call some complex numbers positive and some others negative.
â Did
May 22 '13 at 15:13
add a comment |Â
up vote
115
down vote
This is a three parts post. The first part was written by user Did, it provides a formula and some brief comments on it. The second part was written by user Hans Lundmark, it provides a geometric way to understand the formula. The third part was written by user t.b., it provides some explanatory pictures and some brief comments on them.
(Did) If one is able to compute the square root of every positive real number and the modulus of every complex number, a nice formula for the principal square root $sqrtz$ of $z$ is
$$
sqrtz=sqrtrfracz+rz+r,quad r=|z|.
$$
Try to prove it and you will see, it works...
The principal square root is the one with a positive real part. The only case when the formula fails is when there is no principal square root, that is, when $z$ is a negative real number.
No sine or cosine is involved, one does not even need to solve second degree polynomials, one just uses squares and square roots. For example, for $z=9+4mathrmi$,
$$
sqrtz=frac9+sqrt97+4mathrmisqrt2(9+sqrt97).
$$
(HL) There's a geometric way of understanding the formula in Did's answer. To find a square root of a given complex number $z$, you first want to find a complex number $w$ which has half the argument of $z$ (since squaring doubles the argument). Compute $r=|z|$ and let $w = z+r$; thus $w$ lies $r$ steps to the right of $z$ in the complex plane. Draw a picture of this, and it should be clear that the points $0$, $z$ and $w$ form an isosceles triangle, from which one sees that the line from $0$ to $w$ bisects the angle between the real axis and the line from $0$ to $z$. In other words, $w$ has half the argument of $z$, as desired. Now it only remains to multiply $w$ by some suitable real constant $c$ so that $|cw|^2 = |z|$; then we will have $(cw)^2=z$ and hence $cw$ is a square root of $z$. Obviously, $c=pmsqrtz/|w|$ will do the trick, so this method only fails when $w$ happens to be zero, i.e., if $z$ is a negative real number.
(t.b.) Following a suggestion of Did, I take the liberty of adding two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer, but it seemed better to have them here:
Here's the picture for $z = 9 + 4i$:
Remark: The construction of the square roots is geometrically exact. That is to say, they were constructed using straightedge and compass only. I decided to hide the construction, as it seems rather obfuscating the intended illustration than adding to it. Nevertheless, I suggest taking a moment and thinking about how you would achieve the geometric construction.
Added (t.b.)
Here's the construction I used: Intersect the circle around $z/2$ through $z$ with the tangent to the unit circle orthogonal to $z$. Then $h^2 = (|z|-1)cdot 1$ and thus the red circle has radius $sqrtz$. It remains to intersect the red circle with the angular bisector of the $x$-axis and $z$ which I constructed using the process Hans described in his part of the post.
The pictures were created using GeoGebra.
@Hans: Yes. This is a question where a picture would be useful (if only I knew how to draw pictures on MSE (and if I had more time on my hands)). Thanks.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:14
1
Hans: Following a suggestion of @Didier I added two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer. It seemed more reasonable to have them in one answer. I hope you don't mind.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:44
Since you can't see it on my deleted post, here's @Didier's original comment: "Theo and @Hans: What do you think about the idea of making one single post from our three complementary answers? (Re reputation, if that matters, either one of you may sign the resulting post, I really do not care.)" I refrain from adding Didier's answer in since it seems a bit too aggressive an edit to me, but I'd be strongly in favor of doing it.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:53
1
@Hans: very true. To reduce confusion, I deleted my comment :)
â t.b.
Jun 11 '11 at 14:49
2
@legends2k Right, the formula gets even simpler... Thanks for noticing this. Since you checked the formula, I cancelled the mention "unless I am mistaken".
â Did
Jan 6 '14 at 14:53
 |Â
show 12 more comments
up vote
115
down vote
This is a three parts post. The first part was written by user Did, it provides a formula and some brief comments on it. The second part was written by user Hans Lundmark, it provides a geometric way to understand the formula. The third part was written by user t.b., it provides some explanatory pictures and some brief comments on them.
(Did) If one is able to compute the square root of every positive real number and the modulus of every complex number, a nice formula for the principal square root $sqrtz$ of $z$ is
$$
sqrtz=sqrtrfracz+rz+r,quad r=|z|.
$$
Try to prove it and you will see, it works...
The principal square root is the one with a positive real part. The only case when the formula fails is when there is no principal square root, that is, when $z$ is a negative real number.
No sine or cosine is involved, one does not even need to solve second degree polynomials, one just uses squares and square roots. For example, for $z=9+4mathrmi$,
$$
sqrtz=frac9+sqrt97+4mathrmisqrt2(9+sqrt97).
$$
(HL) There's a geometric way of understanding the formula in Did's answer. To find a square root of a given complex number $z$, you first want to find a complex number $w$ which has half the argument of $z$ (since squaring doubles the argument). Compute $r=|z|$ and let $w = z+r$; thus $w$ lies $r$ steps to the right of $z$ in the complex plane. Draw a picture of this, and it should be clear that the points $0$, $z$ and $w$ form an isosceles triangle, from which one sees that the line from $0$ to $w$ bisects the angle between the real axis and the line from $0$ to $z$. In other words, $w$ has half the argument of $z$, as desired. Now it only remains to multiply $w$ by some suitable real constant $c$ so that $|cw|^2 = |z|$; then we will have $(cw)^2=z$ and hence $cw$ is a square root of $z$. Obviously, $c=pmsqrtz/|w|$ will do the trick, so this method only fails when $w$ happens to be zero, i.e., if $z$ is a negative real number.
(t.b.) Following a suggestion of Did, I take the liberty of adding two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer, but it seemed better to have them here:
Here's the picture for $z = 9 + 4i$:
Remark: The construction of the square roots is geometrically exact. That is to say, they were constructed using straightedge and compass only. I decided to hide the construction, as it seems rather obfuscating the intended illustration than adding to it. Nevertheless, I suggest taking a moment and thinking about how you would achieve the geometric construction.
Added (t.b.)
Here's the construction I used: Intersect the circle around $z/2$ through $z$ with the tangent to the unit circle orthogonal to $z$. Then $h^2 = (|z|-1)cdot 1$ and thus the red circle has radius $sqrtz$. It remains to intersect the red circle with the angular bisector of the $x$-axis and $z$ which I constructed using the process Hans described in his part of the post.
The pictures were created using GeoGebra.
@Hans: Yes. This is a question where a picture would be useful (if only I knew how to draw pictures on MSE (and if I had more time on my hands)). Thanks.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:14
1
Hans: Following a suggestion of @Didier I added two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer. It seemed more reasonable to have them in one answer. I hope you don't mind.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:44
Since you can't see it on my deleted post, here's @Didier's original comment: "Theo and @Hans: What do you think about the idea of making one single post from our three complementary answers? (Re reputation, if that matters, either one of you may sign the resulting post, I really do not care.)" I refrain from adding Didier's answer in since it seems a bit too aggressive an edit to me, but I'd be strongly in favor of doing it.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:53
1
@Hans: very true. To reduce confusion, I deleted my comment :)
â t.b.
Jun 11 '11 at 14:49
2
@legends2k Right, the formula gets even simpler... Thanks for noticing this. Since you checked the formula, I cancelled the mention "unless I am mistaken".
â Did
Jan 6 '14 at 14:53
 |Â
show 12 more comments
up vote
115
down vote
up vote
115
down vote
This is a three parts post. The first part was written by user Did, it provides a formula and some brief comments on it. The second part was written by user Hans Lundmark, it provides a geometric way to understand the formula. The third part was written by user t.b., it provides some explanatory pictures and some brief comments on them.
(Did) If one is able to compute the square root of every positive real number and the modulus of every complex number, a nice formula for the principal square root $sqrtz$ of $z$ is
$$
sqrtz=sqrtrfracz+rz+r,quad r=|z|.
$$
Try to prove it and you will see, it works...
The principal square root is the one with a positive real part. The only case when the formula fails is when there is no principal square root, that is, when $z$ is a negative real number.
No sine or cosine is involved, one does not even need to solve second degree polynomials, one just uses squares and square roots. For example, for $z=9+4mathrmi$,
$$
sqrtz=frac9+sqrt97+4mathrmisqrt2(9+sqrt97).
$$
(HL) There's a geometric way of understanding the formula in Did's answer. To find a square root of a given complex number $z$, you first want to find a complex number $w$ which has half the argument of $z$ (since squaring doubles the argument). Compute $r=|z|$ and let $w = z+r$; thus $w$ lies $r$ steps to the right of $z$ in the complex plane. Draw a picture of this, and it should be clear that the points $0$, $z$ and $w$ form an isosceles triangle, from which one sees that the line from $0$ to $w$ bisects the angle between the real axis and the line from $0$ to $z$. In other words, $w$ has half the argument of $z$, as desired. Now it only remains to multiply $w$ by some suitable real constant $c$ so that $|cw|^2 = |z|$; then we will have $(cw)^2=z$ and hence $cw$ is a square root of $z$. Obviously, $c=pmsqrtz/|w|$ will do the trick, so this method only fails when $w$ happens to be zero, i.e., if $z$ is a negative real number.
(t.b.) Following a suggestion of Did, I take the liberty of adding two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer, but it seemed better to have them here:
Here's the picture for $z = 9 + 4i$:
Remark: The construction of the square roots is geometrically exact. That is to say, they were constructed using straightedge and compass only. I decided to hide the construction, as it seems rather obfuscating the intended illustration than adding to it. Nevertheless, I suggest taking a moment and thinking about how you would achieve the geometric construction.
Added (t.b.)
Here's the construction I used: Intersect the circle around $z/2$ through $z$ with the tangent to the unit circle orthogonal to $z$. Then $h^2 = (|z|-1)cdot 1$ and thus the red circle has radius $sqrtz$. It remains to intersect the red circle with the angular bisector of the $x$-axis and $z$ which I constructed using the process Hans described in his part of the post.
The pictures were created using GeoGebra.
This is a three parts post. The first part was written by user Did, it provides a formula and some brief comments on it. The second part was written by user Hans Lundmark, it provides a geometric way to understand the formula. The third part was written by user t.b., it provides some explanatory pictures and some brief comments on them.
(Did) If one is able to compute the square root of every positive real number and the modulus of every complex number, a nice formula for the principal square root $sqrtz$ of $z$ is
$$
sqrtz=sqrtrfracz+rz+r,quad r=|z|.
$$
Try to prove it and you will see, it works...
The principal square root is the one with a positive real part. The only case when the formula fails is when there is no principal square root, that is, when $z$ is a negative real number.
No sine or cosine is involved, one does not even need to solve second degree polynomials, one just uses squares and square roots. For example, for $z=9+4mathrmi$,
$$
sqrtz=frac9+sqrt97+4mathrmisqrt2(9+sqrt97).
$$
(HL) There's a geometric way of understanding the formula in Did's answer. To find a square root of a given complex number $z$, you first want to find a complex number $w$ which has half the argument of $z$ (since squaring doubles the argument). Compute $r=|z|$ and let $w = z+r$; thus $w$ lies $r$ steps to the right of $z$ in the complex plane. Draw a picture of this, and it should be clear that the points $0$, $z$ and $w$ form an isosceles triangle, from which one sees that the line from $0$ to $w$ bisects the angle between the real axis and the line from $0$ to $z$. In other words, $w$ has half the argument of $z$, as desired. Now it only remains to multiply $w$ by some suitable real constant $c$ so that $|cw|^2 = |z|$; then we will have $(cw)^2=z$ and hence $cw$ is a square root of $z$. Obviously, $c=pmsqrtz/|w|$ will do the trick, so this method only fails when $w$ happens to be zero, i.e., if $z$ is a negative real number.
(t.b.) Following a suggestion of Did, I take the liberty of adding two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer, but it seemed better to have them here:
Here's the picture for $z = 9 + 4i$:
Remark: The construction of the square roots is geometrically exact. That is to say, they were constructed using straightedge and compass only. I decided to hide the construction, as it seems rather obfuscating the intended illustration than adding to it. Nevertheless, I suggest taking a moment and thinking about how you would achieve the geometric construction.
Added (t.b.)
Here's the construction I used: Intersect the circle around $z/2$ through $z$ with the tangent to the unit circle orthogonal to $z$. Then $h^2 = (|z|-1)cdot 1$ and thus the red circle has radius $sqrtz$. It remains to intersect the red circle with the angular bisector of the $x$-axis and $z$ which I constructed using the process Hans described in his part of the post.
The pictures were created using GeoGebra.
edited May 3 at 14:05
community wiki
9 revs, 4 users 50%
Did
@Hans: Yes. This is a question where a picture would be useful (if only I knew how to draw pictures on MSE (and if I had more time on my hands)). Thanks.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:14
1
Hans: Following a suggestion of @Didier I added two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer. It seemed more reasonable to have them in one answer. I hope you don't mind.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:44
Since you can't see it on my deleted post, here's @Didier's original comment: "Theo and @Hans: What do you think about the idea of making one single post from our three complementary answers? (Re reputation, if that matters, either one of you may sign the resulting post, I really do not care.)" I refrain from adding Didier's answer in since it seems a bit too aggressive an edit to me, but I'd be strongly in favor of doing it.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:53
1
@Hans: very true. To reduce confusion, I deleted my comment :)
â t.b.
Jun 11 '11 at 14:49
2
@legends2k Right, the formula gets even simpler... Thanks for noticing this. Since you checked the formula, I cancelled the mention "unless I am mistaken".
â Did
Jan 6 '14 at 14:53
 |Â
show 12 more comments
@Hans: Yes. This is a question where a picture would be useful (if only I knew how to draw pictures on MSE (and if I had more time on my hands)). Thanks.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:14
1
Hans: Following a suggestion of @Didier I added two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer. It seemed more reasonable to have them in one answer. I hope you don't mind.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:44
Since you can't see it on my deleted post, here's @Didier's original comment: "Theo and @Hans: What do you think about the idea of making one single post from our three complementary answers? (Re reputation, if that matters, either one of you may sign the resulting post, I really do not care.)" I refrain from adding Didier's answer in since it seems a bit too aggressive an edit to me, but I'd be strongly in favor of doing it.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:53
1
@Hans: very true. To reduce confusion, I deleted my comment :)
â t.b.
Jun 11 '11 at 14:49
2
@legends2k Right, the formula gets even simpler... Thanks for noticing this. Since you checked the formula, I cancelled the mention "unless I am mistaken".
â Did
Jan 6 '14 at 14:53
@Hans: Yes. This is a question where a picture would be useful (if only I knew how to draw pictures on MSE (and if I had more time on my hands)). Thanks.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:14
@Hans: Yes. This is a question where a picture would be useful (if only I knew how to draw pictures on MSE (and if I had more time on my hands)). Thanks.
â Did
Jun 10 '11 at 6:14
1
1
Hans: Following a suggestion of @Didier I added two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer. It seemed more reasonable to have them in one answer. I hope you don't mind.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:44
Hans: Following a suggestion of @Didier I added two pictures I originally posted as a separate answer. It seemed more reasonable to have them in one answer. I hope you don't mind.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:44
Since you can't see it on my deleted post, here's @Didier's original comment: "Theo and @Hans: What do you think about the idea of making one single post from our three complementary answers? (Re reputation, if that matters, either one of you may sign the resulting post, I really do not care.)" I refrain from adding Didier's answer in since it seems a bit too aggressive an edit to me, but I'd be strongly in favor of doing it.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:53
Since you can't see it on my deleted post, here's @Didier's original comment: "Theo and @Hans: What do you think about the idea of making one single post from our three complementary answers? (Re reputation, if that matters, either one of you may sign the resulting post, I really do not care.)" I refrain from adding Didier's answer in since it seems a bit too aggressive an edit to me, but I'd be strongly in favor of doing it.
â t.b.
Jun 10 '11 at 11:53
1
1
@Hans: very true. To reduce confusion, I deleted my comment :)
â t.b.
Jun 11 '11 at 14:49
@Hans: very true. To reduce confusion, I deleted my comment :)
â t.b.
Jun 11 '11 at 14:49
2
2
@legends2k Right, the formula gets even simpler... Thanks for noticing this. Since you checked the formula, I cancelled the mention "unless I am mistaken".
â Did
Jan 6 '14 at 14:53
@legends2k Right, the formula gets even simpler... Thanks for noticing this. Since you checked the formula, I cancelled the mention "unless I am mistaken".
â Did
Jan 6 '14 at 14:53
 |Â
show 12 more comments
up vote
26
down vote
Here is a direct algebraic answer:
Suppose that $z=c+di$, and we want to find $sqrtz=a+bi$ lying in the first two quadrants. So what are $a$ and $b$?
Precisely we have:
$$a=sqrtfracc+sqrtc^2+d^22$$ and
$$b=fracddsqrtfrac-c+sqrtc^2+d^22.$$ (The factor of $fracdd$ is used so that $b$ has the same sign as $d$) To find this, we can use brute force and the quadratic formula. Squaring, we would need to solve $$a^2-b^2 +2abi=c+di.$$ This gives two equations and two unknowns (seperate into real and imaginary parts) which can then be solved by substitutions and the quadratic formula.
Hope that helps,
Better add and say that you want d/|d|=1 for d=0, right?
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
26
down vote
Here is a direct algebraic answer:
Suppose that $z=c+di$, and we want to find $sqrtz=a+bi$ lying in the first two quadrants. So what are $a$ and $b$?
Precisely we have:
$$a=sqrtfracc+sqrtc^2+d^22$$ and
$$b=fracddsqrtfrac-c+sqrtc^2+d^22.$$ (The factor of $fracdd$ is used so that $b$ has the same sign as $d$) To find this, we can use brute force and the quadratic formula. Squaring, we would need to solve $$a^2-b^2 +2abi=c+di.$$ This gives two equations and two unknowns (seperate into real and imaginary parts) which can then be solved by substitutions and the quadratic formula.
Hope that helps,
Better add and say that you want d/|d|=1 for d=0, right?
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
26
down vote
up vote
26
down vote
Here is a direct algebraic answer:
Suppose that $z=c+di$, and we want to find $sqrtz=a+bi$ lying in the first two quadrants. So what are $a$ and $b$?
Precisely we have:
$$a=sqrtfracc+sqrtc^2+d^22$$ and
$$b=fracddsqrtfrac-c+sqrtc^2+d^22.$$ (The factor of $fracdd$ is used so that $b$ has the same sign as $d$) To find this, we can use brute force and the quadratic formula. Squaring, we would need to solve $$a^2-b^2 +2abi=c+di.$$ This gives two equations and two unknowns (seperate into real and imaginary parts) which can then be solved by substitutions and the quadratic formula.
Hope that helps,
Here is a direct algebraic answer:
Suppose that $z=c+di$, and we want to find $sqrtz=a+bi$ lying in the first two quadrants. So what are $a$ and $b$?
Precisely we have:
$$a=sqrtfracc+sqrtc^2+d^22$$ and
$$b=fracddsqrtfrac-c+sqrtc^2+d^22.$$ (The factor of $fracdd$ is used so that $b$ has the same sign as $d$) To find this, we can use brute force and the quadratic formula. Squaring, we would need to solve $$a^2-b^2 +2abi=c+di.$$ This gives two equations and two unknowns (seperate into real and imaginary parts) which can then be solved by substitutions and the quadratic formula.
Hope that helps,
answered Jun 9 '11 at 19:35
Eric Naslund
59.4k10137239
59.4k10137239
Better add and say that you want d/|d|=1 for d=0, right?
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:49
add a comment |Â
Better add and say that you want d/|d|=1 for d=0, right?
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:49
Better add and say that you want d/|d|=1 for d=0, right?
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:49
Better add and say that you want d/|d|=1 for d=0, right?
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
You can also do following (technique often advised at school) :
Let's write $zò = 9 + 4i$ with $z = a + bi$. The goal is to find $z$
Thus we have $(a + bi)ò = 9 + 4i$ and if you expend we get $aò+ 2abi - bò = 9 + 4i$
If you identify the real and imaginary parts, you obtain :
$aò-bò = 9$ (1)
and
$2ab= 4$ (2)
Now, as $zò = 9 + 4i$, the modulus of $zò$ and $9 + 4i$ are equal so we can write :
$aò+bò = sqrt9ò+4ò$
$aò+bò = sqrt97$ (3)
Now find $a$ and $b$ with the the equations (1) , (2) and (3) :
(1) + (3) $Leftrightarrow 2aò = 9+sqrt97 $
so $a = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $ or $a = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $
With equation (2) and the previous result you can now find $b$ :
$2ab= 4$
$b= 2/a$
so $b = 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $b = - 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
The answer is : $z = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) + 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $z = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) - 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
Why is the modulus of z = a^2 + b^2 instead of sqr( a^4 + b^4 + 4*a^2*b^2 )?
â Mirte
Feb 14 '17 at 13:55
Shouldn't you get 4 roots for a=+- and b=+-. How did you eliminate two choices??
â Harshit Joshi
Aug 12 at 16:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
You can also do following (technique often advised at school) :
Let's write $zò = 9 + 4i$ with $z = a + bi$. The goal is to find $z$
Thus we have $(a + bi)ò = 9 + 4i$ and if you expend we get $aò+ 2abi - bò = 9 + 4i$
If you identify the real and imaginary parts, you obtain :
$aò-bò = 9$ (1)
and
$2ab= 4$ (2)
Now, as $zò = 9 + 4i$, the modulus of $zò$ and $9 + 4i$ are equal so we can write :
$aò+bò = sqrt9ò+4ò$
$aò+bò = sqrt97$ (3)
Now find $a$ and $b$ with the the equations (1) , (2) and (3) :
(1) + (3) $Leftrightarrow 2aò = 9+sqrt97 $
so $a = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $ or $a = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $
With equation (2) and the previous result you can now find $b$ :
$2ab= 4$
$b= 2/a$
so $b = 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $b = - 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
The answer is : $z = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) + 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $z = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) - 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
Why is the modulus of z = a^2 + b^2 instead of sqr( a^4 + b^4 + 4*a^2*b^2 )?
â Mirte
Feb 14 '17 at 13:55
Shouldn't you get 4 roots for a=+- and b=+-. How did you eliminate two choices??
â Harshit Joshi
Aug 12 at 16:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
up vote
13
down vote
You can also do following (technique often advised at school) :
Let's write $zò = 9 + 4i$ with $z = a + bi$. The goal is to find $z$
Thus we have $(a + bi)ò = 9 + 4i$ and if you expend we get $aò+ 2abi - bò = 9 + 4i$
If you identify the real and imaginary parts, you obtain :
$aò-bò = 9$ (1)
and
$2ab= 4$ (2)
Now, as $zò = 9 + 4i$, the modulus of $zò$ and $9 + 4i$ are equal so we can write :
$aò+bò = sqrt9ò+4ò$
$aò+bò = sqrt97$ (3)
Now find $a$ and $b$ with the the equations (1) , (2) and (3) :
(1) + (3) $Leftrightarrow 2aò = 9+sqrt97 $
so $a = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $ or $a = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $
With equation (2) and the previous result you can now find $b$ :
$2ab= 4$
$b= 2/a$
so $b = 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $b = - 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
The answer is : $z = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) + 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $z = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) - 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
You can also do following (technique often advised at school) :
Let's write $zò = 9 + 4i$ with $z = a + bi$. The goal is to find $z$
Thus we have $(a + bi)ò = 9 + 4i$ and if you expend we get $aò+ 2abi - bò = 9 + 4i$
If you identify the real and imaginary parts, you obtain :
$aò-bò = 9$ (1)
and
$2ab= 4$ (2)
Now, as $zò = 9 + 4i$, the modulus of $zò$ and $9 + 4i$ are equal so we can write :
$aò+bò = sqrt9ò+4ò$
$aò+bò = sqrt97$ (3)
Now find $a$ and $b$ with the the equations (1) , (2) and (3) :
(1) + (3) $Leftrightarrow 2aò = 9+sqrt97 $
so $a = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $ or $a = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) $
With equation (2) and the previous result you can now find $b$ :
$2ab= 4$
$b= 2/a$
so $b = 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $b = - 2sqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
The answer is : $z = sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) + 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $ or $z = - sqrtfrac12(9+sqrt97) - 2isqrtfrac29+sqrt97 $
answered Aug 17 '13 at 20:18
Jecimi
26527
26527
Why is the modulus of z = a^2 + b^2 instead of sqr( a^4 + b^4 + 4*a^2*b^2 )?
â Mirte
Feb 14 '17 at 13:55
Shouldn't you get 4 roots for a=+- and b=+-. How did you eliminate two choices??
â Harshit Joshi
Aug 12 at 16:42
add a comment |Â
Why is the modulus of z = a^2 + b^2 instead of sqr( a^4 + b^4 + 4*a^2*b^2 )?
â Mirte
Feb 14 '17 at 13:55
Shouldn't you get 4 roots for a=+- and b=+-. How did you eliminate two choices??
â Harshit Joshi
Aug 12 at 16:42
Why is the modulus of z = a^2 + b^2 instead of sqr( a^4 + b^4 + 4*a^2*b^2 )?
â Mirte
Feb 14 '17 at 13:55
Why is the modulus of z = a^2 + b^2 instead of sqr( a^4 + b^4 + 4*a^2*b^2 )?
â Mirte
Feb 14 '17 at 13:55
Shouldn't you get 4 roots for a=+- and b=+-. How did you eliminate two choices??
â Harshit Joshi
Aug 12 at 16:42
Shouldn't you get 4 roots for a=+- and b=+-. How did you eliminate two choices??
â Harshit Joshi
Aug 12 at 16:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
One way is to convert the complex number into polar form. For $z = re^itheta$, $z^2 = r^2 e^i(2theta)$. So to take the square root, you'll find $z^1/2 = pm sqrtr e^itheta/2$.
Added: Just as with the nonnegative real numbers, there are two complex numbers whose square will be $z$. So there are two square roots (except when $z = 0$).
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
One way is to convert the complex number into polar form. For $z = re^itheta$, $z^2 = r^2 e^i(2theta)$. So to take the square root, you'll find $z^1/2 = pm sqrtr e^itheta/2$.
Added: Just as with the nonnegative real numbers, there are two complex numbers whose square will be $z$. So there are two square roots (except when $z = 0$).
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
One way is to convert the complex number into polar form. For $z = re^itheta$, $z^2 = r^2 e^i(2theta)$. So to take the square root, you'll find $z^1/2 = pm sqrtr e^itheta/2$.
Added: Just as with the nonnegative real numbers, there are two complex numbers whose square will be $z$. So there are two square roots (except when $z = 0$).
One way is to convert the complex number into polar form. For $z = re^itheta$, $z^2 = r^2 e^i(2theta)$. So to take the square root, you'll find $z^1/2 = pm sqrtr e^itheta/2$.
Added: Just as with the nonnegative real numbers, there are two complex numbers whose square will be $z$. So there are two square roots (except when $z = 0$).
edited Jun 9 '11 at 19:32
answered Jun 9 '11 at 19:22
Michael Chen
2,6112040
2,6112040
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Claim 1. Suppose $bneq 0$. Then the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are: $$pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright).$$
Claim 2. Suppose $b>0$. Then:
(a) The two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are $$x = pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+textrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright). $$
(b) And the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a -bi$ are $$x=pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-textrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right).$$
Proof of Claim 1. beginalignat*1
& left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmifracbbrightleft|bright|=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
Proof of Claim 2. beginalignat*1
textbf(a) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmisqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmisqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmisqrtb^2=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
beginalignat*1
textbf(b) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-mathrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]^2\
= & frac12left[a+sqrta^2-b^2+a-sqrta^2+b^2-2mathrmisqrtleft(a+sqrta^2-b^2right)left(a-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]\
= & frac12left[2a-2mathrmisqrta^2-left(a^2-b^2right)right]=a-mathrmisqrtb^2=a-mathrmib.
endalignat*
1
Except when b < 0 the last line isn't true because sqrt(b^2) isn't equal to b. For b < 0 replace + i... by -i... Also typo in second to last line: r + a - (r + a) should be r + a - (r - a), where r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2).
â Wout
Jun 27 '16 at 15:11
@Wout: Thanks for spotting that error! I've now corrected, hopefully it's now good.
â Kenny LJ
Jun 28 '16 at 8:49
Better say b>=0, so that we have sqrt(-1)=i as a first solution.
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Claim 1. Suppose $bneq 0$. Then the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are: $$pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright).$$
Claim 2. Suppose $b>0$. Then:
(a) The two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are $$x = pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+textrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright). $$
(b) And the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a -bi$ are $$x=pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-textrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right).$$
Proof of Claim 1. beginalignat*1
& left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmifracbbrightleft|bright|=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
Proof of Claim 2. beginalignat*1
textbf(a) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmisqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmisqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmisqrtb^2=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
beginalignat*1
textbf(b) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-mathrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]^2\
= & frac12left[a+sqrta^2-b^2+a-sqrta^2+b^2-2mathrmisqrtleft(a+sqrta^2-b^2right)left(a-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]\
= & frac12left[2a-2mathrmisqrta^2-left(a^2-b^2right)right]=a-mathrmisqrtb^2=a-mathrmib.
endalignat*
1
Except when b < 0 the last line isn't true because sqrt(b^2) isn't equal to b. For b < 0 replace + i... by -i... Also typo in second to last line: r + a - (r + a) should be r + a - (r - a), where r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2).
â Wout
Jun 27 '16 at 15:11
@Wout: Thanks for spotting that error! I've now corrected, hopefully it's now good.
â Kenny LJ
Jun 28 '16 at 8:49
Better say b>=0, so that we have sqrt(-1)=i as a first solution.
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Claim 1. Suppose $bneq 0$. Then the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are: $$pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright).$$
Claim 2. Suppose $b>0$. Then:
(a) The two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are $$x = pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+textrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright). $$
(b) And the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a -bi$ are $$x=pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-textrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right).$$
Proof of Claim 1. beginalignat*1
& left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmifracbbrightleft|bright|=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
Proof of Claim 2. beginalignat*1
textbf(a) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmisqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmisqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmisqrtb^2=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
beginalignat*1
textbf(b) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-mathrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]^2\
= & frac12left[a+sqrta^2-b^2+a-sqrta^2+b^2-2mathrmisqrtleft(a+sqrta^2-b^2right)left(a-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]\
= & frac12left[2a-2mathrmisqrta^2-left(a^2-b^2right)right]=a-mathrmisqrtb^2=a-mathrmib.
endalignat*
Claim 1. Suppose $bneq 0$. Then the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are: $$pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright).$$
Claim 2. Suppose $b>0$. Then:
(a) The two roots to the equation $x^2 = a +bi$ are $$x = pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+textrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright). $$
(b) And the two roots to the equation $x^2 = a -bi$ are $$x=pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-textrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right).$$
Proof of Claim 1. beginalignat*1
& left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmifracbbrightsqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmifracbbrightsqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmifracbbrightleft|bright|=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
Proof of Claim 2. beginalignat*1
textbf(a) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrtsqrta^2+b^2+a+mathrmisqrtsqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]^2\
= & frac12left[sqrta^2+b^2+a-left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)+2mathrmisqrtleft(sqrta^2+b^2+aright)left(sqrta^2+b^2-aright)right]\
= & frac12left(2a+2mathrmisqrta^2+b^2-a^2right)=a+mathrmisqrtb^2=a+mathrmib.
endalignat*
beginalignat*1
textbf(b) & left[pmfracsqrt22left(sqrta+sqrta^2-b^2-mathrmisqrta-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]^2\
= & frac12left[a+sqrta^2-b^2+a-sqrta^2+b^2-2mathrmisqrtleft(a+sqrta^2-b^2right)left(a-sqrta^2-b^2right)right]\
= & frac12left[2a-2mathrmisqrta^2-left(a^2-b^2right)right]=a-mathrmisqrtb^2=a-mathrmib.
endalignat*
edited Aug 30 at 1:00
answered Apr 26 '16 at 2:42
Kenny LJ
1,45611331
1,45611331
1
Except when b < 0 the last line isn't true because sqrt(b^2) isn't equal to b. For b < 0 replace + i... by -i... Also typo in second to last line: r + a - (r + a) should be r + a - (r - a), where r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2).
â Wout
Jun 27 '16 at 15:11
@Wout: Thanks for spotting that error! I've now corrected, hopefully it's now good.
â Kenny LJ
Jun 28 '16 at 8:49
Better say b>=0, so that we have sqrt(-1)=i as a first solution.
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:48
add a comment |Â
1
Except when b < 0 the last line isn't true because sqrt(b^2) isn't equal to b. For b < 0 replace + i... by -i... Also typo in second to last line: r + a - (r + a) should be r + a - (r - a), where r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2).
â Wout
Jun 27 '16 at 15:11
@Wout: Thanks for spotting that error! I've now corrected, hopefully it's now good.
â Kenny LJ
Jun 28 '16 at 8:49
Better say b>=0, so that we have sqrt(-1)=i as a first solution.
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:48
1
1
Except when b < 0 the last line isn't true because sqrt(b^2) isn't equal to b. For b < 0 replace + i... by -i... Also typo in second to last line: r + a - (r + a) should be r + a - (r - a), where r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2).
â Wout
Jun 27 '16 at 15:11
Except when b < 0 the last line isn't true because sqrt(b^2) isn't equal to b. For b < 0 replace + i... by -i... Also typo in second to last line: r + a - (r + a) should be r + a - (r - a), where r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2).
â Wout
Jun 27 '16 at 15:11
@Wout: Thanks for spotting that error! I've now corrected, hopefully it's now good.
â Kenny LJ
Jun 28 '16 at 8:49
@Wout: Thanks for spotting that error! I've now corrected, hopefully it's now good.
â Kenny LJ
Jun 28 '16 at 8:49
Better say b>=0, so that we have sqrt(-1)=i as a first solution.
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:48
Better say b>=0, so that we have sqrt(-1)=i as a first solution.
â j4n bur53
Mar 28 '17 at 11:48
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
Here's a useful picture from Wikipedia (ref). This helps visualise some comments above about having two square roots of most complex numbers.
The horizontal plane is the original complex number $z$.
The vertical axis is the real part of the square root(s) of $z$. (Note how there are two solutions for most numbers, i.e. all except zero.)
The colour is the angle of a square root of $z$, where red is 0ð i.e. the real axis, cyan is $pm$180ð and so on.
The principal square root is the top half of the surface.
The see how the imaginary part behaves, rotate the surface 180ð about the vertical axis. (Of course, the colours don't rotate, they stay where they are. More precisely, the magenta part will go to the bottom, and the green to the top, while the yellow and blue will stay as they are.)
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
Here's a useful picture from Wikipedia (ref). This helps visualise some comments above about having two square roots of most complex numbers.
The horizontal plane is the original complex number $z$.
The vertical axis is the real part of the square root(s) of $z$. (Note how there are two solutions for most numbers, i.e. all except zero.)
The colour is the angle of a square root of $z$, where red is 0ð i.e. the real axis, cyan is $pm$180ð and so on.
The principal square root is the top half of the surface.
The see how the imaginary part behaves, rotate the surface 180ð about the vertical axis. (Of course, the colours don't rotate, they stay where they are. More precisely, the magenta part will go to the bottom, and the green to the top, while the yellow and blue will stay as they are.)
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Here's a useful picture from Wikipedia (ref). This helps visualise some comments above about having two square roots of most complex numbers.
The horizontal plane is the original complex number $z$.
The vertical axis is the real part of the square root(s) of $z$. (Note how there are two solutions for most numbers, i.e. all except zero.)
The colour is the angle of a square root of $z$, where red is 0ð i.e. the real axis, cyan is $pm$180ð and so on.
The principal square root is the top half of the surface.
The see how the imaginary part behaves, rotate the surface 180ð about the vertical axis. (Of course, the colours don't rotate, they stay where they are. More precisely, the magenta part will go to the bottom, and the green to the top, while the yellow and blue will stay as they are.)
Here's a useful picture from Wikipedia (ref). This helps visualise some comments above about having two square roots of most complex numbers.
The horizontal plane is the original complex number $z$.
The vertical axis is the real part of the square root(s) of $z$. (Note how there are two solutions for most numbers, i.e. all except zero.)
The colour is the angle of a square root of $z$, where red is 0ð i.e. the real axis, cyan is $pm$180ð and so on.
The principal square root is the top half of the surface.
The see how the imaginary part behaves, rotate the surface 180ð about the vertical axis. (Of course, the colours don't rotate, they stay where they are. More precisely, the magenta part will go to the bottom, and the green to the top, while the yellow and blue will stay as they are.)
edited Oct 22 '14 at 3:49
answered Oct 22 '14 at 3:17
Evgeni Sergeev
32528
32528
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
SQUARE ROOT OF A BINOMIC COMPLEX NUMBER
The number $sqrta+bi$ is a complex (or complex) $x+yi$ such that: $a+bi=(x+yi)^2$
So: $a+bi=(x^2-y^2)+2xyirightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
2xy=b
right}$ Solving this system, and taking into account, to solve the bi-square equation, that $sqrta^2+b^2geq a$:
$$left.
y=dfracb2x atop
4x^4-4ax^2-b^2=0
right}rightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22
right}rightarrow left.
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22 atop
y^2=dfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22
right}$$
Now, the equation $2xy=b$ tells us that the product $xy$ has the same sign as $b$. Therefore, if $b>0$, $x$ and $y$ have the same signs, and if $b<0$, they have different signs.
$$bgeq 0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22+isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
$$b<0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22-isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
In practice, these formulas are not used, but the process is followed.
Also, it is highly recommended to pass it to polar.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
SQUARE ROOT OF A BINOMIC COMPLEX NUMBER
The number $sqrta+bi$ is a complex (or complex) $x+yi$ such that: $a+bi=(x+yi)^2$
So: $a+bi=(x^2-y^2)+2xyirightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
2xy=b
right}$ Solving this system, and taking into account, to solve the bi-square equation, that $sqrta^2+b^2geq a$:
$$left.
y=dfracb2x atop
4x^4-4ax^2-b^2=0
right}rightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22
right}rightarrow left.
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22 atop
y^2=dfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22
right}$$
Now, the equation $2xy=b$ tells us that the product $xy$ has the same sign as $b$. Therefore, if $b>0$, $x$ and $y$ have the same signs, and if $b<0$, they have different signs.
$$bgeq 0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22+isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
$$b<0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22-isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
In practice, these formulas are not used, but the process is followed.
Also, it is highly recommended to pass it to polar.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
SQUARE ROOT OF A BINOMIC COMPLEX NUMBER
The number $sqrta+bi$ is a complex (or complex) $x+yi$ such that: $a+bi=(x+yi)^2$
So: $a+bi=(x^2-y^2)+2xyirightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
2xy=b
right}$ Solving this system, and taking into account, to solve the bi-square equation, that $sqrta^2+b^2geq a$:
$$left.
y=dfracb2x atop
4x^4-4ax^2-b^2=0
right}rightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22
right}rightarrow left.
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22 atop
y^2=dfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22
right}$$
Now, the equation $2xy=b$ tells us that the product $xy$ has the same sign as $b$. Therefore, if $b>0$, $x$ and $y$ have the same signs, and if $b<0$, they have different signs.
$$bgeq 0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22+isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
$$b<0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22-isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
In practice, these formulas are not used, but the process is followed.
Also, it is highly recommended to pass it to polar.
SQUARE ROOT OF A BINOMIC COMPLEX NUMBER
The number $sqrta+bi$ is a complex (or complex) $x+yi$ such that: $a+bi=(x+yi)^2$
So: $a+bi=(x^2-y^2)+2xyirightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
2xy=b
right}$ Solving this system, and taking into account, to solve the bi-square equation, that $sqrta^2+b^2geq a$:
$$left.
y=dfracb2x atop
4x^4-4ax^2-b^2=0
right}rightarrow left.
x^2-y^2=a atop
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22
right}rightarrow left.
x^2=dfraca+sqrta^2+b^22 atop
y^2=dfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22
right}$$
Now, the equation $2xy=b$ tells us that the product $xy$ has the same sign as $b$. Therefore, if $b>0$, $x$ and $y$ have the same signs, and if $b<0$, they have different signs.
$$bgeq 0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22+isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
$$b<0rightarrow sqrta+bi=pm left( sqrtdfraca+sqrta^2+b^22-isqrtdfrac-a+sqrta^2+b^22right)$$
In practice, these formulas are not used, but the process is followed.
Also, it is highly recommended to pass it to polar.
answered Apr 15 '17 at 18:24
Guillemus Callelus
763412
763412
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$x^2 - y^2 +2ixy$ = write the complex no.
$x^2 - y^2$ = write the real value---------(1)
$2xy$ = write the imaginary value------(2)
from equation (1) and (2)
$x^2 + y^2 = sqrt(x^2 - y^2)^2 + 4x^2y^2$
you will get $x^2 + y^2 = ?$ -------(3)
from equation (1) and (3)
you will get the value of $x$ and $y$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$x^2 - y^2 +2ixy$ = write the complex no.
$x^2 - y^2$ = write the real value---------(1)
$2xy$ = write the imaginary value------(2)
from equation (1) and (2)
$x^2 + y^2 = sqrt(x^2 - y^2)^2 + 4x^2y^2$
you will get $x^2 + y^2 = ?$ -------(3)
from equation (1) and (3)
you will get the value of $x$ and $y$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
$x^2 - y^2 +2ixy$ = write the complex no.
$x^2 - y^2$ = write the real value---------(1)
$2xy$ = write the imaginary value------(2)
from equation (1) and (2)
$x^2 + y^2 = sqrt(x^2 - y^2)^2 + 4x^2y^2$
you will get $x^2 + y^2 = ?$ -------(3)
from equation (1) and (3)
you will get the value of $x$ and $y$
$x^2 - y^2 +2ixy$ = write the complex no.
$x^2 - y^2$ = write the real value---------(1)
$2xy$ = write the imaginary value------(2)
from equation (1) and (2)
$x^2 + y^2 = sqrt(x^2 - y^2)^2 + 4x^2y^2$
you will get $x^2 + y^2 = ?$ -------(3)
from equation (1) and (3)
you will get the value of $x$ and $y$
edited Sep 11 '14 at 17:34
jaynp
6012924
6012924
answered Jun 22 '14 at 1:11
Akanksha Mishra
311
311
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
ok, Would someone please tell me if I'm wrong about this.
We want $pmsqrta+bi.$ $($This kind of square root is not well-defined without the $textâÂÂpmtext''.)$
If $a+bi = r(costheta+isintheta)$ then $displaystyletanfractheta2 = fracsintheta1+costheta = frac b sqrta^2+b^2+a,$ so
$$
sinfractheta2 = frac btextsomething text and cosfractheta 2 = fracsqrtb^2+a^2+atextsomething
$$
where $textâÂÂsomething''$ makes $sin^2+cos^2=1,$ so the efficient way to think about this is the tangent half-angle formula. Or is there a more efficient way?
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
ok, Would someone please tell me if I'm wrong about this.
We want $pmsqrta+bi.$ $($This kind of square root is not well-defined without the $textâÂÂpmtext''.)$
If $a+bi = r(costheta+isintheta)$ then $displaystyletanfractheta2 = fracsintheta1+costheta = frac b sqrta^2+b^2+a,$ so
$$
sinfractheta2 = frac btextsomething text and cosfractheta 2 = fracsqrtb^2+a^2+atextsomething
$$
where $textâÂÂsomething''$ makes $sin^2+cos^2=1,$ so the efficient way to think about this is the tangent half-angle formula. Or is there a more efficient way?
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
ok, Would someone please tell me if I'm wrong about this.
We want $pmsqrta+bi.$ $($This kind of square root is not well-defined without the $textâÂÂpmtext''.)$
If $a+bi = r(costheta+isintheta)$ then $displaystyletanfractheta2 = fracsintheta1+costheta = frac b sqrta^2+b^2+a,$ so
$$
sinfractheta2 = frac btextsomething text and cosfractheta 2 = fracsqrtb^2+a^2+atextsomething
$$
where $textâÂÂsomething''$ makes $sin^2+cos^2=1,$ so the efficient way to think about this is the tangent half-angle formula. Or is there a more efficient way?
ok, Would someone please tell me if I'm wrong about this.
We want $pmsqrta+bi.$ $($This kind of square root is not well-defined without the $textâÂÂpmtext''.)$
If $a+bi = r(costheta+isintheta)$ then $displaystyletanfractheta2 = fracsintheta1+costheta = frac b sqrta^2+b^2+a,$ so
$$
sinfractheta2 = frac btextsomething text and cosfractheta 2 = fracsqrtb^2+a^2+atextsomething
$$
where $textâÂÂsomething''$ makes $sin^2+cos^2=1,$ so the efficient way to think about this is the tangent half-angle formula. Or is there a more efficient way?
answered Mar 31 '17 at 21:38
Michael Hardy
205k23187466
205k23187466
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44406%2fhow-do-i-get-the-square-root-of-a-complex-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
14
The answers of using de Moivre's formula are correct but it may also be instructive to try and find the square roots directly using $(a+bi)^2 = 9 + 4i$ (say) and solve for $a$ and $b$ or even just use the quadratic formula directly, which will give you an appreciation for why we use de Moivre's formula.
â Jason Polak
Jun 9 '11 at 19:38