Branches of the square root function in the domain $D=mathbbC$ $[0,infty)$

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I saw the solution for this in Palka's book and one of the branches was defined as follows.
$$
g(z) =
begincases
sqrtz, & zin D ,Im(z)geq0 \
-sqrtz, & zin D ,Im(z)<0
endcases
$$
I am aware that $Argz$ is not continous on the non positive real axis and as the book says $g$ has been constructed to prevent discontinuities. Is $g$ continuous on $D=mathbbC$ $[0,infty)$? I don't understand how this function was constructed any help will be much appreciated. Thanks
complex-analysis analysis complex-numbers radicals
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I saw the solution for this in Palka's book and one of the branches was defined as follows.
$$
g(z) =
begincases
sqrtz, & zin D ,Im(z)geq0 \
-sqrtz, & zin D ,Im(z)<0
endcases
$$
I am aware that $Argz$ is not continous on the non positive real axis and as the book says $g$ has been constructed to prevent discontinuities. Is $g$ continuous on $D=mathbbC$ $[0,infty)$? I don't understand how this function was constructed any help will be much appreciated. Thanks
complex-analysis analysis complex-numbers radicals
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I saw the solution for this in Palka's book and one of the branches was defined as follows.
$$
g(z) =
begincases
sqrtz, & zin D ,Im(z)geq0 \
-sqrtz, & zin D ,Im(z)<0
endcases
$$
I am aware that $Argz$ is not continous on the non positive real axis and as the book says $g$ has been constructed to prevent discontinuities. Is $g$ continuous on $D=mathbbC$ $[0,infty)$? I don't understand how this function was constructed any help will be much appreciated. Thanks
complex-analysis analysis complex-numbers radicals
I saw the solution for this in Palka's book and one of the branches was defined as follows.
$$
g(z) =
begincases
sqrtz, & zin D ,Im(z)geq0 \
-sqrtz, & zin D ,Im(z)<0
endcases
$$
I am aware that $Argz$ is not continous on the non positive real axis and as the book says $g$ has been constructed to prevent discontinuities. Is $g$ continuous on $D=mathbbC$ $[0,infty)$? I don't understand how this function was constructed any help will be much appreciated. Thanks
complex-analysis analysis complex-numbers radicals
edited Oct 15 '14 at 6:19
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
60.3k1383161
60.3k1383161
asked Oct 14 '14 at 7:22
Heisenberg
1,3321637
1,3321637
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Apparently, $sqrtz$ is the unique holomorphic function defined in $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$, with $sqrt1=1$.
This statement, you are referring to says that the other square root of $z$, which is defined also as holomorphic function, now in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$, and is denoted by $g$, AGREES with $sqrtz$, for $Im z>0$, while for $Im z<0$, it agrees with $-sqrtz$.
To understand this better, in the first case (of $sqrtz$),
in the domain $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivartheta$, with $varthetain(-pi,pi)$, and
$$
sqrtz=r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2.
$$
In the case of $g$, in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivarphi$, with $varphiin(0,2pi)$, and
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2.
$$
When $Im z>0$, i.e., $vartheta, varphiin(0,pi)$ the functions $sqrtz$ agree. When $Im z<0$, which happens if $varthetain (-pi,0)$ and $varphiin(pi,2pi)$, then
$$
fracivarphi2-fracivartheta2=ipi,
$$
and hence
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2=-r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2=sqrtz.
$$
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Apparently, $sqrtz$ is the unique holomorphic function defined in $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$, with $sqrt1=1$.
This statement, you are referring to says that the other square root of $z$, which is defined also as holomorphic function, now in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$, and is denoted by $g$, AGREES with $sqrtz$, for $Im z>0$, while for $Im z<0$, it agrees with $-sqrtz$.
To understand this better, in the first case (of $sqrtz$),
in the domain $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivartheta$, with $varthetain(-pi,pi)$, and
$$
sqrtz=r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2.
$$
In the case of $g$, in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivarphi$, with $varphiin(0,2pi)$, and
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2.
$$
When $Im z>0$, i.e., $vartheta, varphiin(0,pi)$ the functions $sqrtz$ agree. When $Im z<0$, which happens if $varthetain (-pi,0)$ and $varphiin(pi,2pi)$, then
$$
fracivarphi2-fracivartheta2=ipi,
$$
and hence
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2=-r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2=sqrtz.
$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Apparently, $sqrtz$ is the unique holomorphic function defined in $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$, with $sqrt1=1$.
This statement, you are referring to says that the other square root of $z$, which is defined also as holomorphic function, now in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$, and is denoted by $g$, AGREES with $sqrtz$, for $Im z>0$, while for $Im z<0$, it agrees with $-sqrtz$.
To understand this better, in the first case (of $sqrtz$),
in the domain $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivartheta$, with $varthetain(-pi,pi)$, and
$$
sqrtz=r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2.
$$
In the case of $g$, in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivarphi$, with $varphiin(0,2pi)$, and
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2.
$$
When $Im z>0$, i.e., $vartheta, varphiin(0,pi)$ the functions $sqrtz$ agree. When $Im z<0$, which happens if $varthetain (-pi,0)$ and $varphiin(pi,2pi)$, then
$$
fracivarphi2-fracivartheta2=ipi,
$$
and hence
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2=-r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2=sqrtz.
$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Apparently, $sqrtz$ is the unique holomorphic function defined in $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$, with $sqrt1=1$.
This statement, you are referring to says that the other square root of $z$, which is defined also as holomorphic function, now in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$, and is denoted by $g$, AGREES with $sqrtz$, for $Im z>0$, while for $Im z<0$, it agrees with $-sqrtz$.
To understand this better, in the first case (of $sqrtz$),
in the domain $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivartheta$, with $varthetain(-pi,pi)$, and
$$
sqrtz=r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2.
$$
In the case of $g$, in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivarphi$, with $varphiin(0,2pi)$, and
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2.
$$
When $Im z>0$, i.e., $vartheta, varphiin(0,pi)$ the functions $sqrtz$ agree. When $Im z<0$, which happens if $varthetain (-pi,0)$ and $varphiin(pi,2pi)$, then
$$
fracivarphi2-fracivartheta2=ipi,
$$
and hence
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2=-r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2=sqrtz.
$$
Apparently, $sqrtz$ is the unique holomorphic function defined in $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$, with $sqrt1=1$.
This statement, you are referring to says that the other square root of $z$, which is defined also as holomorphic function, now in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$, and is denoted by $g$, AGREES with $sqrtz$, for $Im z>0$, while for $Im z<0$, it agrees with $-sqrtz$.
To understand this better, in the first case (of $sqrtz$),
in the domain $mathbb Csmallsetminus(-infty,0]$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivartheta$, with $varthetain(-pi,pi)$, and
$$
sqrtz=r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2.
$$
In the case of $g$, in $mathbb Csmallsetminus[0,infty)$ complex numbers are expressed as
$z=r,mathrme^ivarphi$, with $varphiin(0,2pi)$, and
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2.
$$
When $Im z>0$, i.e., $vartheta, varphiin(0,pi)$ the functions $sqrtz$ agree. When $Im z<0$, which happens if $varthetain (-pi,0)$ and $varphiin(pi,2pi)$, then
$$
fracivarphi2-fracivartheta2=ipi,
$$
and hence
$$
g(z)=r^1/2,mathrme^ivarphi/2=-r^1/2,mathrme^ivartheta/2=sqrtz.
$$
answered Oct 14 '14 at 8:14
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
60.3k1383161
60.3k1383161
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f972947%2fbranches-of-the-square-root-function-in-the-domain-d-mathbbc-0-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password