How to prove that $ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k+2)$ when $ker(T^k)=ker(T^k+1)$. [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












If $ker(T^k)=ker(T^k+1)$, then show that $ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k+2)$.



If $operatornameim(T^k)=operatornameim(T^k+1)$, then show that $operatornameim(T^k+1)=operatornameim(T^k+2)$.




vector-spaces




share|cite|improve this question














closed as off-topic by Did, Jendrik Stelzner, Jyrki Lahtonen, amWhy, Eric Wofsey Aug 21 at 14:26


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Jendrik Stelzner, Jyrki Lahtonen, amWhy, Eric Wofsey
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Possible duplicate of given A linear map $T:Vlongrightarrow V$, let $dim V = n$, prove that for every $kgeq n, operatornameImT^kcap ker T^k=0$.
    – Jneven
    Aug 21 at 11:21










  • What have you done so far? I am also sure that this question was already answered on MSE.
    – amsmath
    Aug 21 at 11:21










  • When is this due?
    – Did
    Aug 21 at 11:47














up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












If $ker(T^k)=ker(T^k+1)$, then show that $ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k+2)$.



If $operatornameim(T^k)=operatornameim(T^k+1)$, then show that $operatornameim(T^k+1)=operatornameim(T^k+2)$.




vector-spaces




share|cite|improve this question














closed as off-topic by Did, Jendrik Stelzner, Jyrki Lahtonen, amWhy, Eric Wofsey Aug 21 at 14:26


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Jendrik Stelzner, Jyrki Lahtonen, amWhy, Eric Wofsey
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Possible duplicate of given A linear map $T:Vlongrightarrow V$, let $dim V = n$, prove that for every $kgeq n, operatornameImT^kcap ker T^k=0$.
    – Jneven
    Aug 21 at 11:21










  • What have you done so far? I am also sure that this question was already answered on MSE.
    – amsmath
    Aug 21 at 11:21










  • When is this due?
    – Did
    Aug 21 at 11:47












up vote
-2
down vote

favorite









up vote
-2
down vote

favorite











If $ker(T^k)=ker(T^k+1)$, then show that $ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k+2)$.



If $operatornameim(T^k)=operatornameim(T^k+1)$, then show that $operatornameim(T^k+1)=operatornameim(T^k+2)$.




vector-spaces




share|cite|improve this question














If $ker(T^k)=ker(T^k+1)$, then show that $ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k+2)$.



If $operatornameim(T^k)=operatornameim(T^k+1)$, then show that $operatornameim(T^k+1)=operatornameim(T^k+2)$.





vector-spaces





share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 21 at 11:30









Bernard

111k635103




111k635103










asked Aug 21 at 11:15









mathnewbie

254




254




closed as off-topic by Did, Jendrik Stelzner, Jyrki Lahtonen, amWhy, Eric Wofsey Aug 21 at 14:26


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Jendrik Stelzner, Jyrki Lahtonen, amWhy, Eric Wofsey
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Did, Jendrik Stelzner, Jyrki Lahtonen, amWhy, Eric Wofsey Aug 21 at 14:26


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Jendrik Stelzner, Jyrki Lahtonen, amWhy, Eric Wofsey
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • Possible duplicate of given A linear map $T:Vlongrightarrow V$, let $dim V = n$, prove that for every $kgeq n, operatornameImT^kcap ker T^k=0$.
    – Jneven
    Aug 21 at 11:21










  • What have you done so far? I am also sure that this question was already answered on MSE.
    – amsmath
    Aug 21 at 11:21










  • When is this due?
    – Did
    Aug 21 at 11:47
















  • Possible duplicate of given A linear map $T:Vlongrightarrow V$, let $dim V = n$, prove that for every $kgeq n, operatornameImT^kcap ker T^k=0$.
    – Jneven
    Aug 21 at 11:21










  • What have you done so far? I am also sure that this question was already answered on MSE.
    – amsmath
    Aug 21 at 11:21










  • When is this due?
    – Did
    Aug 21 at 11:47















Possible duplicate of given A linear map $T:Vlongrightarrow V$, let $dim V = n$, prove that for every $kgeq n, operatornameImT^kcap ker T^k=0$.
– Jneven
Aug 21 at 11:21




Possible duplicate of given A linear map $T:Vlongrightarrow V$, let $dim V = n$, prove that for every $kgeq n, operatornameImT^kcap ker T^k=0$.
– Jneven
Aug 21 at 11:21












What have you done so far? I am also sure that this question was already answered on MSE.
– amsmath
Aug 21 at 11:21




What have you done so far? I am also sure that this question was already answered on MSE.
– amsmath
Aug 21 at 11:21












When is this due?
– Did
Aug 21 at 11:47




When is this due?
– Did
Aug 21 at 11:47










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













It's easy to see that $ker(T^k+1)subset ker(T^k+2)$ so just you need the other inclusion. Let $xin ker(T^k+2)$ i.e. $T^k+2(x)=0$, hence $T(x)in ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k)$ which gives the desired result $T^k+1(x)=T^k(T(x))=0$, i.e. $xin ker(T^k+1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    It's easy to see that $ker(T^k+1)subset ker(T^k+2)$ so just you need the other inclusion. Let $xin ker(T^k+2)$ i.e. $T^k+2(x)=0$, hence $T(x)in ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k)$ which gives the desired result $T^k+1(x)=T^k(T(x))=0$, i.e. $xin ker(T^k+1)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      It's easy to see that $ker(T^k+1)subset ker(T^k+2)$ so just you need the other inclusion. Let $xin ker(T^k+2)$ i.e. $T^k+2(x)=0$, hence $T(x)in ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k)$ which gives the desired result $T^k+1(x)=T^k(T(x))=0$, i.e. $xin ker(T^k+1)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        It's easy to see that $ker(T^k+1)subset ker(T^k+2)$ so just you need the other inclusion. Let $xin ker(T^k+2)$ i.e. $T^k+2(x)=0$, hence $T(x)in ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k)$ which gives the desired result $T^k+1(x)=T^k(T(x))=0$, i.e. $xin ker(T^k+1)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        It's easy to see that $ker(T^k+1)subset ker(T^k+2)$ so just you need the other inclusion. Let $xin ker(T^k+2)$ i.e. $T^k+2(x)=0$, hence $T(x)in ker(T^k+1)=ker(T^k)$ which gives the desired result $T^k+1(x)=T^k(T(x))=0$, i.e. $xin ker(T^k+1)$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 21 at 11:21









        user296113

        6,836828




        6,836828












            -

            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            圖片
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite My aim is to smooth the terrain in a video game. Therefore I contrived an algorithm that makes use of Bézier curves of different orders. But this algorithm is defined in a two dimensional space for now. To shift it into the third dimension I need to somehow combine the Bézier curves. Given two curves in each two dimensions, how can I combine them to build a surface? I thought about something like a curve of a curve. Or maybe I could multiply them somehow. How can I combine them to cause the wanted behavior? Is there a common approach? In the image you can see the input, on the left, and the output, on the right, of the algorithm that works in a two dimensional space. For the real application there is a three dimensional input. The algorithm relays only on the adjacent tiles. Given these it will define the control points of the mentioned Bézier cur...
            閱讀完整內容

            Propositional logic and tautologies

            圖片
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite Taken from P. Suppes "Introduction to logic" pp16 Starting from the sentence "If $P$ tautologically implies $Q$, then.." Question: Is it true that, at least within propositional logic, we are able to prove only tautologies or do I mis-understand something? If yes, is propositional logic special in some way? Is the notion of tautology meaningful only in propositional logic? logic propositional-calculus share | cite | improve this question edited Nov 29 '17 at 18:53 Mauro ALLEGRANZA 60.8k 4 46 105 asked Nov 29 '17 at 16:32 Alvin Lepik 2,448 9 20 add a comment  |  up vote 0 down vote favorite Taken from P. Suppes "Introduction to logic" pp16 Starting from the sentence "If $P$ tautologically implies $Q$, then.." Question: Is it true that, at least within propositional logic, we are able to prove only tautologi...
            閱讀完整內容

            Distribution of Stopped Wiener Process with Stochastic Volatility

            圖片
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite Let $(W_s)_s geq 0$ be a Wiener process and $tau$ be a random variable with an exponential distribution with parameter $lambda$. Suppose that $W$ and $tau$ are independent. In this question, we see that the distribution of the stopped Wiener process $W_tau$ corresponds to a Laplace distribution with scale parameter $fracsigmasqrt2lambda$ where $sigma$ is the instantaneous variance of the Wiener process. Suppose now, that the variance $sigma^2$ also follows a stochastic process such that we have: $$dS = sigma SdW_s \ dsigma^2 = alphasigma^2dt + xisigma^2dW_sigma$$ where $alpha$ and $xi$ are independent of $S$ and $dW_s$ and $dW_sigma$ are independent Wiener processes. My aim is to derive the distribution of $log S_tau$. First, if $barV_T$ denotes the mean variance over some time interval $[0,T]$ defined by $$barV_T = frac1T intlimits_0^Tsigma^2(t)dt,$$ it is easy to show (Lemma of Îto) that $$...
            閱讀完整內容