circumcenter coincides with center of mass

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












I am trying to prove the following statement. Any suggestions or references are highly appreciated.



Consider $n$ points in $R^2$, i.e., $x_iin R^2, i=1,ldots, n.$ Suppose the centroid (or center of mass with unit mass) denoted as $barx=frac1nsum_k=1^n x_k$ coincides with the circumcenter (namely we assume there exists a circumcircle for the points $x_i, i=1,ldots,n$), then there exists $alphain R$ such that
beginalign
x_i+1-x_i + x_i-1 - x_i & = alpha (barx-x_i), forall i=2,ldots,n-1, \
x_2-x_1 + x_n - x_1 & = alpha (barx-x_1), \
x_1-x_n + x_n-1 - x_n & = alpha (barx-x_n).
endalign







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 21 at 9:51














up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












I am trying to prove the following statement. Any suggestions or references are highly appreciated.



Consider $n$ points in $R^2$, i.e., $x_iin R^2, i=1,ldots, n.$ Suppose the centroid (or center of mass with unit mass) denoted as $barx=frac1nsum_k=1^n x_k$ coincides with the circumcenter (namely we assume there exists a circumcircle for the points $x_i, i=1,ldots,n$), then there exists $alphain R$ such that
beginalign
x_i+1-x_i + x_i-1 - x_i & = alpha (barx-x_i), forall i=2,ldots,n-1, \
x_2-x_1 + x_n - x_1 & = alpha (barx-x_1), \
x_1-x_n + x_n-1 - x_n & = alpha (barx-x_n).
endalign







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 21 at 9:51












up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











I am trying to prove the following statement. Any suggestions or references are highly appreciated.



Consider $n$ points in $R^2$, i.e., $x_iin R^2, i=1,ldots, n.$ Suppose the centroid (or center of mass with unit mass) denoted as $barx=frac1nsum_k=1^n x_k$ coincides with the circumcenter (namely we assume there exists a circumcircle for the points $x_i, i=1,ldots,n$), then there exists $alphain R$ such that
beginalign
x_i+1-x_i + x_i-1 - x_i & = alpha (barx-x_i), forall i=2,ldots,n-1, \
x_2-x_1 + x_n - x_1 & = alpha (barx-x_1), \
x_1-x_n + x_n-1 - x_n & = alpha (barx-x_n).
endalign







share|cite|improve this question












I am trying to prove the following statement. Any suggestions or references are highly appreciated.



Consider $n$ points in $R^2$, i.e., $x_iin R^2, i=1,ldots, n.$ Suppose the centroid (or center of mass with unit mass) denoted as $barx=frac1nsum_k=1^n x_k$ coincides with the circumcenter (namely we assume there exists a circumcircle for the points $x_i, i=1,ldots,n$), then there exists $alphain R$ such that
beginalign
x_i+1-x_i + x_i-1 - x_i & = alpha (barx-x_i), forall i=2,ldots,n-1, \
x_2-x_1 + x_n - x_1 & = alpha (barx-x_1), \
x_1-x_n + x_n-1 - x_n & = alpha (barx-x_n).
endalign









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 21 at 9:27









Chandler

31




31











  • Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 21 at 9:51
















  • Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 21 at 9:51















Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 21 at 9:51




Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 21 at 9:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










This does not look true as stated



Consider the six points $(5,0),(4,3),(-4,3),(-5,0),(-4,-3),(4,-3)$ which clearly have a centroid and circumcentre at $barx=(0,0)$. Consider $x_i=(-5,0)$ and then $x_i=(-4,-3)$:



  • $(-4,-3)-(-5,0)+(-4,3)-(-5,0) = (2,0) qquad$ $= frac25big((0,0)-(-5,0)big)$


  • $(4,-3)-(-4,-3)+(-5,0)-(-4,-3) = (7,3) qquad$ $ not= frac25big((0,0)-(-4,-3)big)$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you Henry for the comments. Indeed, the previous statement is not precise. What I was thinking is the vector $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ is on the same line as $barx-x_i$. So the parameter $alpha$ should be changed to $alpha_i$ which can be different for different $x_i$.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:14










  • @Chandler - my second example has $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ having a different direction from $barx-x_i$
    – Henry
    Aug 21 at 10:15











  • I see it now. Thank you so much about this counterexample.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:25










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889669%2fcircumcenter-coincides-with-center-of-mass%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










This does not look true as stated



Consider the six points $(5,0),(4,3),(-4,3),(-5,0),(-4,-3),(4,-3)$ which clearly have a centroid and circumcentre at $barx=(0,0)$. Consider $x_i=(-5,0)$ and then $x_i=(-4,-3)$:



  • $(-4,-3)-(-5,0)+(-4,3)-(-5,0) = (2,0) qquad$ $= frac25big((0,0)-(-5,0)big)$


  • $(4,-3)-(-4,-3)+(-5,0)-(-4,-3) = (7,3) qquad$ $ not= frac25big((0,0)-(-4,-3)big)$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you Henry for the comments. Indeed, the previous statement is not precise. What I was thinking is the vector $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ is on the same line as $barx-x_i$. So the parameter $alpha$ should be changed to $alpha_i$ which can be different for different $x_i$.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:14










  • @Chandler - my second example has $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ having a different direction from $barx-x_i$
    – Henry
    Aug 21 at 10:15











  • I see it now. Thank you so much about this counterexample.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:25














up vote
0
down vote



accepted










This does not look true as stated



Consider the six points $(5,0),(4,3),(-4,3),(-5,0),(-4,-3),(4,-3)$ which clearly have a centroid and circumcentre at $barx=(0,0)$. Consider $x_i=(-5,0)$ and then $x_i=(-4,-3)$:



  • $(-4,-3)-(-5,0)+(-4,3)-(-5,0) = (2,0) qquad$ $= frac25big((0,0)-(-5,0)big)$


  • $(4,-3)-(-4,-3)+(-5,0)-(-4,-3) = (7,3) qquad$ $ not= frac25big((0,0)-(-4,-3)big)$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Thank you Henry for the comments. Indeed, the previous statement is not precise. What I was thinking is the vector $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ is on the same line as $barx-x_i$. So the parameter $alpha$ should be changed to $alpha_i$ which can be different for different $x_i$.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:14










  • @Chandler - my second example has $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ having a different direction from $barx-x_i$
    – Henry
    Aug 21 at 10:15











  • I see it now. Thank you so much about this counterexample.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:25












up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






This does not look true as stated



Consider the six points $(5,0),(4,3),(-4,3),(-5,0),(-4,-3),(4,-3)$ which clearly have a centroid and circumcentre at $barx=(0,0)$. Consider $x_i=(-5,0)$ and then $x_i=(-4,-3)$:



  • $(-4,-3)-(-5,0)+(-4,3)-(-5,0) = (2,0) qquad$ $= frac25big((0,0)-(-5,0)big)$


  • $(4,-3)-(-4,-3)+(-5,0)-(-4,-3) = (7,3) qquad$ $ not= frac25big((0,0)-(-4,-3)big)$






share|cite|improve this answer












This does not look true as stated



Consider the six points $(5,0),(4,3),(-4,3),(-5,0),(-4,-3),(4,-3)$ which clearly have a centroid and circumcentre at $barx=(0,0)$. Consider $x_i=(-5,0)$ and then $x_i=(-4,-3)$:



  • $(-4,-3)-(-5,0)+(-4,3)-(-5,0) = (2,0) qquad$ $= frac25big((0,0)-(-5,0)big)$


  • $(4,-3)-(-4,-3)+(-5,0)-(-4,-3) = (7,3) qquad$ $ not= frac25big((0,0)-(-4,-3)big)$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 21 at 10:03









Henry

93.4k471149




93.4k471149











  • Thank you Henry for the comments. Indeed, the previous statement is not precise. What I was thinking is the vector $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ is on the same line as $barx-x_i$. So the parameter $alpha$ should be changed to $alpha_i$ which can be different for different $x_i$.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:14










  • @Chandler - my second example has $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ having a different direction from $barx-x_i$
    – Henry
    Aug 21 at 10:15











  • I see it now. Thank you so much about this counterexample.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:25
















  • Thank you Henry for the comments. Indeed, the previous statement is not precise. What I was thinking is the vector $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ is on the same line as $barx-x_i$. So the parameter $alpha$ should be changed to $alpha_i$ which can be different for different $x_i$.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:14










  • @Chandler - my second example has $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ having a different direction from $barx-x_i$
    – Henry
    Aug 21 at 10:15











  • I see it now. Thank you so much about this counterexample.
    – Chandler
    Aug 21 at 10:25















Thank you Henry for the comments. Indeed, the previous statement is not precise. What I was thinking is the vector $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ is on the same line as $barx-x_i$. So the parameter $alpha$ should be changed to $alpha_i$ which can be different for different $x_i$.
– Chandler
Aug 21 at 10:14




Thank you Henry for the comments. Indeed, the previous statement is not precise. What I was thinking is the vector $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ is on the same line as $barx-x_i$. So the parameter $alpha$ should be changed to $alpha_i$ which can be different for different $x_i$.
– Chandler
Aug 21 at 10:14












@Chandler - my second example has $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ having a different direction from $barx-x_i$
– Henry
Aug 21 at 10:15





@Chandler - my second example has $x_i+1-x_i+x_i-1-x_i$ having a different direction from $barx-x_i$
– Henry
Aug 21 at 10:15













I see it now. Thank you so much about this counterexample.
– Chandler
Aug 21 at 10:25




I see it now. Thank you so much about this counterexample.
– Chandler
Aug 21 at 10:25












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889669%2fcircumcenter-coincides-with-center-of-mass%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?